Cricket 1905

4 CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J an , 26, 1905. BUSSEY’S “DEMON DRIVERS. < C G B « GEO, G. BUSSEY & GO Desire to inform Cricketers all over tlie world who may experience a difficulty in ob­ taining “ Demon Drivers ” that this difficulty arises in consequence of the ever-increas­ ing demand exceeding the supply. Headers of G e o . G . B u s s e y & Co.’s pamphlet, entitled “ Evolution of the Demon Driver,” are aware that a fea­ ture of the success of the “Demon Driver ” is due to a special process, occupying a long period, that the bats under­ go before leaving the works, and although there are always a large number of Bats under this treatment which could be placed on the market, G e o . G . B u s s e y & Co., in the interest of cricketers and their own repu­ tation, will not deviate from the system that has made the The Finest Bat theWorld produces. GEO.G.BUSSEY&CO, 36 & 88 , QUEEN VICTORIA STREET , E .C. Manufactory—PECKHAM, S.E. T im b e r Mills—ELUSWELL SUFFOLK, AGENTS ALL OVER THE WORLD. A T TH E SIGN OF THE W ICK E T . By F. S. A sblky -C oopeu . FEATS, FACTS AND FIGURES OF 1904. (Continued from page 432). Iff )—Seventh Wicket. 249, W . L. Murdoch (140) and J. H. Hunt (128), Gentlemen v. P.ayers. at Oval. 206, A. H. Hornby (114) and Cu tell, W. R. (101), La? cashire v. Somert-et, a Manchester. 185, Sewell, E. H. D. (18.) and J. W. H. T. Douglas (66J, London County v. Surrey, at Crystal Palace. 177, Sharp, J. (107 no* out) and A. H. Hornby (89), L»xc .shire v. Es^ex, at Manchester. 163, E. M. Ashcraft (’CO) and Cadman (83), Derby­ shire v. Leicestersh re, at Leicester. 151, R. P. Keigwin (7o) and A. J. Turner (72), Etsex v. Lancashire, at Leyton. 147, Rhodes, W. (93) and King, J. H. (9*), North v. South, at Hastings. 136, Haigh. 8. (138) and Hirst, G H. (93), Yorkshire v. Warwickshire, at fcdgbaston. 132, Rhodes, W. (196) and Hai^h, S. 09 not out), Yorkshire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 116, J. R. Mason (126) aDd C. H. B. Marsbam (68), Kent v. Somerset, at Beckenham. 123, Bowley, F. (153) ft^d Gaukrodger, G. A. (50), Worcestaishire v. Warwickshire, at Edg- bastoo. 123, Hirst, G. H. (llv) and Rhodes, W. (74 not out), Morth v. bouth, at Scarborough. 120, Freeman, E. J. (66) and R. P. Keigwin (61), Essex v. Lancashire, at Manchester. 113, Hardstaff, R. G. (58) and Anthony, G. (63), Notts v. Leicestershire at Nottingham. 106, G. E. Bromley-Martia (61) and A. W. Isaac (6 >). Worcestershire v. Hampshire, at Southampton. 105, F. H. Gillingham (103) and J. W. H. T. Douglas (12). Esst x v. Derbyshire, at Leyton. 103, A. J. L. Hill (98 Lot out) and Llewellyn, G. C. B. (4J), Hampshire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 102, M. W. Payne (64) and R. P. Kei^win (51 not out) Cim<»idge Univertity v. G. J. Y. ^ eigal’s X I., at Cambridge. 102, H. K. Foster (107) and G. H.bimpson-Hay ward (58), Worcestershire v. South Africans, at Worcester. 101, Hayes, E. G. (273 not out) and Leas, W. S. (42), Surr- y v. Derbyshire, at Darby. (A)—Eighth Wicket. 