Cricket 1896

A u g . 20, 1896. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 365 WARWICKSHIRE v. HAMPSHIRE. Played at Southampton on Aug. 13, 14 and 15. Warwickshire won by 10 wickets. The Hampshire men were doubly unfortunate in this match, for in addition to losing the toss, which pave Warwickshire an opportunity of batting on a perfect wicket, they had themselves to go iu on a wicket very much affected by rain. Mr. Bainbridge and W. G. Quaife were in great form in both innings of Warwickshire, and Diver, Lilley, and Mr. Glover ai-o played fine cricket in the first innings. But six of the side did practically nothing. The Hampshire first innings was only remarkable for a vigorously played and extremely useful 81 (including thirteen 4’s) by Mr, Robson, and a detennined stand by Mr. Steele at the end of the innings, but in the follow on CaptainWynyard and Captain Quinton were quite at their best. TherewasnoflawinWynyard’sinningsof 111, whichwas made in two hours and a half; it con­ tainedsixteen 4’s. At theendof thesecondday’splay, Hampshire werenotinahopelessposition, forwith six wickets downtheywere71 runs on. The tail, however, with the exception of Mr. Steele, who again played good cricket, did very little,and Warwickshire were left to make 110. So rapidly did Mr. Bainbridge and Quaife score that these runs were knocked off in seventy minutes. W a r w ic k sh ir e . Welford, c Ward, b Baldwin................. Santall, b Pillans ... Pallett, not out.......... Forester, stWynyard, b Baldwin .......... Extras .......... Total .......... I H. W . Bainbridge, b Steele..........................118 W.G.Quaife,bBaldwin 36 Diver, b Steele ........ 39 Law, c Robson, b Baldwin .................. 3 E, J. Pereira, c Rob­ son, b Baldwin ... 9 Lilley, c Quinton, b Ward............................36 A. C. S. Glover, b Baldwin .................... 41 Second innings :—H. W. Bainbridge, not out, 46; Quaife (W. G.), not out, 63; Extra 1.—Total (no wkt.) 110. H am p sh ire First innings. C. Robson, c Law, b Pallett 81 A. A. Pillans, run out ... 0 E. M. Barrett, cBainbridge, Second innings. b Santall .......... ! not out.................1! Bainbridge, Lilley st Lilley,b Pallett 14 b Pallett .......... 0 b Forester........................24 b Pallett Capt. Wynyard, c Law, b Law, b PaJlett................. 3 c H. F. Ward, c Glover, b Forester ........................ Barton, b Pallett................. Capt. Quinton, st Lilley, b Pallett E. C. Mariner, b Pallett ... D. A. Steele, c Santall, b Pallett............................... Baldwin, not out................. Kitchener, c Santall, b Pallett............................... 5 run out Extras ................. 7 Extras . Total ..........li ... 1 b ..111 b Pallett b Pallett ... 53 ... 0 c Lilley, b Pallett 33 b Pallett .......... 2 Total ......... 253 W a r w ic k s h ir e . First innings. i O. ' r " Baldwin ..., 50-2 18 89 6 Kitchener... 19 4 38 0 Pillans , 11 3 24 1 Mariner .. 5 1 9 0 Ward.......... 17 3 61 1 Barton . 13 3 86 0 Steele......... . 15 2 46 2 O. M. R. W . 14 4 37 0 3 1 14 0 3 1 11 0 4 1 16 0| 5 0 16 0 5 0 15 0 Ward delivered one no-ball and Kitchener one wide. H am pshire . First innings. Second innings. 0. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. Santall.......... 10 3 32 0 ............... 34 9 821 Forester......... 14 5 48 2 ... ... 12 7 13 0 Pallett Quaife ... 22 3 74 4 1 7 Glover Lilley 40 17 9 2 Pallett, Quaife and Forester bowled a wide each, Forester one no-ball. GLOUCESTERSHIRE v. NOTTS. Played at Bristol on August 13 and 14. Gloucestershire won by 307 runs. Without Shrewsbury and Gunn the Notts eleven was very weak, and as it had much the worst of the luck, the match ended in an easy victory for Glouces­ tershire, notwithstanding that W.G. did practically nothing for his side. The creditof thevictorybelongs in about equal proportions to Mr. Townsend, Mr. Jessop, Mr. Rice andMr. Sewell, who all did brilliant things, the two former both in bowling and batting. Mr. Champain also did well. Mr. Jessop and Mr. Sewell scored extremely fast in Gloucestershire’s second innings. Notts had much the worst of the wicket in both innings, and except that Mr. Oscroft scored 20 and Brown 40, their batsmen could do but little. G lou cestersh ire . First innings. W.G.Grace, cPike, b Brown 10 Wrathall, b Jones ........... 