Cricket 1902

J une 26 , 1902. CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 237 been very small indeed; as it was it reached 70 for six wickets. Thus, when the game was resumed on Tuesday, the Australians, with four wickets in hand, had a lead of 99. After sixteen runs had been added the remaining four wickets fell in a couple of overs, two of them to Rhodes and two to Haigh. The Yorkshiremen had to go in for the fourth inniogs of the match to make 117 to win. A most disheartening start was made, for after 14 runs had been put up without 1 iss four wickets fe 1 for the addition of a single run. Washington and Hirst made a t-tand, but the issue was never in doubt, and the Australians had their revenge for their defeat in the first match. Trumble bowled splendidly in both innings. A ustralians . First innings. Y. Trumper, c Hirst, b Rhodes.................................. 3 A. J. Hopkins, b Hirst ... 0 C. Hill, c Wainwright, b Rhodes.................. ... 34 J.Darling,c Hunter,bHaigh 40 S. E. Gregory, lbw.bRhodes 6 R. A. Duff, not out ...........11 M. A. Noble, c & b Rhodes 0 J. J. Kelly, c Tunnicliffe, b Rhodes.................................. 0 H. Trumble, b Haigh.......... 0 W . P. Howell, c Washing­ ton. b Haigh ................... 3 J. Saunders, b Haigh......... 4 B 1, lb 4 ................... 5 Second innings. cHunter,bRhode8 9 b Haigh .......... 10 c Taylor, b Hirst 8 c Rhodes,bHaigh 2 not out..................42 b Haigh ........... 4 c and b Rhodes .. 1 b Rhodes ........... 7 c H u n t e r , b Rhodes ........... 0 b Haigh ........... b Haigh ........... Lb 3, nb 1 Total .. 106 Total...........87 Y orkshire . First innings. Tunnicliffe, b Trumble ... 0 Brown, c Darling,bTrumble 14 Denton, c Hill, b Saunders 13 T.L. Taylor, lbw, b Trumble 11 Hirst, c Noble, b Saunders 5 Washington, c Gregory, b Trumble ........................... 3 Wainwright, c Trumper, b Saunders .......................... 4 Haigh, b Trumble ........... 0 Rhodes, b 8aunders ........... 0 Whitehead (Lees), c Saun­ ders, b Trumble ...........11 Hunter, not o u t ...................14 Byes ........................... 2 Second innings, o Trumble, b Saunders........... b Trumble ... . b Trum ble........... b T ru m ble......... b Howell ........... c Hopkins, b Trum ble...........5 lbw, b Trumble .. 2 c B ill, b Saunders 5 run out ........... 6 not out.................. 8 lbw, b Trumble... 0 Byes................... 4 Total 77 T otal. . 72 Hirst Rhodes Haigh A u stra lia n s, First innings. O. M.R. W . ... 6 1 34 1 ... ... 11 2 49 6 ... ... 7-3 2 18 4 ... Second innings. O. M. R. W . ... 4 1 12 1 ... 18 8 22 4 ... 20 4 6 49 6 Hirst delivered a no-ball. Y o rk sh ire . First innings. O. M .R .W . Saunders........... 15 1 58 4 ... Trumble;........... 14*2 6 17 6 . } ’ owell Second innings. O. M. R. VV. ... 10 1 26 2 ... 17*1 6 27 6 . . 7 2 15 1 NOTTS v. LEICESTERSHIRE. Played at Trent Bridge on June 23, 24 & 25. Drawn. Notls had the good fortune to win the toss, and although they soon lost Iremonger the second wicket was difficult to get, A. O. Jones being in great form, while W . Gunn was immovable. Shrewsbury did not come off this time, but other members f the side, notably Goodacre and Hallam, made very useful additions to the total, which, as things go this year, was quite large. After Jones had been disposed of the Nett-* men nearly all made useful scote.*, but none of them except Gunn made large ones. Gunn’s imrngs of 77 was a masterpiece. Thanks to 49 by C. J. B. W ood and 41 I y Whitehead, Leicestershire put up 94 for two wickets before play ended, the first wicket producing 83 runp. On Tueeday morning R. T. Crawford hit finely, and King made a good score, while most of the tail helped a little, so that I eicfsteishire had a small lead. Jones made only a few runs in the Notts second innings, but Iremonger and W . Gunn then got well set and put up 112 for the second wicket. Three wickets were down for 202 at the end of the day, IremoDger having played a splendid innings. Yesterday, Shrewsbury was in fine form, and scored 108 not out in three hours. Leicestershire had four hours before them when the innings was closed; they had to make 326 to win. They began so slowly as to make it evident that they intended to play for a draw, although runs came fester later. N otts . First innings. A. O. Jones, c and b Geeioa 49 Iremonger, b King ........... 