Cricket 1901

172 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. M ay 30, 1901. MIDDLESEX v. SOMERSET, w. g u n n ’ s b e n e f it . Played at Lord’s on May 27, 28, and 29. Middlesex won by 258 runs. There was the usual large Bank Holiday crowd at Lord’s on Monday, and as the cricket was verv interesting it went home well satisfied with itself. The batting of the Middlesex men was consistently good without being at all remarkable. At lunch time three wickets were down for 103, and things went very well until five wickets had fallen, when there was a collapse, which, by some vigorous play by J T. Hearne and Mr. Williams, was prevented from becoming serious. Perhaps the most attractive cricket of the day was shown by Mr. Bosanquet, but he had hardly time to get into his stride. At the end of the day Homereet had made 76 for three wickets, Kraund being not out 30. There w*s some good batting by Braund, Mr. Daniell, and Mr Woodson Tuesday morning, but the total fell shoit of that of Middlesex by 63. The Middlesex second innings was remarkable for the splendid innings of Mr. Warner and fine cricket by Mr. Beldam and Mr. Schwarz. It was a great pity that no one could stay quite long enough with Mr. Warner to ena’ le him to complete his second hundred; he was batting for four hours and a half. But for missed catches, the Middlesex score would have been much smaller Somersetshire did not have a look in when the fourth innings of the match came, and although Mr. Woods andMr. Lionel Palairet did their best for their side, the result was inevitable. M id d le se x . First innings. P. F. Warner, b G ill.........28 H. B. Hayman, st Newton, b Braund ......................21 G. W. Beldam, st Newton, b Braund ...................... 48 L.J. Moon, c Newtou, b Gill 11 B.J.T. Bosanquet, c Woods, b Cranfieid...................... 47 Trott (A. E.), c Daniell, b Cranfieid ......... ... 18 G. MacGregor, st Newton, b Braund ..................... 5 R. O. Schwarz, not out ... 26 Rawlin, c R. Palairet, b Cranfieid ...................... 1 Hearne (J.T.),c R.Palairet, b Cranfieid..........................26 W. Williams, b Gill ... ... 15 B 9, lb 3 .............12 Total................. 268 S omerset . First innings. L. C. H. Palairet, c Trott, b Heame.............................. 8 Lewis,c MacGregor, b Raw­ lin ....................................... 16 R. C. N. Palairet, lbw, b Trott .............................12 Braund, c MacGregor, b Hearne...............................46 J. Daniell, st MacGregor, b Trott ................................ 26 Robson, b Hearne ............ 15 S. M. J. Woods, b Trott ... 37 Gill, b Hearne ................. 4 A. E. Newton, c Williams, b Trott.............................. 0 G. Fowler, b Troit .............11 Cranfieid, not out................. 6 Second innings, not out................ 197 c R. Palairet, b Braund ......... 1 c Newton, b Rob­ son ............... 52 lbw, b Braund ... 0 c Newton, b Gill. 31 c Newton, b Gill. 12 b G ill................ 1 c L. Palairet, b Cranfleld........ 74 cNewton, b Cran­ fieid ................ 4 cNewton, b Cran­ fieid ............... 13 b Robson ......... 2 Extras...........13 Total ......... 400 Second innings. lbw, b Trott ... 55 c Trott, b Rawlin 13 c MacGregor, b Hearne ......... 5 c Moon, b Rawlin 6 run out ......... 7 c Bosanquet, b Trott................ 7 b Bosanquet ... 83 b Trott................ 2 c Trott, b Rawlin 0 notout................16 c Hearne, b Wil­ liams ......... 4 B 9, lb 5 .........14 B 4, lb 3 ... 7 Total.............. 195 Total .........205 M id d le sex . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M . R. W. Cranfieid........ 27 10 61 4 ... ... 24 3 90 3 Braund ... ... 37 5 118 3 ... ... 18 1 68 2 Gill ... ......... 25*2 9 t>7 3 ... ... 31 7 1»3 3 L. Palairet 2 0 20 0 Lewis ... 8 2 2 1 0 Robson ... 17 5 51 2 Fowler ... 2 0 16 0 S om erset . First innings. Second ionings. O. M. R. W. O. M. lv. W. Hearne ......... 39 21 60 4 ... ... 13 2 49 1 Trott ......... 