Cricket 1898

484 M O - C ^ 2 . CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. D ec . 22 , 1898. 24. Oval, Australians v. Surrey 24. Birm ingham . W arw ickshire v. Ham pshire 24. W orcester. W orcestershire v. Leicestershire 24. Leeds, Yorkshire v. K ent 2 1. H astings, Sussex v. M iddlesex 24. Derby, Derbyshire v. Essex 24. M anchester, Lancashire v. Gloucestershire 24. W atford, Hertfordabire v. Bucks 24. Cam bridge. Cambridgeshire v. Northum berland 26. L ord’s, K ugby v. M arlborough 26. Swansea. Glam organshire v. Surrey (2nd XT.) 26. Newcastle, Northum berland v. N orthants 27. Brighton, Australians v. Sussex 27. Oval. Surrey v. M iddlesex 27. Huddersfield, Yorkshire v. Gloucestershire 27. M anchester. Lancashire v. N otts 27. W orcester, W orcestershire v. Ham pshire 27. Leyton, Essex v. K ent 28. D arlington. Durham v. Northam ptonshire 28. L ord’s. H aileybory v. Cheltenham 28. Swindon, W iltshire v. 8urrey (2nd X I ) 31. L ord’s, Australians v. M .C.C. and Ground 31. Oval, Surrey v. K ent 31. Derby, Derbyshire v. W orcestershire 81. Leicester, Leicestershire v. W arwickshire 31. B radford, Yorkshire v. N otts 31. St. Albans, E eits v. Cam bridgeshire AU G U ST. 2. Reading, Berkshire v. Oxfordshire 2. Trow bridge, W ilts v. Bucks 2. Durham , Durham v. Surrey (2nd X I.) 2. Newca^t e. Northum berland v. N orfolk 3. Southam pton, Australians v. Ham pshire 3. Lord’s, M iddlesex v. Surrey 3. W orcester, W orcestershire v. Sussex 3. M anchester, Lancashire v. Yorkshire 3. Leyton, Essex v. Gloucestershire 4. S w incon, W iltshire v. O xfordshire 4. Cam bridge, Cam bridgeshire v. H eitfordshire 4. Durham . Durham v. N orfolk 4. Newcastle, N orthum berland v Surrey (2nd X I ) 7. Birm iogham , Australians v. W arw ickshire 7. Oval. Surrey v. N otts 7. Canterbury, K ent v. Lane > shire 7. D erby, Derbyshire v. Ham pshire Now Ready. 1/=; post free, 1/3. Cloth, 2 / - ; post free, 2/3. JOHN W I S D E N ’S C R IC K E T ER S ’ A LM A N A C K FOR 1899. E d ite d b y S Y D N E Y H . P A R D O N . Contains Full Scores and Bowling Analysis of all FIKS L1-CLASS CRICKET played in 1898. Special Photographs of W . Storer, Albert Trott, C. L. Townsend, W . Lock­ wood, and Rhodes, Mr. Stoddart’ s Team in Australia, etc., and all useful information. 21, Cranbourn Street, LONDON, W.C. 7. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Essex 7. Taunton. Som erset v. M iddlesex 7. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Sussex 7. Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Worcestershire 7. L ord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. N otts Cast’ e 7. Cam bridge.Cam bridgeshire v. M .C.C. aitd Ground 7. N orw ich, N oifolk v. Herts 7. Reading. Berks v. Northam ptonshire 7. Cardiff, Glam organshire v. W iltshire 7. Durham , Durham v. Northum berland 9. L ord’s. M .C.C. and Ground v. Herts (provisional) 9. Reading, Berks v. Glamorganshire 9 Northam pton, N orthants v. Surrey (2nd X I.) 9. Norwich, N orfolk v. Cambridgeshire 9. Newport, M onm outhshire v. W iltshire. 10. Canterbury, Australians v. K ent 10. Oval, Surrey v. Yorii shire 10. Bristol, Gloucestershire v. M iddlesex 10. Taunton, Somerset v. Sussex (Tyler’ s Benefit) 10. Leicester, Leicestershire v. Ham pshire 10. Leyton. Essex v. Lancashire '0. W orcester, W orcestershire v. W arwickshire 11. Reading, Berks v. Bucks 11. Cambridge, < am bridgeshire v. Durham 11. N orwich, M.C.C. and Ground v. N orfolk 14. Oval, England v Australia 14. Sheffield, Y >rkshire v. Hampshire 14. In Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire v. W arwicksh. 