Cricket 1901

348 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. A ug . 15, 1901. C R IC K E T IN S H A N G H A I . Played at Shanghai in sultry weather, on a slow and soft wicket. There were two particularly good bowling performances, Mr. A. G. H. Carruthers taking nine of the Shanghai wickets in the first innings for 32 runs in seventeen overs, and four in the pecond in twelve overs for 31 runs. For Shanghai Mr. J. Mann took eight wickets in the first innings for 6 runs in seven overs, and five in the sec nd for 8 runs in six overs. Mr. McEuen played fine cricket in the second innings for Shanghai. SHANGHAI C.C. v. H.M. IMPERIAL CUSTOMS. S h a n g h a i . First innings. Capt. Price, b Carruthers ... 7 G. F. 1anning, c Macoun, b Carruthers ................. J.Mann. c and b Carruthera N. J. Stabb, b Carruthers .. K. J. McEuen, not out H. S. King, st Weippert, b Carruthers........................ D.R. McEuen, b Carruthers J. B. Walsh, c Carruthers, b Stephenson Jellie . R.C. Farbridge. b Carruthers Capt. Wall, b Carruthers ... A. J. Wicks, st Weippert, b Carruthers........................ Byes................. 12 8 0 2 23 0 5 1 3 9 2 Second innings, b L a y ................. b Carruthers ... 1 not out................. b Carruthers ... J b Carruthers b Jellie .......... not out... 10 candb Carruthers 0 Total................ 72 Total (6 wkts) 92 I m p e r ia l C ustoms . First innings. Second innings J. W. Stephenson-Jellie, b b Mann .......... Mann ......... ................. 0 0 J. A. Tipp. b Mann .......... 2 not out................. 15 W . H. Weippert, b Mann... 4 b Mann .......... 1 A.G. H. Carruthers.b Mann 2 b Mann ........ 0 J. W. Richardson, b Mann. 0 b Mann .......... 6 J. H. Macoun, b Mann 1 not o u t................ 1 W.G.l ay,cWalsh,bMcEuen 8 b Mann .......... 2 C. E. Holworthy, cMcEuen, b Mann ........................ 0 G. F. Holland, b Mann ... 0 R. H. R. Wade, run out ... 0 C. P. Dawson, not out 2 B 9, lb 3 ... .......... 12 B 11, lb 2 ... 13 Total .. - ............... 31 Total (5 wkts) 38 ... 222 . 107 ... 149 ... 133 T h e follow ing are some of the latest hundreds :— AUGUST. 5. R . O . Schwarz, Incogniti v. E x m o u th .............186 5. G . K . Asprey, Incogniti v. Exm outh .............114 5. C . A . Leggatt, Surbiton v. E w e ll......................116 5 . H . J . Davenport, Ewell v. Surbiton ... . ICO 7. Rev. E . B. Brutton, Sidm outh v. Incogniti... 120 7. J . Conway Rees, Incogniti v . Sidm outh ... 101 8. D r . W . G . G race , L ondon C ounty v .M .C .C . and G round .............................................................132 8. L . W alker , L ondon C o unty v . M .C .C . and G round ............. .......................................... 8. G . B rann , S ussex v . S omerset ............. 8. A . O. .T ones , N otts v . E ssex - ....................... 8. I remonqer , N otts v . E ssex ...................... 9. L . C. H . P alair et , S omerset v . S ussex ... 194 9. L e w is , S omerset v . S ussex ................................120 9. H earne (G. G .), M .C .C . and G round v . ^ L on ’ don C ountv ................................................... 9. C. C. T . D oll , M .C.C. an d G round v . L ondon C ounty ...................................................................... 9. H T . Gillett, Gentlemen of Surrey v. Gentle­ m en of Holland ................................................... 9. B rown , Y orkshire v . H am psh ire ..................... 9. T . L . T aylor , Y orkshire v . H ampshire ... 9. C arpenter , E ssex v . N otts ................................118 9. A . J. T urner , E ssex v . N otts .......................120 10. F . L . F ane , E ssex v . N otts ................................120* 10. P . P errin , E ssex v . N otts ................................108* 10. J . C. Schroder, Gentlemen of Holland v. Gentlemen of Surrey ............. .............115 10. W .P .R obertson ,M iddlesexv G loucester ­ shire ............................................................................... 110* 10, C . B . F ry , S ussex v . S omerset .......................119* 10. K . S. R anjitsinhji , S ussex v . S omerset ... 285* 10. A . H . Barker, East Molesey v. Brixton W anderers......................................................................100 10. F . Odell, Brixton W anderers v. F ast Molesey 110 12. K . S. R anjitsinhji , S ussex v . L ancashire ‘204 12. K illick , S ussex v. L ancashire .......................119 12. I remonoer , N otts v. D erbyshire ... ... 