31-2 8 93 5 ... ... 14 1 5* 3 Rawlin ......... 9 3 28 1 ... ... lb 5 44 3 Williams ... 65 0 29 1 Boianquet ... 6 1 24 1 WORCESTERSHIRE v. WARW ICK ­ SHIRE. Played at Worcester on May 27, 28 and 29. Warwickshire won by six wickets. A big innings by W. G. Quaife, good all round batting by most of the rest of the Warwickshire team and good bowling by Hargreaves placed Warwickshire in an enviable position at the close of play on Monday. The Worcestershire men could do little on Tuesday against the bowling of Hargreaves and Santall, even the two Fosters failing. Worcester­ shire had to follow on, and did much better, Mr. R. E. Foster playing uncommonly well, but their failure in the first inoings was too great. W a r w ic k sh ir e . First iuniDgs. Second innings Devey.cBurrows,bBannister 18 lbw, b Burrows ^11 Kinntir, b Pearson .........27 c R.Foster,b Ban- F.J.Byme, c R. E. Foster, b Pearson ......................4 1 wick . Bannister, Burrows ... W. G. Quaife, c Straw, b Burrows ......................83 b Burrows ... Lilley, c H.K.Foster, b Ban­ nister ........ .................15 not out T. S. Fishwick, b Burrows 21 not out A.C.S.Glover,c &b Burrows 13 Santall, c Bird, b Burrows 9 Charlesworth, not out 22 Hargreave,cBurrows,b Bird 1 Field, b Bird...................... 0 B 6 , lb 4 ................10 Extras ... 12 Total . 261 Total ...105 W ORCESTERSHIRE. First innings. W. H. Wilkie, c and b Har- greave ............................ 4 Pearson, b Hurgreave........ 5 Arnold, lbw, b Hargreave... 2 R.E.Foster,cSantall, b Field 18 Bird, b Hargreave ......... 6 H. K. Foster, lbw, b Har­ greave ............................. 0 G. Simpson-Hayward, b Hargreave...................... 4 E. P. Jobson, c Kinneir, b Santall............................ 20 Straw, b Santall.............. 9 Burrows, c Einneir, b Har­ greave .............................14 Bannister, not out B 2, w 1 , Second innings. lbw, b Hargreave 33 c Lilley, b Santall 23 oLilley, b Santall 33 c Santall, b Field 68 b Hargreave ... 0 b Hargreave .. 24 c Lilley, b Santall 11 b Field.............. 13 cFishwick,bField 28 st Lilley, b Har­ greave .........19 not out............... 1 B 4, lb 11.........15 Total.........93 W a r w ic k sh ir e . Total ...271 First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. Burrows ... ... 25 1 93 4 ... . .14 0 63 3 Bannister... ... 35 20 40 2 ... . . 9 3 16 1 Bird ......... ... 14-4 6 43 2 ... . Pearson ... ... 18 2 75 2 ... . ’. 5 1 1C 0 Jobson ... . . 1 0 8 0 Hayward W orcestersh ire . 03 0 0 0 First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. Hargreave ..25 7 50 7 ... . . 26 2 6 67 4 Santall ... .. 14-4 9 J 6 2 ... . .26 5 69 3 Field ... .. 10 0 24 1 ... . . 23 2 94 3 Q,uaife ... . . 5 0 24 0 Kinneir ... . . 4 2 2 0 HAMPSHIRE v. DERBYSHIRE. Played at Southampton on May 27, 28 and 29. Hampshire won by two wickets. The difference which the presence of Mr. S. H. Evershed makes to the Derbyshire team was plainly seen in this match on Monday, for he played a brilliant hard hitting innings of 123. Unfortunately for his s:de, Storer, who is usually its mainstay, was not in luck’s way, and of the rest of the team only Mr. Wright and Chatterton, who generally make a good score, could do anything with the bowling. Captain Greig, at the [end of the innings, met with very great success. Hampshire began well indeed, Webb and Barton putting on 100 in an hour for the first wicket. The latter was not out when stumps were d awn with the total at 140 for one wicket. On Tuesday things did not go quite so well for Hampshire. Barton only increased his score by 10, and Mr. Hill was caught at the wicket for a single. But Mr. Sprot was in fine form and prevented a collapse; and as the tail played up well the total exceeded that of Derbyshire by 59. In their second innings Derbyshire did none too well, the only man who showed up prominently being Chatterton. At the end of the day Hampshire had, without loss, knocked off 28 of the runs required to win, and thus with all their wickets in hand only had to make 119 to win yesterday. Llewellyn, Webb, Barton and Mr, Hill did well, but there was a scare before the runs were knocked off. D er b ysh ir e , First innings. L. G. Wright, lbw, b Greig 41 ~ H.Evershed,candb Greigl23 Bagshaw, c Robson, b Greig 0 Storer, b H ill..................... 6 Chatterton, not out .........33 A. E. Lawton, c Robson, b Greig .............................16 E.M.Ashcroft, cand b Greig 1 J. R. Gregory, cSprot, b Hill 6 Hulme, b Greig ................ 