Cricket 1895

142 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. M ay 16, 1895. W arw ickshire . First Innings. Mr. H. W . Bainbridge, c Davidson, b Hulme ... 11 W . Quaife, c Malthouse, b H ulm e................................... 8 Santall, c Evans, b Hulme 8 W . G. Quaife, c Storer, b E v a n s...................................26 Lilley, b Davidson ...........139 Rhodes,c Sugg, b Walker... 64 Law, c Sugg, b Walker ... 8 Devey, lbw, b Davidson ... 17 Barnes, nor. out ................... 9 Pallett, b Davidson ........... 3 Barton,c Hulme, b Davidson 10 B yes................................... 2 Second Innings, not out...................104 lbw, b Hulme b Davidson... b Hulme ........... 3 b Evans ...........22 cW right,bWalker 7 run out .......... 22 cW right,bWalker 2 not out...................11 Extras........... 8 Total ...................305 Total *237 * Innings declared closed. D erbyshire , First Innings. Mr. S. H. Evershed, b Pallett .......................... Mr. L. G. W right, c Devey, b Santall ........................... Bagshaw, c Bainbridge, b Pallett •Chatterton, b Paliett........... Storer, c Rhodes, b Pallett Davidson, c Devey, b Pallett Hulme, c Barnes, b Pallett W . Sugg, c Bainbridge, b Santall ........................... Evans, b P a lle tt................... Malthouse, not out ........... Mr. G. G. Walker, c Bain­ bridge, b Pallett ........... B 3, 1-b 5, w 1... Total ...................5 Second Innings. c Santall, Barnes lbw, b P allett. not out ... . not out ... . b Santall B 10,1-b 2, w 3 15 T ota l...........197 W arwickshire . First Innings. Second Innings. O. R. R, W . O. M . R. W . Davidson ... 34*216 46 4 ........... 25 7 68 1 Hulme ... ... 34 9 91 3 ... .. 29 15 41 2 W alker ... ... 25 5 70 2 ........... 19 3 65 2 Evans ... ... 17 5 40 1 ........... 8 2 36 1 Malthouse ... 12 4 22 0 ........... 10 5 19 0 Bagshaw ... 7 2 14 0 Chatterton ... 3 0 20 0 D erbyshire . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W . Pallett . . 46-2 18 69 8 ........... 35 16 48 1 Barnes . 12 3 30 0 ........... 10 2 20 1 Santall .. 40 6 90 2 ........... 32 13 54 1 Barton . 10 1 24 0 ........... 9 5 18 0 Devey . 4 0 12 0 ........... 7 1 17 0 W G. Quaife 9 4 25 0 Pallett bowled a wide and Quaife tw o wides. LEATHERHEAD. May 1. School Ground, v. St. John’s College. May 4. Leatherhead, v. Preston House. May 11. Leatherhead, v. Ewell. May 18. Leatherhead, v. Sutton. May 22. Leatherhead, v. Cheam. May 25. Leatherhead, v. Institute. June 1. Wimbledon, v. Wimbledon. June 3. Epsom, v. Epsom. June 5. Leatherhead, v. Ashstead. June 8. Leatherhead, v. Crystal Palace. June 15. Leatherhead, v. St. John’s College. June 22. Sutton, v. Sutton. June 25. Dorking, v. Dorking. June 29. W imbledon, v. Wimbledon, July 3. Leatherhead, v. Ockley. July 6. Leatherhead, v. Old Westminsters. July 10. Ashstead, v. Ashstead. July 20. Streatham, v-. Streatham. July 22. Reigate, v. Reigate Hill. .July 24. Ockley, v. Ockley. July 27. Leatherhead, v. i^psom. Aug. 3. Leatherhead, v. Granville (Lee), Aug. 5. Leatherhead, v. Wimbledon. Aug. 6. Leatherhead, v. Richmond. Aug. 7. Leatherhead, v. Reigate Hill. Aug. 8. Leatherhead, v. Surrey fJlub and Ground. Aug. 9. Leatherhead, v. Broadwater. Aug. 10. Leatherhead, v. M.C.C. Aug. 17. Richmond, v. Richmond. . Aug. 21. Leatherhead, v. Dorking. Aug. 24. Ewell, v. Ewell. Sept. 7. Leatherhead, v. Streatham. Sept. 14. Leatherhead, v. Institute. TWELVE YEARS OP SURREY CRICKET. (1882-1893). Continued from C r ick et of May 2 ni. Bat then Somerset won at the Oval by 30 runs (Tyler eleven wickets for 97), Kent at Catford Bridge by 22 (Walter Heame ten for 89), and Sussex by 129, Marlow playing splendidly