Cricket 1901

A p r il 11, 1901. CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OP THE GAME. 53 K. S. Ranjitsinhji’s two centurieB against Yorkshire, at Brighton, in 1896, were made on the third day of the match, although the batsman commenced his first innings on the evening of the second. It is curious that no cricketer should have succeeded in scoring two separate centuries in one match against Sussex. The nearest approach to the feat was made as far back as 1863 by Griffith, G., who scored 89 and 142 for Surrey at Brighton. T ablk No. 6 —THREE IN D IVID U A L CEN­ TURIES IN ONE INNINGS OF A MATCH, (a.)- F or S ussex . Scores. Batsmen. Against. Ground. Year. *114...K. S. Ranjitsinhji) 113...Bean, G .............. >Gloucester.. Brighton...1896 1(8.. Marlow, F. W . ) *201...W . Newham ... ) 144...W . L. Murdoch ^Somerset ...Brighton...1896 107...K . S. Ranjitsinhji) The two instances recorded above occurred in consecutive matches, but not consecutive innings. (6.)— A gainst S ussex . Ground. Year. Notts ..1887 .Brighton...1890 . Brighton . Scores. Batsmen. *205...Gunn, W . 135 . Phrewsbury, A. 120...Birnes, w . ... 191..F . G. J. Ford... 131...G. MacGregor 117 . C. P. Foley ... 164...5.rewsbury, A. 166 ..Gunn, W . 102...Barne8, W . ... 219...Gunn, W . 119...R. H. Howitt... 110...Bagguley, R. ... 311...Brown, J. T., sen. 147...Tunnicliffe, J. *104...Wainwright, E. * Signifies not out. N o t e . — For Yorkshire, at Brighton, in 1896, Peel, R-, scored 106, F. S. Jackson 102, and Tunnicliffe, J., 99. For. |N otts... . j- Cam.Univ. |Notts ... . |Notts ... . I Yorkshire.. Sheffield.. 1897 ..Notts . 1895 T able No. 7.—FIVE IND IVIDUAL CENTURIES IN ONE MATCH. Match. Sussexv. Oxford University, at Brighton, 1895. Sussex v. Gloucestershire, at Brighton, 1896. Scores. Batsmen. For. 174 ...G. L. Wilson \ 137*...K.S.Ranjitsinhji >Sussex 130 .. Marlow, F. W . ) 264*.. G. J. Mordaunt [ ~ TT •„ 125 ...C. B. Fry ... j Ox.Univ. 114*...K.S.Ranjitsinhji ) 113...Bean, G............ /-Sussex 1<8 ...Marlow, F. W . j 243*...W . G. Grace .. I ,103 ...E. L. Thomas \ Glouces * Signifies not out. T able N o. 8 —CARRYING BAT THROUGH A COMPLETED INNINGS. Score. 8.. 42 27... 35.. 65... 53 47... 37.. 77... 60 . 41.. 40 . 145 . 43 . 110... 104. 179. Score, 43.. 31.. 124.. 128 50. 82... 81.. 57.. 196.. 243.. 55. (a.)—F ob S ussex . Batsman. Against. .Hooker, W ...............Surrey Lillywhite, W. ...M.C.C.&G.. .Picknell, G...............Surrey .Wells, G................... K e n t........... .Wells, G..................M.C.C.&G.. Payne, C .................K e n t.......... .C. H. Smith ..........Surrey .Payne, C................... Middlesex.. R. T. Ellis ................ Somerset R. T. Ellis ...........Australns ... H. Whitfeld ..........Surrey Quaife, W ................Lancs.......... Bean, G.....................N otts.......... Marlow, F. W . ..Surrey .W . N ew ham ..........Lancs.......... .C. B. F ry.................Middlesex.. .C. B. F ry....................Yorkshire... (6.)