Cricket 1903

198 CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J u n e 11, 1903. remarkable in the cricket, although Jones, G. Gunn and Hallam all made good scores. The most attract­ ive feature of the day’s cricket was the partnership between Hallam and Taylor, wnich produced 72 runs in three-quarters of an hour. On Saturday, the Essex men, who were leadicg by 98 runs, seemed to have made up their minds to play for a draw, and they easily accomplished their object. Perrin had the distinction of scoring a hundred, for the second time in them a'ch; he was batting for three hours and forty minutes. When he had succeeded in making his hundred the innings was closed, but Notts only had an hour to play. E sse x . First inniDgs. Second innings. F.L.Fane, cOates, b tlallam 35 b J. G unn..........23 Sewell, st Oates, b Hallam 72 c and b Hallam .. 45 P. Perrin, b J. Gunn.........170 not ou t..................102 C. McGahey, c Taylor, b J. c Iremonger, b Gunn ................................ 0 Hallam ..........44 Buckenham, c and b Taylor 15 c and b Hallam .. 0 A. P. Lucas, b J. Gunn ... 49 c Oates,b Hallam 8 C. J. Kortright, b J. Gunn 9 c G. Gunn, b Hallam .......... 5 Russell (E.), b J. Gunn .. 26 notout................. 0 Tremlin, not ou t.................10 Young, b Taylor.................14 Mead, b J. Gunn................. 0 No-ball ................. 1 B 1, lb 1 ... 2 Total ................401 Total (6 wkts)*229 •Ianings declared closed. N o t ts . A.O.Jones, c Sewell, b McGahey.................77 Iremonger, c Kort­ right, b Buckenham 35 Gunn (W .), b Kort­ right .......... .......... 1 Gunn (J.). c Young, b Buckenham ..........25 Gunn (G.), c Kort­ right, b Young ... 52 Anthony, c Kortright, b Y o u n g ................. 2 Dexter, c Russell, b Young Taylor, c Young, Mead................ Oates, c Sewell, Tremlin ... 12 b .. 34 b 7 Hallam. c Kortright, b Buckenham......... I Pennington, not o u t.. Byes ................. Total ...........3< Second innings : Gunn (Gh), not out, 15 ; Dexter, not out, 13 ; bye, 1.—Total (no wicket) 29. E ssex . First innintrs. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Fennington ... 17 14 44 0 ... .. . 6 1 20 0 Taylor .......... 87 4 118 2 ... . . . 5 0 26 0 Hallam .......... 33 13 77 2 ... .,.. 50 19 80 4 Gunn (J.) 42 5 13 103 6 ... ... 61 13 102 2 Anthony.......... 14 3 34 0 Iremonger 5 1 24 0 Anthony delivered a no-ball. N otts . First innings. Second innirgs. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. Mead .......... 17 6 3> 1 ... ... 17 13 12 0 McG-they 18 3 63 1 ... ... 17 10 16 0 Buckenham ... 25 3 1 91 3 Kortright 7 0 36 1 Young .......... 21 6 62 3 Trem lin.......... 6 0 21 1 S U S S E X y . S O M E R S E T . P layed at H astings on June 4 and 5. Sussex won by 8 wickets. Much of the interest in this match was lost when it was found that L. C. H. Palairet, F. A. Phillips, and Captain Hedley could not play for Somerset, but the county has such a reputation for making a good tight, even under the most disheartening circum­ stances, that it was never safe to prophesy a victory for Sussex. For the first time this season 8 . M. J. Woods won the tcss, but possibly it might have been better if he bad lost it, for his side did very little in the first inniegs. For Sussex, who, when stumps were drawn, were 98 to the good with half their wickets in hand, Fry played well, and Killick and Ranj teicbji put on 99 runs in partnership in an hour. On the next day Somerset were again outplayed, tut idartyn and hewton made a desperate attempt to tave the game. S omerset . First innings. Second innings. O. M. Samson, c and b B lan d................................ 11 c Belf, b Cox ... 8 Braund, c sub, b Bland ... 0 c Ranjiteinbji b R e lf......... ... o P. R. Johnson, b Helf..........12 c Tate, b Belf 17 Lewis, c Butt b K e if..........16 c Fry, b Relf " 25 S. M. J. V\oods, lbw, b Relf 1 c Fry, b Cox 0 Robson, lbw, b Relf ..........31 runout Lee, b Relf ........................ 17 b Relf ... .*.! \\\ 13 H. Martyr, b Bland ..........10 b Vine..................* 79 A. E. Newton, b C ox......... 7 c Butt, b Kiilick 86 H. Major, c Vine, b Relf ... 