Cricket 1896

A pril 16, 1896. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 71 JULY. 4. Forest Hill, v. Croydon I. 6. Forest Hill, v. Wanstead. 7. Forest Hill, v. Sidcup. 8. Forest Hill, v. M.C.C. 9. Forest Hill, v. Brixton. 10. Forest Hill, v. Spencer. 11. Forest Hill, v. 8utton. 18. Charlton, v. Charlton Park I. 24. Wandsworth, v. Spencer. 25. Forest Hill, v. Addiscombe I. AUGUST. 1. Norwood, v. Norwood I. 3. Lee, v. Northbrook I. 8. Dulwich, v. Dulwich I. 1-2. Crystal Palace, v. Crystal Palace. 15. Sutton, v. Sutton. 2*2. Forest Hill, v. London and Westminster Bank I. 29. Denmark Hill, v. Brixton Wanderers I. * Two day matches. E a s t M o l e s e y has L. M a lleson for its hon. sec. It is fortunate, too, in having a keen sportsman in H. C. Parkes, a son of whom (H .E.) has not only done g o o d service in the Uppingham Eleven, but recently came out with a very creditable record in the School sports. They begin cricket early inEast Molesey, as the club is down to play Fifteen of Molesey on Saturday next. In addition to twenty- four matches for the first eleven the list, as will be seen, includes fifteen for the second team. FIRST TEAM.—APRIL. 18. East Molesey, v. XV. of Molesey. 25. East Molesey, v. Moseley Boat Club. MAY. 2. East Molesey, v. Heathfield. 9. East Molesey, v. Malden Wanderers. 16. East Molesey, v. Fairlawn. 23. Hampton Wick, v. Hampton Wick. 25. East Molesey, v. Clapham. 30. East Molesey, v. Thames Ditton. JUNE. 6. East Molesey, v. St. 8within’s. 13. East Molesey, v. Richmond. 20. Teddington, v. Teddington. 27. Malden, v. Malden Wanderers. JULY. 4. East Molesey, v. University College. 11. East Molesey, v. St. Margaret’s. 16. East Molesey, v. Whitgift Grammar School. 18. East Molesey, v. Surbiton Lacrosse Club. AUGUST. 1. East Molesey, v. Merton. 3. East Molesey, v. Sunbury. 5. East Molesey, v. Surrey Club and Ground. 8. East Molesey, v. Public 8chools. 15. Thames Ditton v. Thames Ditton. 22. East Molesey, v. Hampton Wick. 29. East Molesey, v. Heathfield. SEPTEMBER. 5. East Molesey, v. Waldegrave Park. The Hon. Sec. of the N o r t h b r o o k C.C., Mr. F. W. Foston, has arranged a longish list of fixtures for the season. Saturday week will see operations commenced in the form of an opening match, though real business does not begin till the first Saturday in May. From this time till September 5th two teams will be repre­ senting Northbrook every Saturday as well as on the two Bank Holidays. As the last match of the year is on September 12th, against Gravesend, the members will have a busy summer of it. APRIL. 25. Opening Match. MAY. 2. Lee, v. Dulwich. 2. Dulwich, y. Dulwich.* 9. Lee, v. Croydon. 9. Croydon, v. Croydon.* 16. Addiscombe, v. Addiseombe. 16. Lee, ▼. Addiscombe.* . 23. Lee, v. Bromley. 23. Sidcup, v. Sidcup.* 25. Forest Hill, v. Forest Hill. 25. Lee, v. Forest Hill.* 30. Hornsey, v. Hornsey. 30. L*e, v. Goldsmith’s Institute.* JUNE. 6. Blackheath, v. Blackheath. 6. Catford, v. Panther.* 13. Bromley, v. Bromley. 13. Lee, v. Bromley.* 20. Parley, v. Cane Hill Asylum. 20. Manor Way, v. Blackheath Proprietary School.* 24 and 25. Lee, v. Parr’s and Alliance Bank.*+ 27. Lee, y. Burlington Wanderers. 27. New Eltham, v. S. E. Railway.* JULY. 4. Lee, v. Rochester. 4. Bexley* v. Bexley.* 11. Honor Oak, v. Honor Oak. 11. Lee, v. Sidcup.* 15. Lee, v. M.C.C. 18. Lee, v. South Hampstead. 18. New Cross v. Goldsmith’s Institute* 25. Lee, v. Blackheath. 25. Mottingham, v. Mottingham. 27 and 28. Lee, v. Parr’s and Alliance Bank.*+ AUGUST. 1. Dulwich, v. Dulwich. 1. Lee, v. Dulwich.* 3. Lee, v. Forest Hill. 3. Forest Hill, v. Forest Hill.* 8. Gravesend, v. Gravesend. 8. Catford, v. Panther.* 12. Boys’ Match, Mr. Mark’s Team of Members’ Sons v. Mr. Ingram’s. 15. Plaistow, v. Plaistow. 15. Lee, v. S. E. Railway.* 22. Lee, v. Hornsey. 22. Bexley, v. Bexley.* 29. Lee, v. Addiscombe. 29. Addiscombe, v. Addiscombe.* SEPTEMBER. 5. Croydon, v. Croydon. 5. Lee, v. Croydon.