Cricket 1902

A p r i l 24, 1902. CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 93 Molesey, Sutton, Barnes, Leatherhead, Roebampton, T. Hill’s XI., Upper Toot­ ing, Esher and Banstead. M AY. 10. Ewell, v. Flannelled Fools 17. Ewell, v. Snrbiton 19. Ewell, v. Nondescripts 24. Ewell, y . "Wimbledon 31. Ewell, v. M.C.C. JUNE. 7. Oatlands Park, v. Oatlands Park 14. Ewell, v. Beddington 21. Ewell, v. East Molesley 26. Ewell, y . Sutton 28. Wimbledon, v. Wimbledon JULY. 6. Ewell, v. Barnes 12. Leatherhead, v. Leatherhead 19. Ewell, v. Roehampton 23. Parkside, v. T. Hill’ s X I. 26. Upper Tooting, v. Upper Tooting AUGUST. 2. Ewell, v. Leatherhead 4. Surbiton, v. Surbiton 9. Esher, v. Esher 16. Beddington, v. Beddington' 23. East Molseley, v. East Molesley 30. Ewell, v. Banstead The card for Mr. J. C. L o v e l l ’ s XI. follows closely that of former seasons as regards the clubs to be met. The team will very much miss the company and services of J. P. Candler, one of the principal mainstays of the team as regards both batting and bowling, who is now abroad. APRIL. 26. Tulse Hill, v. H.A.C. C.C. MAY. 3. Norbury, y . Norbury Park 10. Tulse Hill, v. Barnes 17. Tulse Hill, v. Home and Colonial C.C. 19. Tulse Hill, v. Pembury 24. Tulse Hill, v. Croydon 31. Beddington, v. Beddington JUNE. 7. Croydon, v. Croydon 14. Tulse Hill, v. Barnes 21. Tulse Hill, v. Brixton Wanderers 28. Tulse Hill, v. Norbury JU LY. 6. Tulse Hill, v. Beddington 12. Tulse Hill, v. Dulwich 16. Easl Dulwich, v. Brixton Wanderers 19. Tulee H ill, v. Home and Colonial C.C. 26. Finsbury, v. H.A.C. C.C. A lth o u g h the S il w o o d P a r k C .C . can h a rd ly b e saicl to c o m e u n d er the h e a d in g o f “ M etro p o lita n ,’5 it p lay s again st so m an y team s from L o n d o n that it m a y re ce iv e a p la ce here. T h e m an ag ers fo r the va riou s m atch es are M essrs. C . C. C lark e (the captain and h o n o ra ry secreta ry), E . C. M ordaun t, A . F . S oam e s, A . H a y, J. L . N ick isso n , R . H . R a p h a e l, an d H . S illem . B rick ett is the C lu b p rofession a l. A s usual, m atch es w ill b e arra n ged on the Silvvood P ark G ro u n d d u rin g A u g u st fo r b o y s ; M r. C. P ra tt-B a rlow h a s u n d ertaken to arrange these. MAY. I. Esher, v. Esher 3. New Haw Farm, v. New Haw Farm 10. Sandhurst, v. R.M.C. 1st X I. 17. Silwood Park, v. Free Foresters 19. Silwood Park, v. Eton Ramblers 24. Silwood Park, v. I. Zingari 31. Silwood Park, v. M.C.C. JUNE. 7. Windlesham, v. Windlesham 14. Silwood Park, v. Chobham 21. Aldershot, v. A.D.C.C. 28. Silwood Park, v. R. M . C. 2nd X I. JULY. 5. Staff College, v. Staff College 7. Sefton Park, 8k. Poges. v. Mr. J. G. Bulteel s X I. 12. bilwood Park, v. New Haw Farm 19. Silwood Park, v. Ascot 26. Silwood Park, v. A.D.C.C. 80. Ascot, v. Ascot AUGUST. 4. Silwood Park, v. Gentlemen v. Players :’0. Broadwater, v. Broadwater SEPTEMBER. . Ether, v. Esher SURREY COUNTY CRICKET CLUB. The following are the most important items in the annual report of the com­ mittee :— The cricket shown by the Second Eleven was decidedly encouraging. In the competi­ tion for the championship of the Minor Counties Cricket Association, though second to Durham, they played amuch larger number of matches. The committee desire to express their hearty appreciation of the able and inde­ fatigable manner in which Mr. D. L. A. Jephson fulfilled the arduous duties of captain of the County Eleven, and are glad to record that an unusually large number of amateurs played for the county in the First Eleven matches. During the past year 110 new members were elected. Up to the present time 3,575 members have paid their subscriptions for 1902. The accounts show that there was a profit of £184 5s. 7d. on the year’s working, a result which, considering the adverse circum­ stances of the season, cannot be regarded as otherwise than satisfactory. The following members of the committee retire by rotation, and are eligible for re- election : R. K. Causton, M.P., S. Colman, D. L. A. Jephson, H. D. G. Leveson-Gower, W. E. Roller, J. Shuter, W. W . Thomson, and F. G. Thome. The committee feel it necessary to call the attention of the members to the rule that tickets are not transferable. The annual general meeting of the club will be held in the Pavilion on Thursday, May 1st, at 5 p.m. A dinner in honour of the Australian cricketers will be held at the Oval, on May 12 th. Members desirous of attending can obtain all particulars of the secretary. MATCH EXPENSES. D rbyshire ............... ............... Essex . ...................................... Gloucestershire..................................... Hampshire ...................................... Kent .................................................. Lancashire ...................................... i.eicestersbire...................................... Middlesex ...................................... Nottinghamshire ........................... Som