108 * Signifies not out. T H E M anager of Cricket wishes to obtain copies of W isden’s Alm anack ” for 1864,66,73,74,76,77 ; “ John Lillywhite’s Com panion.” 1865, 66, 67, 68, 70 ; “ Jam es lillyw h ite’s Annual,” 1874, 7 7 ,; Yol. 4 of “ Scores and Biographies.” — 168, U pper Thames Street, London, E.C . T H E D U T C H T E A M . MATCH AGAINST GENTLEMEN OF LONDON COUNTY. FOURTH OF THE TOUR. Played at the Crystal Palace on August 12 and 13. London County won by an innings and 23 runs. The Doctor had got together quite a strong batting team against the Dutchman, who, as usual, lost the toss. The result was that a big score was put up against them. Mr. W . G. Grace, jun , a^d Mr. tf. J. Heygate made a finebeginning, and nearly every man on the side scored well, although the Doctor himself did not get going. The Dutchmen ha 1a little batting before stumps were drawn, and lust three wickets for 89, Mr. Feith, their best batsman, scoring a duck’s egg Mr. Schroder and Mr. Bourchier played excellent cricket. On Tuesday morning Mr. Hifgen and Mr. Rincker gave a very good specimen of determined cricket, and most <*f tbe tail did well. But, as was to be expected, a f«>llow-on was necessary. Again Mr. Hisgen greatly distinguished himself. L ondon C o u n ty . W. G. Grace, jun., b Rincker 96 H. J. Heygate, b Post­ huma ........................75 J. Gilman, c Hisgen, b Rincker ............... 21 R. B Heygate, b Rincker ................. 0 A. G. Richardson, c Groepou,bPosthuma 44 L. Walker, b Coops ... 79 Dr. W . G. Grace, b Rincker .................25 P.G.Gale,b Posthuma 70 J. H. Todd, c Hisgen, b Coops ................. 4 H.L.Malthews,8tSchro- der, b Posthuma ... 30 C. B. Grace, not out... 8 B 17, lb 6 ..........23 T o ta l................475 G entlem en of H o llan d . First innings. Second innings. J. C. Schroder, c Matthews, b Grace, j un...................... E. Bourlier, c Grace, sen., b Gilman............................... 31 c C. Grace, Grace, jun. 9 24 st Matthews, b C. Grace .......... C. Feith, c Walker, b Grace, jun...................................... J.Hisgen, lbw, b Grace, sen. 55 c Gilman, b 0. B. Grace ..........oy J. Rincker. run out ........ 53 candb Grace,jun. 1 C. J. Posthuma, b Walker.. 3 b C. B. Grace ... 1 A. Broese van Groenou, b c C. Grace, b Grace, sen........................23 Grace, jun. ... 1 K. Beukema, b Grace, sen.12 cGale,bGrace,jun. 22 0 candb Grace,jun. 4 A.Kool, c Tod, b Grace, sen. H.Dubois, c Gale, b Gilman 14 W. Coops, not out B 7, lb 6, w 2 . C. Grace, Grace, jun. ... 0 c H. Heygate, b C. Grace.......... 4 not out... ......... 0 B 1,1b 5 ... 6 Total............... 236 Total ..........116 L ondon C o unty . O.M. R. W. Posthuma.. 29*1 2160 4 Rincber ... 39 3 192 4 Coops.........11 1 46 2 G entlem en of H ollan d . First innings. O. M. R. W. Hisgen Feith M. R. W. 1 32 0 0 22 0 Second innings. O. M. R. W. C. B. Grace 11 2 42 0 ... ... 10 i 50 4 224* R. B. Heygate... 4 1 15 0 ... W.G.Grace, jun. 12 2 52 2 ... !!! i6 3 38 6 204 J. Gilman......... 9 0 30 2 ... ... 6 0 22 0 110 Dr. W. G. ©race 12-4 5 44 4 .. 156 L. Walker... 8 3 38 1 ... Walker bowled two wides. SURREY y. ESSEX. Played at the Oval on August 12, 13 and 14. Abandoned. Rain fell at the Oval on Monday morning, and twice during the day it caused interruptions. On the Surrey side Lockwood and Mr. Crawford were not playing, while Essex had to do without Mr. Turner and Mead, lt was soon seen that runs would be very difficult to make, and Mr. Fane and Mr. Perrin speedily fell to Richardson. Carpenter made a useful stand with Mr. McGahey, but half the side were out with the total at 74. The tail did fairly well, but the most noticeable innings was that of McGahe 3 \ who was at the wickets for about two hours for his 46, making no boundary hits but two fives, run out. It was a small total which Surrey had to go in against, but by the end of the day they had not made enough runs for the three wickets which were down to be able to congratulate them­ selves. On Tuesday morning, however, things went much better with them, for starting with 70 for three wickets they increased their score bj' 222 runs. This was chiefly due