Cricket 1897

240 CRICKET A WEEKLY RECORD OP THE GAME. Jun e 24, 1897. THE TONBRIDGE WEEK. KENT v. SUSSEX. Played at Tonbridge on June 21, 22 , and 23. Sussex won by six wickets. On the first day of this match the wicket was decidedly in favour of the bowlers, of whom Bland and Martin were very successful. Kent began so badly that three wickets fell for 7runs, and five for 35. Then the tail put their side in a much better position, Mr. Weigall and Mr. Marchant especially batting well, and in the end the total was by no means bad. At the end of the day there was not very much to choose between the sides, for Sussex had lost six wickets for 118, Ranjitsiuhji, Mr. Murdoch and Mr. Brann only making 9 between them. Mr. Newham, however, playing in the good form which has happily returned to him, was not out 30. On Tuesday morning, after the the teams had sung the National Anthem, Mr. Newham in­ creased his score to 59—a very good innings indeed. Kent did fairly well in the second innings, butSussex had very little difficulty in knocking off the runs, thanks to Mr. Fry, Marlow. Ranjitsinhji, and Mr. Brann. K e n t . First innings. Second innings. J. R. Mason, c Murdoch, b Bland........................... 1b Tate..............22 Hearne (AJ, b Tate ........ 17 b Bland ....... 55 H.C.Stewart,cButt,bBland 4b Tate..............26 Rev. W. Rashleigh, b Bland 0 cMurdoch, b Kil- G. J. Mordaunt, c Butt, b Bland........................... 2 G. J. V. Weigall, b Bland... 41 Martin, run out ...............15 Easby, b Bland ...............17 F.Marchant,c Butt, b Bland 32 c Butt, b Tate . Wright, not out ...............16 b Tate.......... Huish, cButt, b Bland ... 8 not out........ Byes.................... 3 B 9, lb 4 lick b Bland b Tate....... c Fry, b Tate b Tate .. 34 ... 19 ... 19 ... 0 10 . 0 . 12 . 1 . 13 Total........ ..156 Total ...211 S u sse x . First innings. Second innings. C.B.Fry,c Hearne,bWright 25b Hearne ........ 41 Marlow, c Huish. b Martin 'c.7 cand b Wright... 49 K. S. Ranjitsinhji, c Rash­ leigh, b Martin.............. 3not out...............65 W. L. Murdoch, cHuish, b Martin........................... 0 G. Brann, b Martin ........ 6 W. Newham, c Mordaunt, b Mason .......................59 Bean (G.), c Mordaunt, b Hearne............................17 Killick, run out ............... 7 Butt, b Wright ............... 0 Bland,cMordaunt, b Hearne 6 Tate, not out....................... 12 Extras ............... 0 cHuish.b Hearne 2 c Huish, b Mar­ chant ........ 37 not out............... 0 Extras........ Tate Bland Total...............172 K e n t . First innings. O. M. R. W. ........ 35 10 88 1 ... ........ 35 10 65 8 .. Fry Second innings. O. M. R. W. 33-211 62 7 20 2 76 2 18 6 44 0 Killick... 6 1 16 1 Hearne... Martin... Mason ... Wright... S ussex . First innings. O. M. R. W. ... 3112 55 2 ... ... 28 9 50 4 ... ... 54 2 11 1 ... ... 36 17 56 2 .. Marchant.. Alec Heame bowled onewide. Second innings. O. M. R. W. 15 31 2 3 28 0 4 78 0 8 49 1 2 8 1 ... 25 ... 15 ... 22 4 ... 25 ... 4 SURREY v. YORKSHIRE. Played at Leeds on June 21, 22 and 23. Yorkshire won by 100 runs. The heavy rain which had fallen at Leeds was the causethat the bowlers had the first day of the match almost to themselves, with the exception of an hour or soat the end of the day, when Mr. Jackson and Tunnicliffe took the bowling in charge. It was a pieceof $ood fortune for Yorkshire to win the toss, and so difficult was the wicket that they did not do badly tomake 90 against Richardson and Hayward, of whom the former took 7 wickets for 55. The batsmen were all more or less at sea. Just as Richardson had beaten the Yorkshiremen, so Haigh beat the visitors; in fact, he had a much better