* 12. Lee, v. Gravesend. * Second Team Matches. + Two-day Matches. At present no tour has been arranged by the S u tto n O.C., but as a set-off against this matches have been arranged for three teams on most Saturdays. The ground bowlers for the coming season are S. Chambers and J. Chambers, both of Nottinghamshire. The Honorary Secre­ tary is W. Allen Hunt, Southborough, Sutton, Surrey. FIRST TEAM MATCHES.—MAY. 2. Sutton, v. Streatham. 9. Banstead, v. Banstead. 16. Leatherhead, v. Leatherhead. 23. Sutton, v. Barnes. 25. Sutton, v. Beduington. 30. Sutton, v. Whitgift Wanderers. JUNE. 6. Sutton, v. Cheam. 8. Sutton, v. Surrey Club and Ground. 13. Sutton, v. Epsom. 17. Sutton, v. St. Swithin’s. 20. Sutton, v. Leatherhead. 27. Dulwich, y. Dulwich. JULY. 4. Streatham, v. Streatham. 11. Forest Hill. v. Forest Hill. 18. Sutton, v. Pallingswick. 25. Sutton, v. Dulwich. AUGUST. 1. Epsom, v. Epsom. 3. Beddington, v. Beddington. 8. Cheam, v. Cheam. 15. Sutton, v. Forest Hill. 22. Acton, v. Pallingswick. 29. SEPTEMBER. 5. 12. Addiscombe, v. Addiscombe. HALF-DAY TEAM MATCHES.—APRIL. 25. Addiscombe, v. Addiscombe. MAY. 2. Carshalton, v. Carshalton. 9. Weybridge, v. St. George’s College. 9. Sutton, v. Whitgift Wanderers II. 16. Champion Hill, v. Old Fairfieldians. 16. Sutton, v. Hampton Wick. 3. Kingston, v, Kingston Grammar School. 95. Wandsworth, v. Spencer. 25. Beddington, v. Beddington. 9O. Catford, v. Panther. 36. Denmark Hill, v. Brixton Wanderers. 13 JUNE. 6. Norbury Park, v. Norbury. 6. Kingston, v. Kingston Grammar School. 13. Epsom, v. Epsom. 20. Catford, v. Panther. 20. Honor Oak, v. Columbia. 27. Sutton, v. Dulwich II. 27. Catford, v. St. Swithin’s. JULY. 4. Sutton, v. Addiscombe. 4. Sutton, v. Homefield School. 11. Sutton, v. Forest Hill. 11. Carshalton, v, Carshalton. 18. Champion Hill, v. Old Fairfieldians. 18. Weybridge, v 8t. George’s College. 25. Dulwich, v. Dulwich II. AUGUST. 1. Sutton, v. Epsom. 3. Sutton, v. Beddington. 4. Croydon, v. Croydon H. 8. Sutton, v. Norbury. 15. Forest Hill, v. Forest Hill. 22. Sutton, v. London & South Western Bank. 29. Sutton, v. London and County Bank. SEPTEMBER. 5. Hampton Wick, v. Hampton Wick. 5. Sutton, v. Columbia. 12. Sutton, v. Brixton Wanderers. 19. Honor Oak, v. Lloyd’s Register. The Rev. A. E. Beavan (King Charles’ Road, Surbiton) retains the office of Hon. Sec. of the S u r bito n Club. F. Fielding, his many friends will regret to learn, is for the moment unable to undertake the duties of the Captaincy, and in these cir­ cumstances a Vice-Captain has been appointed. Every one who has played at Surbiton will be grieved to learn that the coming season of 1897 will be the club’s last on its present field. Great efforts have been made to secure a renewal of the lease on reasonable conditions, but without success. MAY. 2. Weybridge, v. Oatlands Park. 2. Surbiton, v. Richmond * 9. Surbiton, v. Guy’s Hospital. 16. Tooting, v. Upper Tooting. 16. Surbiton, v. Upper Tooting.* 23. Surbiton, v. Merton. 23. Wimbledon, v. Wimbledon.* 25. Surbiton, v. Chiswick Park. 30. Surbiton, v. Broadwater. JUNE. 6. Surbiton, v. University College Hospital. 6. Chiswick Park v. Chiswick Park.* 13. Richmond, v. Richmond. 13. Surbiton, v. Teddington.* 20. Merton, v. Merton. 20. Surbiton, v. S. Margarets-on-Thames.* 27. Surbiton, v. Hampstead. 27. Waldegrave Park, v. Waldegrave Park.* JULY. 1. Virginia Water, v. S. Anne’s Heath. 4. Wimbledon, v. Wimbledon. 4. Surbiton, v. Wimbledon.* 11. Surbiton, v. Ealing. 18. Hampstead, v. Hampstead. 25. Surbiton, v. Marlboro’ Blues. 27. Surbiton, v. Incogniti.+ 29. Surbiton, v. Streatham. 30. Surbiton, v. Wimbledon. 31. Surbiton, v. M.C.C. AUGUST. 1. Surbiton, v. Richmond. 3. Surbiton, v. Oundle Rovers. 8. Surbiton, v. Teddington. 15. Surbiton, v. Upper Tooting. 22. Teddington, v. Teddington. 22. Surbiton, v. Waldegrave Park.* 29. Streatham, v. Streatham. SEPTEMBER. 2. Ealing, v. Ealing. * Half-holiday matches. + Two-day match. C RICKET Report Sheets, lOd. per dozen,post free. Order of Going-In Cards,7d. per dozen, post free. West’s Pocket Scoring Book, 1/2 each, post free.—To be obtained at the Office of Cricket, 168, Upper Thames Street. London, E.C.