Cricket 1900

7 0 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. A p r il 1 9 , 1 9 0 0 . 11. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Worcestershire 11. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Warwickshire 11. Cambridge, Cambridge University v. Sussex 11. Crystal Palace, London County v. West Indians 11. Basingstoke, Hants (2nd X I.) v. Essex (2nd X I.) 13 Marlborough, Marlborough College v. Chelten­ ham College 14. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Gloucestershire 14. Leyton, Essex v. Yorkshire 14. Manchester, Lancashire v. Surrey 14. Oxford, Oxford University v. Somerset 14. Brighton, Sussex v. Notts 14. Worcester, Worcestershire v. W est Indians 14. Derby, Derbyshire v. London County 14. Stoke, Staffordshire v. Warwickshire 14. Bedford, Oxfordshire v. M C.C. and Ground 15. Cardiff, Glamorgan v. Northamptonshire 15. Tonbridge, Tonbridge echool v. Llifton College 15. Uppingham, Uppingham School v. Malvern Coll. 18. Lord’f, M.C.C. and Ground v. Derbyshire 18. Tonbridge, Kent v. Sussex (Tonbridge Week) 18. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Lancashire 18. Sheffield, Yorkshire v. 8urrey j 8. Crystal Palace, London County v. Cambridge University 18. Oxford, Oxford University v. Worcestershire 18. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. West Indians 18. Oval, Surrey (2nd X I.) v. Northamptonshire 19. Cheveley Park, Cambridgeshire Colts’ Match 20. Eton, Eton College v. M.C.C. and tiround 21. Tonbridge, Kent v. Middlesex (Tonbridge W eek) 21. Taunton, Somerset v. Lancashire 21, Eastbourne, Sussex v. Essex 21. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Leicestershire 21. Glossop, Derbyshire v. Warwickshire 21. Oval, hurrey v. Cambridge University 21. Hull, Yorkshire, v. Hampshire 21. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. West Indians 21. Bedford, Bedfordshire v. Staffordshire 21. St. Albans, Heitfordshire v. M.C.C. and Ground 22. Northampton, Northamptonshire v. Northumber­ land 23 Harrow, The School v. M.C.C. and Ground 25. Derby, Derbyshire v. Yorkshire 25. Brighton, Sussex v. Cambridge University 25. Oval. Surrey v. Oxford University 25. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Middlesex 25. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Gloucestershire 25. Nottingham, Notts v. Lancashire 25. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. London County 25. Leyton, Essex (2nd X I.) v. Middlesex (2nd X I ) 25. Dunstable, Bedfordshire v. Hertfordshire 25. Wolverhampton,Staffordshire v. Northumberland 26. Winchester, Winchester College v. M.C.C. and G. 27. Norwich, Norfolk v. Northumberland 27. Repton, Bepton School v. Uppingham School 28 Leyton. Esesx v. Derbyshire 28 . Manchester, Lancashire v. Middlesex 28. Portsmouth, Hampshire v. Warwickshire 28. Blaekheath, Kent v. Notts 28. Worcester, Worcestershiie v. Surrey 28. Dewsbury, Yorkshire v. Somerset 28. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Cambridge Univ. 28. Bright >n, 8ussex v. Oxford University 28 Bristol, Gloucestershire v. West Indians 29. Oval, Surrey (2nd X I.) v. Glamorgan i9. l ambridge, Cambridgeshire v. Northumberland 29. Trowbridge, Wiltshire v. M.C.C. and Ground 29. Godalming, Charterhouse v. Westminster 29. Winchester, Winchester v. Eton JU LY. 2. