Cricket 1902

204 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J une 12, 19 02. A ustralians . V. Trumper, st Wint* r, b Dowson................... 128 R. A Duff, c F. B., b E. R. Wilson . . 32 C. Hill, c Ebden, b Dowson ..................... S6 W . Armstrong, b Dowson ..................... 39 S. E. Gregory, c Driffield.b E. Wilson 72 A. J. Hopkins, c W inter,bE. Wilson 0 J. Kelly, b E. W ilson 12 H. Carter, c F. Wilson, b D ow son................. 7 R. J. Pope, not out ... 2 E. Jones, b Dowson . 0 H. Trumble, absent, ill ........................... 0 B 12, lb 1, nb 7 ... 20 Total . 337 C ambridge U niversity . Jones......... Trumble .. Armstrong Trumper .. First innings. O. M. R. W . 12 4 28 0 ... 19 6 33 4 ... 16 6 21 1 ... 83 4 19 5 ... Hopkins Second innings. O. . 8 M R. W. 1 3) 3 ... 8 2 10 7 Armstrong delivered a no-ba’l. A ustralians . O. M.R. W . 0 . M. R. W . Dowson ... 4'» 4 14S 6 j Penn ... 9 0 3 ) 0 E.R Wilson 38 5 107 4 |Blaker ... 3 1 10 0 Driffield ... 11 3 24 0 1 Dowton delivered four and W ilson three no-balls. SURREY v. SUSSEX. Played at the Oval on June 9, 10 and 11. Drawn An accident to his hand during the Leicestershire match last week, compelled Tate to stand out against Surrey. This was a great misfortune for his county, for he was the one man on the side who would have been able to make good use of the slow wicket. The Surrey innings was noticeable almost entirely for ihe splendid batting of Abel, who went ia first, and was not out at the end of the innings. He scored 161runs in four hours and a quarter, hittiDg two fives and eighteen 4’s. A t times he hit very finely, never failing to pick out the right ball; his cutting was one of the features of his game. He received very little assistance, and his total of 161 was made out of 256 from the bat. It was one of the best innings of the year, and was all the more remarkable wnce only one other man on the side scored over twenty, and this score was but 34. Killick bowled very well indeed for Sussex. Before stumps were drawn, Sussex had scored 42 for the loss of Vine and Killiok, C. B. try being not out 25. On '1 uesday Fry was speedily dis­ posed of, and as Brann and Marlow did very little, five wickets were down for 70 runs, so that Sussex were in a bad case. A t 99 Relfe was out and Newham soon followed him. Seven wickets for 105. Meanwhile Ranjitsinhj ihad been playing a very careful game, and now he rose to the situation in a re illy wonderful manner. If possible, his innings was even more note­ worthy than that of Abel on the previous day, for his side was in the greatest difficulties. Butt and Cor­ dingley gave him useful assistance, the former help­ ing him to put on 52 runs and the latter 115, both playing a purely defensive game with considerable skill. Ranjitsinhji, after a quite faultless innings, was at la-1 caught at m id-off; he had be«n batting for three hours and twenty minutes, and had seen the score increased by 202. W ith a balance e gainst them of 9 runs, Surrey lost four wickets for 49 runs before stumps were drawn. This was very bad, but yesterday Captain Bush, V. F. S. Crawford and Brockwell played so well that all danger of a defeat was averted, although there was no possibility of declaring. Sussex had to make 257 to win in an hour and a-half, a task which was soon found to be impossible, although there was never the slightest cnance of defeat. S urrey . First innings. Second innioga. Abel, not out... ..................... 151 c and b Vine .. 10 D. L. A. Jephson, c Butt, b K illick...................................14 b R e lf.....................25 Hayes, lbw, b B la n d ...........34 b R e lf........... l Lockwood, b Bland ...............19 c Brann, b Killick 26 Hayward, c Brann, b Killick 8 b Relf .. 11 Baker (A .), b Vine ............ 3 b V in e ........... iii 5 Brockwell, c Fry, b Vine ... 5 b Vine........... " 5 3 V. F. 8. Crawford, c Butt, b K illick .................................11 Capt. H. S. Bush, hit wkt, b V ine.................................. 5 S ussex . First innings. C. B. Fry, c Brockwell, b L ock w ood.......................... 59 Second innings. c Hayward, b Richardson ... 