analysis— 7 wickets for 17. The only batsman who distinguished himself was Mr. Walter Read, who carried his bat for 24. With a useful lead of 15, Yorkshire greatly strengthened their position before stumps were drawn. Mr. Jackson, Tunnicliffe and Brown putting on 70 for 1 wicket. On Tuesday a remarkable innings by Mr. Jackson, and steady cricket by Denton, enabled Yorkshire to set Surrey the difficult task of making 271 runs, a task which proved altogether too difficult for them, although the tail made a determined effort to savetheir side. Y orksh ire . First innings. F. S. Jackson, c Abel, b Richardson.................. 0 Tunnicliffe, b Hayward ... 4 Brown, cLees,b Richardson 11 Denton, b Richardson.... 22 E. Smith, c Brockwell, b Richardson............ .....15 Moorhouse, b Richardson... 5 Wainwright, c Richardson, b Hayward................... 6 Hirst, c Brockwell, b Hay­ ward ........................14 Peel, b Richardson ..... 10 Haigh, not out ............. 0 Hunter, b Richardson...... 0 Lb 1, nb 2 ....... 3 Second innings. cand b Hayward 92 b Richardson ... 20 b Hayward........22 c & b Richardson 77 c Hayward, b Richardson ... 2 b Richardson ... 1 b Richardson 21 b Richardson ... 5 b Richardson ... 1 b Richardson ... 3 not out.............. 1 B 6, lb 1, wl,nb 3 11 Total First innings. Abel, b Wainwright .. ... 90 S u rr e y , Total ...256 8 Brockwell, b Wainwiight... 2 Hayward, b Haigh ........ 16 Baldwin, b Haigh............. 4 H. D. G. Leveson-Gower, b Haigh........................... 9 H* Chinnery, b Haigh.. W. W. Read, not out... K. J. Key, b Haigh Lees, b Haigh............. Wood, b Haigh ........ Richardson, b Hirst ... Leg-bye ... Total ... Second innings, c and b Wain­ wright ........ 17 cHaieh, bWain­ wright ........ 12 b Haigh ........ 9 b Hirst.............. 17 c Tunnicliffe, b Peel.............. 6 b Wainwright ... 11 b Wainwright ... 29 b Hirst ........ 1 cHunter,bHaigh 44 c Haigh, b Peel... 6 not out.............. 4 B 13, lb 1, w 1 15 75 Total........ 171 Y o r k s h ir e . First innings. O. M. R. W. Richai’dson ... 21"3 5 55 7 ... Hayward ... 21 9 32 3 ... Lees Second inQings. O. M. R.W. ... 4213 99 8 ... 31 8 57 2 ... 11 3 32 0 Brockwell 12 4 30 0 Chinnery 4 0 18 0 Abel ... 5 1 9 0 Richardson delivered one no-ball and one wide, and Hayward four no-balls. Peel ........ Wainwright Haigh H irst....... S u rrey . First innings. O. M. R. W. 10 6 13 0 19 6 44 2 .12 5 17 7 2-2 2 0 1 Jackson ... Wainwright delivered onewide. Secondinnings. O. M. R. W. ... 13-2 2 26 2 ... 22 10 43 4 ... 23 3 56 2 ... 17 7 26 2 ... 4 3 5 0 GOLDSMITHS’ INSTITUTE v. STAMFORD HILL.— Played at Walthamstow on June 19. G oldsm iths ’ I n stitu te . H. Pond, run out........ 5 H. Randall, c Jones, b Redmond.............. 29 H.E. Murrell,cPhilpot, b Redmond ........ 27 A. Mouncher,b Philpot 10 P.Brownfield,cGarner, b Collinson ........ 9 B.W. Jenkins, cJones, b Collinson ........ 18 W. H. Manley, lbw, b Philpot.............. 10 S. R. Best, not out ... 22 W. H. Joanes, notout 10 B 7, lb 3, w 1 ... 11 Total R. Windebank and F. C. Ladd didnotbat. declared closed. S tam ford H il l . ........*151 •Innings H. Langley, lbw, b F. Collinson, c and b Windebank ........ 8 Manley ............ 5 W.Redmond,bMurrell 1 J. Garner, b Murrell 5 J. Chitty, c Manley, b G. Wilson, not out ... E. Philpot, b Murrell 7 Murrell .............. 47 0 H. Glover, c Best, b W. Garner, not out... 3 Murrell .............. 0 B 16,lb 1 ........ 17 B. Jones, c Best, b Manley .............. 8 Total.............. 