Cricket 1895

32 CRICKET A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. F e b . 28, 1885 Yorkshire :— W . Rates, 1; J. T. Brown, 1; A. Greenwood, 1; L. Ball, 1; Lord Hawke, 4; F. Lee, 2; E. Lockwood, 2 ; R. Peel, 1; G. Ulyett, 1 ; E. Wainwright, 2. N.B.—None by R. Iddison, F. S. Jaakson, J. Row- botham, A . Sellers, and J. Tunnicliffe. P.S.—Bear in mind that in these lists we are dealing only with First Class County Matches. N OTABILIA. 1. Successful First Appearances : —L. Winslow, 124 for Sussex v. Gloucestershire, 1874 ; A. G. Steel, 87 for Lancashire v. Sussex, 1877; G. M. Kemp, 105for Lancashire v. Yorkshire, 1835 ; A. C.Mac- Laren, 107 for Lancashire v. Sussex, 1890. 2. Played all through this period, 1873 to 1894 E. M. Grace, W . G. Grace, A. N. Hornby, and W . W . Read. Walter Humphreys and Alfred Shaw both played in 1873 and 1894, but the former was absent from county cricket in 1877, 1878, and 1879. whilst the latter was absent from 1888 to to 1893 (inclusive). 3. Closure first applied by Surrey in 1889, when play­ ing Gloucestershire. Lancashire, in 1890, was the first county to apply it in the first innings, when meeting Sussex. 4. Middlesex v. Yorkshire, 1873. When match was a tie, scorers announced game, and stumps were drawn. Yorkshire, not insisting on strict letter of the law, turned out again, stumps were re­ pitched, and one run was scored. Thus Middle­ sex won by 10 wickets. 5. Rapid scoring:—I. D. Walker and A. Lyttleton scored 226 runs in an hour and three-quarters for Middlesex v. Gloucestershire. 6. Surrey v. Notts at Oval, 1592, 63,768 persons paid for admission. 7. The 346 runs made by H. T. Hewett and L. C. Palairet for Somersetshire v. Yorkshire, 1892, is the record for the first w icket; whilst the 173 by .1. Briggs and R. Pilling for Lancashire v. Surrey, 1883, is the record for the last wicket. II.-B O W L E R S . 1. 100 W ickets in One Season L an cash ire — Mold, 104 in 1890; 112 in 1891, 117 in 1893,144 in 1894. Brigars. 103 in 1«93. M id d le se x —J. T. Hearne, 100 in 1890, 118 in 1891, 137 in 1893, 119 in 1894. N o tts —F. Morley, 118 in 1878. S u rrey —J. Southerton, 107 in 1873. G. Lohmann, 108 in 1887, 142 in 1888, 116 in 1889, 102 in 1890, 132 in 1891, 113 in 1892. W . Lockwood, 114 in 1890. J. W . Sharpe, 102 in 1892. T. Richardson, 120 in 1894. S u ssex —W . Humphreys, 122 in 1893. Y o r k s h ir e — E . Peate, 100 in 1880, 110 in 1881, 116 in 1882. 2. (a) All the Wickets in an Innings:—G. Burton, for Middlesex v. Surrey, in 1888. b. Nine Wickets in an Innings:— G lou cestersh ire — W . G. Grace v. Notts, 1877. K en t —F. Martin v. Surrey, 1890. L an cash ire — A. Appleby v. Sussex, 1877. R. Barlow v. Sussex, 1886. J. Briggs v. Sussex, 1885; v. Sussex, 1888. A. Mold v. Yorkshire, 1890; v. Kent, 1892. A . G. Steel v. Yorkshire, 1878. A . Watson v. Derbyshire, 1874, M id d l e s e x — J. T. Hearne v. Notts, 1891. N o t t s — R. J. Mee v. Sussex, 1893. S urer V'—G. Lohmann v. Sussex, 1889. J. W . Sharpe v. Middlesex, 1891. T. Richardson v. Yorkshire, 1893. Y orksh ire — E . Wainwright v. Middlesex, 1894. c. Most Wickets in a Match :—17, by W . G. Grace v. Notts, 1877. d. 16 Wickets in a Match :—G. Burton for Middlesex v. Yorkshire, 1888. -. 15 Wickets in a M atch:— G lou cestersh ire —W . G. Grace v. Surrey, 1879, K e n t — W . Hearne v. Lancashire, 1893. L an c a sh ir e — W . McIntyre v. Derbyshire, 1877. A. Mold v. Somersetshire, 1891; v. Sussex, 1894. S u rrey — G. Lohmann v. Sussex, 1889. S ussex —F. Parris v. Gloucestershire, 1894. f. Four Wickets with Consecutive Balls:—F. Shack- lock. f or Notts v. Somov e shire, 1893—all clean bowled. </. The Hat-Trick in both innings of one match :— A. Shaw for Notts v. Gloucestershire, 1884. h. Th e Hat-Trick in one innings :— Derbyshire—H. Evans v. Pussex, 1881. Gloucestershire—C. L. Townsend v. Somerset­ shire, 1893. K ei^—F. M trcin v. Surrey, 1890 ; W . Hearne v. L m ra hire, 1894; W . F. Best v. Somerset­ shire, 1891. L.n'jashire—J. Crossland v. Surrey, 1881; R. G. Barlow v. Derbyshire, 1881 ; A . Mold, v. Somersetshire, 1894. Notts—A. Shaw v. Derbyshire, 1875 ; J. A. Dixon v. Lancashire, 1887; W . Flowers v. Kent. 1888. Surrey—T. Richardson v. Gloucestershire, 1893. Sussex - W . Blackman v. Surrey, 1881. Yorkshire—E. Peate v. Kent, 1882 ; v. Gloucester­ shire, 1884; G. Ulyett v. Lancashire, 1883; E, Wainwright, v. Sussex, 1894. t. Bowlers unchanged in a m atch:— Gloucestershire—W . G. Grace and W . R. Gilbert v. Lancashire, 1878. Kent—A Penn and -T. Wootton v. Sussex, 1881. W . W right and F. Martin v. Yorkshire, 1889, W.