to the excellent batting of of Hayward. Baker and Holland. The former played with all his old skill and patience for two hours and a quarter for his 75, while Baker, who seemed quite at home, could not be tempted to choose the wrong ball. Holland played a very good innings indeed, putting on 60 runs in three-quarters of an hour with Stedman, the two men playing the most attractive cricketof the day. Mr. Dowson alsomade a very useful score, so that the Essex total was exceeded by 138. As Essex lost a couple of wickets very quickly things looked bad for them, and there seemed more than a fair prospect that they would be defeated by an innings. Mr. Perrin and Mr. McGahey then made a useful stand, and, later, Mr. Lucas was in form, so that when stumps were drawn Essex had scored 94 for four wickets. Mr Perrin was at the wicket for an hour and fifty minutes for his 33. Yesterday. Essex, who still required 44 to save the innings’ defeat, had a few minutes* hatting, when rain came down and there was no more play. E sse x . First innings. Second inniDgs. F. L. Fan*, c Stedman, b Richardson........................ 0 b L e e s ................. 3 Carpenter, c Hayward, b cHayes,bRichard- Dowaon ...................... 25 son ........... 1 P. Perrin, c Stedman, b Richardson........................ 3 b Lees.................. 33 C. McGahey, b Lees ....... 46 c Brockwell, b Jephson.......... 28 A. P. Lucas,b Richardson.. 8 not o u t............... 33 G. Tosetti, run out ... 6 notout.................. 4 C. J. Kortright, c Dowson, b Richardson...................... 16 Reeves, b Lees ................. 6 Russell (T.), not o u t ....... 15 Young,cDowson,b Richard­ son ....................... ... 2 Tremlin, c Stedman, b Lees 17 B 4, w 3, nb 3 ...........10 W 1, nb 1 ... 2 Total ....... 154 Total (4 wkts) 104 S u rrey . Abel, c Tosetti McGahey ........ ... 5 D. L. A. J^phson, lbw, b McGahey ..........27 Hayes, b Young........ 7 Brockwell, c Perrin, b McGahey.................16 Hayward, c Lucas, b McGahey................75 Baker (A.), c Russell, b Young .................46 E ssex . First innings. O, M. R. W. Holland, c Tremlin, b Tosetti .................50 E.M. Dowson, c and b McGahey.................21 Lees,c Perrin,bYoung 1 Stedman, b Reeves ... 29 I ichardson, not out... 0 B 8, lb 5, nb 2... 15 Total .. 292 Richardson Dowson ... Lees.......... Second innings O. M. R. W. ... 17 5 35 1 ... 7 1 19 0 ... 11 3 25 2 12 1 23 1 37 13 79 5 . 19 6 35 1........ 19-2 9 30 8 ... ., Jephson . Richardson delivered three no-balls, Dowson three wide', and Lees one wide and one no-ball S u r r e y . O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W Young ... 44 10 109 3 1Tosetti ... 14 4 28 1 McGahey.. 45 13 93 5 |Reeves ... 8*1 1 22 1 Tremlin... 7 0 25 0 | McGahey and Tosetti each delivered a no-ball. SUSSEX v. LANCASHIRE. Played at Brighton on August 12, 13 and 14. Drawn. There had been a good deal of rain at Brighton in the early part of the morning, on Monday, but before 12 o’elock the sun was shining so brightly that Mr. Maclaren, the Lancashire captain, was con­ vinced that the bowlers would for a time have every­ thing their own way. When, therefore, he won the toss he decided to put Sussex in first. This man­ oeuvre might or might not have been successful if the sun had not decided to retire behind heavy clouds for the rest of the day, or if a very hard chance given by Ranjitsinhji when he had made eight runs, and another by Killick before he had made thirty, had been brought off. The odds are that even if the catches had been taken the Sussex score would have been fairly big. for, although the ball had to be watched carefully, the batsmen seemed to make runs pretty easily. Vine was dismissed for three when the total was twenty-five, and then Mr. Fry and Ranjitsinhji, playing well and easily, brought the score to 64, when the former was caught at the wicket. The next partnership was not brought to a oonclusion until a few minutes before stumps were drawn, Killick playing a sound and very steady game, while Kanjitsinhji juggled with the bowling as the mood seemed to take him ; his placing was admirable. At the end of the day he was not out 200. His partnership with Killick for the third wicket produced 298 runs in less than four hours. When stumps were drawn the total waa 382 for three