Cricket 1903

466 CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. D ec . 31, 1903 BUSSEY’S “DEMON DRIVERS. < C C B « GEO, G. BUSSEY & GO Desire to inform Cricketers all over the world who may experience a difficulty in ob­ taining “ Demon Drivers ” that this difficulty arises in consequence oftheever-increas­ ing demand exceeding the supply. Headers of G e o . G . B u s s e y & Co.’s pamphlet, entitled “ Evolution of the Demon Driver,” are aware that a fea­ ture of the success of the “Demon Driver ” is due to a special process, occupying a long period,that thebatsunder­ go before leaving the works, and although there are always a large number of Bats under this treatment which could be placed on the market, G e o . G . B u s s e y & Co., in the interest of cricketers and their own repu­ tation, will not deviate fromthe system that has made the r > ^ c l O ^ ^ / V v The Finest Bat the World produces. GEO.G.BUSSEY"&CO., 36 & 38, QUEENVICTORIASTREET, E.C. Manufactory—PECKHAM, S.E. Timber Mills—ELMSWELL SUFFOLK. AGENTS ALL OVER THE WORLD. AT THE SIGN OF THE WICKET. B y F. S . A sh le y -O oopbr . FEATS, FACTS AND FIGURES OF 1903. (Continuedfrompage 452.) T a b le No. 13.—TABLE 8 BO WING THE NUM­ BER OP BATSMEN WHO SCORED A HUN­ DRED OR MORE RUNS IN ONE INNINGS ON THEIR FIRST APPEARANC E IN FIRST- CLASS CKICKET DURING THE SEASON. Batsman. Match. Ground. Score* Knight, A. E. .. Player* v. Gents ... Lord’s .. 139 His first appearance for the Players. T a b le N o . 14.—TABLE SHOWING THE NUM­ BER OF BATSMEN WBO SCORED TWO SEPARATR HUNDREDS IN A FIRST-CLASS MATCH DURING THE SEASON. Scores. Batsman Match. Ground. 128 | Arn°kl> E., Worces. v. Cam. Un., Cambridge 101* | C. B. Fry, Sussex v. Kent Brighton. | A. O. Jones, Notts, v. Lancs. Nottingham 102* \ -Perr*n>Essex v. Notts. Nottingham N o te .— For Sussex v. Leicestershire, at Brighton, C. B. Fry scored 99 and 127*. * Signifies not out. T a b le N o . 15.—TABLE SHOWING THE NUM­ BER OF BATSMEN WHO SCORED THREE SEPARATE CENTURIES OR MORE IN CONSECUTIVE INNINGS IN FIRsT-CLASS MATCHES DURING THE SEASON. Batsman. P. A. Perrin Score. Match. Ground. Essex y. Notts .. Nottingham Essex y. Derby...Leyton. * Signifies not out. (17° | <102* i (lOa*... Century Scorers. ( P. F. Warner ... - L. J. Moon.......... ( Trott, A. E........... ... 149 ... 122 ... 1 3 ( Gunn, J................. ... i9l |Gunn, W .............. ... 139 <J. A. Dixon.......... ...*104 ( Bowley, F............. ... 149 <Arnold. E............. ... 1*28 (H . K. Foster ... ... 119 / H. K. Foster ... ... 216 < Bowley, F.............. ... 148 ( Wheldon, F. ... 112 T a b le N o. 16.—TABLE SHOWING T iE NUM­ BER OF MATCHES IN w h IOH THttEE INDIVIDUAL CENTURIES WERE SCORED IN ONE INNINGS. Match. Middlesex y. Glouces., at Lord’s Notts v. Leicestershire, at Nottingham at Cambridge. Worces. v. Somerset, at Worcester * Signifies not out. T a b le N o . 17.—TABLE SHOWING THE NUM­ BER OF BATSMEN WHO A1ADE TWO SEPARATE SCORES OF FIFTY OR MORE IN A FIRST-CLAsS MATCH DURING THE SEASON. Arnold, E. Ill* and 128, Worcester v Cambridge University, at Cambridge. G. W . Beldam. 80 and 54,Gentltmen v. Players, at the Oval. 89and 118. Middletex v. Surrey, at Lord’s. 57 and 88*, Middlesex v. England, at the Oval. F. H. Bohlea. 54 and 63, Philadelphians v. Camb. University, at Cambridge. B. J. T. Bosanquet. 52 and 97, Middlesex v. Sutrc-y, at Lord’s. Bowlev, F. 164 and 55, Worces. v. Hants., at Southampton. Brown, J. T., sen. 50 and 55, Yoikshire v. Middlesex, at Lord’s. P. H. Clark. 