Cricket 1903

D ec . 31, 1903. CRICKET •. A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 475 FIRST-CLASS FIXTURES f o r 1904 A PR IL. 28. Crystal Palace, London County v. Surrey MAY. 2. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. London County 4. Lords, M.C.C. and Ground v. Notts h. L 'T 'I'k . V| »;■«.. »i,u ■•r-.iiiul V i>ottn 5. Oval, Surrey v. London County 9. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Yorkshire 9. Oval, Surrey v. Hampshire 9. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Lancashire. 9. Crystal Palace, London County v. The Indians 12. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Sussex. 12. Gravesend, Kent v. Notts 12. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Leicester­ shire 12. Leyton, Essex v. Surrey. 12. Oxford, Oxford University v. Somerset 12. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. York­ shire. 16. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Kent 16. Bradford, Yorkshire v. Leicestershire 16. Brighton, Sussex v. Notts 16.. Manchester, Lancashire v. Warwickshire 16. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Somerset 16. Oval, Surrey v. Derbyshire 16. Nottingham, Nottingham Colts v. York­ shire (2nd XI.) 19. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Sussex 19. Oval, Surrey v. Worcestershire L9. Crystal Palace, London County v. Derby- shire 19. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. The Indians 19. Oxford, Oxford University v. Yorkshire 23 (Whit-Monday). Lord’s, Middlesex v. Som­ erset (J. E. W est’s Benefit) 23. Nottingham, Notts v. Surrey 23. Manchester, Lancashire v. Yorkshire 23. Leyton, Essex v. Kent 23. Brighton, Sussex v. Gloucestershire 23. Southampton, Hampshire v. Derbyshire 23. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Worcester­ shire 23. Leicester, Leicestershire v. London County 23. Sheffield, Sheffield United v. The Indians 23. Worcester, Worcestershire (2nd XI.) v. War­ wickshire (2nd XI.) 23. Ripon, Yorkshire (2nd XI.) v. Lancashire (2nd XI.) 26. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Gloucestershire 26. Nottingham, Notts v. Essex. 26. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Surrey 26. Brighton, Sussex v. Somerset 26. Manchester, Lancashire v. Kent 26. Derby, Derbyshire v. Yorkshire 26. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. Lon­ don County 26. Leamington, Warwickshire v. The In­ dians 30. Lord’s, M^C.C. and Ground v. South Africans 30. Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Worcestershire 30. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Sussex 30. Oval, Surrey v. Gloucestershire JUNE. 2. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Yorkshire 2. Nottingham, Notts v. Sussex 2. Southampton, Hampshire v. Kent 2. Leyton, Essex v. Leicestershire 2. Bath, Somerset v. Gloucestershire (Bath Festival) 2. Manchester, Lancashire v. Surrey 2. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. W ar­ wickshire 2. Worcester, Worcestershire v. ' South Africans 6. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. The Indians 6. Gloucester, Gloucestershire v. Notts (Glou­ cester week) 6. Maidstone, Kent v. Worcestershire 6. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Essex 6. Bath, Somerset v. Lancashire (Bath Fes­ tival) 6. Brighton, Sussex v. Derbyshire 6. Bradford, Yorkshire v. Surrey 6. Crystal Palace, London County v. Leices­ tershire 6. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. South Africans 6. Manchester, Lancashire (2nd XI.) v. Surrey (2nd XI.) 9. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Derbyshire 9. Nottingham, Notts v. Yorkshire 9. Southampton, Hampshire v. Worcestershire 9. Catford Bridge, Kent v. Middlesex 9. Leyton, Essex v. Sussex 9. Gloucester, Gloucestershire v. Lancashire (Gloucester Week) 9. Cambridge. Cambridge University v. Surrey 9. Leicester, Leicestershire v. The Indians 9. Oxford, Oxford University v. South Africans 13. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Notts 13. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Lancashire 13. Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Sussex 13. Oval, Surrey v. Essex 13. Oxford, Oxford University v. Worcester­ shire 13. Crystal Palace, London County v. Cam­ bridge University 13. Derby, Derbyshire v. The Indians 13. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. South Africans 13. Town Mailing, Kent (2nd XI.) v. Surrey (2nd XI.) 16. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Leicestershire 16. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Yorkshire 16. Nottingham, Notts v. Kent 16. Manchester, Lancashire v. Sussex 16. Leyton, Essex v. Derbyshire 16. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. South Africans 16. Oval, Surrey v. Cambridge University 17. Swindon, W iltshire v. South Africans 20. Lord’s, Middlesex v. South Africans 20. Tonbridge, Kent v. Lancashire (Tonbridge week) 20. Leyton, Essex v. Yorkshire 20. Glossop, Derbyshire v. Warwickshire 20. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Somerset 20. Brighton, Sussex v. Cambridge University 20. Oval, Surrey v. Oxford University 20. Alton, Hampshire v. The Indians 23. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Cambridge University 23. Tonbridge, Kent v. Gloucestershire (Ton­ bridge week) 23. Hull, Yorkshire v. Somerset 23. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Hampshire 23. Oval, Surrey v. Lancashire 23. Crystal Palace, London County v. South Africans 23. Brighton, Sussex v. Oxford University 27. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Oxford Uni­ versity (two days) 27. Leeds, Yorkshire v. Hampshire 27. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Worcestershire 27. Chesterfield, Derbyshire v. Notts 27. Manchester, Lancashire v. Somerset 27. Oval, Surrey v. Middlesex 27. Catford Bridge, Kent v. The Indians 27. Dublin, Dublin University v. South Africans 28. Salisbury, W iltshire v. London County 30. Lord’s, Oxford v. Cambridge 30. Nottingham, Notts v. Lancashire 30. Brighton, Sussex v. Leicestershire 30. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Yorkshire 30. Derby, Derbyshire v. Surrey 30. Cork, Gentlemen of Ireland v. South Africans 30. Oval, Surrey (2nd XI.) v. Lancashire (2nd XI.) JULY. 4. Lord’s, Gentlemen v. Players 4. Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Derbyshire 4. Liverpool, Liverpool and District v. Cam­ bridge University 7. Oval, Gentlemen v. Players 7. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Derbyshire 7. Harrogate, Yorkshire v. Kent 7. Brighton, Sussex v. Essex 7. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Cambridge University 7. Southampton, Hampshire v. South Africans 7. Northampton, Northamptonshire v. The Indians 8. Lord’s, Eton v. Harrow 11. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Essex 11. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Lancashire 11. Nottingham, Notts v. Leicestershire 11. Portsmouth, Hampshire v. Yorkshire 11. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Surrey 11. Tunbridge Wells, Kent. v. Sussex (Tun­ bridge W ells week) 11. Indian Team—Irish Tour 14. Lord’s, an XI. of England v. South Africans 14. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Surrey 14. Taunton, Somerset v. Hampshire 14. Tunbridge Wells, Kent v. Yorkshire (Tun­ bridge Wells week) 14. Derby, Derbyshire v. Lancashire 14. Coventry, Warwickshire v. London County 14. Oval. Surrey (2nd XI.) v. Kent (2nd XI.) 18. Nottingham. Notts v. Gloucestershire 18. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Hampshire 18. Manchester, Lancashire v. Middlesex 18. Oval, Surrey v. Yorkshire 18. Chesterfield, Derbyshire v. Essex 18. ' rr-ta •nuoty v M <’ ^ and G. 18. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Warwickshire 18. Edinburgh, Scotland v. South Africans 20. Newcastle-on-Tyne, Northumberland v. The Indians 21. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Notts 21. Brighton, Sussex v. Surrey 21. Beckenham, Kent v. Somerset 21. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Hampshire 21. Manchester, Lancashire v. Essex 21. Dewsbury, Yorkshire v. Gloucestershire 21. Liverpool, Liverpool and District v. South Africans 22. In Durham, Durham v. The Indians 25. Bradford, Yorkshire v. Notts 25. Oval, Surrey v. Somerset 25. Derby, Derbyshire v. Sussex 25. Liverpool, Lancashire v. Gloucestershire 25. Leyton, Essex v. Warwickshire 25. Glasgow, W est of Scotland v. The Indians 25. Maidstone, Gentlemen of Kent v. Players of Kent (Hickmott’s Benefit) 27. Lord’s, Rugby v. Marlborough 28. Nottingham, Notts v. Derbyshire 28. Manchester, Lancashire v. Worcestershire 28. Southampton, Hampshire v. Surrey 28. Bath, Somerset v. Sussex 28. Leyton, Essex v. Middlesex 28. Hull, Yorkshire-v. South Africans 29. Edinburgh, East of Scotland v. The In­ dians 29. Lord’s, Cheltenham v. Haileybury AUGUST. 1. (Bank Holiday)—Canterbury, Kent v. Essex (Canterbury week) 1. Oval, Surrey v. Notts 1. Leeds, Yorkshire v. Lancashire (Hirst’s Benefit) I. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Warwickshire 1. Derby, Derbyshire v. Hampshire 1. Taunton, Somerset v. Middlesex 1. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Sussex 1. Leicester, Leicestershire v. South Africans 1. Norwich, Norfolk v. London County 1. Cardiff, South Wales v. The Indians 1. Manchester, Lancashire (2nd XI.) v. York­ shire (2nd XI.) 4. Canterbury, Kent v. Surrey (Canterbury week) 4. Brighton, Sussex v. Hampshire 4. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Derbyshire 4. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Yorkshire 4. Leyton, Essex v. Notts 4. Worcester, Worcestershire v. The Indians 4. Manchester, Lancashire v. South Africans 8. Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Middlesex 8. Taunton, Somerset v. Worcestershire 8. Oval, Surrey v. Warwickshire 8. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Kent 8. Brighton, Sussex v. Lancashire 8. Nottingham, Notts v. South Africans 8. Chesterfield, Derbyshire v. London County II. Lord’s, South Africa v. India. 11. Nottingham, Notts v. Middlesex 11. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Worcestershire 11. Huddersfield, Yorkshire v. Warwickshire 11. Southampton, Hampshire v. Leicestershire 11. Oval, Surrey v. Sussex 11. Leyton, Essex v. Lancashire 11. Taunton, Somerset v. Kent. 15. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Lancashire 15. Leeds, Yorkshire v. Essex 15. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Kent 15. Portsmouth, Hampshire v. Sussex 15. Derby, Derbyshire v. South Africans 15. Oval, Surrey v. The Indians 18. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Surrey 18. Brighton, Sussex v. Yorkshire 18. Manchester, Lancashire v. Notts 18. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Gloucester­ shire 18. Tonbridge, Kent v. Hampshire 18. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Essex 22. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Kent 22. Taunton, Somerset v. Surrey 22. Liyerpool, Lancashire v. Leicestershire 22. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Yorkshire 22. Crystal Palace, London County v. W ar­ wickshire 22. Brighton, Sussex v. South Africans 22. Eastbourne, Eastbourne v. The Indians 25. Manchester, Lancashire v. Derbyshire 25. In Sussex, Sussex v. Middlesex 25. Taunton, Somerset v. Yorkshire 25. Gloucester, Gloucestershire v. Surrey 25. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Leicestershire 25. Bournemouth, Hampshire v. Warwickshire (Bournemouth Festival) 25. Canterbury, Kent v. South Africans 25. Harrogate, Yorkshire v. The Indians 29. Bournemouth, Hampshire v. Somerset (Bournemouth Festival) 29. Derby, Derbyshire v. Leicestershire 29. Brighton, Sussex v. Kent 29. Scarborough, Yorkshire v. M.C.C. and Ground (Scarborough Festival) 29. Oval, Surrey v. South Africans 29. Crystal Palace, London County v. W ilt­ shire SEPTEMBER. 1. Oval, Surrey v. Kent 1. Bournemouth, Gentlemen of the South v. Players of the South (Bournemouth Fes­ tival) 1. Scarborough, Yorkshire v. South Africans (Scarborough Festival) 5. Oval, Surrey v. Leicestershire 5, Scarborough, Mr. P. F. Warner's X I. v. Mr. C. I. Thornton’s X I. (Scarborough Festival)