—A gainst S ussex . Batsmen. For. Humphrey, T. .Surrey .Hall, L ......................Yorkshire.. .Hall, L ......................Yorkshire . Hall, L ......................Yorkshire . Hall, L ......................Yorkshire.., .Hall, L .....................Yorkshire.. W . G. G ra ce .........M.C.C.&G.. H. W . R. Bencraft..Hants......... .W . W . R e a d ......... Surrey .W . G. Grace ..........Gloucest’r.. Hearne, A ................ K e n t.......... Ground. Year. .Godalmg. 1830 Lord’s ...1839 .Oval.......... 1850 .Brighton...1858 Loid’s ...1860 Brighton . 1865 Oval .. .. 1868 .Brighton ...1868 ■Brighten... 1880 Brighton ..1883 .Oval...........1884 Manchsr...l887 .Brighton . 1891 •Oval.........1891 Manchsr ...1894 Lord’s ...1898 Brighton... 1898 Gro >nd. Year. Brighton...1867 Brighton... 1878 Brighton . 1883 Hudtte!d...l884 ,Hudfield...l886 Brighton... 1887 .Lord’s ...1887 Biighton...1891 Oval..........1892 Brighton...1896 Tonbdge...l899 It will be observed that Hall (L.) per­ formed the feat on five occasions for Yorkshire. T able No. 9.—SUCCESSFUL FIRST APPEAR­ ANCES FOR SUSSEX. (One innings and scoring 50 runs, or two innings and scoring 70.) Scores. Batsman. Against. Ground. ^ j-Lambert, W ............Epsom ... .Lord’s gj |Broadbridge, W . ...Epsom 92 ..Hooker, W. 70 ' Year. ...1816 IBrown, G. 8g |Pierpoint, C. ..M .C.C. ...Kent ... 124 *73 1 28 103 18 73 24 L. Winslow R. T. Ellis ...Kent ... ...Glouces ...Glouces A . H. Trevor...........Kent ... F.F.Thom as,jun....Kent ... ..L ord’s ...1817 ...Lord’s .. 1823 ...Brighton,..1825 ...Brighton...1825 ...Brighton,.. 1875 ...Clifton ...1877 ...Brighton... 1880 ..Tonbdge...l886 j-G. L. W ilson ......... Yorkshire...Bradford... 1887 144 . Marlow, F. W ....M.C.C.&G...Lord’s ...1891 14 *84 *77 150 *80 31 93 *29 |W . L. Murdoch .. N otts..........Notts ...1893 |K. S. Ranjitsinhji...M.C.C.&G...Lord’s ...1895 •+L.deMontezuma.. N otts..........Brighton..,1898 •P. H. Latham ...Lancs..........Brighton...1898 * Signifies not out. + This was L. de Montezuma’s second match for Sussex. He had previously played against Essex, at Leyton, when rain prevented Sussex batting. T ablk No. 10.—8USSEX BATSMEN AVERAGING FIFTY RUNS PEtt INNINGS FOR SEASON. Batsman. 2 Lambeit, W . (1817) F. M. Lucas ( 1 885) Pierpoint, C. ( 1825) K.S.R anj itsinhji (1900) 24 . 37.. 5 . 275 K.S.Ranjitsinhji (1899) K. T. Ellis (18/7).......... C. B. Fry (1900).......... Saunders, J. (i823) ... J. M. Cotterill (1875) .. G. Osbaldeston (i817) Pilch, F. (1837) H < 1... 2...1...157 ... 264 . 264-00 4... 6 2.. 215*... 396 .. 99 00 1 .. 2 . 1... 85*... 90... 90-C0 ...2824... 88'25 ...2555... 75*14 ... 74 .. 74 00 ,..1678.. 62'tO .. 123... 61'60 ... 369 .. 61 fO ... 122... 61-00 122... 61*00 23...40...6...197 1... a.. 1... 73* 21 ..32.. 2 . 229 2 .. 2...0... 89 , 4... 6 . 0...191 1... 2 . 0 . 106 1... 2 . 0... 84 K.S.Ranjitsinhji(1696) 21...41 . 5 .171*...2113... 58 C. B. Fry (1898)........... 18...35...4 ..179*...1764 .. 