177, Quaife, W. G. (200 notout) and Whittle, A. (104), Warwickbliire v. Essex, a! Edgoa^ton. 152, Rhodes, W. (98) and Rothery, J. VV. (70), York­ shire v. Hampshire, at Portsmouth. 150, E. A. Haliiwell (88 not out) and G. C. White (80), South Africans v.Leicester, at Leicester. 143, C. L. A. Smi h (8 j ) and Cox, G. (76), Sussex v. Essex, at Brighton. Ill, P. A. Perrin (343 not out) and J. W. H. T. Douglas ( »7), Essex v Derbyshire, at Ches­ terfield. 134, Caiman (126) and Humphries J. (44), Derby- sh.re v. Estex, at Leyt n. 132, Hirst, G. H (103) ani E. 8mith (59), Yorkshire v. Middlesex, at Sheffield. 131, Coe, S. (103) and Gill, G. (57), Leicestershire v. London County, at Leicester. 130, E. Smith (98) and Lord Htwke (54), Yorkshire v. Lancashire, at Leeds. 125, G. L. Jetsop ( l£9 not out) and Cox, G. (17), South of England v. bouth Africans, at Hastings. 121, C. P. Foley (61) and G. MacGregor (61), Middle­ sex v. Yorkshire, at Lord’s. 120, J. E. Raphael ( 0.) and W. S. bird (30 not out), Oxford University v. Yorkshire, at Oxford. 119, H. S. PoyLtz (85) and Braund, L. C. (2t ), Somer­ set v. Kent, at Beckenham. 18*, Leach. G. (76 not out) and C. L. A. Smiih (32 not oat), Susstx v. Hampshire, at Ports­ mouth. 103, R. E. More (39) andG. MacGregor (15), Middle­ sex v. Sussex, at Biigaton. (i)—Ninth Wicket. 179, C. H. McGahey (225) and Buckenham, C. P. (l'>0), Essex v. Notts, at Leyton. 162, Rhodes, W. (94 not out) and Haigh S. (84), Yorkshire v. Lancashire, at Manchester. 132, Cadman (y3) and Morton (56), Derbyshire v. W'arwiekishire, at Glossop. 128, B. J. T. Uosanquet (141) and R. E. More (i20 not out), Middlesex v. Yorkshire, atbheffield. 117, L. D. 1rownlee (97) and Huggios, J. H. (33 not out), Gloucestershire v. Keut, at Bristol. Ill, A. C. Johnston (115) and Langford, W . (49), Hampshire v. Worcestershire, at Southamp­ ton. 108, Leach, G. (86) and W. Newham (63), Sussex v. CambiiJge University, at Bii^hton. 107, E. A. Halliwell (72 not out) and G. H. Shepstone (64), South Africans v. Somerset, at Taunton. 106, Blj tiie, u. (8i not out) at d Fairservice, J, W, (50), Kent v. Notts., at Nottingham, (J )—Tenth Wicket. 129, Goatly, E. G. (76) and Stedmaa, F. (44 not out), Surrey v. South Africans, at th* Oval. 1C8, Seymour, Jas. (136 not out) and Fielder A. (37), Kent v. Worcestershire, at Maidstone. 101, H. D. G. Leveson-Gower (35 not out) and R. H. Fox (43), H. D. G. Laves '•n-Gower’s X£ v. Oxford University, at Oxford. • Without a separation bei :g • fleeted. + R. H. Spooner and Hallows (J.) had added 35* for the fourth wicker, when the latter was injured and had to retire. He subsequently returned when iwo more wickets had fallen and, with R H. Spooner, added 96 for the sixth wicket. The pirtnership therefore realised, in all, 131 runs. It will be observed that A. O. Jones and Irem'mger (J.) made over 100 runs for the fir3t wicket of Notts, in each innings of the match agaiost Gloucestershire, at Nottingham, their second partnership realising 3 3. Such a performance, however, did no- prevent Gloucestershire from winning by an innings and one run. T able No. 11.