Cricket 1901

CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. M ay 2, 1901. SURREY X II. v. NEXT XV II. Played at the Oval on April 30 and May 1. Drawn. The appearance of Strudwick on the side of the Twelve does not indicate that he was played in preference to Stedman; the honour was due to the fact that he arrived late on the scene, Stedman hav­ ing meanwhile taken his place at the wicket. It was not anticipated that there was any dark horse among the bowlers in the Seventeen; nor did any bowler make a decided mark, although Stacey, who is qualified by residence, showed some promise. There was nothing very remarkable in the batting of the Twelve, but Hayward was in great form. Baker, Mr. L. Walker and Gooder played the Surrey bow ling with some confidence, but the Twelve had a con­ siderable lead on the first innings. In the second innings the bowlers soon began to get the upper hand, and wickets fell fast. Hayward was reserved until late, and made a much needed stand, which probably saved his side from defeat, for although the Seventeen began their second innings most dis­ astrously, such a fine stand was made by Goatley and Thompson that their side was well on the way to victory when stumps were drawn. S u rrey . First innings. A t el, c and b Nice ... ...2 1 Brockwell, c Stedman, b Gooder..................................27 Hayes, b D o lb e y ..................14 Lockwood.cColman, b Nice 29 Hayward, run out ...........89 K. E. M. Barker, c Gooder, b Stacey .......................... 8 V. F. 8. Crawford, b Stacey 2 Lees, b Stacey ................... 5 D. L. A. Jephson,b Smith .. 31 Clode, c Nice, b Archer ... 20 Richardson cGooder,bSmith 4 Strudwick, not out ........... 3 Byes .......................... 20 Second innings, c Kersley, b Nice 18 b Stacey ........... 2 b Montgomery ... 7 c Gooder,b Stacey 6 c Montgomery, b Smith ... ... 27 cA.Baker,bStacey 2 b Smith ...........13 0 7 7 0 0 6 Total ...273 b Smith b Dolbey ........... not o u t................. b Dolbey ........... c Walker,b Smith B 4, lb 2 ........... Total ........... N e x t X Y I I . First innings. Second innings. Goatley, st Strudwick, b Clode ... .. ... ........... 4 Holland, b Richardson Baker, A,, b Lockwood not out........... ...1 1 lbw ,bLees... ... 37 c Strudwick, L ees........... Penfold, c and b Brockwell 19 runout Mr. L . Walker, b Brockwell 20 Gooder, c Abel, b Clode ... 27 b Jephson . Montgomery, b Brockwell .. 0 b Jephson... Thomp on, b Brockwell ... 0 notout.......... Baker (W . J.), run out ... 5 Kersley, b C lo d e ................... 0 Nice, b Clode.......................... 0 Smith, W . C.t c Lockwood, b Richardson ................... 0 Mr.8. Colman, b Richardson 5 Stedman, not out...................25 Mr. H. O. Doltey, b Clode 0 Stacey, b Lees .................. 6 Archer, b Lees ................... 0 B 5, lb 1, w 1 ........... 7 Byes ... Total ...166 Total (5 wkts) 112 S u r rey . First innings. Second innings. O. M. E. W . O. M. R. W . Fmith ... .......... 13 1 37 2 .. ... 11-5 1 32 4 Gooder 12 3 40 1 .. Baker (W . J.) .. 5 2 8 0 .. Dolbey................. 11 6 21 1 .. . . . 2 1 5 2 Montgomery 18 4 54 0 .. ... 11 3 17 1 Nice ................. 12 4 34 2 .. ... 12 7 19 1 Stacey ................. 11 4 £6 3 .. ... 13 6 16 3 Kersley ......... 4 1 17 0 .. Walker ......... 5 3 8 0 .. Archer................. 1-4 0 8 1 .. Clode ... Richardson I.ees Parker ... Brockwell Lockwood Jephson .. N ext XV II. First innings. O. M. R. W . 