Cricket 1897

J une 17, 1897. CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 215 O’Brien had hurt his foot and was not able to bat, there was only onemore wicket to fall. Roche, the lastman, batted in great form, so well indeed that there was a probability that M.C.C. would win after all. He kept in with Mr. Vernon until only 13 more runs wererequired when hewas caught at point. Mr. Vernon carried his bat forawonderfullygoodinnings of 57, which included six fours. O x f o r d U n iv e r s it y . First innings. Second innings. F. L. Fane, c Crawley, b Hearne...........................44 runout ..........20 F.H.B. Champain,bHearne 5 b Heame ........31 G. E. Bromley-Martin, c Board, b Hearne ........48 R. E. Foster, b Hearne ... 27 A. Eccles, cRoche,b Heame 8 G. R. Bardswell, b Hearne 19 cBoard,b Hearne T. B. Henderson, c Roche, b Hearne ..................... 0 cBoard,b Heame E. C. Wright, b Hearne ... 0 b Roche ........ F. H. E. Cunliffe, c and b Attewell .................... 5 b Hearne ........ 31 F. W. Stocks, not out........ 1 c Board,bHearne 9 R.W.Fox,cBoard,bHearne 4 notout.............. 2 Byes ..................... 6 b Roche ........ b Hearne ........ cRawlin, bRoche Total ..167 Total ...117 M.C.C. a n d G ro u n d . A. J. Webbe, c Cunliffe, b Stocks...........................47 Board, cWright, b Cunliffe 2 G. Kemp, b Cunliffe ........ Rawlin, b Wright ........ A. S. Crawley, b Wright .. Sir T. C. O’Brien, c Hen­ derson, b Wright G. F. Vernon, c Bromley- Martin, b Cunliffe ........ Attewell, c Henderson, b Cunliffe ..................... A. E. Leatham, not out ... Hearne (J. T.), c Wright, b Stocks........................... Roche, cBardswell, bStocks B 6, lb 2, nb 4 ........ b Henderson ... 15 cWright, b Cun­ liffe .............. 26 b Henderson ... 11 b Wright ........ 8 c Bardswell, b Henderson ... 2 absent.............. 0 6 notout.. 57 c Fox, b Wright 6 b Wright ........ 0 b Stocks ........ 12 cWright,b Stocks 20 B9, lbl,nb3... 13 Total . .170 Total .............. 101 O x f o r d U n iv e r s it y . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Hearne.............. 31 14 549 ......... 26 11 56 6 Roche ............... 13 3 480 ......... 17 6 30 3 Attewell ........ 25 14 431 .......... 8 2 25 0 Rawlin............... 7 3 160 .......... Cunliffe Wright Stocks ... M.C.C. a n d G ro u n d . O. M. R. W ... 21 5 55 4 ... 19 11 19 3 ... 94 3 15 3 Henderson O. M. R. W. ... 13 3 30 1 ... 22 3 58 3 ... 14-4 6 30 2 .. 13 4 39 3 Cunliffe delivered sevenno-balls. M.C.C. & GROUND v. DERBYSHIRE. A CLOSE F IN IS H . Played at Lord’s on June 10 and 11. M.C.C. won by two wickets. At the end of this interesting match the M.C C. had to make 74 to win with only two wickets to fall, a task which seemed quite hopeless, But Mead and Albert Trott then came together, and by the most attractive cricket seenduriDg the match gradually made up the leeway, finally earning a splendid victory for the M.C.C. without being sepa­ rated. The runs werehit off in forty minutes. Cross bowled with great success at one time during the innings. D e r b y sh ir e First innings. L. G. Wright, c Handford, b Mead .................... 55 Bostock, b Mead.............. 9 Bagshow, b Trott.............. 21 Chatterton, cTrott, b Mead 18 Davidson, c O’Halloran, b Trott ...........................27 Storer, b Trott .............. 10 Sugg, b Trott................... Wilmot, b Tro tt............. Cross, b Mead ............. Warren, not out............. Hancock, cMead, b Trott.. B 7, lb 3 .............. Secondinnings. c and b Trott ... 6 b Mead ........ 1 c Carpenter, b O’Halloran ... 1 c O’Halloran, b Mead ........ cTancred, b Car­ penter c Handford, Trott.............. not out.............. lbw, b Mead c Russell, bMead 0 b Trott.............. 6 b Mead ........ 2 B6,lb2, nbl... 9 ... 30 b . 22 . 