Cricket 1901

244 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J u ly 4, 1901. Y O R K S H I R E v. D E R B Y S H I R E . P layed at Glossop on Ju n e 27, 28 and 29. Y o rksh ire won b y 245 runs. Although Derbyshire men can have had very little hopes of tak in g a good fight with Yorkshire, they must have been satisfied with themselves when they succeeded in dismissing their famous opponents for 2>3, only Mr. Taylor and Mr. Mitchell being able to offer any resistance to their bow li' g. But th^se two msn put on a score of 1*27 duriog their partnership in an hour and a-half. By the end o f the day the posi­ tion of the Derbyshire men was not so satisfactory, for seven of their wickets had fallen for 113, and on Friday the inniDgs ended 72 to the bad. W hen Yorkshire went in again they soon obtained the upper hand, and when stumps were drawn had scored 359 for fivewickets, Whitehead being notout 52 and Wain­ wright not out 108, while Brown and Tunnicliffe had also made big scores. Yorkshire were thus leading by 431. On Saturday morning they declared at once, and Derbyshire, losing five wickets for about a hun­ dred, had no further hope of playing out time. Y o b k sh ir e . First innings. Brown, b Bestwick Tunnicliffe, Bestwick W ilmot, b ........................10 Wainwright, b Bestwick .. T.L.Taylor,cWarren,bBest- wick .................................. F.Mitchell,c Wilmot,b Best wick ... ... ........... Hirst, b Bestwick........... Whitehead, run out ... Lord Hawke, b Bestwick Haigh, b H u lm e........... Rhodes, b H ulm e.......... Hunter, not out ......... B 4, lb 2, nb 1 ... Second innings, c Storer, b Best­ w ick......................71 c Needham, b Storer ..............58 not o u t...................108 . 53 c Looker, b Storer 26 b Warren ... b Warren ... n o to u t.......... B 4, lb 5, nb 1, w 1 11 Total ...................213 Total (5 wkts) *359 * Innings declared closed. D er b y sh ir e . First innings. Second inniogs. Bagshaw, b Rhodes ...........27 b Rhodes .............18 Locker, b H a ig h ...................18 b Haigh ............ 27 Storer, c Wainwright, b H a ig h .................. ... 12 b Rhodes ........... 6 Needham, c Tunnicliffe, b H a ig h ................................... 1 c Tunnicliffe, b Rhodes ... ... 25 Chatterton, c Tunnicliffe, b B row n...................................13 c Hunter,b Haigh 1 A . E . Lawton, b Rhodes ...1 5 c Tunnicliffe, b Rhodes ...........17 S. H. W ood, c Tunnicliffe, b Rhodes ...........................15 cHunter,b Brown 25 Wilmot, not o u t ...................10 c Wainwright, b Rhodes ...........19 Warren, b H aigh...................13 b Haigh ............33 Hulme,cTunnicliffe,bHa;gh 6 not o u t .................. 6 Beatwick, run out................... 0 b Haigh ............ 6 B 5, lb 6 ......................11 Byes ......... 3 Total ...................141 Total ..186 Y o bk sh ibe . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. Bestwick........... 28 6 70 7 ............ 24 4 92 1 Hulme ............. 271 6 61 2 ..........*3 3 71 0 W a rren ........... 10 0 45 0 ............ 18 0 79 *2 Storer .......... 4 9 27 0 ............ 14 0 68 2 Lawton ... 11 0 38 0 Bestwick and Storer each delivereda no-ball, and Warren a wide. D e b b y sh ib e . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W . Hirst ........... 11 0 30 0 ............ 10 3 26 0 Rhodes ...........19 13 *4 3 ............ 23 10 60 4 Brown .......... 14 7 21 1 ............ 6 1 26 2 Haigh ............ 22*1 4 55 5 .............. 23 5 3 71 4 G L O U C E S T E R S H IR E v . W A R W I C K ­ S H IR E . F la ye d at B risto l on Jun e 27, 28, and 29. G loucestershire w on b y nine w ickets. For nearly the whole of the first day Warwickshire were at the wickets for 299 runs, no great scores being made, but several men playing very good cricket. Gloucestershire had lost a wicket for 55 when stumps were drawn, Mr. H. W . Rice being not out 11 and Mr. Townsend not out 15. On Friday the Gloucester­ shire men all played exceedingly well, most of them making very useful scores, but the chief feature of the day’s cricket was the Bplendid innings of Mr. Jessop, who, while he was not quite as aggressive as he sometimes is. made his ru^s rapidly and in good style. He was forty minutes in puttiog together his first 50, and was altogether at the wickets for an hour and twenty-five minutes for his 106, which included a six (into the football ground), a five, and thirteen 4’s. Gloucestershire had a lead of 158 runs. At the close of play Warwickshire had knocked off 38 of these without loss, so that they began Saturday’s cricket with a balance against them of 120 with all their wickets in hand. Things did not go well with them and they lost five wickets for about a hundred. W abwickshirb . First innings. Second innings. Devey. b R oberts................. 