Cricket 1902

172 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. M a y 2 9 , 1902. after the interval for tea that the break down in the Surrey batting began. The score stood at 237 for three wicksts, and in three quarters of an hour the innings was over for 262. No one seemed to have any idea of playing M’Gahey, whose pitch was for once as accurate as that o f Braund. Carpenter also met with great success with the ball. The partnership between Abel and Hayes produced 68 runs in an hour and a quarter, and that between Abel and Baker, 148 in two hours and ten minutes. Essex had half an hour’s batting before stumps were drawn on account of the bad light, and lost Perrin and Carpenter for 28 runs, M’ Gahey being not out 18. On the next morning M’ Gahey, who had evidently struck oil in this match, played a brilliant innings, but could get nobody to stay with him to wear down the fine bowling of Lockwood, who was in magnificent form. Essex saved the follow on, and then had a slice of good fortune in disposing of Abel for a duck’ s egg. But Hayes and Hayward played well, and the 8urrey men seemed to have a very good chance of winning. Captain Bush afterwards played a splendid game, and Essex were left to make 302 to win. When stumps were drawn their total was 29 for one wicket. Yesterday, Brockwell bowled finely, and only two Essex men distinguished themselves, viz., Carpenter and T. Russell. S ubbey . First innings. Abel, b M cGahey...................150 Brockwell.c Reeves,b Young 3 Hayes, c Kortright,b Reeves 42 Baker, c Fane, b Carpenter 41 H . 8. Bush, c Sewell, b Car­ penter ................................... 2 Hayward, run out ........... 6 Lockwood,c and bCarpenter 6 L . Walker, b McGahey ... 8 D. L . A. Jephson, not out 1 Stedman, b M cGahey.......... 0 Richardson, lbw,b McGahey 0 B 1,1b 3 ................... 4 Second innings, b McGahey c Carpenter, b McGahey... c Carpenter, b M cGahey......... ht wkt, b Mead .. Yesterday the Oxford captain at once closed his innings and the Irishmen made a magnificent fight for victory. The great feature of the innings was the ;>artnership of 170 between Sir T. C. O’ Brien and R. I . Lambert. It would be hard to say which man batted the better. Sir Timothy was at the wickets for three hours and forty minutes for his 167, and Lambert nearly two hours for his 81. After tbis partnership, Browning played a great game, and Harvey followed his example, but the big task proved just a little too much for the team, who, nevertheless, covered themselves with glory. O xfobd U niversity . First innings. Second innings. !. H. B. Marsham, b Ross 0c Adair, b K. Lam bert........120 E. W . Dillon, c Ross,b Har- c Ross, b R.Lam- vey ...............................23 b e r t .................17 . W yld, b R oss...............28 c Meldon, b Har­ rington .........40 W . H. Evans, b R oss.......55 b Adair ...........34 R. Z. H. Voss, b Ross ... 9 not o u t .............. 43 M Bonham-Carter, b Har­ vey ..............................60 not o u t ..............37 R. A . Williams, lbw, b Ross 65 W . Findlay, c Harvey, b Lambert ........................ 8 E. G. Whately, b Ross ... 0 G. W . F. Kelly, b Harring­ ton ...............................43 A . C. von Ernsthausen, not out........................................ 7 B 4, lb 2 ................... 6 B 8, lb 10 Total ...........262 E ssex . First innings. F. L. Fane, b Lockwood ... 5 c c Sewell, b Mead 69 c Sewell, b Reeves 38 b McGahey......... 1 c Russell, b Mead 0 b Mead ........... 0 b Mead ........... 1 not o u t ................. 2 B 5, lb 1 ... 6 Total ...177 Carpenter, b Lockwood P. Perrin, c Stedman, b L ock w ood ......................... 1 C. McGahey, c Hayes, b B rock w ell...........................79 Sewell, b Lockwood ........... 1 C. J. Kortright, c Hayward, b Lockwood ...................17 Russell (T.), b Lockw ood... 6 H . G. Owen, b Lockwood... 