ersetshire...................................... Sussex .................................................. W arwickshire...................................... Worcestershire...................................... Yorkshire ...................................... Do. Lockwood’s Share of Gate London County Cricket Ciub Gentlemen v. Players.......................... Cambridge Uni\ ersity .............. Oxford University ........................... Surrey v. Gentlemen of Holland ... Do. do. Share of Ga Surrey v. West Indians ............... Surrey v. South Africans ............... D o. Share of Gate Th^ Twelve v. Next Seventeen Second Eleven Matches Club and Ground and Colts’ Matches Luncheons and Refreshment B ji 'I s , Uloves and Caps .............. Net* Score toards, etc...................... Clohlc Boom Attendants and Sundries £ s. d. ... 160 7 6 ... 142 3 0 ... 172 18 6 ... 139 17 9 ... 140 13 8 ... 153 15 8 ... 170 15 0 .. 140 18 6 ... 184 15 0 ... 173 7 0 ... 147 7 2 ... 162 8 10 ... 156 18 0 ... 306 16 8 ... 205 6 2 ... 128 2 6 ... 176 1 0 ... 141 8 6 .* 148 19 4 1 14 0 te 9 8 0 70 12 0 ... 34 16 5 ... 53 4 0 ... 672 6 5 ,.. 269 19 6 ... 315 1 9 4=> 17 6 .. 124 15 9 ,.. 36 12 1 £4,797 6 1 MATCH RECEIPTS. Derbyshire ........................... 85 9 8 Essex ...................................... 3C0 5 10 Gloucestershire.......................... 221 6 4 Hampshire ........................... 57 17 10 Kent ...................................... 254 14 0 Lancashire ........................... 4*9 9 10 1Leicestershire.......................... 134 16 2 Middlesex .......................... 291 16 6 Notti< gh*mshire ............... 929 5 2 (Somersetshire.......................... 211 7 2 Sussex ...................................... 319 12 6 Warwicfcsh r e ......................... 256 12 0 ** orcesiershire........................... 151 IX 8 York-hir-s ............. 498 8 10 London County Cricket Club 76 1» 8 Oentlemen v. Players 417 9 0 Cambridge University 98 9 6 Oxford University ............... 133 5 10 Surrey v. Genthmen of Holland 11 2 0 Surrey v. W e t Indians Surrey v. South Africans 69 12 10 The Twelve v. Next Seventeen 24 11 0 Second Eleven Matches 110 2 6 Club and Ground and Colts Match 18 7 0 Stands ...................................... 954 12 0 £6, 57 6 10 SURREY (XII) v. NEXT FIFTEEN. Played at the Oval on April 21 and 22. Except that Mr. Jephson and Hay­ ward were absent, the couuty team was nearly at full strength, and gave an excellent account of itself on the first day, despite the failure of Abel and Brockwell to make a score. Hayes, Mr. Crawford, Holland, Lockwood and Lees were all seen to advantage with the bat. When the Fifteen went in they could none of them, with the exception of Nice, make much of the bowling of Mr. H. C. McDonell, and when stumps were drawn they were 90 ruus bahin 1 with only three wickets in hand. Nice played a good innings. Mr. McDonell and Adams were the best of the bowlers. S u r r e y . Abel, b Adams .................... 1 b Adams Brockwell, st Strudwick, b Adams..................................11 Hayes, b D olb ey...................... 38 Lockwood, b G ooder...........41 Holland.c Moulder,bAdams 36 H. C. McDonell, b Dolbey... 1 Baker (A .), c Strudwick, b AdninQ 10 V. F. S. Crawford,' b Dolbey 37 Lees, not out.............................. 27 Stedman, run out ............ 0 Smith, b Clode ................... u Richardson, c Strudwick, b Clode .................................. 2 B 5, nb 2 .................... 7 Total....................214 N ext X V . Goatly, b Lees ...........13 Moulder, c Stedman, b Bichardson .......... 4 Gooder, b Lockwood 8 Montgomery, c Abel, b Richardson ........... 1 Nice, c Baker, b M cDonell..................51 not out.................. 38 c Montgomery, b Clode ...........15 c A ’ ams, b Nice 6 b Gjoder c Strudwick, Adams st (Strudwick, N ice........... No-ball 4 b ,.. 25 b ... 0 Total (6 wkts) 117 Davis, fit Stedman, b Me l onell Kersley, b Lees . ... 11 0 Clodc, c Crawford, b McDonell 8 K.E.M.B*rker,cCraw- ford, ii McDunell ... H. O. Dolbey, c Loek- woo j , u M cDonell.. Adams, st St* dm in, b M cDonell.................. btrudwick, c and b Smith .. ........... Edwards, not out Stacey, b Sm ith........... B 4, lb 9 ........... Total 7 .. 6 0 .. 1J . 132 Thompson,b McDonell 6 Second innings : Moulder, not out, 4 ; Cooder, not out, 6 ; Kersley, c Holland, b Lees, 27; Barker, c 1 ichardson, b Isrockwell, 5.—Total (2 wkts), 42. Adams ........... Clcde ........... Kersley ........... N ic e ................. H. O. D .lb e y .. Gooder ........... Monlgi.mery... Stacey ........... Davis ........... S u rrey . O . M . R . W . 0 . M . B . W. 13 3 35 4 ............ 7 2 It 2 9-4 0 31 2 ......... . 7 1 24 i 6 2 13 0 ......... . 9 0 26 0 It 1 40 0 ......... . 9 4 9 2 13 3 44 3 ......... 5 1 7 1 ......... 2 0 8 1 4 0 12 0 ......... 8 4 10 0 4 1 7 0 ......... 4 0 8 0 .......... K. E. M . Barker... 3 0 14 0 Edwards .......... , 8 2 13 0