56 90 Lambert, W . (1816) Hooker, W. (1823) ... Hon.F.G.Pelham(1866) Pean, G. (1888) .......... F. M. Lucas (1886) K.S.Ranjiteinhji( 1 ... 113... 56 50 113... 56*60 166... 55*33 161... 53-65 572... 52-00 1766... 60-45 2 . 0 .. 63 2...0... 92 3 . 0 .. 78 , 3 . 0... 90 8 ... 12 .., 1 ... 121 19.. 38...3...150 Signifies not out. The names of the players who have averaged 50 runs or more per innings for an entire season are given in the above list irrespective of the number of innings played. OR T a b le No. 11.—PARTNERSHIPS OF 150 MORE RUNS IN SUSSEX MATCHES. (a.)— F or S u ssex . Rns. Wkt. 325 for 2, K . S. Ranjitsinhji (197) andG. Brann (157), v. Surrey, at the Oval, 1699. 303 for 1, G. L. Wilson (174) and Marlow, F. W . (130), v. Oxford University, at Brighton, lb95. 252 for 2, K. S. Ranjitsinbji (154) and G. Brann (136), v. Gloucestershire, at Bristol, 1899. 246 for 5, K. S. Ranjitsinhji (220) and A. Collins (54), v. Kent, at Brighton, 19C0. 226 for 4, G. Brann (2*9) and F. M. Lucas (109), v. Hampshire, at Brighton, 1886. 226 for 2, Bean, G. (186) and W. L. Murdoch (96), v. Lancashire, at Manchester, 1893. 226 for 2, Marlow, F. W. (155) and K. S. Ranjitsinbji (95), v. Somersetshire, at Brighton, 1895. 217 for 1, Bean, G. (120) and G. L. W ilson (1C5), v. Gloucestershire, at Brighton, 1893. 216 for 3, W . Newham (201 not out) and W . L. Murdoch (144), v. Somersetshire, at Brighton, 1896. 209 for 3, C. B. Fry (181) and Killick, E. H. (106), v. Australians, at Brighton, 1899. 198 for 2, W . Newham (137) and H. Whitfeld (63), v. Kent, at Tonbridge, 1884. 196 for 3, C. B. Fry (229) andK . S. Ranjitainhji (103), v. Surrey, at Brighton, 1S00. 195 for 4, C. B. Fry (162) and P. H. Latham (85), v. Somersetshire, at Taunton, 1899. 194 for 4, K . S. Ranjitsinbji (222) and Killick, E. H. (127), v. Somersetshire, at Brighton, 1900. 194 for 3, K. S. Banjitsinhji (275) andC. B. Fry (135), v. Leicestershire, at Leicester, 1900. 193 for 3, C. B. Fry (157) and A. Collins (60), v. Hampshire, at Portsmouth, 1899. 188 for 4, W . L. Murdoch (226) and G. Brann (92), v. Cambridge University, at Brighton, )895. 188 for 3, K . S. Ranjitsinbji (161) and Vine, J. (49), v. Essex, at Brighton, 1899. 185 for 6, W . Newham (101) and Phillips, J. (89), v. Hampshire, at Brighton, 1882. 184* for 4, W . Newbam (95 not out) and W . L. Mur­ doch (89 not out), v. Hampshiie, at Brighton, 1895. 182 for 8, G. N. Wyatt (112) and Phillips, H. (Ill), v. Australians, at Brighton, 1834. 182 for 7, Bean, G. (117) and W. Newham (96 not out), v. Yorkshire, at Brighton, 1897. 181 for 2, W . Newham (105) and Bean, G. (97), v. Kent, at Tonbridge, 1891. 179 for 3, Marlow, F. W . (112) and C. B. Fry (110), v. Somersetshire, at Taunton, 1898. 178 for 7, C. B. Fry (109) and Butt, H. R. (65), v. Gloucestershire, at Bristol, 1894. 173 for 3, K . S. Ranjitsinhji (26t) and W. L. Murdoch (51), v. M.C.C. and G., at Lord’s, 1897. 171 for 2, W . L. Murdoch (144) and K. S. Ranjittinbji (107), v. Somersetshire, at Brighton, 1896. 171 for 5, Killick, E. H. (191) and W . Newham (92), v. Somersetshire, at Taunton, 1896. 