101 LANCASHIRE v. SOMERSET. Played at Taunton on June 21 , 22 and 23. Lancashire won by four wickets. There was not much chance that Lancashire would have awalk over against Somerset, for thelatterhave, by their defeat of Surrey, gained a lot of confidence. It was a distinct advantage for them to win the toss, and they made good use of it, scoring 233on by no means an easywicket. Nichols was in splendid form andcarried hisbatnearly through the innings, while thetail,particularlyMr. Newton, distinguishedthem­ selves. Lancashirefaredbadlyatfirst, but eventually camewithin 53of the totalmadeby Somerset. In the second innings the Somerset men did not do so well, but Lancashire had by no means an easy task before them, having tomake203towin. At the close of the secondday’splay they were in a good position, having knocked off 138of the runs for four wickets. S om erset. First innings. H. T. Stanley, b Mold ... 10 Smith, D., b Hallam........ 3 R. C. N. Palairet, c Hallam, b Mold...........................20 Nicholls, not out...............74 Robson, bMold ............... 5 S. M. J. Woods, c Ward, b Hallam ..................... 7 G. Fowler, b Mold ........ 9 Tyler, b Cuttell .............. 26 M. H. Toller, st Smith, b Hallam ..................... A. E. Newton, c Hornby, b Cuttell...........................43 Gill, c Smith, b Hallam ... 19 B 14, lb 2 ...............16 Secondinnings, c Hornby, b Hal­ lam ...............14 lbw, b Cuttell ... 3 cHornby,bCuttell 2 cSmith,b Hallam 50 cBaker,b Hallam 6 b Cuttell ........ 3 c Smith, bCuttell 34 c Sugg, b Hallam 3 1 cHartley.bBriggs 9 not out.............. cSmith, bHallam No-ball ... 20 Total ...233 L a n c a s h ir e . Total........ 149 First innings. Ward,A.,cNewton,bRobson 27 C. R. Hartley, b Woods ... 13 Sugg, F., bWoods ........ 5 Baker, cPalairet, b Gill ... 15 Tyldesley, st Newton, Gill .................... Smith, cRobson, b Tyler Briggs, b Tyler ...............10 Hallam, b Tyle r............... 0 A. N. Hornby, c Robson, b Tyler ...........................13 Cuttell, c Gill, b Tyler ... 47 Mold, not out ... ........ 26 B 1, lb 1, w 2........ 4 18 Se 2 ond innings, c Smith, b Tyler 24 c Toller, b Tyler 10 c and b Tyler ... 21 not out.............. 54 b Robson ........ 19 b Tyler....... ...34 st Newton,bTyler 35 not out.............. 5 Total ... ..180 Mold Hallam Cuttell Briggs Tyler ... Woods ... Gill........ Robson... Nichols... S om erset. First innings. O. M. R. W. 34 5 41-1 12 21 5 21 8 Leg-bye........ 1 Total.........203 Secondinnings. O. M. R. W. ........ 35-4 15 54 5 8 362 ........ 32 16 44 4 0 120 ........ 9 1 31 1 Baker 6 1 19 0 Cuttell delivered a no-ball. L a n ca s h ire . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. ..... 30 7 755 ......... 35-3 11106 5 6 612 ......... 20 3 60 0 2 142 ......... 6-2 3 16 0 4 171 ......... 11 5 30 1 1 90 ......... Gill and Woods eachbowled a wide. GOLDSMITHS (2) v. CHAMPION H IL L —Played at New Cross on June 19. G o ldsm ith s . W. S. Murrell, c P. Marshall, b Arliffe 18 J. E. De Gruchy, b Arliffe .............. 5 J. Green, b P. Mar­ shall .....................20 J. A. T. Good, b P. Marshall.............. 19 A.G.Blofield, cP.Mar- shall, b A. Farrow 7 A. Baldwin, b P. Mar­ shall .....................23 W. Dray, b P. Mar­ shall ..................... G. Gillingham, c A. Farrow, b P. Mar­ shall ..................... A.Cullingworth,cFul­ ler, b P. Marshall... F. Blake, b A. Farrow W. Falkner, not out... B 12, lb 2 ........ Total C ham pion H il l . R. Hills, c Blofield, b Green.................... 13 S. T. Farrow, cBlake, b Green .............. 12 Fuller, b Gillingham 6 P. A. Marshall, b Gil­ lingham .............. 1 W. R. Marshall, run out ..................... 4 A. E. Farrow, b Green 5 Arliffe, c Dray, b Murrell ............... Hewitson.cDeGruchy, b Murrell.............. Harvey, not out........ W. Farrow, run out... Leg-byes........ Total .........