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Surrey 2 Liverpool, Lancashire v. Somerset 2. Nottingham, Notts, v. Sussex 2. Southampton, Hampshire v. Essex 2 . Chesterfield, Deroyshire v. Worcestershire 2. Leeds, Yorkshire v. Kent 2 . Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Oxford University 2. Leicester, Leicestershire v. West Indians 2. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Dublin University 2. Oval, Surrey (2nd X I.) v. Es<ex (2od X I.) 2. W atford, Her.s v. Northamptonshire 2. Brighton, Sussex Club and Ground v. M.C.C. and Ground 5. Lord’s, Oxford v. Cambridge 5. Manchester, Lancashire v. Sussex 5. Oval, Surrey v. Leicestershire 5. Scarborough, Yorkshire v. Notts 5. Birmingham, w arwickshire v. Dublin University b. Rugby, Rugby School v. M.C C. ana Ground 6. Haileybury, Haiieybury Coll. v. Wellington Coll. 7. Clifton, Clifton Coll. v. Haverford Cob. (U.S.A.) 9. Oval, Gentlemen v. Players 9. Worcebter, Worcestershire v. Lancashire 9. Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Sussex 9. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Minor Counties 9. Nottingham, Notts v. W est Indians 9. Liverpool, Liverpool and District v. Cambridge University 9. Leyton, Essex (2nd X I.) v. Hants (2nd X I.) 9. Brighton, Sussex (2nd X L ) v. Kent (2nd X I.) 9. Manchester, Lancs. (2ud XE.) v. Yornsh.(2ndXI.) 9. Marlborough, Marlborough College v. Haverford College (U.S.A.) 9. Hereford, Herefordshire v. M C.C. and Ground 10. Clifton, Clifton College v. Cheltenham Colhge 11. Alton, Hampshire ( 2 nd X I.) v. Surrey (2nd X I.) 11. Newport. Monmouthshire v. M.C.C. and Ground 12. Leyton, Essex v. Surrey 12. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Sussex 12. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Lancashire 12. Gloucester, Gloucestershire v. Worcestershire 12. Portsmouth, Hampshire v. Yorkshire 12. Nottingham. Notts v. Kent 12. Lord’s, Gentlemen of M.C.C. v. Haverford College 13. Lord’s. Eton v. Harrow 13. Swindon, Wiltshire v. West Indians 13. Malvern, Malvern College v Repton School 13. Uppingham, Uppingham School v. Haileybury College 1\ Cardiff, Glamorgan v. M.C.C. and Ground 16. Lord’s, Gentlemen v. Players 16. Brighton, Sussex v. Hampshire 16. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Yorkshire 16. Manchester. Lancashire v. West Indians 16. Lichfield, Staffordshire v. Northamptonshire 17. Newcastle, Northumberland v. Cambridgeshire 17. Bishop’s Stortfoid, Hertfordshire v. Norfolk 18. Cardiff, Glamorgan v. Surrey (2nd X I.) 18. Heading. Berkshire v. M.C.C. and Ground 19. Lord’s, Middlesex v Leicestershire 19. Manchester, Lancashire v. Yorkshire. (A. Mold’s benefit) 19. Brighton, Sussex v. Surrey 19. Leyton. Essex v. Hampshire 19. Nottingham, Notts v. Gloucestershire 19. Blackh^atb, Kent v. Somerset 19. Derby, Derbyshire v. W est Indians 19. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. London County 19. Sunderland, Durham v. Cambridgeshire 20. Swindon, Wiltshire v. Surrey (2nd X I.) 20, Cardiff (?), Glamorgan v. Devon 21. Wellington. Wellington College v. Charterhouse 23. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Essex 23. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Lancashire 23. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Derbyshire 23. Bradford, Yorkshire v. Gloucester-hire 23. Southampton, Hampshire v. Somerset 23. Oval, Surrey v. Kent 23. Stoke, Staffordshire v. West Indians 23. Tunbridge Wells, Kent (2nd X I.) v. Sussex (2nd X I.; 25. Bristol, Gloucester (2nd X I.) v. Monmouthshire 25. Trowbridge, Wiltshire v. Bucks 26. Watford, Herts v. Cambridgeshire 26. Leyton, Essex v. Kent 26. Brighton, Sussex v. Middlesex 26. Derby, Derbyshire v. Leicestershire 26. Manchester, Lancashire v. Gloucestershire 26. Oval, Surrey v. Yorkshire. (Brockwell’s benefit) 26. Southampton, Hampshire v. West Indians 26. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Worcestershire 27. South Shields, Durham v. Northamptonshire 30. Glossop, Derbyshire v. Lancashire 30. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Warwickshire 30. Nottingham, Notts v. Yorkshire 30. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Middlesex 30. Oval, Surrey v. West Indians 30. Lord’s, Middlesex (2nd X I.) v. Sussex (2nd X I.) 30. Newcastle, Northumberland v. Northamptonshire 30. St. Albans, Herts v. Bucks 30. Leeds, Yorkshire (2nd X I.-) v. Norfolk 30. Cardiff, Glamorgan v. Berkshire AUGUST. 1. Newcastle, Northumberland v. Staffordshire 1. Durham, Durham v. Norfolk 1. Lord’s, Rugby v. Marlborough 1. Newport, Monmouthshire v. Gloucester (2nd X I.) 2. Oval, Surrey v. Middlesex 2. Harrogate, Yorkshire v. Essex 2. W orces'er, Worcestershire v. Sussex 2. Bath, Somerset v. Gloucestershire 2. Southampton, Hampshire v. Kent 2. Nottingham, Notts v. Leicestershire 2. Liverpool, Li' «rp >ol and District v. W est Indians 3. Newcastle, Ni rtii imberland v. Norfolk 3. Trowbridge, .shire v. Berkshire 3. Northampton, Northampton v. Surrey (2nd X I.) 3. Lord’s, Haileybury v. Cheltenham 3. Brighton, Gentlemen of Sussex v. Old Cliftonians 3. Oswestry, Shropshire v. M.C.C. and Ground 6. (Bank Holiday). Oval, Surrey v. Notts 6. Canterbury, Kent v. Lancs. (Canterbury Week) 6. Taunton, Somerset v. Middlesex 6. Fristol, Gloucestershire v. Sussex 6. Derby, Derbyshire v. Hampshire 6. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Essex 6. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Worcestershire 6. Bradford, Yorkshire v. West Indians 6. Lord’s, Middlesex (2nd X I.) v. Essex (2nd X I ) 6. Newcastle, Northumberland v. Durham 6. Norwich, Norfolk v. Herts (Norwich Week) 6. Swindon, Wiltshire v. Glamorgan 6. Oxford, Oxfordshire v. Berkshire 6. Manchester, Lancs (2nd X I.) v. Surrey (2nd X I.) 6. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire v. M.C.C. and Grouud 6. Southampton,Hants (2nd X I.) v.Sussex (2nd X L ) 8. Norwich, Norfolk v. Cambridgeshire 8. Oxford, Wiltshire v. Oxfordshire 8. Northampton, Northamptonshire v. Berks 8. Barnsley, Yorkshire (2nd X I.) v. Surrey (2nd X I.) 8. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Hertfordshire 9. Canterbury, Kent v. Surrey (Martin’s Benefit) (Canterbury Week) 9. Leyton, Essex v. Lancashire 9. Taunton, Somerset v. Sussex 9. Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Yorkshire 9. Clifton, Gloucestershire v. Middlesex 9. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Hampshire 9. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Derbyshire 10. Norwich. Norfolk v. W est Indians 10. Northampton, Northamptonshire v. Glam >rgam 10. Bletchley, Bucks v. Wiltshire 10. Oxford, Oxfordshire v. Bedfordshire 10. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Berkshire 10. Brighton, Sussex (2ndX I.) v. Middlesex (2ndX I.) 13. Hastings, Sussex v. Lancashire 13. Clifton, Gloucestershire v. Kent 13. Bournemouth, Hampshire v. Surrey 13. Derby, Derbyshire v. Essex 13. Leeds, Yorkshire v. Middlesex 13. Crystal Palace, London County v. Worcester 13. Norwich, Norfolk v. Durhim 13. Reading, Berkshire v. Northamptonshire 13. Trowbridge, Wiltshire v. Oxford-dme 13. Oval, Surrey (2nd XI.) v. Yorkshire (2nd X I ) 13. Stoke, Staffordshire v. Bedfordshire 13. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Bucks 13. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire v. Hertfordshire It. Taunton, (ientlemen of Somerset v. Dorset 15. Norwich, Norfolk v. Yorkshire (2nd X L ) 15. Reading, Berkshire v. Oxfordshire 11. Lord s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Wiltshire 15. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire v. Durham 15. St. Albans, Hertfordshire v. Bedfordshire 16. Oval, Surrey v. Lancashire 16. Leyton, Essex v. Warwickshire 6 Cheltenham, Gloucestershire v. Yorkshire (Chel­ tenham Week) 16. Bournemouth, Hampshire v. Worcestershire 16. Nottingham, Notts v. Middlesex 16, Taunton, Somerset v. Kent 17. Crystal Palace, London County v. Wiltshire l 7. Northampton, Northamptonshire v. Durham 17. Reading, Berkshire v. Bucks 17. Oxford, Oxfordshire v. Bedfordshire 17. Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Cambridgeshire 17. Exeter, Devon v. M.C.C. and Ground 20. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Surrey 20. Brighton, Sussex v. Leicestershire 20. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire v. Essex (Chelten­ ham Week) 20. Tonbridge, Kent v. Hampshire 20. Chesterfield, Derbyshire v. Notts 20. Taunton, Somerset v. Yorkshire 20. Crystal Palace, London County v. Warwickshire 20. Aylesbury, Bucks v Hertfordshire 20. Oval, Surrey (2nd X I ) v. Bedfordshire 20. Harrogate, Yorkshire (2nd X I.) v. Lancashire (2nd X L ) 22. Aylesbury, Bucks v. Berks 22. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire v Norfolk 22. Whitby (?), Yorkshire ( 2 nd X I.) v. Staffordshire 23. Leyton, Essex v. Middlesex (W . Mead’s benefit) 23. Brighton. Sussex v. Yorkshire (Butt’s benefit) 23. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Surrey 2 J. Southampton, Hampshire v. Leicestershire 23. Manchester, i ancashire v. Notts 23. Canterbury, Kent v. Worcestershire 23. Crystal Palace, London County v. M.C.C. and Ground 24. Ayleobury, Bucks v. Oxfordshire 27. Lord’s, Middlesex v. Kent 27. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Derbyshire 27. Worcester, Worcestershire v. Gloucestershire 27. Portsmouth, Hampshire v. Sussex 27. Taunton, Somerset v. Surrey 27. Scarborough, Yorkshire v. M.C.C, and Ground (Scarborough Festival) 27. Oval, Surrey (2nd X I.) v. Wiltshire 27. Brighton, Gentlemen of Sussex v. Incogniti 27. Truro, Cornwall v. M C.C. and Ground 29. Reading, Berks v. Wilts 29. Oxford, Oxfordshire v. Bucks 30 Lord’s, Middlesex v. Worcestershire 30. Oval, Surrey v. Derbyshire 30. Brighton, Sussex v. Kent 30. Manchester, Lancashire v. Leicestershire 30. Scarborough, Gentlemen v. Players (Scarborough Festival) SEPTEMBER. 3 Scarborough, Yorkshire v. Mr. C. I. Thornton’s X I (Scarborough Festival) 6. Hastings, North v. c*outh (Hastings Festival) 10 Hastings, Surrey and Sussex v. Rest of England (Hastings Festival) 13. Lord’s, North v. South (P. Need’s Benefit) THE WAY THEY DO THINGS IN AMERICA. From Cricket Club Life (Philadelphia). When it comes to making up a schedule, I think we must admit that they manage these thiugs better in England. It is certain that, recognising