0 W. M’G. Hemingway, c Attewell, b Jones ........... 6 C. O. H. Sewell, c Attewell, b Jones ......................... 0 R. W. Rice, c Oscroft, b Brown............................ 68 C. L. Townsend, c Tike, b Attewell ........................38 G. L. Jfssop, c Oscroft, b Attewe’l ........................10 W.G.Grace, jun., bAttewell 0 Board, lbw, b Attewell ... 11 F. n . B. Champain, not out 33 Roberts, c Attewell, b Gutt­ ridge ..................................16 W 1,1b I ................ 2 Total ..................196 N o tts . First inniogs. A. O. Jones, c Jessop, b Townsend........................ 5 Daft, run out ................. 2 P. W. Oscroft, bGrace, sen. 20 Attewell, b Townsend ... 2 C. W. Wright, b Jessop ... 2 Bagguley, b Townsend ... 5 Carlin, c Grace, jun., b Townsend........................ 4 Pike, st Board, b Townsend 3 Guttridge, lbw, b Townsend 0 J. Gunn, not out.................12 Brown, b Jessop.................40 B 1, lb 3 ................. 4 Secrnd innings, cGunn, b Jones... 1 c Oscroft, b Jones 7 cWright, b Gutt­ ridge..................104 c Pike, b Jones... 11 c Brown, b Atte­ well .................. 1 st Tike, b Jones . 71 b Brown .......... 9 c O sc ro ft, b Guttridge ... 13 b Brown ..........28 not out................. 0 B 9, w l, nbl... 11 Total..........262 Second innings. c R ob erts, b Townsend ... 9 c Grace, jun., b Townsend ... 3 stBoard.bTowns- end ................. 2 b Jessop ..........14 b Jessop ..........10 b Jessop .......... 0 b ; not out... b Townsend cJessop,bTowns- end ................. cSewell,bTowns- end ................. B 5, lb 4.......... Total .................99 G lo u c e s te r s h ir e . First innings. Total..........52 Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Jones................. 21 5 53 3 ............. 19 3 84 4 Brown .......... 37 1484 2 .............. 16 2 75 2 Guttridge.......... 4*2 1 17 1 .......... 4 0 23 2 Attewell .......... 30 1740 4 .............. 13 5 34 1 Bagguley ... 3 0 22 0 Daft ........... 3 0 13 0 Jones bowled two wides and Guttiidge one no-ball. N otts . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Townsend.......... 20 4 59 6 ............ 10'1 2 28 6 Jessop.................14 3 6 16 2 ............ 10 5 15 4 Grace, sen........... 9 1 20 1 ............ SURREY v. KENT. Played at the Oval on August 13 and 14. Surrey won by ten wickets. The wicket at the Oval was very different from that which had been used for England v. Australia, but nevertheless the heavy rains had affected it to some extent- enough to makethe ball dounexpected things occasionally. Kent had the advantage of winningthe toss, and for a time things went well with them, not­ withstanding the absence of Alec Hearne. Mr. Mason played well for 22, and when Mr. Patterson and Mr. Burnup got together there wasreasonable prospect of a big score. In their different stylesboth menplayed excellent and pretty cricket. Mr. Patterson might have Veen the Patterson of years ago for any sign of falling off that there was in his play, and Mr. Burnup made many delightful strokes, which the Oval crowd appreciated to the full. Hayward at last went on to bowl, and met with such success that the innings came to an abrupt end. When he began to bowl the score was 95 for one wicket; the total was 135. Hay­ ward had five wickets for 26. It wasnot tobeexpected that Surrey would be disposed of for such a small score as this, more especially as Kent, in the absence of Walter Wright and Alec B earne, were lamentably weak in bowling, and nobody was surprised when Brockwell and Abel made a good stand for the first wicket. At the cl^se of the day the Kent score had been exceeded by one run, and only one wicket was down—that of Brockwell. Hayward was not out 28, and Abel not out 77. This looked very promising for