3 b Richardson ... 2 b Richardson ... 4 b Richardson ... 1 not o u t................. 1 Vine, b Lockwood ........... 7 Killick, lbw, b Lockwood... 5 Relf, c Abel, b Brockwell... 34 G. Brann, b Biohardson ... 5 Marlow, lbw, b Lockwood .. 1 K .8 .Ranjitsinhji,c Jephson, b Richardson ....................136 not out................36 W . Newham, b Richardson 2 Butt, b Richardson ...........11 Cordingley, not out ...........24 Bland, d Hayes .................. 0 B 4, lb 10, w l,n b 4... 19 B 1, nb 1 ... 2 Total ................... 272 Total(4 wkts)150 Cordingley Bland Killick ... Vine . ... R e lf........... S urrey . First innings. O. M. ... 4 0 ... 19 4 ... 36*5 21 44 4 ... 27 6 88 3 ... 13 4 R. W . 25 0 .. 66 2 .. Second innings. O. M. R. W. 1 ... , 12 . 8 48 1 28 1 3 23 1 16 106 3 52*1 23 101 5 Stedman, lbw, b R elf............ 3 Richardson, c Cordinirley, b K illick................... ... ... 3 B 2, lb 3, w 2 ............ 7 Total ......................... 263 b R e lf...................35 c Ranjitsinhji, b Bland ...........55 not out...................15 c Cordingley, b R e lf ...................22 B 2, lb 2, w 3... 7 Vine bowled one and Bland two wides. Lockwood Brockwell Richardson Jephson ... Hayward Hayes S ussex . First innings. O. M. R. W. ... 33 ... 29 ... 31 ... 4 ... 4 24 Second innings. O. M. R. W. ... 6 0 31 0 2 43 o 1 74 4 . 19 20 9 74 4 6 75 1 9 69 4 0 15 0 1 14 0 ........... 0 6 1 ....... Lockwood delivered five no-balls and bowled one wide. Total ...266 WORCESTERSHIRE v. KENT. Played at Worcester on June 9, 10 and 11. Kent won by 98 runs. After having rain on Sunday night the wicket at Worcester was sl-»w, but not very difficult until towards the close of the day, when the wickets fell very rapidly indeed. Burnup played an exceedingly good innings. In partnership with Seymour he helped to put on 99 runs for the second wicket, while Mason and Marsham scored 66 while together. W ith only four wickets down for 193 Kent were doing finely, but the last six wickets only added 26 runs to this total. When Worcestershire went in the wicket was at its worst, and before stumps were drawn six men were out for 41, so that 28 runs were required to save the follow-on These runs were easily obtained, Simpson, Hayward and Gaukrodger playing very good cricket. Kent made a very bad start in their second innings losing half their wickets f >r 38 runs, but the tail did so much better that Worcestershire had to make 244 runs to win. They began very badly by losing four wickets for 24 before stumps were drawn, but the rest of the team played up well yesterday, although they could not avoid a severe defeat. K ent . First innings. Second innings. C. J. Burnup, c Corden, b W ils o n ................................63 c and b W ilson ... 6 E .W .Dillon,cWilson.b Bird 4 b S.-Hayward ... 5 Seymour, c and b Pearson .3 6 b Arnold ........... 7 J. R. Mason, c S.-Hayward, b Arnold .......................... 56 b Arnold ............. 3 C. H. B. Marsham, c Gauk­ rodger, b Arnold .......... 29 b Arnold ............. 5 Bearne (A .), not o u t ........... 8 notout...................38 G. J. V. Weigall, b Wilson 8 b B ird...................16 Murrell, b Wilson ........... 1 b Arnold ...........10 Huish, c and b Arnold ... 0 Blythe, c S.-flayward, b Arnold ........................... 4 W . M. Bradley, b Wilson... 0 B 4, lb 3, nb 2 ... 9 st Gaukrodger, b S.-Hayward ... 21 st Gaukrodger, b S.-Hayward ... 2 b B ird ................... 4 B 14, lb 5 nb 2 21 Total ...................218 W oroebtershire . Total ... 138 First innings. H. K . Foster, run out ... 9 Pearson, lbw, b Blythe ... 1 Smith, b M a s o n .................. 10 Bowley, b Mason ...................13 Wheldon, st Huish,bBlythe 0 Arnold, c Mason, b Blythe 3 G. H. Simpson-Hayward, b Blythe.................................. 