0 Reeves, c Hayward, b Lock­ wood ........................... ••• Young, c Hayward, b Lock- t wood ........................ Mead, not out ... . Byes ................ Total ... . SUBBBY. First innings. O. M. R. W ........... 21 7 40 0 ........... 17 2 41 19 4 57 28'5 11 39 6 0 Second innings. Stedman, b Brockwell ... 14 c Hayes, b Brock- well ...................46 c Hayes, b Brock­ well ................... b Brockwell c Lockwood, b Brockwell b Richardson ... 18 not o u t .................34 cStedman,bLock- wood ...........19 Mead ... Young ... Reeves ... McGahey Kortright Sewell ... Perrin .. Carpenter 7 4 10 Second innings. O. M. R. W .. 11*4 1 32 5 ... 9 2 16 0 ... 12 4 41 1 ... 28 4 72 4 Lockwood Richardson Brockwell Jephson 3 10 0 21 1 22 3 . Essex. First innings. O. M. R. W . .. 27-3 3 59 9 ,. 15 3 41 0 . . 5 0 17 1 . 7 2 17 0 . .. 4 0 10 0 Second innings. O. M. R. W . . ..19 1 55 2 . ...17 2 47 2 . ...24 7 51 5 . ...61 1 12 1 OXFORD UNIVERSITY v. IRELAND Played at Oxford on May 26, 27 and 28. Oxford won by 62 runs. On a good wicket the ’Varsity were seen to advan­ tage on Monday, although the Irishmen bowled uncommonly well. W hen stumps were drawn the Irishmen had made 21 for the loss of one wicket against a total of 304. They had an uphill game the next morning, but thanks to fine cricket by the two Lamberts they saved the follow on. In the second innings Oxford soon began to forge ahead, and when stumps were drawn were leading by 428 runs, thanks chiefly to brilliant cricket by Marsham. T o ta l...........................304 * Innings declared Ib elan d . First innings. F. H. Browning,c Williams, b W hately............................ 6 R. E. Adair, c Williams, b Whately ...........................24 O. Andrews, b Ernsthausen 10 A . D. Comyn, b Whately ... 8 R. H. Lambert, c Findlay, b W illiams.......................... 30 S. D. Lambert, not out 60 Sir T. C. O’ Brien, st Find­ lay, b Dillon ........... T. C. Ross, b Dillon ... M. Meldon, c Dillon, Ernsthausen ........... T. A. Harvey, c W yld, Whately ........................... 7 W . Harrington, run out ... 6 B 2, lb 1, nb 1 ........... 4 18 Total (4 wkts) *309 closed. Second innings. b Evans ...........56 b Evans ........... 2 b Evans ........... 1 c Findlay, bEms- thaueen ...........14 c Williams, b Dillon ...........81 b Emsthaueen ... 2 c F in d la y , b .. 11 W hately... ...167 9 b Evans ........... 2 11 b Ernsthausen . 3 Total... ...186 cEvans,bWilliams 31 not out ........... 0 B 6, w 1 ... 7 Total ...366 O xfobd U nivebsity . First innings. Second inning 8 lbw.b Richardson 0 O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. R oss.................. 32 8 91 6 ......... 10 2 39 0 16 b Lockwood ... 14 Harvey .. . 10 0 53 2 ......... 2 0 11 0 4 cBaker,b Jephson 3 Harrington .. 20 5 67 1 ......... 30 4 59 1 4 Extras ... 8 Lambert (R.)-. 14 0 84 1 ......... 19 1 128 2 Adair .......... 1 0 3 0 ......... 6 1 29 1 138 Total...........173 Andrews.. . 6 2 26 0 I reland . Whately delivered a no-ball and Evans one wide. although Hale played a very fine innings, and Lan­ cashire had no difficulty in winning, thanks to another fine innings by Maclaren. G loucestershire . First innings. W . Troup, b Barnes ...........47 Wrathall,cHartley,bBarne8 24 Hale, c Eccles, b Barnes ... 4 Langdon, c Barnes, b Sharp 65 G. L. Jessop, c Cuttell, b Barnes................................... 0 W . 8. A. Brown, b Barnes 11 Board, c Hartley, b Steel ... 38 H. B. Champain, c Sharp, b Steel .................................. 2 Huggins, lbw, b Sharp ... 16 Paish, not out ...................35 Roberts, b Sharp................... 7 B 6, lb 1, w 2, nb 2 11 Second innings, lbw, b Barnes ... 0 c Hallows,bSharp 1 c Hallows, b Steel 75 run out ........... 9 c W ard, b Barnes 14 b Barnes ........... 0 c Hartley, b Steel 4 lbw, b Barnes c Maclaren, Steel........... b Steel........... not o u t .......... E xtras... 14 , 0 4 . 