Cricket 1902

23 6 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J u n e 26 , 1902. M.C.C. and G round . Second innings. Bestwick... Buxton ... Hulme ... A shcroft... Lawton ... Warren ... O. M. R. W . O. M . R. W . 17 5 52 3 ... ... 17 o 46 1 12 1 46 2 ... ... 3 0 15 1 10 3 11 3 ... ... 74 2 20 0 2 0 13 0 ... 2 0 10 0 ... 2 4 0 2 2 ... ... 12 2 38 1 Storer ... ... 7 0 25 1 Buxton bowled a wide. HAMPSHIRE y . KENT. Played at Bournemouth on June 23 and 24. Kent won by nine wickets. On a somewhat difficult wicket Hampshire found it hard to score, although Webb aud Stone made an excellent beginning by putting up 50 for the first wicket. But the tail played up well, and considerably increased the score. Alec Hearne, Seymour and Mason all did well for Kent, who, when the day’s play ended, had scored 166 for the loss of half their wickets. The tail did next to nothiDg on Tuesday morning, but Hampshire had to go in against a balance of 55, and so m four wickets were down for 33, an un­ promising start from which they never recovered. H ampshire . First innings. Webb, b Blythe ...................20 Stone, c Huish, b Hearne ... 31 E. M. Sprot, c Bradley, b B lythe.................. ... 8 Llewellyn, c Humphreys, b B lythe.................................. 13 Barton, c Seymour,b Blythe 1 Soar, c Mano, b Blythe Phillips, b Hearne ........... C. Kobson, b H earne.......... D. A. Steele, st Huish, b Blythe................................... Smoker, c Humphreys, b Hearne ................... H. Hesketh-Pritchard, not out ................................. B 1, lb 1 ................... Total .........133 K ent . Second innings. b Bradley ........... 8 c Singh, bBradley 11 cHuish,b Bradley 12 c Huish, b Blythe 0 c S e y m o u r , b Bradley ........... 8 run out ...........24 c Singh, b Mason J cBurnup, bMason 18 cBurnup, bMason 4 b Bradley ........... 2 not out................... 0 B 6, lb 2, nb 1 9 Total ... 97 C. J. Burnup, st Stone, b Llewellyn ........... 8 Hearne (A .), b Steele 39 Seymour, hit wkt, b Steele.......................... 47 Humphreys, b Steele 14 J. R. Mason, b Prit­ chard .......................... 24 G. J. V . Weigall, b Llewellyn ... E. W . Mann, lbw, b Pritchard...................12 K.8.8ingh,bPritchard 0 Huish, b Pritchard ... 9 Blythe, c Steele, b Llewellyn.................. 8 W .M .Bradley,notout 2 B 6,1b 10, nb 1... 17 Total .. 188 Second in n in g s C . J. Burnup, not out, 14; Hearne (A .), run out, 0; Seymour, not out, 29; Bye, 1.—Total (1 wicket), 44. H ampshire . Blythe Mason Heame First innings. O. M. R. W . .......... 28*3 6 92 6 ... ........... 9 6 9 0 ... ........... 22 8 30 4 ... Bradley ... Second innings. O. M. R. W . .12 3 20 1 . 121 3 29 3 Mason delivered a no-ball. , 25 10 39 5 Llewellyn Pritchard Barton .. Webb Soar... .. Steele K ent . First innings. O. M. R. W . 40-3 18 65 3 . 23 5 5 Second innings. O. M. K. W. 14 9 41 4 . 2 12 0 . 2 9 0 . 3 14 0 . 5 30 3 . 6*1 4 Pritchard delivered a no-ball. SURREY y. OXFORD UNIVERSITY. Played at the Oval on June 23, 24 and 25. Surrey won by an innings and 96 runs. In the first match at Oxford between these teams the University gained a very creditable victory by a couple of wickets, and they were naturally very anxious to repeat the success. Fortune favoired them in the toss, and they played a good innings on a slow and moderately easy wicket. E. W . Dillon and W. H. B. Evans made a fine stand for the tbird wicket, which produced 82 runs in an hour and five minutes, and before they were out the Surrey bowling seemed almost mastered. But when once the ice was broken things began to take a turn in favour of the home team, although R. A . W illiams and M. Bon­ ham-Carter gave them some trouble. Four Oxford wickets were down for 165, and at this period o f the game the prospects of the home team were not bright. But D. L. A . Jephson then reappeared on the scene (he had previously been knocked about by Evans and Dillon) and, as in the Cambridge match, brought about a surprising alteration in the state of affairs, the remaining six wic^e:s only adding 41 runs to the total. Richardson having a hand in disposing