*W right and F. Martin v. Sussex, 1890. W . W right and F. Martin v. Middlesex, 1891. W . Hearne and F. Martin v. Surrey. 1894. Lancashire—A . Watson and W . McIntyre v. Surrey, 1873 (both matches). A . Watson and W . McIntyre v. Derbyshire, 1876 (both matches). A . Watson and W . McIntyre v. Notts, 1877. A . Watson and R. Barlow v. Derbyshire, 1883. J. Briggs and R. Barlow v. Gloucestershire, 1888. J. Briggs and A . Watson v. Sussex, 1890. A . M old and A. Watson v. Yorkshire, 1890. A . Mold and J. Briggs v. Sussex, 1891 (both matches). A. Mold and J. Briggs v. Kent, 1892. A . Mold and A. Watson v. Sussex, 1892. Middlesex—J. T. Hearne and J. T. Rawlin v. Sussex, 1892. Notts—A . Shaw and F. Morley v. Surrey, v. Yorkshire and v. Kent, 1878. A. Shaw and F. Morley v. Derbyshire, 1879 (both matches). A . Shaw and W . Attewell v. Gloucestershire, 1884. Surrey—G. Lohmann and J. Beaumont v. Kent, 1889. G. Lohmann and J. Sharpe v. Lancashire, 1890. G. Lohmann and J. Sharpe v. Somersetshire, 1891. T. Richardson and F. Smith v. Gloucester­ shire, 1894. Sussex—J. Lillywhite and R. Fillery v. Kent, v. Surrey, and v. Gloucestershire, 1873. J. Lillywhite and R. Pillery v. Notts, 1874. Yorkshire—T. Emmett and A. Hill v. Surrey and v. Lancashire, 1873. T. Emmett and A. Hill v. Notts and v. Lancashire, 1874. T. Emmett and W . Bates v. Sussex, 1878. E. Peate and W . Bites v. Notts, 1880. E. Peate and A . Hill v. Surrey, 1881. E. Peate and W . Bates v. Notts, 1881. E. Peate and G. Harrison v . Kent, 1883. E. Peate and T. Emmett v. Sussex, 1886 R. Peel and E. Wainwright v. Sussex, 1894. k. All the bowlers on in one innings : For Kent v. Sussex, 1884. For Sussex v. Surrey, 1888. Whilst 10 men bowled for Middlesex v. York­ shire, 1884, and for Notts v. Kent, 1888. P. S .—Any corrections to these County Summaries will be gladly acknowledged. N O W R E A D Y . Yol. XIII. of “ CR ICKET , ” Neatly bound in dark green cloth with gilt lettering. Price 8 s . 6d. (Per Parcels Post, securely packed, 9d. extra.) B esides Full Scores of all principal matches played in 1894, Biographies of Eminent Cricketers, and a mass of Valuable Informa­ tion, it contains the following portraits :— J. Douglas (Middlesex), H. C. Stewart, J. R. Mason, Walter Heame, and F. N. Perkins (of Kent), Routledge and E. A. Halliwell (of South African Team), Smith, Hayward, Richardson, Brockwell, and D. L. A. Jeplison (of Surrey), Butt (of Sussex), F. N. Perkins, S. M. J. W oods, J. A. Dixon, L. C. H. Palairet, Lockwood, Flowers, and the following groups:—First Class Cricketers in 1893, South African Team, Surrey Eleven, Middlesex Eleven, Notts Eleven. Yorkshire Eleven, Warwickshire Eleven, Gentlemen of Holland, Surrey Second Eleven; History, with Portraits, of the following Metropolitan Clubs :—Clapton, Northbrook, Black- heath, Leatherhead, and Croydon. In addition to the above, the following Illus­ trations are also included in the volume :— Lords and Ladies, A Past Master of the Oval, A t the Bar of the House, In the Nets (Surrey Smith), Briggs as he Bowls, Twelfth English Team in Aus­ tralia, Cricket at Lords in 1822. Stories by W. S afte , J un ,, J. N. P entelow , and E. V. B. C h r ist ia n . Cases for Binding, 2s. 6d. OFFICE OF “ CRICKET.” 6, C reed L ane , L udgate H il J E .C . Printed for the Proprietor by M essrs . M e r r itt & H atch er , 167,168 and 169, Upper Thames Street, London, E.C., February 28th, 1895.