4 Young, lbw, b Llewellyn 6 Bestwick, c Steele, b Llewel­ lyn................................... 6 B 9, lb 3, nb 2 ........ 14 Total .............. 256 H am psh ire . First innings. Webb, c Chatterton, b Best­ wick ............................ 61 Barton, st Storer, b Bag­ shaw .............................73 Second innings b Llewellyn ... 18 b Sprot ......... 9 c Palmer, b Greig 15 b Sprot ......... 4 cGreig, b Llewel­ lyn ................73 cHill.b Llewellyn 17 st Robson, b Llewellyn ... 22 b Llewellyn ... 16 c Sprot, b Greig .. 5 c and b Greig ... 16 notout............... 0 B 4, lb 5, w 1 10 Total ...205 Baldwin, c Chatterton, b BeBtwick ......................26 notout... A. J. L. Hill, c Storer, b Bestwick ...................... 1 Second innings. c Chatterton, b Bestwick.........26 c Wright, b Best­ wick................27 c Chatterton, b Bestwick.........30 c Chatterton, b B«stwick......... 1 cHulme, b Young 42 b Bestwick......... 0 E. M. Sprot, run o u t............ 92 Llewellyn, b Young ............ 29 Capt. Greig, b Youne.......... 1 Capt. Palmer, c Evershed,b Bagshaw ....................... 5 b Bestwick... H. M. Greenhill, c Lawton, b Bagshaw ................. 4 b Young ... C. Robson, st Storer, b Bag­ shaw ... . . . 8 D. L. A. Steele, not out ... 3 Extras ............ 12 Total.................315 D e r b y s h ir e . First inoings. notout................ 12 Extras......... 1 Total .........147 Llewellyn Barton ... Baldwin... Greenhill Sprot H ill......... Greig O. M. R. W. 23*5 6 74 2 ... 5 16 0 ... 1 20 0 ... 0 22 0 ... 1 20 0 ... 11 7 5 6 . 16 16 Second innings. O. M. R. W. ... 26 5 6 76 5 13 2 28 43 2 8 0 Greenhill delivered two no-balls and Llewellyn a wide. H a m psh ir e . O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Bestwick ... 27 7 98 3 IYoung ... 17 7 41 2 Hulme ... 9 2 44 0 Storer ... 11 0 45 0 Bagshaw .. 23‘2 4 75 4 | Bagshaw delivered a wide. SURREY v. NOTTS. Played at Trent Bridge on May 27, 28 and 29. Notts won by five wickets. The players in this match found that there had been enough rain to aff&ct the pitch considerably for some time, and at no period during Whit Monday was it at all easy to make runs. For ouce, Abel failed, but Brockwell and Hayes made a very useful stand, making runs at a fair pace, and Lockwood steadily kept up his end. So far there was nothing very unpromising about the Surrey innings, for with only two men out the score had reached a hundred. But then Hayes waa dismissed, and Hayward, the reliable, let a straight ball hit his leg, while the cap­ tain failed, and things began to Io o k veiv bad. Lockwood and Mr. Leveson-Gower kept together for some time, but when they were parted there was another collapse, and the innings was over for 182, the last five wickets having fallen for 60 runs in an hour. Notts tegan well enough. Mr. Jones played the most brilliant cricket, while Shrewsbury held on to his end with his usual care for about an hour, and although in that time he only fcored 13, the moral effect of his innings was great. Mr. Goodacre helped Mr. Jones, but at the end of the day there was a breakdown, and when stumps were drawn the total was 148 for seven wickets, so that it did not seem that either side had gained any advantage. Mr. Jones’ fine innings of 75 was quite invaluable to his side. On Tuesday morning Dench and Carlin did exceedingly well, and thanks to them and a useful innings by Hallam, the Surrey total was headed by