of three of them. Although Surrey lost Wiltshire for one run, Abel and Hayward,proceeJed to play out time. They treated the Oxford bowling with great respect, B ayward t eing particularly careful. N ever- theless, when stumps were drawn they had brought the score to 96 for one wicket. On Tuesday m om i g they again bf gau steadily, but as time went on they played attractive cricket, and it was not until the total was 185 that Hayward was di'nm sed for an excellent 72. This wicket had put on 167 runs in a little less than two hours and three-quarters. The Oxford bowli g was now fairly mastered, and although with the score at 211 Abel was caught for another very fine innings of over a hundred, after batting for three hours and a half, theri was no ces­ sation in the scoring. Everybody made runs, and Walker was especially in brilliant form, his 87 being put together in a couple of hours. The innings eoded with a lead of 217 for Surrey. A t the end of the day Oxford had lost three wickets for 41, and yesterday they could make nothing of the bowling of Clode. O xford U niversity . First innings. C. H. B. Marsham, b Bichardson.......................... 15 E. W . Dillon, c Abel, b Richardson.........................52 W . S. Medlicott, b Richard­ son ................................... 0 W . H. B. Evans, b Jephson 61 R. A. Williams, b Clode .. 16 M . Bonham-Carter, b Clode 17 Second innings. b Clode ...........13 b Clode ...........18 G. W . F. KeLy, b Jephson 0 L.H.Heathcote-Amory,lbw, b Jeph son ........................... 3 W . Findlay, not o u t ...........22 A. C von Ernsthausen, c Hayes, b Richardson ... 9 R. C, W. Burn, b Clode ... 1 B 6, lb 4 ...................10 b Jeph son ...........20 c Abel, b Jephson 27 absent (ill)........... 0 st Strudwick, b Clode ........... 2 c Abel, b Jeph on 13 c Strudwick, o Clode ...........10 c Strudwick, b Clode ........... 3 not o u t ................. 11 c Hayes, b Clode 0 Byes ........... 4 Total ................. 206 Total .. 121 S urrey . Abel,c Evans, b Dillonll2 E .W ilt3hire,stFindlay, b Burn ................... 1 Hayward, c Dillon, b Emsthausen ... ... 72 Holland, c Amory, b Evans..........................30 Hayes, b E van s..........21 Baker(A .;st,B .-Carter, b Williams ...........14 Total .. L. Walker, st Findlay, b Burn ................. O xford U niversity . D. L. A . Jephson, b B urn.......................... 22 Clode, c Medlicott, b B u m ..........................27 Richardson, not ou t... 6 Strudwick, c Amory, b Bum ................... 6 B 13, lb 5, w 6, nb 8 32 ..423 O. M. R W . O. M. R. W . Richardson ... 26 4 70 4 ............ 12 2 34 0 Clode ........... 26 7 61 3 ............ 324 16 31 6 Jephson ........... 23 7 55 3 ............ 22 3 52 3 H olland........... 6 0 20 0 ............ S urrey . O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. Ernsthaus’n 20 G 44 1 H.-Am ory 13 2 32 0 B urn........... 32 6 88 5 Dillon .. 15 1 70 1 Evans ... 29 9 €5 2 Kelly .. 5 1 20 0 W illiams . 15 0 53 1 B.-Carter. 3 0 19 0 Ernsthausen, Burn and Evans each bowled a wide, and W illiams three wides, Evans delivered four no­ balls and Am ory four no-balls. LANCASHIRE v. WARWICKSHIRE. Played at Manchester on June 23, 24 and 25. Warwickshire won by 102 runs. In the Warwickshire first iDnings W . G. Quaife kept up his wicket, when the rest of his side found it next to impossible to play Hallows and I ’Anson. Quaife continued to play admirable cricket, receiving very little assistance from the rest of the team, and in the latter part of his innings he hit finely all round the wicket, making his 106 runs out of a total of 168 from the bat. He was batting altogether for three hours and ten minutes. Lancashire fared badly, and lost six wickets for 67 before stumps were drawn. Yesterday the tail distinguished itself, and in the end there was but a small adverse balance. The Warwickshire battiDg in the second innings was chiefly remarkable for the fine play of Kinne r, who nearly reached his hundred. Lilley also did well, and in the end Lancashire had to make 217 to win. They began their task badly by losing three wickets for 161 before stumps were drawn, and although Tyldesley made a splendid effort yesterday, W ar­ wickshire always looked like winning. W arwickshire . First innings. Second innings. Devey, c and b Hallows ... Kinneir, b I’Anson ..............11 T. S. Fishwick, c Cuttell, b Hallows ........................... 