35 2 M.C.C. First innings. C. W. Wright, st Storer, b Davidson .................... 52 A. B. Tancred, run out ... 19 Carpenter, b Hancock ... 4 C. McGahey, b Cross ... ... 35 Trott (A. E.), run out........ 5 Wrathall, cBostock,bChat­ terton .......................... 19 Russell, b Chatterlon.......13 B. N. Bosworth-Smith, c Storer, b Hancock ........ 16 O’Halloran, not out ........12 Mead, c Wright, b Hancock 0 Handford, lbw, b Hancock 0 B 5, lb 5 ................ 10 Second innings. cand b Davidson 7 b Hancock......... 4 c Storer, b Chat­ terton ...... 44 lbw, b Cross ... 34 not out............ 41 b Cross........ b Cross........ b Chatterton b Chatterton not out........ B 4, lb 1... Total ...185 D e r b y s h ir e . First innings. O. M. R. W. Mead ........ 37 18 46 4 ... Handford ... 9 2 22 0 ... O’Halloran ... 10 1 31 0 ... Trott ........ 244 7 47 6 ... ' Carpenter . Total (8wkts) 178 Secondinnings. O. M. R. W. , 7 7 29 4 Handford bowled one no-ball. M.C.< O. M R. W. O. M. R. W. Davidson ... ... 30 12 55 1 ... ... 20 11 48 1 Cross ........ ... 16 6 4 2 1 ... .. 12 2 18 3 Hancock . . ... 163 6 39 4 .. ... 21 7 46 1 Warren ... 8 4 17 0 .. ... 6 1 23 0 Chatterton... ... 8 2 22 2 ... ... 11 4 26 3 Storer ... ... 2 10 is 0 Total ...............156 Total . ...204 YORKSHIRE v. KENT. Played at Halifax on June 10 and 11. Yorkshire won by an innings and 103 runs. The most sanguine of cricketers would not expect to seeKent beat Yorkshire unless the luck was at the very least equal on both sides,at anyrate at this time of year when the strongest teamis not available. But when Kent had to bat on a wicket which helped the bowlersmore and more, after Yorkshire had ran up a big score, the game was over, notwithstanding the curious changeswhichmay possibly occurin cricket. Y o r k s h ir e . F. S. Jackson,cHuish, Hirst, lbw, b Easby ... 68 b Hearne............. 24 F. W. Milligan, Tunnicliffe, b Wright 92 Wright, bMason . Brown, c Huish, b Haigh, not out . Hearne .............. 19 Hunter, c Heame, Denton, c & b Martin 2 Easby Moorhouse, b Hunt ... 4 Wainwright, bHearne 17 Peel,cHuish, bHearne 1 K e n t . First innings. Secondinnings. J. R. Mason, b Wainwright 28 b Peel.............. 5 Hearne (A.), c Tunnicliffe, b Peel........................... 4 b Peel.............. 8 Hon. J. R. Tufton, c Milli­ gan, b Peel.................... 22 b Hirst............... 1 G. J. V. Weigall, c Hunter, b Peel........................... 1 Total ...279 Martin, cTunnicliffe, b Peel 0 Easby, b Peel... ............ 19 F. Marchant, b Hirst........ 19 E. C. Mordaunt, st Hunter, b Peel.......................... Wright, run o u t.............. Hunt, cand b Peel ........ Huish, not out .............. c Tunnicliffe, b Hirst ........ c and b Peel b Haigh ........ c Hirst, b Haigh Total ... ..102 b Haigh ........ 0 cHunter,bHaigh 7 b Haigh ....... 3 not out.............. 11 B 1,w 1 ........ 2 Total........ 74 Y o r k s h ir e . O. M. R. W. Martin ... 36 11 101 1 ( Mason Heame ... 45 19 63 4 Wright . Hunt...... 17 3 47 1 |Easby . K e n t . First innings. O. M. R. W. Peel.............. 23-4 7 53 8 ........ Wainwright ... 16 4 38 0 ........ Haigh ........ 4 1 8 0 .......... Hirst.............. 3 2 3 1 ........ Peel bowled awide. O. M. R. W. ,. 10 2 28 1 . 8 4 22 1 . 6*2 1 15 2 Second innings. O. M. R. W. 22 11 32 3 10*4 2 27 5 11 7 13 2 MARQUEES, TENTS from16/-,complete ;all kinds, sizes, prices. New and secondhand. Before pur­ chasing write for list.— H e a t h f ie l d , Lauderdale Buildings, Aldersgate, London. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY v. HANTS. c a r p e n te r ’s b e n e fit m atch. Played at Cambridge on June 10 and 11. Cambridge won by an innings and 21 runs. Although the Universityafter winning the tosslost two of their best bats, Burnup and Marriott, very quickly, they ran up a big score on a wicket which was only fairly easy. But it was due to the efforts of . Mr. Druce and Mr. Mitchell that the ’Varsity was so successful, for the rest of the .team did nothing in particular. Mr. Druce,who has completely recovered his best form, was batting for two hours and a half for 117, an innings quite worthy of his reputation. Mr. Mitchell also showed that he is as good as ever, although he did not get his runs as quickly as in former days. Hampshire lost a wicket beforestumps were drawn for 21runs,and onthefollowingdaythey found that the wicket was greatly in favour of the bowlers. Under these circumstances they could not hopetomake amatch of it. Captain Wynyard stayed in for about an hour and a quarter in each innings, making 31and 22, and hiswas by far the bestbatting on the side. In fact the only other scores of any im­ portance were 22not out by Mr. Heseltine—a good innings, and 27 by Webb. The most successful of the Cambridge bowlers was De Zoete, but Jessop andWilson also didwell. C am b r id g e U n iv e r s it y . E. H. Bray, lbw, b Hill .................. H. B. J. Taylor, Baldwin ........ , H. W. de Zoete, Hill .................. E. B. Shine, c Hesel­ tine, b Steele........ 0 A. E. Fernie, not out 0 . B 1,1b 3, w8 ... 12 26 ... 15 Total ...263 C. J. Burnup, cWebb, b Bowers................ 0 F. Mitchell, c Barton, b Bowers................. 47 H.H.Marriott, cWyn­ yard, b Baldwin ... 7 N. F. Druce, c Steele, b Bowers................117 G. L. Jessop, c Bald­ win, b Soar ...........22 C. E. M. Wilson, c Wynyard, b Soar ... 14 H a m p s h ir e . First innings. Second innings. A. J. L. Hill, cBray, b Shine 6cDruce, b Jessop 0 Barton,cMitchell,bDeZoete 15 cShine,b Wilson 4 Capt. Wynyard, c Jessop, b De Zoete .................... 31 Soar, b De Zoete.............. 9 R. A. Bennett, b Shine ... 0 Webb, cWilson, bDe Zoete 4 D.A.Steele,cBray.bDeZoete 5 Major Spens, c Marriott, b De Zoete .................... 9 b Fernie not out........ b Wilson ... b De Zoete... b Wilson ... C. Heseltine, not out........ 22 Baldwin, b Wilson ........ 9 Bowers, b Jessop.............. 1 B 11, lb 2, w 1, nb 1... 15 c M a rrio tt, b Wilson ....... 8 b Jessop ........ 0 c Shine, b Femie 13 b Jessop ........ 8 B 3, lb3, nb2... 8 Total .............. 126 Total.........116 C a m b r id g e U n iv e r s it y . O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W . Baldwin ... 20 6 59 2 j Soar ... 268 54 2 Bowers ... 20 3 55 3 Heseltine 136 33 0 Hill ....... 17 8 47 2 I Steele ... 2’30 3 1 Bowers bowled fivewides, Hill two wides, and onewide. H a m ps h ir e . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W . Jessop............... 6-1 2 11 1 ........ 163 6 28 3 De Zoete ........ 20 4 53 6 ......... 8 3 18 1 Shine .............. 16 3 42 2 ......... Wilson ........ 2 0 5 1 ......... 23 10 20 4 Fernie ....... 15 5 32 2 De Zoete bowled one wide, Shine one no-ball, and Wilson two no-balls. M ILL H ILL SCHOOL v. UNIVERSITY COLLEGE SCHOOL.—Played at Mill Hill on June 2. M il l H il l S c h o o l . W. C. Nimmo, b R. Price-Williams ... 41 D. C. A. Morrison, run out .............. 2 W. S. Young, b Jen­ nings .................... 38 J. D. Mitchell, b D. Price-Williams ... 22 R. H. Dodds, not out 11 H. B. Viney, c Cuth- bertson, b D. Price- Williams .............. 0 F. J. W. Higgin, b Stone.................... 3 B 3, lb 2, w 1 ... 6 Total (6wkts)*123 G. G. Dumbleton, W. A. C. Pearce, F. W. H. Auty and H. S. Phillips did not bat. •Innings declared closed. U n iv e r s it y C o l l e g e S c h o o l . V. Bayley, b Viney ... 11 H. J. Titford, b Viney 8 C. F. Stone, b Viney... 5 E. A. Emmett, bAuty 3 D. Price-Williams, b Viney.................... 2 T. Cuthbertson, c and b Viney .............. 4 R. Price-Williams, b Viney.................... 4 H. G. Scott, b Auty ... N. F. Mascus, not out H. W. Jennings, run out .................... G. A. Tisdall, b Viney B .................... Total ... ...