Surrey, but Hayward, Holland, and Baldwin were soon out on Fiiday morning, and although Abel played one of his best innings, and only just missed his hundred, the total was not as large as had seemed likely. The two amateurs in the teamwere the only others who made many runs. For the second time in the match the first few batsmen on the Kent side did well. Mr. Mason and Mr. Bumup w-ent first to the wickets, and notwithstanding that the ball occasion­ ally did unaccountable things which astonished the batsmen and the bowlers alike, a fine stand was made. Mr. Burnup was at home at once, and his innings of 38 was most attractive. Mr. Mason was frequently in difficulties, but his innings of 23 had many good points. With Mr. Rashleigh and Mr. Patterson together another good stand was made. The bowling was never collared, and for once Mr. Rashleigh did not score at allrapidly. Hemade some good hits, however, and occasionally both he and Mr. Patterson ventured to drive Richardson to the boundary. Just when both men seemed thoroughly set Mr. Patterson was bowled, and very shortly afterwards the inning3 was over, Mr. Weigall alone making double figures. The last five batsmen made foui runs between them. Richardson and Hayward had good analyses, and Lohmann and Abel bowled well. K en t . First innings. J. R.Mason,bLohmann ...21 R. O’H. Livesay, bRichard­ son...................................... 1 W. H. Patterson, c Wood, b Richardson .................47 C. J. Burnup, b Hayward .. 45 Rev. W. Rashleigh, b Hay­ ward ............................... 8 G. J. V. Weigall, bRichard­ son...................................... 4 F. Marchant, b Hayward ... 4 Easby, b Hayward .......... 0 Martin, not out ................. 0 F. H. Huish, b Hayward ... 0 E. B. Shine, bRichardson... 1 Byes ........................ 4 Total... ..........135 S urrey . Second innings, b Richardson ... 23 b Richardson ... 5 b Thompson ... 26 lbw, b Lohmann 38 b Hayward..........34 b Hayward..........21 b Hayward.......... 1 b Richardson ... 1 c & b Richardson 0 b Richardson ... 1 not out................. 1 Byes .......... 4 Total ...155 Brockwell, c Huish, b Martin ................ Abel, c Huish, b Mar­ tin ........................ Hayward, c Mason, b Martin ................. Baldwin, c Patterson, b Martin................. Holland, c Huish, b Martin ................. W. W. Read, c and b Martin ................. Second innings:—K. son, not out, 0; w 1.—' Lohmann, lbw, b Mar­ tin ........................16 K. J. Key, c Shine, b Martin .................24 Thompson, not out ... 14 Wood, cMartin.bShine 9 Richardson, b Shine... 6 B 8, lb 4, w 1, nb 2 15 Total ...290 J. Key, not out, 0; Richard- Total, 1. Richardson, Abel Lohmann , Thompson . Brockwell , Hayward K en t . First innings. O. M. R. W. 29-2 17 36 4 7 - - 14 6 2 13 Second innings. O. M. R. W. 1 18 0 ... 5 29 1 ... 2 10 0 ... 0 12 0 ... 4 26 5 ... ... 2L'l ... 6 ... 10 ... 4 65 5 17 0 12 1 13 1 .19 4 44 3 S u rrey . O. M. R. W. I O. M. R. W . Martin... 66 31 89 8 Mason ... 19 5 47 0 Shine ... 53‘2 17 124 2 |Easby ... 5 0 15 0 Mason bowled a wide and two no-balls. LONDON AND COUNTY BANK v. PANTHER. Played at Catford on August 11, 12 and 13. P a n th er . A. Pauli, c Briggs, b Bienvenu.................21 A. Coppinger, run out 0 E. S. Barry, b Finlin- son ........................49 E. W. Mantle, notout 35 W. H. Williams, cand b Cumings ......... 15 W. L. Biyley, b Cu­ mings........................ 4 S. Silverthorne, cFast, b Bienvenu .......... 2 D.E. Williams, not out 11 Byes .................14 Total (6 wkts) 151 P. Newton, B. W. Green and A. J. Larkman did not bat. L ondon an d C ounty B ank . A. Jackson, c Green, b Bany ................. F. G. Cumings,b Pauli W . R. Pattinson, b Barry........................ J. A. Bienvenu, lbw, b Pauli ................. F. H. Briggs, b Barry F. J. Finlinson, not out ........................ W, Bell, b Barry W. East, b Pauli ... B. M. Waldock,bNew- ton ........................ P. W. Goodchild, b Newton ............... A. Silver, absent B G,lb 4 .......... Total ..........