5 run out ... 24 Kinneir. c Board, b Hu.>gins 53 c and b Paish ...3 0 J. F. Byrne, b Roberts ... 21 b H uggins...........14 Quaife (W . G .), b Huggins 50 c Board, b Hug­ gins ...................22 T. S. Fishwick, c Board, b Huggins ........... ......... 29 lbw, b Paish ... 5 Lilley,cTownsend.bBrown 53 notout...................44 Charlesworth, c Brown, b Roberts ........................... 6 c and b Paish ... 1 A . C. S. Glover, c Rice, b Roberts ...........................17 b Paish ............. 3 Santall, not out ...................36 b H uggins............. 10 Hargreave, c Board, b Hug­ gins ........... ... ........... l c Brown, b Paish. 16 Field, c Fowler, b Brown ... 13 c Fowler, b Paish 3 B 10, nb 3 ... 13 B 8, w 2,nb 4... 14 T ota l.................299 Total ............186 G loucrstebshibe . Wrathall, st Lilley, b Hargreave .......... 27 R. W . Rice, b Santall 25 C. L. Townsend, b Santall ......................19 Langdon, b Field ...38 G. L. Jessop, c Har­ greave, b Santall ...106 W . S. A. Brown, run out ..............................49 Board,c Lilley, b Har­ greave ...................44 T. Fowler, b Lilley ... 45 Huggins, c Santall, b Hargreave ...........57 Paish, not out ...........17 Roberts, run out ...1 6 B 8, lb 2, nb 4 ... 14 Total ... ...457 Second innings: C. L. Townsend, not out, 23, Roberts, b Field, 3; W. S. A. Brown, not out, 5; Total (1 wkt), 31. WARWICK8HIBK. First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. Roberts ... 28 6 83 4 ........... ’ 3 9 28 0 P a ish ........... ... 23 8 63 0 ........... 32*3 12 79 6 Huggins ... ... 30 7 84 4 ........... 27 15 50 3 Brown ... 18 7 53 2 ........... a 1 10 0 Jessop......... ... 4 2 3 0 ........... 1 1 0 0 Townsend 5 2 5 0 Roberts delivered six no-balls, Paish one no-ball and G lou cestebsh ibe . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. F ield ...............i9 3 113 1 ............ 2*2 0 14 1 Hargreave ... 85 6 1103 ............ 3 0 17 0 Santall ......... 28*3 4 82 3 ............ Quaife ......... 14 0 73 0 ............ Charlesworth ... 5 0 33 0 ............ Kinneir ......... 6 0 ?0 0 ............ Lilley................. 3 0 12 1 ............ Field delivered four no-balls. E S S E X v . S U R R E Y . P la y e d at L eyton on June 28, 29, and 30. D raw n . W hen stumps were drawn on Thursday evening Essex seemed to have very much the best o f this m atch; on Friday evening they looked quite out of the running. 8urrey went in first and lost Holland off the first ball of the match, Abel and Hayes then giving a splendid display of batting which produced 92 runs in fifty-five minutes, both men making fine hits and playing all the bowling with ease. Buc after this good beginning the bowling suddenly seemed to become difficult and no one, not even Hayward, appeared at all happy in dealing with it. Hayward played an entirely defensive game, and it was not until Richardson came in that he attempted to force the game. Essex began even worse than Surrey, for in the first over Mr. Ow^n was bowled by Lockwood, and with the total at 8 the same bowler dismissed Mr. Perrin. But a fine stand was then made by Mr. McGahey and Carpenter, who at the close of the day had been together for an hour and a half, during which they had added 93 runs. On Friday morning the two men continued to play well, but after their partnership was broken Lockwood and Richardson brought the inniogs to a conclusion very much sooner than could possioly have been anticipated. Mr. Kortright alone could do anything with them. Surrey had a lead of 32 after all, and at the close of the day were 3 5 runs to the good. This was chiefly due to a splendid stand by Holland and Hayward for the third wicket after Holland and Hayes