-TABLE SHOEING THE NUM­ BER OF BATSMEN WHO CARRIED THEIR BAT THROUGH A COMPLETED INNINGS IN A FIRST-CLASS MATCH DURING THE SEASON. Batsmen. For.Against. Ground. Scr. Hayward, T... Surrey... Kent ... Canteroury... 188 Hearne. A. .. Kent ... Gloucs.... Tonbridge... 90 Irem^nger, J. Notts ... Mdax. ... Lord’s ..........189 T ablk No. 12.—TABLE SHOWING* THE NUM­ BER OF BATSMEN WHO SCORtSD CEN­ TURIES IN FIRST-CLASS MATCHES DURING THE SEASON. (a) —Eleven. Haywaid, T., It#*, 1/8,12/, 122,148, 203, 161*, 106 and 112,188*, 197. (5)—Ten. C. B. Fry. 12J, 19i*, 2.6, 177, 105*, 15**, 191, 181, 211, 2 9. (c)—Nine. Hirst, G. H., 102, 153, 152, 157, 108, 103, 140,121, 112. (<i)—Eight. K. S. Ranjitsiubji, 148, 16b*, 142,121, 135, 152, 207*, 17o* ; Tyidesley. J. T., 146, 210, 1.3, 223, 196, 102, 103*, 104. (<?)—Six. Iremonger, J., 137, 189*, 272, 142, 197, 133. ( t ) —Five. H. K. Foster, 107, 118, 118, 112, 119; A. O. Jones, 113,119, 108, 187, 150*; Knight, A. E., Ill*, 140, 203, 118, 103; King. J. H., 128,1.7*, 104 and 109*, 186; P. A. Perrin. 100*, 190, 134. 343*, 143 ; Quaife,W. G., 20A HO, 1*3,131*, 193 ; R. H. epooner, 122, 126, 101,102*, 215. iff) • Four. B. J. T. Bosanquet, 110, 124, 145,111; Bowley, F.f 153, 107, 138, 116 ; M. Hathom, 117,13.', li8, 139; A. C. MacLaren, 10^, 151, 166, 114; J. R. Mason, 138, 126, 133, 100; J. E. Raphael, 201, 123, 111, 111 ; L. J. Tancred, 106, 109, 113, 101 ; Tunuicitfe, J., 119, 128, 135, 139*; Yiue, J., 124, lt>9, 111, 111. (/*) —Tnree. G. W. Beldam, 140, 141, 119; Denton, D., 105, 111, 119; Hallows, J., ill, 137*, la5; Hayes, E. G., 273*, lu4. 100; Humphreys, E., 131, loi, 143 ; C. H. McGahey, 173, 2^5, 10;*; L. C. H. Palairet. 166, 113, 203; L. O. S. Poidevin, lu3, 153, 10o*; Sewell, E. H. D.’ 181, 107, 106*; Seymour, Jas, 108 and 136*, 106; P. F. Warner, 106, 163, 145; L. G. Wright. 139, 14J, 131. (i) -Two. E. M. Ashcroft, 111, loo; K. M. Carlisle, 114*, 107* ; carpenter, H., 199, K8* ; Cuttell, W. R., 128, 101; J. Douglas, 114, 153; W. H. B. Evans, 113,115; T. d. Fishwick, lu3,113; Rev. F. H. Gillingham, 103, 201; A. C. S. Glover, 124, 106; Gunn, G., 106, 143 ; H*igh, S., 138, 104; A. J.L. Hill,111, 117; Hon. F.S. Jackson, 158, 110*; G. L. Jessop, 206, 159* ; A. C. Johnston, 105, 108; Ktnneir, S. P., lo5, 152; Lewis, A . E., 101, 118*; J. F. Marsh, 118,172*; Relf, A. E., 154, 10i*; Rhodes, W., 107, 196; Sharp, J., 104*, 107*; C. J. B. Wood, 110, 123; S. M. J. Woods, 136, 123. ( ;) - One. Arnold, E., I l l ; E. A. Beldam, 105; G. G. M. Ben­ nett, ±3i ; Buckenham, C. P., 10J; W. B. Burns, 165; Cadman, 126; Coe, S., 103; Y. F. S. Crawford, 160; G. Curgenven, 121; Davis,W., 102; S. H. Day, 15i* ; J. A. Dixon, 135 ; F. L. Fane, 126; K. R. B. Fry, 129 ; R. T. Godsell, 111; W. G. Grace, 166; Gunn, J., 100; Lord Hawke, 100*; Hearne, A., 100*; Holland, F. C., 112; A. fl. Hornby, 114 ; J. H. Hunt, 128 ; R. P. Keigwia, 116 ; C. H. B. Marsham, ltil*; F. Mitchell, 102*; L. J. Moon, 162; R. E. More, 120*; W. L. Mur­ doch, 140; U. A. Ollivierre, 229; M. W. Payne, 102*; Pearson, F., 1C6; E. S. Phillips, 107; Rudbton, H., 161; R. O. Schwaiz, 102 ; J. H. fejpclair, 103 j E. M. Sprot, 118; E, E. S.eel,