Cricket 1903

Nov. 26, 1903. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 451 BUSEY’S “DEMON DRIVERS.” - <- e - c b « - GEO, G. BUSSEY & GO Desire to inform Cricketers all over the world who may experience a difficulty in ob­ taining “ Demon Drivers ” that this difficulty arises in consequence oftheever-increas­ ing demand exceeding the supply. Readers of G e o . G . B u s se y & Co.’s pamphlet, entitled “ Evolution of the Demon Driver,” are aware that a fea­ ture of the success of the “Demon Driver ” is due to a special process, occupying a long period,that thebatsunder­ go before leaving the works, and although there are always a large number of Bats under this treatment which could be placed on the market, G e o . G . B u s s e y & Co., in the interest of cricketers and their own repu­ tation, will not deviate fromthe system that has made the The Finest Bat tbe World produces. GEO.G.BDSSEY&CO., 36 & 38, QUEENVICTORIASTREET, E.C. Manufactory—PECKHAM, S.E. Timber Mills—ELMSWELL SUFFOLK. AGENTS ALL OVER THE WORLD. AT THE SIGN OF THE WICKET. B y F. 8 . A s h l e y - O o o p h r . FEATS, FACTS AND FIGURES OF 1903. (Continuedfrompage, 436.) (5)—Second Wicket. 250, H. K. Foster (216) and Bowley, F. (148), W or­ cestershire v. Somersetshire, at Worcester. 241, Knight, A. E. (144 not out) and King, J. H. (127), Leicestershire v. Notts, at Nottingham 235, A. O. Jones (*296) and Gunn, W. (76), Notting­ hamshire v. Gloucestershire, at Nottingham. 226, W . L. Murdoch (155) and C. J. B. Wooa (78), London County v. Lancashire, at Man­ chester. 506, R. H. Spooner (247) and Tyldesley, J. T. (9?), Lancashire v. Notts, at Nottingham. 191, Gunn, W. ( 112 ) and Iremonger, J. (93), Notting­ hamshire y. Surrey, at Nottingham. 178, C. C. T. Doll (131) and Relf, A. E. (120), London County v. M.O.C. and Ground, at C. Palace. 170, Storer. W. (89) and T. Forester (58), Derbyshire v. Essex, at Leyton. 169, Killick, E. H. (94) and Vine, J. (80), Sussex v. Oxford University, at Brighton. 158, P. F. Warner (115) and G. vV. Beldam (88 not out), Middlesex v. England, at the Oval. 156, Hayes, E. G. (145) and Holland, F. C. (77), Surrey v. Lancashire, at the Oval. 153*, E. M. Dowson (122 not out) and E. W . Mann (69 not out), Cambridge University v. Wor­ cestershire, at Cambridge. 153, C. B. Fry (*200) and Killick, E. H. (79), Sussex v. Surrey, at Brighton. 147, Hayward, T. (107) and Hayes, E. G. (51), Surrey v. London County, at the Oval. 145, King, J. fl. (167) and Whitehead, H. ( 66 ), Leicestershire v. Derbyshire, at Leicester. 143*, J. F. Byrne (77 not out) and F. R. Loveitt (62 not out), Vvarwickshire v. Gloucestershire, at Bristol. 142, C. B. Fry (232 not out) and K. 8 . Ranjitsinbji (60), Gentlemen v. Players, at Lord’s. 139, Hayes, E. G. ( 88 ) and Hayward, T. (80), Surrey v. Somerset, at the Oval. 137, A. O. Jones (100) and Gunn, W. (73), Notting­ hamshire v. Lancashire, at Nottingham. 125, Iremonger, J. (67) and Gunn, W. ( 66 ), Notting­ hamshire v. Leicestershire, at Leicester. 121, A. O. Jones (73) and Gunn, W . ( 66 ), Notting­ hamshire v. Es»ex, at Leyton. 120, L. C. H. Palairet (r7) and braund, L. C. (63), Somerset v. Surrey, at Taunton. 119, R. H. Spooner (73) and Tyldesley, J. T. (61)* Lancashire v. Sussex, at Brighton. 118; C. H. McGahey (67) and P. A. Perrin (50), Essex v. Hampshire, at Southampton. 