0 Quaife (W . G.), c Smith, b Cuttell...................................106 Lilley, b I ’Anson..................... 11 J. F. Byrne, c Maclaren, b 1’ Anson ........................... Santall, c and b Hallows ... Charlesworth, b Sharp c Maclaren, Hallows ... b rA nson ... lbw, b Hallows... 8 15 lbw. b Steel c Tyldesley, I ’Anson ... 31 A. C. S. Glover, c Potter, b Steel .................................. 1 Moorhou8e,c Smith, b Sharp 0 Barg reave, not out ........... 9 Byes ........................... 8 b r A n s o n ........... 2 cSmith,b I ’Anson 0 c Hallows, b I ’Anson ... ... 3 cEccles,b 1’Anson 0 not out...................15 b I ’Anson ........... 6 E xtras.......... 8 Total ...................184 L ancashire . Total ... ...191 First innings. A. C. Maclaren, b Hargreave 4 Ward, c Fishwick, b Har­ greave .................................. 4 Tyldesley, c Glover, b Har­ greave .................................13 Hallows, b Hargreave ...1 4 A . Eccles, b Hargreave ... 2 G. Potter, c Devey, b Moor- house ..................................37 E. E. Steel, c and b Quaife 11 I ’Ausod, c Lilley, b Har­ greave .................................17 Cuttell, b H argreave........... 2 8harp,c Lilley, b Hargreave 17 Smith, not out ................. 6 Byes ................... „... 22 Second innings, b Hargreave ... 0 c Lilley, b Har­ greave ...........14 b Hargreave c Glover, b San­ tall ................... b Hargreave b Santall b Santall 12 0 c and b Hargreave 0 c & b Moorhouse 16 b Hargreave ... 0 not o u t................. 0 Extras ........... 5 Hallows Cuttell I ’Anson Steel .. Sharp Total ................. 149 W arw ickshire . First innings. O. M. R. W. 14 57 3 ... 16 36 1 , 31 27 21 9 31 3 ... 0 28 1 ... 6 0 24 2 ... L ancashire . Tirst innings. O. M. R. W . Hargreave ... 32*212 52 8 ... Santall .............. 18 7 37 0 ... Moorhouse ... 9 1 25 1 ... Quaife .............. 5 0 13 1 ... Total ......... 124 Second innings. O. M.R . W . ... 27 11 45 2 ... 9 2 23 0 ... 28*2 11 48 7 . . . 9 2 36 1 ... 5 0 31 0 Second innings. O. M. R. W. ... 31*2 12 47 6 ... 22 9 49 3 ... 9 0 23 1 THE AUSTRALIANS. THE SECOND YORKSHIRE MATCH. ( fifteenth of th e to u r .) Played at Bradford on June 23 and 24. Australians won by 44 runs. The interest taken in this match was very general, and in Yorkshire immense enthusiasm was shown over it. In the first match the Yorkshiremen, with their full team, were victorious by five wickets, but in the return neither F. S. Jackson nor Lord Hawke was playing. The Australians left out Jones, Carter and Armstrong. The beginning of the match was startling, for Trumper was finely caught at mid- off by Hirst off Rhodes when his score was only three, and almost immediately afterwards Hirst bowled Hopkins. Two wickets for three runs. But this sort of thing did not last for long, and Darling and Hill p’ayed magnificent cricket, the former making some particularly hard and crisp hits. Jackson’s bowling was a good deal missed during this partnership, which did not come to an end until the score had been raised to 77. So far, the Austra­ lians were doing well, despite their bad start, but then came a complete breakdown against Rhodes and Haigh, the former taking three wickets in four balls, 'lhings at once went badly with the York­ shiremen when their turn came to go in, aod they lost half their wickets for 47—a very bad look out indeed. Five Yorkshire wickets fell with the score between 40 and 60, but the tail broke the monotony of the proceedings and brought the total within 29 of that of the Australians. But this 29 was worth a good deal under the circumstances, as was soon seen when the Australians went in again, for the bowlers still held the upper hand. If it had not been for a very steady innings by Gregory, who, when stumps were drawn was not out 31, the score would have