had broken the back o f the bowling by making 83 for the second wicket. Holland was in magnificent form and scored 101 out of 175 in two hours and twenty minutes; his innings included a five and fourteen 4’s. At the close of the day Hayward was still not out with 85 to his credit, the total being 283 for four wickets. This was increased by nearly a hundred on Saturday morning before the innings was declared c’osed when eight wickets were down. Essex had to make 403 to win with no reasonable chance of getting so many runs in the time at their disposal. They played steadily for a draw and easily accomplished their object. S ubbky . First innings. Second innings. Abel, c Russell, b Young ... 71 c Carpenter, b Kjrtright ... 12 Holland, c Russell, b Kort­ right ... ......................... 0 cGarrett.bMead 129 Hayes, b Y o u n g ...............53 c Kortright, b Young ...........36 V. F. 8. Crawford, c Lucas, b Young .......................15 b Mead .........10 Hayward, not out .......56 b K ortright.......8> L ckwood, c Lucas, b McGahey ......................... 9 notout.................41 L. Walker, b Y o u n g ......... 5 cJIcGahey,bMead 18 H. D. G. Leveson-Gower, b Y ou n g................................ 0 c McGahey, b Kortright ... 14 Lees, b McGahey................. 5 c Reeves, b Mead 10 Stedman, b M cGahey........ 0 notout................... 5 Richardson, b Young......... 1 B 8, lb 2 ... .,. 10 B 4, lb 6 ... 10 T otal................. 225 Total (8 wkts) *370 *Innings declared closed. E ssex . First innings. H. G. Owen, b Lockwood... 4 Carpenter, b Lockwood ... 72 P. Perrin, b Lockwood 1 C. McGahey, c Crawford, b L ockw ood........................47 W . T. Garrett, b Lockwood 5 A . P. Lucas, c Hayward, b Richardson......................... 8 C. J. Kortright. c Leveson- Gower. b Richardson ... 32 Reeves, b Richardson.......... 0 Russell, b L ockw ood......... 6 Mead, b Richardson .......... 7 Young, not out .................. 1 B 4, lb 2, w 1, nb 3 ... 10 Second innings, b Richardson ... 26 b Lockwood ... 0 cL“es,bLockwood 44 not o u t..................62 cHayward, b Lees 0 b Lees ... not o u t.. 44 4 B 12,1b 1,w l,n b 3 17 T otal. ...193 Total (5 wkts) 197 S u r b b y . First innings. O. M. R. W . Kortright........... 4 0 29 1 ... M e a d ................... 6 1 30 0 ... Young ........... 32 5 84 6 ... M cG ah ey........... 35 12 66 3 ... tieeves ........... 6 3 6 0 ... Second innings. O. M. R. W . 17 2 62 3 7 83 4 3 96 1 6 57 0 2 62 0 ... 29 ... 28 ... 20 ... 18 E sse x . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W . O. M . R. W. Lockwood ... 28 5 79 6 .................................... 18 5 32 2 Richardson ... 22*5 6 64 4 .................................... 82 14 53 L e e s................... 10 1 30 0 ......... 26 11 50 2 Hayes ........... 4 3 4 0 ............ 4 1 6 0 A b e l................... 1 0 6 0 ............ 3 2 4 0 Ste^man . . 3 0 14 0 Walker ... 5 0 15 0 Hayward.. 4 2 5 0 Crawford.. 2 1 1 0 Lockwood delivered a wide and four no-balls, Lees one wide and one no-ball, and Richardson one no­ ball. M .C .C . A N D G R O U N D v. C A M B R ID G E U N I V E R S I T Y . P layed at Lord ’ s on June 27, 28 and 29. M .C .C . won b y seven w ickets. W ith a view to giving a trial to some of the men who might be worth including in the team, Mr. Day somewhat altered his team. Against fairly strong bowling Cambridge did moderately well on Thursday, •r'i_^owson an<^ ^ r*-E\R* Wilson playing the best cricket. As they got rid of L)r. Grace and King before stumps were drawn with the M.C.C. total at 59, their position on Friday morning was by no means unsatisfactory. But the extreme weakness of their bowling was well seen before the day was over, and two men, Mr. Weigall and Mr. Fane, neither of whom has a regular place in his county team, made it appear inferior to that of many club elevens. The two men in partnership put on 273 runs in two hours and three-quarters, Mr. Fane only missing his second hundred by five runs; he was batting for four hours and ten minutes. After this Mr. Dowson bowled finely, and the remaining six wickets fell for an addi­ tion of 71 runs. W ith a balance against them of 162 runs Cambridge lost four wickets before stumps were drawn, and were still 11 runs behind. But on Satur-