67 and 52, Philadelphians v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. Denton, D. 98 and 84, Yorksh. v. Lancashire, at Manchester. E. M. Dowson. 94 and 122*, Camb. Univ. v. Worces., at Cambridge H. K. Foster. 71* and 120, Worces. v. Yorkshire, at Worcester. T. H. Fowler. 50 and_ 55, Glouces. v. Lond. Cnty, at Gloucester. C. B. Fry. 99 and 127*, Sussex v. Leicestershire, at Brighton. 138 and 101*, Sussex v. Kent, at Brighton. Gunn, J. 52 and 96, Notts v. Philadelph’ns, at Nottingham Gnnn, W . 50 and 70, Notts v. Lancashire, at Nottingham. Hayes, E. G. 95 and 52, Surrey v. Notts, at Nottingham. Hearne, A. 79* and 75, Kent v. Worcestershire, at Canterbury Iremonger, J. 67 and 80*, Notts v. Leicesteishire, at Leicester. 63 and 70, Notts v. Surrey, at the Oval. P. R. Johnson. 50 and 121, Somerset v. Sus ex, at Taunton. A. O. Jonej. 137 and 10D, Notts v. Lancashire, at Nottingham. J. B. Kirg. 98 and 113*, Philadelphians v. Surrey, at the Oval. King. J. H. 56 and 87, Leicestershire v. Derbyshire, at Derby. Knight, A.E. 144 and 91*, Leicestershire v. Suirey, at the Oval. Lees, W . S. 61 and 75*, Surrey v. Leices., at Leicester. J. A. Lester. 126* and 64, Philadelphians v. Leics., at Leicester. Lilley. A. A. 57 and 55, Warwickshire v. Hants, at Edgbaston. A. C. MacLaren. 83 and 56*, Lancs, v. Derbyshire, at Manchester. L. C. H. Palairet. 67 and 114, Somersetshire v. Surrey, at Taunton. P. A. Perrin. 170 and 102*, Essex v. Notts., at Nottingham. 62 and 66, Essex v. Derbyshire, at Glossop. 50 and 72, Essex v. Lancashire, at Manchester. L. O. S. Poidevin. 67 and 64, Lon. County v. Gloucs., at Gloucester. Quaife, W. G. 53 and 77, Wark. v. Derbyshire, at Edgbaston. 79 and 72, Players v. Gentlemen, at the Oval. K. S. Ranjitsinhji. 132 and 59*, Lon. Cty. v. M.C.C. and Ground, at the Crystal Palace. E. M. Sprot. 66 and 65, Hants v. Worcs., at Southampton. 103 and 50, Hants v. Sussex, at Brighton. Tyldesley, J. T. 73 and 52, Lancs, v. Yorkshire, at Manchester. Vine. J. 73 and 59, Sussex v. Leicestershire, at Brighton. C. M. Wells. 65* and 59*, Middlesex v. Somerset, at Taunton. 68 and 82*, Middlesex v. Glo’stershire, at Bristol. Wheldon, F. 53 and f>2, Worcestershire v. Sussex, at Brighton. 71 and 71, Worcester v Yorkshire, at Worcester. 50 and 55, Worcs. v. Cambs. Univ., at Cambridge. F. B. Wilson. 64 and 72*, Cambs. Univ. v. Warks., at Cambridge 55 and 76, Cambs. (Jmv. v. Sussex, at Brighton. * Signifies not out. T a b le No. 18 .— TABLE SHOWING THE NUM­ BER OF PLAYERS WHO SCORED “ SPEC­ TACLES” DURING THE SEASON IN FIRaT-CLASS MATCHES. Abel, R., Surrey v. Derbyshire, at Chesterfield. Barnes, S. F., Lancashire v. Kent, at Manchester. Bestwick, W ., Dert yshire v. Hampshire, at South­ hampton. Bestwick, W., Derbyshire v. Essex, at Leyton. Bowell, Hampshire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. Braund. L. C., Somerset v. Sussex, at Hastings. G. E. Brom’.ey-Martin, Worcestershire v. Gloucester­ shire, at Cheltenham. R. D. Brown, Philadelphians v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. L. D. Brownlee, Gloucestershire v. Kent, at Chelten­ ham. Clode, H , Surrey v. Derbyshire, at Chesterfield. E. M. Crtgar, Philadelphians v. Cambridge Univer­ sity, at Cambridge. A. E. Davis, Leicestershire v. Sussex, at Brighton. Dennett, Gloucestershire v. Worcestershire, at Chel­ tenham. E. W . Dillon, Kent v. M.C.C. & Ground, at Lord’s. Eilis, W., Derbyshire v. Lancashire, at Derby. Field, F. E , Warwickshire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. W. Findlay, Oxford University v. M.C.C. & Ground, at Oxford.