7 Second innings, b Woodcock ... 7 c Odell, b White­ head ....................10) st Whitesile, b Gees m ... ... 38 not o u t .................. 10tj b King..................... 39 Gunn (W ), c de Trafford, b Ode’l ................................77 Shrewsbury, b O d ell............ 2 Gunn (J.), b Woodcock ... 12 W .B. Goodacre,c Whitehead b Odell .. ................21 n o to u t..................31 Hon.M.H^rbert, lbw,b King 13 Oates, b Kir g ...................13 Hallam, not o u t ...................30 Wass, b Woodcock ........... 6 Taylor, b W ood cock ...........10 B 9, lb 11, w 2 ...........22 Extras ............................15 Total ................ 262Total (4 wkts) *342 * Innings declared closed. L kicestershibe . First innings. Second innings. C. J. B. W ood, run out Whitehead, c Oates, b J. G u n n ................................. 41 Knight, b J. Gunn ........... 9 King, c Jones, b Hal am 39 R. Macdonald, c Jones, b Hallam ................... 12 R. T. Crawford, c Jones, b J. Gunn .........................79 C.E.deTrafford, c Goodacre, b J. G u n n .........................12 Geeson. c Oates, b Hallam.. 15 W . W . Odell, c Goodacre, b J. Gunn .........................17 Woodcock, b Wass ........... 3 Whiteside, not out ........... 4 B 2, lb 2, w l, n b3 ... 8 H I, lb 3, n b l 5 Total .288 Total (2 wkts) 209 N otts . 49 not out b Taylor ...........44 cOates.bGoodacre 60 not o u t ................. 0 First innings O. M. R. W. Woodcock King Odell ... Geeson ... Second innings 151 5 37 3 ... ... 15 2 1 6 51 3 .. ... 24 25 5 86 3 ... ... 21 16 1 66 1 ... . 14 Whitehead ... 8 W ood ... ... 6 Crawford .. 4 M. R. W . 2 Ed 1 5 80 1 4 66 0 2 65 1 2 30 1 1 20 0 6 20 0 King bowled two wides and two no-balls. L e ice ste rsh ire . First innings. O. M. R. W . Second innings. O. M. R. W . Taylor ... ... 17 3 66 0 .......... . 6 2 15 1 Gunn (J.) ... 441 16 99 5 ........... 17 4 44 0 Ballam ... ... 26 10 50 3 ......... . 12 5 29 0 Jones ... 1 0 3 0 ........... 8 1 31 0 Wass ... 21 7 62 1 ......... . Goodacre ..’. 12 3 29 1 Iremonger.. . 9 1 24 0 Gunn (J.) delivered four no-balls and Wass one wide. GL OUC E S T ER S H I RE v. WORCESTERSHIRE. Played at Bristol on June 23, 24 and 25. Worcestershire won by six wickets. The advantage of goiog in first was decidedly not of much use to Glouceaterchire. who, after a fair beginning 1y W . Troup and Wrathall, could do very little against the bowling of Arnold and Wilson. Worceistershire, on the other hand, soon began to pile up runs. Ti anks to a splendid innings of 82 by Bowley, and good play by Arnold, Corden, H. K. Foster, and a hard hit 18 not out by Wilson, the Worcestershire total had reached 251 for nine wickets when stump* were drawn. The fcore was not increased on Tuesday. Gloucestershire were now in a parlous state. Nothing could save them from a severe defeat unless Jessop happened to come off. As thirgs turned out he rose to ihe occasion in a wonderful w*y. In three quarteis of an hour he reached his 60 ; in an hour and ten minutes his hun­ dred, and eventually was out for 126, out of 159 for the second wicket, after a stay at the wickets of two hours. Meanwhile Troup had been holding his end safe in a methodical manner, thus doing the greatest service to his side, and when Jess< p iefc, he was still going str mg. Langdon came in and helped to swell the total considerably, and despite their unhappy first innings, Gloucestershire had now a chance of viotory. Troup carried his bat through the innings, he played splendid and useful cricket, and was batting for five hours and a half. The innings closed just before time. Worcestershire now had the task of making 227 to win, and so finely did Bowley, Arnold, H . K. Foster and Wheldon play, that the task was accomplished for the loss of four wickets. G loucestebshibe . First innings. W . Troup, c S.