117, Holland, F. C. (76) and Hayward, T. (74), Surrey v. Cambridge University, at Cambridge. 113, Brown, J. T., sen. (96) and Denton, D. (47), Yorkshire v. Somerset, at Bradford. 109, L. G. Wright (72) and Storer, W. ( 54 ), Derby­ shire v. Hampshire, at Southampton. 107, C. C. Morris ( 1 64) and F. C. Sharpless (20), Philadelphians v. Nottinghamshire, at Not­ tingham. 105, C. B. Fry (234) and Killick, E. H. (58), Sussex v. Yorkshire, at Bradford. 105, P. A. Perrin (72) and Sewell, E. H. D. (€9), Essex v. Lancashire, at Manchester. 103, E. M. Sprot (It3) and D. A. Steele ( 66 ), Hamp­ shire v. Sussex, at Brighton. 102, Iremoneer, J. (l*26) and Gunn, W. (50), Not- linghamshire v. Lincashiie, at Nottingham. 102, L. G. Wiight (116) and C. A. Ollivierre ( 53 ), Derbyshire v. Lancashire, at Manchester. 102, H. S. Bush (78) and Hayward, T. (54), Surrey v. Sussex, at the Oval. 101, Arnold, E. ( 86 ) and H. K. Foster (65), Wor­ cestershire v. Philadelphians, at Worcester. 101, C. J. Burnup (80) and Seymour (61) Kent v. Sussex, at Brighton. (e)—Third Wicket. 367, Gunn, J. (29') and Gunn, W, (139), Notts v. Leicestershire, at Nottingham. 3C9*, C. B. Fry (*82 not out) and A C.MacLaren ( "68 not out), Gentlemen v. Players, at Ltrd’s. 233, A. C. MacLaren (143) and F. H. Hollins (114), Lancashire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 221, Bowley, F. (149) and Arnold, E. (128), Worces­ tershire v. Cambiidge Unmr.. at Cam* ridge. 200, A. J. L. Bill (150) and E. M. Sprot (96), Hamp­ shire v. Derbyshire, at Southampton. 200. E. M. Dowson (136) and F. B. Wilson (76), Cambridge University v. Sussex, at Brighton. 196, C. B. Fry (181) and K. S. Ranjitsinbji (106), Sussex v. Lancashire, at Manchester. 174, C. B. Fry (234) and K. S. Banjitsinbji (93), Sussex v. Yorkshire, at Bradford. 173, Bowley, F. (164) and H. K. Foster (114), W or­ cestershire v. Hampshire, at Southampton. 162, K. S. Ranjitsinhji (144 not out) and Killick, E. H. ( 86 ), Sussex v. Lancashire, at Brighton. 150, Kinneir, S. P. (85) and Quaife, W. G. (77), Warwickshire v. Derbyshire, at Edgbaston. 150, Knight, A. E. (229 not out) and King, J. H. (72), Leicestershire v. Worces., at Worcester. 149, Arnold, E. (83) and Wheldon, F. (71), Worces­ tershire v. Yorkshire, at Worcester ( 2 nd inns.) 144, P. A. Perrin (102 not out) and C. H. McGahey ( 86 ), Essex v. Derbyshire, at Leyton. 141, Gunn, J. (109) and Iremonger, J. (110), Notts v. Middle-ex, at Nottingham. 133*, C. B. Fry (101 not out) and K. S. Rsnj^sinhji (72 not out). Sussex v. Kent, at Brighton. 132, J. A. Lester (67) and F. H. Bohh-n ( 06 ), Phila­ delphians v. Notts, at Nottingham. 132, Iremonger, J. (210) and G. T. Branston (39), Nottinghamshire v. Kent, at Nottingham. 132, J. B. King (113 not out) and F. H. Bohlen (58), Philadelphians v. Surriy, at the Oval. 129, E. M. Dow 8 on (94) and C. H. M. Ebden (90), Camb. Univ. v. Worces., at Cambridge. 124, C. B. Fry (160) and Relf, A. E. (61), Sussex v. Hampshire, at Brighton. 123, F. H. B hlen (93) and F. C. Sharpless (38), Philadelphians v. Warwickshire, at Coventry. 122, L. O. S. Poidevin (79) and R. B. Heygate (61 not out), London County v. M.C.C. and G., at tbe Crystal Palace. 121, E. M. Dowson (116) and L. Y. Harper (51), Cambridge University v. Warwickshire, at Cambridge. 