28 8 53 5 ... 20 9 36 3 ... Second innings. O. M. R. W. 2 ... ... 10 5 22 ... 4 1 15 0 ............ ... 12 8 12 4 ........... ... 116 21 1 ......... ... 11 0 0 ............ Hayward Abel Clode bowled a wide. 13 9 24 2 GOLDSMITHS’ INSTITUTE v. OLD CHARLTON. Played at Charlton Park on April 27. O ld C harlton . W . Murrell, not out 18 B 8, lb 1 ........... 9 Total (3 wkts) *240 G. Osmond, c Henty, b M urrell.................. 26 S. Steam, c Winde- bank. b Baldwin ...100 H . Gradidge,b Murrell 87 J. Hale, B. Raynor, G. Gilbert, A . Boxall, Hill, Freeman, and W . Draper did not bat. * Innings declared closed. G oldsmiths * I nstitute . H. Holmes, b Raynor 1 H. Mayo, c Gilbert, b Stearn .................. 27 A. Mouncher, b Ray­ nor .......................... 0 W.Falkner,b Gradidge 19 R.R. Henty, b Murrell 83 S. R. Best, c Osmond, b Gradidge ........... 2 R. Windebank.c Ray­ nor, b Gradidge ... 9 W .H .Joanes,bMurrell 7 W .S. Murrell, not out 6 A. Baldwin, b Murrell 2 W. F. Dray, not out.. 0 B 14, lb 6, w 2, nb 1 23 Total (9 wkts) ...179 GOLDSMITHS’ “ A ” v. OLD CHARLTON (2).— Played at New Cross on April 27. G oldsmiths ’ “ A .” E. C. Rowe, c Ryan, b Heaton .................. 1 J. C. Green, b Ryan ... 41 C. E. Sykes, b Heaton 0 J. Gillingham, b Cooke 9 E J. Lander, c Heaton, b Dawes .......... ... 0 A . 8. Medway, b Kirk 16 E.B. Tolley, c Lander, b H eaton .................. 6 A. A. Knapton, not out .................. J. A . T. Good, c Pen- stone, b Masters ... R. L. Whifestone, b Heaton ................... B10, lb 4 .. .. Total (9 wkts) .. 107 Frown, b £ykes . Kirk, b Sykes .......... Penstone, b Sykes ... Ryan,run out ......... Lamt erf, c Medway, b Sykes .......................... Heaton, c Knapton, b Sykes.......................... O ld C harlton (2). Dawes, b Lander Cooke, c suh., b Sykes Bradley, not out Masters, absent......... B 6, lb 2........... T o ta l.................. LONDON COUNTY v. BELGRAVE. Played at Wormwood Scruhbs on April 29. This match was played to commemorate the formal opening of the season of the recent combination of the Belgrave and Kensington cricket clubs. Each side was exceedingly strong in batting and pretty weak in bowling, so that it was not remarkable that some good scores were made. V . P. S. Crawford played a remarkable innings, being the only man on his side, except the Surrey captain, who could make any stand against P. B. Smith and S. M. T in dall; he went in first and was out last. The innings of London County was chiefly remarkable for the fine form shown by F. Mitchell, but W . G., ju n ., W .L.Murdoch, S.M .Tindall, and P. G. Gale each gave an excellent exhibition. Be LORAVE. Sir Cecil M ood ,b Smith 0 G R. Osmond, b Smith 1 V. F. 8. Crawford, c Mitchell, b Tindall 80 J. Pattison, lbw, b Smith.......................... 6 D . L. A . Jephson, b Smith..........................16 H. F. Lett, b Smith ... 8 E. Cox, run o u t........... 0 E. Harvey, b Tindall 2 W . Taylor Ruscel>, b Tindall .................. 0 E. H. Johnson, c Bel­ dam, b Tindall ... 4 A . E. Waller, lbw, b Smith ................... 0 Barker (W ), not out 17 B 13, lb 1 ...........14 Total ...148 W . G. Grace, jun., c Johnson, b Lott ... 23 F. Mitchell, b Craw­ ford ... ...........72 W . L. Murdoch, c Os­ mond, b Crawford... 28 G. W . Beldam, c Jeph­ son, b Crawford L ondon C o u n ty . P. G. Gale, not out ... 