12 Total ...................250 L ancashire . Total ...133 First innings Second innings. E. E. Steel, c Board, b Hug­ gins ............................................................................... 6 W ard, b Roberts............................................................... 0 Tyldesley, b H uggins......... 120 b Langdon'..............29 Cuttell, b Huggins ....................................................... 0 Hallows, c Troup,bHuggins 19 cBoard,bLangdon 4 A. C. Maclaren, c Hale, b Brown ... A . Eccles, not out .......... C. R. Hartley, b Jessop .. Sharp, c Jessop, b Brown.. Barnes, b Jessop................. Radcliffe, b Jessop ... . B 14, lb 3, w 8, nb 2 ., 65 not out... 26 not out... 14 15 3 0 27 66 0 Total.......................... 295 Total (2 wkts) 89 G loucestkbshi re . Barnes Sharp Steel... Cuttell Ward Hallows First innings. O. M. R. W . ........... 36 10 68 5 . 19 1 8 40 3 . ... 26 ... 18 ... 9 ... 3 6 34 8 22 Second innings* O. M. R. W . 28 9 65 4 6 12 1 7 44 4 8 192 Barnes delivered three wides and Sharp two, also one no-ball each. Brown ... H uggins... Roberts ... Jessop ... Paish ... L an ca sh ire, First innings. O. M. R. W. 40 14 83 2 ... Second innings. O. M. R. W . , 51 7 . 14 , 13 27 2 21 4 ... 1 . . . 1 43 3 ... 2 61 0 ... Wrathall Langdon 7*1 Roberts delivered a wide and a no-ball, Hudgins a no-ball and three wides, and Brown four wides. First innings. o T m . R. W . Second innings. O. M. r . w . Ernsthausen ... 23 12 49 2 ... ... 31 16 88 3 W hately........... 19-1 4 50 4 ... ... 30 5 104 1 Dillon ........... 14 6 39 2 ... ... 15 2 43 1 Williams 7 1 43 1 . . . ... 6*1 0 29 0 Carter... ... 7 1 25 0 Kelly ... ... 6 1 19 0 Evans... ... 16 1 61 5 MARLBOROUGH BLUES v. EPSOM COLLEGE. —Played at Epsom College on May 24. E f 80 m C ollege . GLOUCESTERSHIRE v. LANCASHIRE. Played at Bristol on May 26, 27 and 28. Lancashire won by eight wickets. On the first day of the match Gloucestershire had a distinct advantage, for after makirg 260 runs they disposed of three Lancashire men for 44 before stumps were drawn. Barnes bowled very well for Lancashire, but nearly all the Gloucestershire men made runs. On Tuesday morning Tyldesley, who was not out 24 overnight, played a splendid game, and after another wicket had fallen he was joined by Maclaren, with the result that the bowling was collared. The two men kept together until nearly lunch time, when Maclaren was bowled for 65, after helping Tyldesley to put on 219 runs in three hours and ten minutes. Tyldesley was out very soon afterwards for 120. Lancashire had a lead of 45 runs. In their second innings, Gloucestershire did not do much against the bowling of Barnes and Steel, J.S Cannell,bManders 7 A. Ward, b Coles ... 3 F. M. Neild, b M. S. Rogers ... ............ 13 C. Gibson, b Coles ... 1 H. F. Coltart, run out 10 J. C. Crocker, b M. 8. Rogers ..................... 0 G. E. Neligan, b M. S. Rogers .....................24 J. N. Eggar, c H. M. Rogers, b Black ... L. K. Cooper, c Coles, b Black ................... T. G. Gibson, not out. R.G.Smith, c Bellamy, b M. 8. Rogers ... B 2, lb 5 ........... Total M ablbobough B lues . 74 L . N. Rogers, lbw, b T. G. G ib son ........... 9 A. N. Rogers, c Neild, b Neligan..................35 G.Coles,5 T. G. Gibson 1 T.C.Manders,cCooper, b T .G . Gibson ... 4 H.M . Rogers, st Neild, b Cannell..................40 R. W. Foster, A . J. May and G. T. Sholl did not bat. M .S.Rogers,c Eggar, b Cooper ...................25 F. W . Bellamy,not out 13 A . M. Black, not out.. 0 B 2, lb 6 ........... 7 Total (6 wkts) 184 T H E ELEVENTH AU STRALIAN TOUR, 1902. i Price One Penny. Containing portraits and biographies of the players. Full details of all the Test Matches from 1877, and a list o f players who have taken part in previous tours. Copies can be obtained at all the leading county cricket grounds, bookstalls, or post free, ljd . Cricket Office, 168, Upper Thames Street, E.C.