119, P. R. Johnson (121) and Braund, L. C. ('Ill), Somerset v. Sussex, at Taunton. 114, Denton, D. (133) and Wilkinson. W. H. (46), Yornshire v. Leicestershire, at Dewsbury. 113, Wheldon, F. (71) and Arnold, E. (35), Worces. v. Yorkshire, at Worcester ( 1 st innings). 113, C. J. B. Wood (71) and L. O. S. Poidevin (64), Loudon County v. Glouces., at Gloucester. 113, W . S. Caldwell (133) and Wheldon, F. (87), Worcestershire v. Sussex, at Worcester. 109. K. M. Carlisle (60) and C. D. Mclver (51), Ox­ ford Univ. v. Cambridge Univ., at Lord’s. 107, K. S. Ranjitsinhji (99) and C. B. Fry (89), Sussex v. Middlesex, at Brighton. 104*, C. B. Fry (65 not out) and K. S. Banjitsinbji (51 not out), 8 ussex v. Middlesex, at Lord’s. 103, L. O. S. Poidevin (69) and B. J. T. Bosanquet (64), Gentlemen of England v. Cambridge University, at Cambridge. 103, Hayward, T. ( 86 ) and Holland, F.C. (55), Surrey v. Oxford Universi*y, at the Oval. 103, Tyldesley, J. T. (64) and A. H. Hornby (50), Lancashire v. Essex, at Manchester 102, He&rne, A. (79) and C. J. Burnup (54), Kent v. Lancashire, at Tunbridge Wells. 100, Tyldesley, J. T. (47) and Denton, D. (43), Lan­ cashire and Yorkshire v. An England X I., at Hastings. (d )—Fourth Wicket. 242, Tyldesley, J. T. (248) and A. H. Hornby (74), Lancashire v. Worcestershire, at Live)pool. 198, Tyldesley, J T. (146) and A. H. Bornby (91), Lancashire v. Warwickshire, at Edgt a.-ton. 176, G. L. Jessop (168) and Langdon, T. (9i), Glou­ cestershire v. Lancashire, at Bristol. 152, C. B. Fry (174) and C. L. A. Smith (36), Sussex v. Wo cestershire, at Brighton. 152. Hirst, G. H. (153) and Denton, D. (133), York­ shire v. Leicestershire, at Dewsbury. 144, Hirst, G. H. (123) and Wilkinson, W. H. ( 88 ), Yorkshire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 143, Hirst, G. H. (99) and Wilkinson, W. H. (64), Yorkshire v. Notts, at Nottingham. 338, Tyldesley, J. T. (97) and A. C. MacLaren (76), Lancashire v. Kent, at Tunbridge Wells. 134, G. W . Beldam (118) and B. J T. Bosanquet (97), Middlesex v. Surrey, at Lord’s. 129, Gunn, J. (95) and Kev. J. Staunton (48), Notts v. Sussex at Brighton. 125, Bowley, F. (lt> 4 ) and Gaukrodger, G. A. (69), Worces. v. Hampshire, at Southampton 122, K. S. Banjitsinhji (20 1 ) and G. Brann (54), Sussex v. Surrey, at the Oval. 114, Gunn, J. (95), antf Gunn, G. (41), Notts v. Lei­ cestershire. at Leicester. 109, K. S. Ranjitsinhji (162 not out) and Relf, A. E. (cO), 8 us»ex v. Gloucestershire, at Brighton. 107, Bir^t, G. H. (76), and K. S. Banjitsinbji (42), England v. Middlesex, at the Oval. 104, Tjldesiey, J. T. (73), and A. C. MacLaren (53), Lancashire v. Yorkshire, at Manchester. 102, G. .L. Jesscp (62) and C. O. H. Sewell (39), G iouch . v. Kent, at Cheltenhim. 1C2, Hirst, G. H. (60), and F. 8 . Jackson (54), York­ shire v. M.C.C. and Ground, at Scarborough. 101, L. G. Wright (133) and Netdham, E. (37), Derbyshire v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston. ( e) - Fifth Wicket. 231, Llewellyn, G. C. B. (148) and E. I. M. Barrett (92), Hamp-hire v. Derbyshire, at South­ hampton. 167, Gaukrodger, G. A. (91) and H. K. Foster (81), Worcestershire v. Lancashire, at Liverpool. 160, Sharp, J. (1^0) and R . H. Spooner (73), Lanca­ shire v. Sussex, at Manchester. 167, Hirst, G. H. (142) and E. Smith (51), Yorkshire v. Somerset, at Bradford. 4 ^ / v v