14. Aylesbury, Bucks v. Berkshire 14. Yarm outh, N orfolk v. Durham 16. Aylesbury. Bucks v. Berkshire 16. Swindon, W iltshire v. Berkshire 17. Cheltenham, Australians v. Gloucestershire 17. L ord’s, M iddlesex v. Laucasbire 17. Bournem outh, Ham pshire v. Leicestershire 17. Taunton, Somerset v. Surrey 17. Nottingham , N otts v. Yorkshire 17. W orcester. W orcestershire v. Derbyshire 17. Brighton, Sussex v. Essex 18. Aylesbury. Bucks v. Oxfordshire 18. Cardiff, Glam organshire v. Berks 18. Oval. Surrey (2ud X I.) v. Durham 21. L ord’s. Australians v. M iddlesex 21. Bournem outh, Ham pshire v. W arwickshire Tonbridge, K ent v. Yorkshire Brighton, Sussex v. Lancashire Cheltenham, Glouces'ershire v. Surrey Derby. Derbyshire v. N otts O xford, Oxfordshire v. W ilts Crystal Palace, London County C.C. v. W orces­ tershire Northam pton, Northam ptonshire v. Berks Leeds, Yorkshire (2nd X I.) v. Durham O xford. O xfordshire v. Berks Bletchley, Bucks v W iltshire Taunton. Australians v. Somerset Catford. K ent v. W arw ickshire Brighton, Sussex v. Yorkshire NottiDgham, N otts v. M iddlesex Clifton, G loucester hire v. Essex Oval, Surrey v. Lancashire Southam pton, Bam pshire v. W orcestershire Swansea. Glam organshire v. Cornwall O xford, O xfordshire v. Bucks Northam pton, Northants v. Durham Liverpool. Australians v. Lancashire Blackheath, K ent v. Surrey Birm ingham , W arw ickshire v Derbyshire Scarborough, Yorkshire v. M .C.C. and Ground (Scarborough Festival) Leicester, Leicestershire v. M iddlesex Portsm outh, Ham pshire v. Sussex Taunton. Somerset v Gloucestershire St. Albans. Berts v. Northants L ord’s, M .C.C. and G iound v. Cambridgeshire Newport, M onm outhshire v. Glam organshire Leyton, Essex v. W arwickshire Scarborough, Australians v. M r. T hornton’s X I . of England M anchester. Lancashire v. M iddlesex Brighton, Sussex v. Kent Oval, Surrey v. Ham pshire P I C K E R I N G S ’ For Whitening ait Articles of Buff or Buckskin Leather, each as Leg Guards, Gloves, M ilitary Equipment, White Helmets, Gloves, Hunting Thongs, Whips, Cricket and TenniB Shoes, Tennis Balls, &c., &c. It is prepared ina very careful manner, and extia precautions are taken to insure AN EVENNESS OF COLOUR. It contains nothing that will in any way injure the article to which it is applied, and if used as di­ rectedasplendid white of a glossysatin- like appearance and soft silky surface is insured, which will not readily rub off. The mouldsof ‘ ‘ B la n c o ” aremadein one size only, andwill fit speciallymade zincboxes, whicharenon-corrosive. ManufacturersJOSEPH PICKERING & SONS, $ g K , SHEFFIELD. London Office: ST. GEORGE’S HOUSE, EASTCHEAP. Remington Typewriter. WHY I ts R epu tation is W orld-W ide and E xtends over a Quarter o f a Century. I t is Simple in Construction, and th erefore Reliable. SAVES EVERYBODYS TIME. The T ime o f the P r in c ip a l; fo r L etters are E asily Checked. The Time o f th e C lerk; fo r the Machine is far more Speedy than th e P en The T ime o f the A u th o r; fo r the Machine Xeeps Face w ith Thought. The T ime o f the E d ito r ; fo r a Type-written M anuscrip t is as Clear as P rin t. THE REMINGTON ? I t is Pacile in Operation, L igh t to the Finger®. I t is made o f the B est M aterials, and w ith the U tmost Care and P r e c is io n ; ai»d th erefore Cheapest in the End. F U L L P A R TIC U L A R S U P O N A P P L IC A TIO N T O O l Y C K O p F , S E H m f l f l S & B E N E D I C T , 100, Gracechurch S t ree t , LONDON, E • C* ( l e a d e n h a l l s t r e e t . ) Printed and Published fo r the Proprietor by M e e e it t Sc H a t c h e s , L t d ., 167, 168, and 169, U pper Tham es Street, L ondon, E.C., D ecem ber 22nd, 1898.