32 S. M. Tindall, lbw, b Barker ...................20 W . F. Frith, b Barker 0 N. F. Damian, b Lott 0 B 1, lb 1, w 2, nb 3 7 Total (7 wkts) ...190 Dr. W . G. Grace, C. B. Grace, B. Westmacott and Smith (F. E.) did not bat. LONDON COUNTY v. AN E RLE Y.—Played at the Crystal Palace on April 25. During the winter the whole of the turf has been relaid and several improvements have been made in the surroundings, and a greater portion of the seats are free to visitors. Dr. Grace took nine wickets for 52 runs. L ondon C o unty . W . L. Murdoch, b L. Walker ...................17 B. Thomas, b Wardle 12 P. G. Gale, b Pullen 31 N. A. Damian, b E. Walker ...................40 W . G. Grace, jun., b E. Walker ................... 6 R. H . Powell, c sub., b E. Walker ... 9 Dr. W . G. Grace, b E. Walker ...................28 A n erley . B. Westmacott, b E. Walker ................... 6 F.C. Mann, c and b E. Walker ...................10 L.G. S. Reynolds,c L., b E . W a lk e r........... 9 H. C. Stapleton, lbw, b E. Walker ........... 2 L. C. Cowell, not out 2 Extras ...........29 Total , ...201 L. Walker, b Dr. Grace 61 R. Dillon, c Damian, b Dr. G race................... 3 C. Pullen, b Damian... 1 W . Riley, b Dr. Grace 13 J. D. Gillespie, lbw, b Dr. G race.................. 1 E. Walker, b Thomas 6 F. P. Hodes, not out... 5 P. Wardle, c Colville, b Dr. G race................... 2 G.Oldman, c Murdoch b Dr. Grace ........... 1 P.H.Jennings,cWest- macott, b Dr. Grace 0 C.Genward,bDr,Grace 10 W.Murch, c Murdoch, b Dr. Grace ........... 0 Extras...................10 Total ...113 CRUSADERS v. JESUS COLLEGE—Played on Jesus Close on April 24. K. S. Ranjitsinhji and other well-known cricketers played. C rusaders . C. H. M. Ebden, st Marsh, b Bashford... 85 E. M. Dowson, c Roberts, b Smith ... 22 P. R. Johnson, st Marsh, b Sagar ... 37 K. S. Ranjitsinhji, c and b Roberts...........19 _____ ______ f A E. Hind, E. R. Wilson, and C. E. Winter did not bat. *Innings declared closed. J esus C ollege . W .E . P. Robertson, st Marsh, b Bashford 7 E. B .Noel, b Bashford 6 R. T. Goodsell, not out 25 H. W illey, not out ... 23 B 3, lb 2 ........... 6 *Total (6 wkts) 229 J. W . Marsh, c Winter, b Johnson.................. 28 J. F. Morris, c Hind, b Dowson .................. 41 W . H. Sell, b Johnson 0 M. R. A. Muir Macken­ zie, b D ow son........... 0 A . M. Bashford, Dowson ........... H. B. S. Banning, Wilson ........... J. Gilman, not out B 12, lb 1 ... 12 6 13 Total (6 wkts) 108 A. J. L. Roberts, A. Duchesne, J. W . Sa^ar "and A. F. Smith did not bat. ’ LONDON AND COUNTY BANK. MAY. Beckenham, v. Union Bank* Beckenham, v. London Joint Stock Bank* Townley Park, v. London & South Western Bank* Beckenham, v. National Provincial Bank* JUNE. Norbury, v. London and Westminster Bank* Home, v. London and South Western Bank* Home, v. National Provincial Bank* Sutton, v. Sutton Catford, v. Lloyds Bankt JU LY . Catford, v. Lloyds Bankt Green Lane, v. Old Olavians Home, v. London and Westminster Bank* Home. v. London Joint Stock Bank* Dulwich, v. Yokohama Specie Bank Home, v. Union Bank* AUGUST. Dulwich, v. Dulwich Home, v. Old Olavians * Three-day matches. t Two-day matches. Artists in Water Color and Oil Artists in Crayon and Miniature Painters. PHOTOGRAPHERS ROYAL. E. H AW K IN S & COMPANY, 32 & 33, Preston St., Brighton (Under entirely New Management), Still hold their reputation as Cricket Specialists, and with their increased staff of first-class assistants, clients may rely on every attention, while their esteemed orders will be executed in the shortest possible time.