Cricket 1901

D ec . 19, 1901. CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 475 FIRST-CLASS FIXTURES FOR 1902. The following is the programme of first- class matches for next season. The list was arranged at the annual meeting of county secretaries held at Lord’s on the 10th inst. 24. Crystal Palace, London County C.C. v. Surrey 28. Kennington Oval, Surrey v. London County C.C. MAY. 1. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. London County 1. Oval, Surrey v. Worcestershire 1. Nottingham, Notts Colts v. Yorkshire Colts 5. Crystal Palace, Australians v. London County C.C. 5. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Yorkshire 6. Oval, Surrey v. Essex 8. Nottingham, Australians v. Notts 8. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Giound v. Lancashire 8. Leyton, Essex v. Yorkshire 8. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Surrey 12. Oval, Australians v. Surrey 12. In Yorkshire, Yorkshire v. Sussex 12. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Lancashire 12. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Notts 12. Oxford, Oxford University v. Mr. H. D. G. Leveson-Gower’s XI. 12. Lord’s. M.C.C. and Ground v. London County 15. Leyton, Australians v. Essex. IB. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Kent 15. Oxford, Oxford University v. Somerset 15. Manchester, Lancashire v. Sussex 15. Oval, Surrey v. Gloucestershire 15. In Yorkshire, Yorkshire v. Leicestershire 15. Cambridge, Cambridge Univeisity v. London County 19. Leicester. Australians v. Leicestershire 19. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Somerset (G. Hay’s benefit) 19. Leyton, Essex v. Kent. 19. Nottingham, Notts v. Surrey (W. Gunn's testi- n otial match) 19. Brighton, Sussex v. Gloucesterhire 19. Woicester, Worcesteishire v. Warwickshire 19. Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Lancashire 19. Southampton, Hampshire v. Derbyshire 19. Ciystal 1 alace, London County C.C. v. All Ireland 22. Oxford, Australians v. Oxford University 22. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. All Ireland 22. Brighton, Sussex v. Somerset 22. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Surrey 22. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. Yorkshire 22. Manchester, Lancashire v. Kent 22. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Gloucesteretire 22. Nottingham, Notts v. Essex 26. Lord’s, Australians v. M.C.C. and Ground | 26. Leyton, Essex v. Surrey 26. Oxfoid, Oxford University v. All Ireland 26. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Lancashire 26. Wt rcester, Worcestershire v. Leict stershire 26. In Yorkshire, Yorkshire v. Kent 29. Oval, Surrey v. Hampshire 29. In Yorkshire, Yorkshire v. Deibyshire 29. Bath, Somersetshire v- Lancashire 29. Brighton, Sussex v. Worceslei shire 29. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. All Ireland 29. l ord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Ktnt 29. Birmingham, England v. Australia JUNE. 2. Leeds, Australians v. Yorkshire 2. Lora’s, Middlesex v. Gloucestershire 2. Bath, Somersetshire v. Hampshiie 2. Manchester, Lancashire v. Worcestershire 2. Nottingham. Notts v. Sussex 2. Oval, Surrey v. Kent 5. Manchester, Australians v. Lancashire 5. Lord's, Middlesex v. Notts. 5. Oxford, Oxford University v. Kent 5. Leicester, Leicesterhire v. Sussex 5. Chesterfield, Derbyshire v. Yorkshire 5. Worcester, Woicestei shire v. Hampshire 5. Leyton, Essex v. Warwickshire 5. Cambridge, Camtridge University v. Surrey 9. Cambridge, Australians v. Cambridge University 9. Lord’s, M.C.C and Ground v. Notts 9. Crystal Palace, London County C.C. v. Leicester­ shire 9. Gloucester, Gloucestershire v. S<mersetshire 9. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Kent 9. In Yorkshire, Yorkshire v.Middlesex 9. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Derbyshire 9. Oval, Surrey v Sussex 12. Lord’s, England v. Australia 12. Gloucester, Gloucestershire v. Surrey 12. Gravesend, Kent v. Notts 12. Glossop, Derbyshire v. Worcestershire 12. Manchester, Lancashire v. Somersetshire 12. Southampton, Hampshire v. Leicest. rshire 16. Loid’s, Middlesex v. Essex 16. Oxford University v. Surrey 16. Brighton, 6ussex v. Notts 16. Tonbridge, Kent v. Lancashire (Tonbridge Week) 16. In Yorkshire; Yorkshire v. Somersetshire 16. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Warwickshire 16. Crystal Palace, London County C.C. v. Caml ridge University 19. Derby, Australians v. Derbyshire 19. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Sussex 19. Tont ridge, Kentv. Gloucestershire (Tonbr.Week) 19. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Somersetshire 19. Leylon. Essex v. Lancashire 19. Hrmingbam, Warwickshire v. Yorkshire 19. Oval, Surrey v. Cambridge University S3. Bradfoid, Austialians v. Yorkshire 23, Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Derbyshire 23. Nottingham, Notts v. Leicestershire 23. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Worcestershire 23. Manchester, Lancashire v. Warwickshire 23. Bournemouth, Hampshire v. Kent 23. Brighton, Sussex v. Cambridge University 23. Oval, Surrey v. Oxford University 26. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Cambridge Univ. 26. In Yorkshire, Yorkshire v. Notts 26. Manchester, Lancashire v. Surrey 26. Taunton, Somerset v. Worcestershire 28. Beckenham, Kent v. Middlesex 26. Brighton, Sussex v. Oxford University S6. Derby, Derbyshire v. London County C.C. 30. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Oxford University (two days) 30. Leeds, Yorkshire v. Surrey £0. Nottirgham, Notts v. Lancashire 30. Bristol, Glouci stershire v. Kent 30. Leyton, Essex v. Sussex 30. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Hampshire 30. Chesterfield, Deibyshire v. Leicestershire JULY. 1. Ipswich, Suffolk v. Norfolk 3. Lord’s, Oxford v, Cambridge 3. Oval, Surrey v. Derbyshire 3. Bath, Somerset v. Gloucestershire 3. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Notts 7. Biimingham, Australians v. Warwickshire 7. Lord’s, Gentlemen v. Players 7. Brighton, Sussex v. Hampshire 7. Liveipool, Liverpool and District v. Cambridge University 3. Sheffield, England v. Australia 10. Worcester, Australians v. Worcestershire 10. Brighton, Sussex v. Yorkshire 10. Portsmouth, Hampshire v. Somerset 10. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Derbyshire 10. Oval. Gentlemen v. Piaytrs 11. Lord’s, Eton v. Harrow 14. Bristol, Australians v. Gloucestershire 14. Ciystal Palace, London County C.C. v. M.C.C. and Ground 14 Derby, Derbyshire v Notts 14. Worcester, Worcest» rehire v. Lancashire 14. In Yorl shire, Yorkshire v. Essex 14. Tunbridge Wells. Kent v. Hampshire (Tunbridge Wells Week) 14. Brighton, Sussex v. Surrey 17. Taunton, Australians v. Somersetshire 17. Lord’s, Middlesex v. fcurrey 17. Manchester, I.ancashire v. Eisex 17. Nottirgham. Notts v. Yorkshire 17. Tunbridge Wells, Ktnt v. Sussex (Tunbridge Wells Wetk) 17. Birmingham, V arwickshire v. Leicestershire 21. Oval, Australians v. Surrey 21. Liverpool, Lai cashiie v. Midd esex 21. In Yorkshire, Yorkshire v. Gloucestershire 21. Woicester, Worcestershire v. bussex 21. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Essex 21. Ciystal Palace, London County C.C. v. Derbyshire 24. Manche>-ter, England v. Australia 24. Nottingham, Notts v. Gloucestershire 24 Oval, Surrey v. Somersetshiie 21. Derbyshire, Derbjshiie v. Essex 28. Mai Chester, Lancashire v. Gloucestershire 28. Eastbourne, Sussex v. Middlesex 28. 1 eicester. Leicestershire v. Worcestershire 18. In Yorkshire, Yorkshiie v. ^ arwicksbiie 58. Southampton, Hampshire v. Surrey 28. Maidstone, Kent v. Somersetshire 30. Loid’s, Kugty v. Marlboiough 31. Biighton, Australians v. Sussex 31. Oval, Surrey v. Yorkshire 31. Leyton, Essex v. Middlesex 31. Nottingham, Notts v. Kent 31, Liverpool, Liverpool and District v. Mr. G. L. Jtssop’s Gloucestershire XI. AUGUST. 4. (BankHoliday) —Marchester,Lancashirev.York­ shire (A. Waid’s benefit) 4. Oval, Suirey v. Notts 4. Biistol, Gloucestershire v. Sussex 4. Birmingham, Warnickshire v. Worcestershire 4. Taunton, Somersetshiie v. Middlesex 4. Derby, Dtrbyshire v. Hampshire 4. Leictster, Leicesteishire v. London County C.C. 4. Canterbury, Kent v. Essex (Canterbury Week) 4. Noiwich, Noifolk v. Suffolk 6. Norwich, Noifolk v. Cambridgeshire 7. Southampton, Australians v. Hampshire 7. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Lancashire 7. Leyton, Essex v. Notts. 7. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Middlesex 7 Worcester, \Noicestershire v. Derbyshire 7. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Yorkshire 7. Taunton, Somersetshire v. Sussex 7. Canterbury, Kent v. Surrey (Canterbury Week) 8. Norwich, Norfolk v. M.C.C. and Ground 11. Oval, England v. Australia 11. Brighton, Sussex v. Lancashire 11. Nottingham, Notts v. Derbyshire 11. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Leicestershire 14. Lord’s, Australians v. M C.C. and Ground 14. Cheltenham, Gloucestarshire v. Yorkshire (Chel­ tenham Festival) 14, Nottingham, Notts v. Middlesex 14. Portsmouth, Hampshire v. Worcestershire 14. Oval, Surrey v. Lancashire 14. Derby, Derbyshire v. Warwickshire 14. Brighton, Sussex v. Leicestershire 14. Taunton, Somerset v. Kent 18. Cheltenham, Australians v. Gloucestershire 18. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Lancashire 18. Tonbridge, Kent v. Worcestershire 18. Taunton, Somerset v. Yorkshire 18. Leicester. Leicestershire v. Hampshire 18. Glossop, Derbyshire v. Surrey 18. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Essex 21. Canterbury, Australia v. Kent 21. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Yorkshire 21. Manchester, Lancashire v. Notts 21. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Surrey 21. Southampton, Hampshire v. Sussex 21. Leyton, Essex v. Derbyshire 21. Crystal Palace, London County C.C. v. Warwick­ shire 25. Lord’s, Australians v. Middlesex 25. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Warwickshire 25. Manchester, Lancashire v. Leicestershire 25. Catford, Kent v. Yorkshire 25. Brighton, Sussex v. Essex 25. Taunton, Somersetshire v. Surrey 28. Liverpool, Australians v. Lancashire 28. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Gloucestershire 28. Oval, Surrey v. Middlesex 28. Scarborough, Yorkshire v. M.C.C and Ground (Scarborough Festival) 28. Bournemouth, Hampshiie v. Warwickshire 28. Leyton, Essex v. Leicestershire 28. Brighton, Sussex v. Kent SEPTEMBER. 1. Scarborough, Gentlemen v. Players (Scarborough Festival) 1. Oval, fcurrey v. Leicestershire 4. Scarborough, Australians v. 4. Oval, Suirey v. Warwickshire 4. Hastirgs, Kent and Sussex v. Rest of England (bastings Festival) 8. Hastings, Austialians v. CRICKET IN SOUTH AFRICA. PRETORIA y. JOHANNESBURG. Johannesburg sent a team to Pretoiia on November 9th to play an eleven picked from the military and civilian clubs of Pretoria. Though they were without some of their best players, notably Major J. H . Sinclair, the visitors made a good tight, being only beaten by nineteen runs. Major Poore, it will be seen, was the highest scorer for Pretoria. P re to r ia . Dr. G. Thornton, b Norden .................10 W. E. Niemeyer,cand b N oideu.................15 Major R. M. Poore, b Walshe .................66 Capt. H. R. Brown, b Kempis .................14 Capt. H. W. Hutson, c Lennard, b Norden 6 Major E. H. Cox, b Walshe ................. 7 G. C. MacArthur, b Mainon .................19 C.H.Button,e Walshe, b Norden.................16 C. S. A. Cosser, c Stanton, b ILainon 23 Pte. F. Caffyn, c Bloe- menstein, b Kempis 1 Pte. H. Potter, Lot out ........................ 7 Extras.................35 Total . 219 J ohannesburg . C. d’O. Mainon, e Thornton, b Potter 47 B. Walshe, c Button, b Hutson................. 9 J. van Bloemensteio, c Pooie, b MacArthur 33 F. liudlay, c Caffyn, b Thornton.................45 Lieut. Udal. b Mac­ Arthur ......... ... 3 H. Lennard, b Nie- meyer .................10 R. Norden, c Cosser, b Niemeyer ........ 9 R. Stanton, c and b Potter .................27 G. S. Kempis,b Potter 3 A. Richardson, st Caffyn, b Potter ... 5 Major Hoskins, not out ........................ 0 Extras................. 9 Total ...2C0