Cricket 1903

76 CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. Ap b il 16, 1903, F IX T U R E S FOR 1903. APRIL. 13. Oval, Surrey v. London County C.C. 27. Oval, Surrey XI. v. Next XIV. 30. Crystal Palace, London County C.C. v. Surrey MAY. 4. Oval, Smrey v. Warwickshire 4. Nottingham, Notts (2) v. Leicrstershire (>) 4. Ro’herham, Yorkshire v. 1Hof Kotherham 6. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Notts 6. Anniversary Meeting of Marylebone Club 7. Oval. Annual General Meeting Surrey C.C. 7. Crystal Palace, London County C.C. v. Lancashire 7. Oval, Surrey v. Hampshire 7. North*.lerton, Yorkshire v. 16 of Northallerton 11. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Yorkshire 11. Nottingham, Notts v. Derbyshire 11. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Lancashire 11. Birmir gham, Warwickshire v. Surrey 11. Bright n, Su sex v. Worcestershire 11. <ambridge. UDiv. v. Gentleman of England 13. Barr.s’ey, Yorkshire (2) v. No ts Colts 14. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Sussex 14. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Notts 14. Manchester, Lancashire v. Warwickshire 14. Leyton, Essex v. Yorkshire 14. Worcester, Worces'ershire v. Surrey 14. Oxford, University v. Gentlemen of E' gland 18. Lord’s, M.C.C. andGrout.d v. London County C.C. 18. Brighton, Sussex v. Notts 18. Birmingham, Warwickshi’ e v. Leicestershire 18. Derby, Derbyshire v. Lancashire 18, Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Yorkshire 18. Oval, Surrey v. Essex 18. Oxf id, Oxford University v. Worcestershire 18. .Liverpool, Liverpool and District v. Mr. S. M. J. Woods’ Somerset X I. 21. L o'd’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Derbyshire 21. Leicester. Leicestershire v. Sussex 21. Catford, Kent v. Not s. 21. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Lancashire 21. Taunton, Somerset v. Yorkshire 21. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. Waiwick- shire 21. Oxford, Oxford University v. Surrey 25. Lord's, Middlesex v. Gloucestershire 25. Nottingham, Notts, v. Leicestershire 25. Manchester, Lancashire v. Sussex 25. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Yorkshire 25. Leyton, Essex v. Surrey 25 Poole, Dorsetshire v. Hampshire 26. Barnsley, Yorkshire (2) v. Surrey (2) 28. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Kent 28. Oxford, Uxford University v. Somerset 2-i. Cambridge, Cam ridge University v. Yorkshire 18. Oval, Surrey v. Gloucestershire 18. Manchester, Lancashire (2) v. Surrey (2) JUNE. 1. (Whit-Monday)—Lord’s, Middletex v. Somerset (W. Attewell’s Benefit) 1. Manchester, Lancashiie v, Yorkshire 1. Nottingham, Notts v. Suney 1. Southampton, Hampshire v. Derbyshire 1. Leicester, Leicestershire v. London County C.C. 1. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Warwickshire 1. Leyton, Essex v. Kent 1. Brighton, Sussex v. Gloucestershire 1. Oval, Surr y (2) v. Essex ( ) . 1. Harrogate, Yorkshire (2) v. Lancashire (2) 1. Birmingham, Warwickshire (2) v. Worcester­ shire (2) 1. Newcastle, Northumberland v. Durham 1. Northampton, Northants v. Bedfordshire I. Chippenham, Witts v. Glamorganshire 3. Northampton, Northants v. Surrey (2) 4. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Yoikshire 4. Manchester, Lancashire v. Kent 4. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Surrey 4. Nottingham, Notts v. Essex 4. Crystal Palace, London County v. Gloucestershire 4. Oxford, Oxford University v. M.C.C. and Ground 4. Hastings, buss x v. fcomerset 8. Bradford, Yorkshire v. Sussex 8. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Leicestershire 8. Leyton, Essex v. Derbyshire 8. Bristol Gloucestershire v. Lancashire 8. Oval, feurrey v. Worcestershire 8. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. Philadel­ phians 8. Newcastle, Northumberland v. Yorkshire (2) 10. Cardiff, Glamorganshire v. Motmouthshire II. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Notts 11. Southampton, Bampshire v. Leicestershire 11. Bath, Somerset v. Lancashire (Bath Week) 11. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Yorkshire 11. Worcester, Worcestershire v. KeLt 11. Leyton, Essex v. Sussex 11. Cambridge, t amt ridge University v. Surrey 11. Oxford, Oxford Univeisity v. Philadelphians 15. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Essex 16. bht tfieid, Yorkshi.e v. Caml ridge University 15. Bath, Somerset v. Hampshire (Bath Week) 16. Leicester, Leicestershire v: Warwickshire 15. Chcsteifield, Derbyshire v. Surrey 15. Tonbridge, Kent v. Sussex (Tonbridge Week) 15. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire v. Philadelphians 15. Oval, Surrey (2) v. Lancashire (2) 17. Cardiff, Glamorganshire v. Surrey (2) 17. Newport, Monmouthshire v. M.C.C. & Ground 18. Manche(>ter, Lai cishire v. London County C.C. 18. Nottingham, Notts v. Gentlemen of Philadelphia 18. Derby, Deibysliire v. Yorkshire 18. Worcestershire v. Hampshire 18. Leyton. Essex v . Warwickshire 18. Tonlr.dge, Kent v. Gloucestershire (Tonbridge Weea) 18. Brighton, fcurstx v. Middlesex 18. Oval, Surrey v. Cambridge University 18. Hertford, Hertfordshire v. Bedfordshira 19. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Middlesex Colts 19. Swindon, WiltsLire v. Surrey (2) 22. Lord’s, M.C.C. v. Pniladelphians 22. Gloucester, Gloucesteishire v. London County C.C. (Gloucester Week) 22. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Der’ yshire 22. Liverpool, Lancashire v. Worcestershire 2 Leeds, Yorkshire v. Kent 22. Brigh on. Sussex v. Cambridge University 2i. Oval, Surrey v. Oxford University 2 i. i own Mailing, Keut (a) v. Surrey (2) 24. Cambridge, CHmbridgeshire v. Northumberland 24. Durham, Durham v. Yorkshire (2) 24. Stoke, Staffordshire v. Dorset 25. Lera's, M.C.C. and G. v. Cambridge University 2>. Derby, Derbyshire v. Leicestershire 2?. Nottingham, Notts, v. Yorkshire 25. Manchester, Lancashire v. Surrey 2j. Gloucester, Gloucestershire v. Somerset 25. Beckenham, Kent v. Philadelphians 25. Biighton, Sussex v. Oxford University 25. Leyton, Essex (2) v. Norfolk -.6. Northampton, Northants v. Northumberland 26. Swiadon, Wilts v. Dorset 29. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v Oxford University 29. Southampton, Hampshire v. Worcestershire 29. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Notts. 29. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Lancashire 29. Taunton, Somerset v. Philadelphians 29 Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Surrey 29. Eastbourne, Sussex v. Essex 29. Oval, Surrey (2) v. Northants 29. Wolverhampton, Staffordshire v. Bedfordshire JULY. 2. Lord’s, Oxford v. Cambridge 2. Nottingham. Notts v. Lancashire 2. Dewsbury, Yorkshire v. Leicestershire 2. Bath, Somerset v. Gloucestershire 2. Brighton, Sussex v. Surrey 6 Lord’s, Gentlemen v. Players 6. Leicester, Le cestershiie v. Derbyshire 6. Manchester, Lacctfliire v. Philadelphians 6. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Somerset 6. Liverpool, Liverpool a-id District v. Cambridge University 6. Bedford, Bedfordshire v. N~rlhants 6. Leeds, Yorkshire v. 16 of Yorkshire C. Council 8. Swansea, Glamorganshire v. Berks 9. Oval, Gent emen v. Players 9. Brighton, Su-sex v. Hampshire 9. Derby, Derbyshire v. Notts 9. Manchester. Lancashire v. Somerset 9. Coventry, Warwickshire v. Philadelphians 10. Lord’s, Eton v. Harrow 10. Northampton, Noithants v. Herts 10. Newport, Monmouthshire v. Berks 10. Leyton, Esstx (2) v. Surrey (2) 13. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Surrey 13. Nottingham, Notts v. Sussex 13. Tunbridge Wells, Kent v. Lancashire (Tunbri dge Wells Week) 13. Bradford, Yoikshire v. Somerset 13. Biimi gham, Warwickshire v. Essex 13. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Philadelphians 13. Leicester, Leice>tershire (2) v. Notts (2) 13. Oval, Surrey (2) v. Yorkahire (2) 13 St. Albans, Herts v. Bucks 15. Poole, Dorset v. Staffordshire 16. Crystal Palace, London County v. Derbyshire 16. Leicester, Leicesteishire v. Essex 16 Southampton, Hampshire v. Philadelphians 16. Oval, Suirey v. Lancashire 16. Hucdersfield, Yorkshire v. Worcestershire 16. Tunbridge Wells, Kent v. Middlesex (Tunbridge Wells Week) 16. Biighton, Sussex (2) v. Essjx (2) 16. Biistol, Gloucestershire v. Warwickshire 16. St. Albans, Herts v. M.C.C. and Ground 16. Bedford, Bedfordshire v. Cambridgeshire 17. Lora’s, M.C.C. v. Koyal Navy 17. Newport, Monmouthshire v. Glamorganshire 20. Newcastle, Northumberland v. Cambridgeshire 20. Deroy, Derbyshire v. Essex 20. Leeds, Yorkshire v. Notts. 20. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Worcestershire 20. Catfprd, Kent v. Hampshire 2u. Manchester, Lancashire v. Middlesex 20. Oval, Surrey v. Somerset 20. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Gloucestershire 20. Crystal Palace, London County v. M.C.C. and Ground 20. Lord’s, M.C.C. v. Royal Artillery (Military Week) 20. Halifax, Yorkshire (2) v. Northants 20. I eyton. Essex (v) v. Kent (2) 22. Lord’s, M.C.C. v. Household Brigade 22. Durham. Durham v. Cambridgeshire 22. Newcastle, Northumberland v. Norihants 22. Cardiff, Glamorganshire v. Devonshire 23. Portsmouth, Hampshire v. Surrey 23. Nottingham, Notts v. Gloucestershire 23. Brighton, Sussex v. Leicestershire 23. Manchester, Lancashire v. Essex (Cuttell’s and Smi h’s benefit) 23. Grivesend, Kent v. Somerset 23. Hull. Ytrkshire v. Warwickshire 24. Lnrd’s, M.C.C. v. Royal Eng neers 24. Chippenham, Wilts v. London County C.C. 24. Durham, Durham v. Northamptonshire 24 Newport, Moomouthshire v. Devonshire 57. Leyton, Etsex v. Hampshire 27. Sheffield, Yoriuhire v. Gloucestershire 27. Maidstone, Kent v. Surrey V7. Brighton, Sussex v. Philadelphians 27. Lora’s, M.C.U. and Ground v. Grange Club and Ground 27. Oval, Surrey (2) v. Glamorganshire *7. Poule, Dorset v. Herts 29. Lord’s, Rugby v. Marlborough 29. Poo’e, Dorset v. Wiltshire 30. Nottingham, Notts v. Kent 30. Liverpool, Lancashire v. Gloucestershire 30. Oval, Surrey v. Yorkshire £0 Worcester, Worcestershire v. Sussex 30. Leyton, E sex v, Middlesex 30. Cardiff, Glamorganshire v. Philadelphians 31. Lord’s, Cheltenham v. Haileybury 31. Exeter, Devonshire v. Wiltshire AUGUST. 3. (Bank Holiday), Oval, Surrey v. Notts 3. Lora’s, M.C.C. andGround v. The Public Schools 3. Leicester. Leicestershire v. Philadelphians 3. Derby, Derbyshire v. Hampshire 3. Bradford, Yorkshire v. Lancashire (Tunnicliffe’s Benefit) 3. Taunton, Somerset v. Mildlesex 3. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Worcestershire 3. Canterbury, Kent v. Essex (Canterbury Week) 3. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Sussex 3. Leyt >n, Essex (2) v. Middlesex (2) 3. Cardiff, Glamorganshire v. Wiltshire 3. Manchester, Lancashire (2) v. Yorkshire (2) 3. Nottingham, Gentlemen v. Players of Notts 3. Exeter, Devonshire v. Dorsetshire • 3. Worcester, Worcester*hire (2) v. Warwickshire (2) 3 Bedford, Bedfordshire v. Herts 3. Oxford, Oxfordshire v. Staffordshire 3. Durham Durham v. Northumberland 5. Lord’s, M.<’.C. and Ground v. Herts 5. Northampton, Northants v. York>hire (2) 5. Cambiidge, Cambii lgeshire v. Durham 5. N wport, Monmouth v. Wiltshire 5. Bedford. Bedfordshire v Staffordshiie 5. Oxford, Oxfordshire v. Berks 6 Leicester. Leicestershire v. Yorkshire 6. Leyton, Essex v. Notts. 6. Manchester, Lancashire v. Derbyshire 6. Taunton, Somerset v. Sussex 6. Canterbury, Kent v. Worcestershire (Canterbury Week) 6. Oval, Surrey v. Philadelphians 6. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Middlesex 7. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire v. StafforJshire 7. Lord's, M.C.C. and Ground v. Dorset 7. Northampton, Northants v. Durham 7. Chippenham, Wiltshire v. Devonshire 7. Oxford. Oxfordshire v. Herts 10. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Leicestershire 10. Southampton, Hampshire v. Warwickshire 10. Oval, Surrey v. Derbyshire 10. Brighton, Sussex v. Lancashire 10. Taunton. Somerset v. Kent 10. Leeds, Yorkshire v. Middlesex 10. Reading, Berks v. Oxfordshire 10. Norwich, Norfolk v. Fijians 10. Trowbridge, Wilts v. Bucks 10. Lord’s, Middlesex (2) v. Essex (2) 10. Bipon, York?h re (2) v. Durham 12. Watford, Herts v. Oxfordshire 12. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Wilts 12. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire v. Beds 12. Reading, Berks v. Bucks 13. Nottingham, Notts v. Middlesex 13. Crystal Palace, London County v. Leicestershire 13. Portsmouth, Hampshire v. Sussex 13. Harrogate, Yorkshire v. Derbyshire 13. Leyton, Essex v. Lancashire 13. Taunton, Somerset v. Worcestershire 13. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire v. Kent (Chelten­ ham Week) 11. Reading, Berks v. Glamorganshire 14. hletchley Park, Bucks v. Wiltshire 14. Loid’s, M.C C. and G ound v. Norfolk 14. Exeter, Devonshire v. I Zingari 14. Bishop Stortford, Herts v. Dorset 14. Bedford, Bedfordshire v. Oxfordshire 17. Lords, Middlesex v. Lancashire 17. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Hampshire