28 Corden, c Huish, b Blythe 13 Gaukrodger, c Seymour, b Bra ley ...........................23 Wilson, c Seymour, bB ly the 4 Bird, not ou t........................... 6 Byes... ................... 2 Total .................112 Second innings. cBlythe.bBradley 24 c Marsham, b Blythe ........... 1 b Mason ........... 7 c and b Blythe ... 0 c Dillon, b Blythe 17 b Bradley ........... 0 K ent . First innings. O. M. R. W. W ilson ........... 39 11 89 4 . Arnold ........... 23 7 49 4 . B ird ................... 23 2 58 1 Pearson........... 3 0 13 1 Second innings. O. M . R. W . ... 10 3 25 1 ... 22 11 32 4 ... 16*2 3 35 2 S.-Hayward ... 12 1 25 3 Arnold delivered four no-balls. W orcestershire . First innings. O. M . R . W . Blythe ...........— Hearne ...........20 Mason ...........18 B radley........... 7 14 43 6 ... 9 21 0 ... 6 34 2 ... 3 12 1 ... Dillon Second innings. O. M. R .W . ... 26 11 48 4 ... 6 4 2 0 ... 303 17 34 2 ... 23 6 49 3 ... 2 1 1 0 WARWICKSHIRE v. DERBYSHIRE. Played at Edgbaston on June 9, 10 and 11. Warwickshire won by nine wickets. On a soft wicket the Derbyshire men f«red badly with the exception of Storer, who never seemed to find any difficulty with the bowling. Towards the c'ose of the innings Hargreave met with much suc­ cess, ending up by taking three wickets in four balls. Devey and Kinneir soon made the Derbyshire bowling look easy, the former playir g a most attrac­ tive inning*. which lasted for an hour and a half. At th* end of the day Quaife and Lilley put on 86 runs for the fourth wicket without being separated, the former being not out 27, and the latter not out 54, with the total at 192. The rest of the innings on Tuesday did not last very long, but still Warwick­ shire had a lead of 143. Against this Derbyshire struggled gamely, but when half their wickets were down they stood a good chance of being beaten in an innings. But A. E. Lawton played a very fine game at a critical time, and was fairly well backed up by the tail, so that the innings’ defeat was avoided. D erbyshire . First innings. L. G. W right, b Moorhouse 2 Needham, b Charlesworth 16 Storer, b Santall...................53 Chatterton, b Hargreave ... 1 Hulme, b H argreave...........16 W . Sugg, b Hargreave ... 5 A . E. Lawton, b Santall ... 1 Humphreys, b Hargreave... 11 Warren, not o u t ................... 9 Buxton ,c Lilley,bHargreave 0 Bestwick, b Hargreave B 7, w 1 ........... Second innings, c Lilley, b Har­ greave ........... b Santall ........... lbw, b Santall ... b Moorhouse c Lilley, b H ar­ greave ........... b Santall ........... b Hargreave not out................... b Santall ......... c Kinneir, b Har­ greave ........... b Santall ........... B 14, lb 1 ... Total Total... W arw ickshire . Fishwick, b Lawton... 13 Aloorhouse, not o u t... 8 9 , W . Bainbridge, b Lawton ................... 7 Sargreave, c Need­ ham, b Hulme ... 2 B 15, lb 9 ...........24 Devey, b Buxton ... 62 Kinneir, c Wright, b Buxton ...................26 Charlesworth, b Sugg 8 Quaife, c Humphreys, b Hulme ......................28 Lilley, c and b Hulme 59 J. F. Byrne, b Best­ wick .................* ... 9 Santall, c Humphreys, b Law ton..................19 Second innings: —Charlesworth, run out, 4; Devey, not out, 21; J. F. Byrne, not out, 16.—Total (1 wkt), 41.. Total ..265 D erbyshire . First innin; ga. Second inniDgs. 0 . :M. R. W . O. M. R. W . Hargreave ... 245 5 54 6 ... ... 24 2 79 4 Moorhouse ... 9 2 21 1 ... . . . 6 2 3 1 K inn eir........... 2 0 9 0 . . ... 1 0 4 0 Santall ........... 13 4 24 2 ... ... 26-1 8 60 5 Charlesworth 4 2 6 1 ... ... 7 1 19 0 Quaife .. ... 2 0 12 0 Hargreave bowled a wide. W arw ickshire . run out ........... 7 O. M. R. w . c Huish, b Mason 21 Hulme ... ... 42 5 13 89 3 ... Bestwick... ... 21 12 32 1 ... b B rad ley........... 48 Lawton ... ... 17 8 M 3 ... not out ........... 9 Chatterton ... 4 0 19 0 ... lbw, b Blythe .. 0 Buxton ... ... 7 2 14 2 ... ... Extras .. 12 Sugg ... 6 0 15 1 ... — Warren ... ... 6 1 12 0 ... ... Total ...146 Storer ... ... 6 0 26 0 ... ... O. M. R. W. 9 3 22 0 10 3 19 0