-Hayward, b A rnold.................................. 22 Wrathall. b Wilson ...........17 Second innings. n o to u t............... c Gaukrodger, W Ison ......... W . S. A. Brown, c and b /ra old ... .......................... 1 b Arnold L D. Browniei, c Pearson,*) A rn o ld ......... ........... 0 G. L. Jessop, b W ilton ... 2 Langdon, b Arnold ...........16 Board, b W i s o n ................... 4 127 , 20 8 H. C. Manners, b W ilson... 19 G. L. Rattenbury. b W ilson 0 Huggins, c Isaac, b Arnold 3 Roberts, not o u t ................... 0 B 1,1b 3, w l ........... 5 Total lbw, b Arnold c Bird, b Wilson 126 b B ir d ...................62 b Wilson ........... 1 b Wilson ........... 0 b Wilson ........... 7 b Wilson ........... 7 b Arnold ........... 3 B 6, lb 5, nb 1 12 Total ...388 WORCEST*R8HIBE. First innings. Bowley, b Jessop........... Pearson, c Board, b Roberts 3 Arnold,c Board, b Jessop... 40 Corden, b Jessop...................25 H. K . Foster, c Board, b Huggins ...........................32 Second innings, c Wrathall, b H uggins...........51 not out........... b Langdon... c B r o w n , Langdon... b Jessop 49 0 . 74 . 35 Wheldon, c andb Jessop ... G. H. Simpson-Hayward, c Roberts, b Jessop..........15 not out................. 9 A. W.Isaac, c Board, b Jes­ sop ................................... 3 Gaukrodger, b Jessop ... 0 B rd, c W rathill, b Roberts 5 W ilson, not out ..................28 B 10, lb l, w 2,nb 1 ...14 Extras ............... 5 Total ................251 Tot il (4 wkts) 229 GLOUCEbTBRSHIBE. First innings. O. M .R .W . Wilson ........... 17*2 6 36 6 ... Arnold ........... 176 48 5 ... S.-H ayw ard... B ird ................. Foster ........... Wheldon W ilson delivered a no-ball. Second innings. O. M. R. W. .3 5 6124 6 . 30*2 5 79 3 .2 4 7 64 0 .21 4 71 1 . 3 7 1 81 WORCESTERSHIRB. innings Second innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. 21*2 6 64 2 ......... . 14 3 42 0 24 4 64 1 .......... 14 3 31 1 6 2 17 0 ........... 11-4 2 68 0 £6 6 77 7 ........... 13 2 45 1 5 1 15 0 ........... 17 6 32 0 Langdon ... 6 2 10 2 R o b e its......... Huggins......... Rattenbury .. Jessop ........... Brown .......... Huggins delivered a wide and a no-ball, and Jessop a wide. Brown delivered a wide. SUSSEX v. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY. Played at Brighton on June 23, 24 and 25. Sussex won by seven wickets. After their victory over Surrey the Cantabs entered on what was likely—this year at any iate—to be a harder task, for several of the Sussex men had played ihemselves into form, while Tate is at the present time one of the most dangerous bowlers in England, while Relf and Vine are by no means to be despised. On a wicket which was in favour of the bowlers the University men did not n.eet with much success. The two men who had done so very well against Sur­ rey, Et den and Dowson, both failed them, and for a time their score premised tobe very small indeed, seven wickets being down for 67. But an opportune stand by L. V. Harper and F. B. Wilson made matters look better, and eventually the hundred was reached. By the way in which the Sussex men set about their work it did not look as if this total would be anything like large enough. But C. B. Fry did not repeat hi* fine performances at Lord’s. And there was no Ranjitsinhji to come afterwards. Nevertheless, at the close of the day the score was 143 for four wickets, Killick being not out6J. He increased his score to within three of the hundred after batting for four hours and showing very good cricket indeed. Marlow did well and Newham ably upheld the credit of the t il. Sussex had a lead of 167, and in their second inniogs Cambridge, despite a good 47 by Day and uteful scores by E. h. Wilson and L. V . Harper, seemed not unlikely to be beaten by an innings, but Gilman and F. B. W ilson did so well that when the innings came to an end just before time, they were able to tend Sussex in again to make 71, a task which