169 for 3, K. S. Ranjitsinhji (109) and C. B. Fry (105), v. Gloucestershire, at Bristol, 1900. 168 for 3, K . S. Ranjitsinhji (149) and W. L. Murdoch (70), v. Hampshire, at Brighton, 1897. 167 for 1. Relf, A. E. (96) and A. Collins (80), v. Wor­ cestershire, at Brighton, 1900. 166 for 5, G. Brann (115) and W. Newham (70), v. Middlesex, at Brighton, 1895. 166 for 2, W . L. Murdoch (121 not out) and G. Brann (105), v. Nottinghamshire, at Notting­ ham, 1898. 165 for 5, W . Newham (107) and G. Brann (87), v. Cambridge University, at Brighton, 1897. 161 for 8, G. Brann (104) and F. M. Lucas (93 not out), v. Australians, at Brighton, 1886. 161 for 6, Hide, J. (130) acd C. A . Smith (85), v. Gloucestershire, at Brighton, 1888. 169 for 3, C. H. Smith (95) and Wells, G. (82), v. Surrey, at Brighton, 1864. 169 for 2, W . Newham (100) and H. Whitfeld (80), v. Yorkshire, at Brighton, 1884. 158 for 7, K. S. Ranjitsinbji (97) and Marlow, F. W . (83 not out), v. Gloucestershire, at Brigh­ ton, 1900. 155 for 1, Bean, G. (82) and Marlow, F. W . (82), v. Cambridge University, at Brighton, 1893. 153* for 2, G. Brann (85 not out) and K . S. Ranjit­ sinbji (83not out), v. Surrey, at Brighton, 1899. 153* for 5, K . S. Ranjitsinbji (192 not out) and Marlow, F, W . (4 1 not out), v. Kent, at Tonbridge, 19C0. (6.)— A gainst S ussex . Rns. Wkts. 398 for 2, Shrewsbury, A. (267) and Gunn, W . (196), for Notts, at Nottingham, 1890. 378 for 1, Brown, J. T., sen. (311) and Tunnicliffe, J. (147), for Yorkshire, at Sheffield, 1897. 338 for 5, Sir T. C. O’ Brien (202) and R. S. Lucas (185), for Middlesex, at Brighton, 1895. 312 for 2, Shrewsbury, A . (165) and Gunn, W . (161), for Notts, at Brighton. 1891. 274 for 2, Shrewsbury, A . (164) and Gunn, W . (156), for Notts, at Brighton, 1893. 266 for 5, Shrewsbury, A. (209) and Gunn, W . (122), for Notts, at Brighton, 1884. 256 for 4, Knight, A. E. (182) and Whitehead, H. (116), for Leicestershire, at Leicester, 1900. 249 for 4, F. Marchant (176) and Hearne, G. G. (103), for Kent, at Gravesend, 1889. 249 for 2, R. C. N. Palairet (156) and L . C. H. Palairet (154), for Somersetshire, at Taunton, 1896. 248 for 7, W . G. Grace (243 not out) andC.L.Thomaa (’09), for Gloucestershire, at Brighton, 1896. 241 for 2, Shrewsbury, A. (154 not out) and Gunn, W . (125), for Notts, at Brighton, 1898. 235 for 3, Carpenter, H. (140) and (J. McGahey (107), for Essex, at Leyton, 1900. 231 for 1, Abel, R. (156) and Brockwell, W . (131), for Surrey, at the Oval, 1897. 228 for 2, W . L. Murdoch (168) and J. E. Barrett (83), for Australians, at Brighton, 1890. 215* for 3, Briggs, J. (129 not out) and Ward, A. (77 not out), for Lancashire, at Manchester, 1890. 214 for 4, G. MacGregor (131) and C. P. Foley (117), for Cambridge University, at Brighton, 1890. 211 for 2, W . G. Grace (301) and R. W . Rice (84), for Gloucestershire, at Bristol, 1896. 211 for 3, V. Trumper (300 not out) and S. E. Gregory (73), for Australians, at Brighton, 1899.