6 c Re f, b Cox ...1 1 Cranfield. not out.................13 not out ** 4 B 12, lb 6 , nb 1 ..........18 B 20, lb 7 27 Total ..........141 Total..........223 S ussex . Cox, st Martyn, b Cranfield.................22 Butt, b Cranfield ... 11 Tate, c sub., b Woods 4 C. B. Fry, b W oods... 42 Vine, c Cranfield, b Braund .................12 Killick, c Samson, b Cranfield.................77 Bland, not out K. S. Ranjitsinbji, lbw B 13, lb 7, w 1 b Braund.................57 Relf, b B raund.......15 Total J. Heygate, b Cranfield 26 W . Newham, lbw, b Braund ..............15 Second innings.—C. B. Fry, not out, 43; Vine, c Samson, b Major, 6 ;J. Heygate, b Johnson,0; Butt, not out, 4 ; lb 7, w 1. Total (2 wkts) 60. S omebset . . 306 First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. K. W. Relf... ... ..< 24 5 6 71 6 ............22 7 69 4 Bland ............ 17 6 30 3 .......... Cox ... ............ 7 1 22 1 ............19 8 53 8 Tate ... ............. 6 0 20 0 Killick ............ 6 1 24 1 Vine ... ............ 8 0 80 1 Relf delivered a no-ball. S u ssex . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. 0 . M. R. W. Cranfleld ... 36 5 1 83 4 ............ 4 0 20 0 Woods ............ 23 3 82 2 Braund ............ 80 7 91 4 .V. .*.*.* 3 0 7 0 Lea is ............ 4 1 21 0 ... ... Johnson ............ 3 1 20 1 M ajor... ............ 2.4 2 6 1 Cranfield ard Johnson each bowled a wide. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY v. WORCESTERSHIRE. TWO SEPARATE HUNDREDS MY ARNOLD. Played at Cambridge on June 4, 6 and 6. Drawn. The Worcestershire first innings afforded a most curious display of batting. Wheldon and Arnold put on 91 m fifty-five minutes, and between them were responsible for 161 runs of the total of 191, there being nine extras. No other man on the side scored double figures. By the time that stumps were drawn Cambridge, thinks to an admirable 90 by Ebden, and 71 not out by the captain, bad ex­ ceeded the Worcestershire total by 87, and had only lost three wickets. On the next morning Dowson nearly brought his score to a hundred, and Harper played sound cricket, while Hirsch played a veiy useful innings. Cambridge had a lead of 197, but before the end of the day Worcestershire, for the loss of two wickets, had knocked these off, and were 44 runs on. This was chiefly owing to a very fine innings of 119 by H. K. Foster, by the aid of a few mistakes in the fle]d. Arnold was not out 34, while Wheldon had again played a good innings. On Saturday Arnold, for the second time in the match, had the pleasure of making a hundred, and as Bowley was also in great form, the county was able to declare, leaving Cambridge no possible chance of making the 320 required to win. Uut Dowson played a brilliant innir gs, and was splendidly backed up by Mann, so that when the match was over Cambridge had only lost a wicket, and were in an excellent position. The bowling was unchanged during this innings. W obcestebbhibe . First innings. Second innings. Bowley, b May ................. 4 c Ebden, b Keig­ win ................149 Wheldon, c & b Keigwin ... 50 c sub , b Dowson 66 Arnold, not out .................101 c May, b Roberts 128 H. K. Foster, c Dowson, b Keigwin ........................ 3 c Mann, b May . 119 W. B. Burns, c Eyre, b Roberts ........................ 8 not out................. 8 Cuffe, lbw, b Dowson.......... 7 cEbden,b Roberts 25 R. S. Brinton, b Dowson ... 6 not ou t................ 9 G. S. Tomkinson, c Hirech, b M a y............................... 1 A . W. Isaacs, c and b May 0 Burrows, b Dowson .......... 0 Solly, b D ow son................. 3 Lb 7, w 2 ........................ 9 B7, lb6, w6,nb6 23 Total........................191 Total (5 wkts) 616 C ambbidge U kivebbity . R. E. Lambert,b Bur­ rows ........................ 1 G. G. Hirsch, b Cuffe F. B. Roberts, b Cuffe H. S. Bompas, notout P. R. May,cWheldon, b Cuffe C. H. M. Ebden,c Fos­ ter, b A rn old ..........90 C. H. Eyre, lbw, b Ar­ nold ........................ 7 E. W. Mann, c Bur­ rows, b C uffe......... 18 E M.Dowson,bArnold 94 L. V. Harper, b Solly. 68 R. P. Keigwin.c Whel­ don, b Arnold.......... 8 Second innings: - C. H. 13 B 20, lb 13, w 6 . 89 Total .......... i 88 Ebden, c Wheldon, b Cuffe, 14 ; E. W. Mann, not out, 89; E. M. Dow»on, not out, 122 1 wide. 3.—Totil (one wkt), 2.8. WOBCESTEBSHIBE. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W . Dowson.......... 16*3 2 60 4 ......... 23 4 64 1 May.................. 20 2 60 3 ........... 17 3 10 1 Keigwin.......... .12 2 33 2 ........... 33 12 87 1 R oberts........... 8 0 39 1 .......... 31 3 118 2 Lambert.......... 23 3 82 0 Mann ..........16 1 6 * 0 Ebden .......... 7 0 37 0 Dowscn bowled a wide and delivered a no-ball, and May one wide, Keigwin and Mann three wrides, and Roberts four no-balls. G ambbidg * U niversity . 0 . M. R. W . 0 . M. R. W. Burrows... ... 27 7 86 1 ... Arnold ... ... 34 7 us 4 ... Solly... ... Cuffe ... 26 7 06 1 ... Z 21 8 116 0 ... 26 3 3 88 4 .. ... 2 i 0 89 1 Brinton ... ... •2 0 13 0 ... Solly bowled two wides and Cuffe seven wides. LANCASHIRE v. KENT. Played at Old Trafford on June 4, 5 and 6. Kent won by 177 runs. Times seem to be changing, and the Southern counties are beginning to come out on top again. In this match Kent from the end of the first day had the mitch ia hand, quite outplaying their formidable opponents. When stumps were drawn on the first day, they had scored 321, and had dismissed three good men for 20. The chief feature of the day’s cricket was the fine inniegs of 127, made in three hours and a half by Seymour, and the good innings of 63 by Humphreys, who helped Seymour to put on 123 in an hour and a half for the fifth wicket, and the stand made for the eighth and ninth wickets, which between them added 101 runs to the total. On the next day the wicket was not in such good condition as ithadteen on the previous day, aud Lan­ cashire failed to distinguish themselves, the only man who seemed auite comfortable being Tyldesley. With a lead of 163 Kent preferred to go in again, and when stumps were drawn had scored 147 for six wickets, bo that they were now 313 runs on with four wickets in hand. On Saturday they were able to put I^ancashire in to make 834 in the fourth innings of the match, and with the wicket not in very good condition, this task proved f»r too formidable. Garnett p?ayed a splendid innings. K in t . First innings. Second innings. C. J. Burnup, c Maclaren, b Cuttell............................... 19 c Cuttell,b Barnes 0 E. W. Dillon, c Hornby, b o Kadcliff b Cuttell.....................................28 Steel..................84 C. H. B. Marsham, c Steel, b Cuttell ........................10 b Barnes ........... 19 Seymour, b Cuttell .........127 c Radcliffe, b Brearley..........36 J. R. Mason, c Garnett, b Steel ............................... 6 c Cuttell,b Steel.. 25 Humphreys, c Cuttell, b Steel ............................... 63 lbw, b Steel ... 6 R. N. R. Blaker, c Hornby, b Steel............................... 6 b Cuttell ...........21 Huish, b Steel ................. 0 lbw, b Cuttell ... 9 Fairservice. b Brearley ... 23 cGarnett,bBarnes 2 Blythe, c Sharp, b Barnes... 11 not out.................10 Fielder, not out ................. 6 cHomby.bBarnes 6 B 21, lb 2, nb 1 ................24 Byes.................. 3 Total .................321 IiANCASIIIBE. First innings. Cuttell, ht wkt, b Fielder... 8 Ward, bB lj the ................. 0 E. E. Steel, b Blythe........ 10 A.H. Hornby,c and b Mason 19 H. G. Garnett, c Huish, b Fielder............................... 6 Tyldesley, c Huish, b Blythe 66 A. C. Maclaren, b Mason ... 13 Sharp, b Blythe .................26 Barnes, c Fielder, b Blythe 0 Kadcliffe, c Blaker, b Blythe 7 W. Brearley, not out.......... 2 B 7, lb 4 ........................11 Total ... Total .........170 Second innings. 0 Marsham, b Blythe .......... 0 c Mar*ham, b Blythe ..........17 c Blythe,b Fielder 3 c Fairservice, b Blythe .......... 9 b Mason ..........64 st Huish,b Blythe 36 c Seymour, b Fielder .......... 3 c Mason, b Blythe 18 run out................. 0 n otout................ 0 c Huish, b Fielder 0 B 3, lb 2 , nb 2 7 ..........ICS T o t a l..........166 K e n t . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Barnes ..........215 6 68 1 ........... 20 4 67 4 Brearley.......... 28 8 40 1 ........... 10 0 61 1 Cuttell .......... 26 3 66 4 ........... 12 6 24 2 Steel................. 26 4 89 4 ........... 14 2 83 3 Sha.p .......... 9 1 89 0 .......... Ward .......... 2 0 6 0 .......... Cuttell delivered a no-ball.