for 80 and 126. A gleam of hope came when the Australians were beaten by two wickets in a match of many runs ; but this was followed by a nine wickets’ defeat from Lancashire, for whom Johnny Briggs made 112. Then came a draw with Kent, Hayward scoring 112, and Walter Read 84, and a really grand victory by ten wickets over Notts. But this was fol­ lowed by a five wickets’ defeat from Leicestershire (discounted by the fact that the amateurs, with Lockwood and Maurice Read, were all away), in a match in which only 197 runs were scored. Warwickshire was beaten in an innings ; and Somerset by eight wickets; and then the first-class season wound up with an inglorious defeat by 33 runs from Glouces­ tershire at Cheltenham. Matches with Essex (lost by 102 runs) and Derbyshire (won by seven wickets) completed the cards. Weakness in batting caused the Surrey failures in 1893. Mr. W. W. Read made 1,126 runs—average 32 ; Mr. Key batted well, and Brockwell improved immensely; but the rest of the men—and especially Abel, whose eyes troubled him a good deal, and Mr. Shuter—were below their proper form. In spite of Lohmann’s absence the bowling was very strong Richardson took 184 wickets for 2,449, Lockwood 112 for 1,849, and Brockwell 80 for 1,123. Y. Having already (in Chapter I.) given the particulars of matches won and lost, runs scored for and against, and the like, we now, after an all too brief review of the three hundred or so of matches played, wherein exigencies of space caused the omission of many an interesting and important detail, come to the individual averages and records. And first we will give a list of the centuries scored. The figure in brackets against the name of the player indicates the number of centuries scored for his county during the twelve years ; while against each score is given the place at which and the year in which the innings was played. CENTURIES FOR SURREY. A g a in st M e. W . "W. R ea d (32). Cambridge University—114, Oval, 1886 : 244*. Oval 1887. Derbyshire—109, Oval, 1885; 123, Derby, 1885: 115, Oval, 1886; 145, Derby, 1887. Essex—143, Oval, 1885 ; 214*, Leyton, 1885; 129, Leyton, 1888. Gloucestershire—135, Clifton, 1884; 120, Clifton, 1886; 107, Cheltenham, 1892, Hampshire—168, Oval, 1883; 102, Oval, 1890. Kent—117, Oval, 1882 ; 100, Oval, 1887. Lancashire—127, Old Trafford, 1883 ; 247, Old Trafford, 1887 ; 147*, Old I'rafford, 1893. Leicestershire—161*, Oval, 1884: 157*, Oval, 1886. Middlesex—115, Oval, 1889. Notts—135, Oval, 1885. Oxford University—118, Oxford, 1887 : 338, Oval. 1888. Scotland—156, Edingburgh, 1892. Sussex—163, Oval. 1885; 101. Brighton, 1885; 171, Oval, 1888; 112, Brighton, 1892; 196*, Oval, 1892. Yorkshire —103, Oval, 1888. J. M. R ead (9). Australians—186, Oval, 1886. Derbyshire -108, Oval, 1893. Gloucestershire—113*, Oval, 1883; 135, Oval, 1890. Leicestershire—131, Leicester, 1892. Oxford University—136, Oval, 1889. Somerset—186*, Oval, 1883. Yorkshire—109, Bradford, 1888; 135, Sheffield, 1891. R. A bel (9). Australians—144, Oval, 1886. Cambridge University—160, Oval, 1888. Gloucestershire—110, Oval, 1886. Lancashire—146, Oval, 1890. Leicestershire—118, Leicester, 1887. Middlesex—151*, Lord’s 1890. Notts—103, Trent Bridge, 1891. Oxford University- - 138, Oval, 1889. Sussex—197, Oval, 1891. M r . K . J. K ey (8). Derbyshire—137, Oval, 1890. Essex—105, Leyton, 1887. Kent—179, Oval, 1887. Middlesex—121*, Lord’s, 1889. Oxford University—176*, Oxford, 1889. Scotland—143, Oval, 1892. Yorkshire—108, Bradford, 1888; 100, Oval, 1893. M r . W . E R oller (8). K ent-142, Oval, 1883; 102*, Beckenham, 1886. Lancashire—12i», Old Trafford, 1887. Leicestershire—120, Leicester, 1890. Middlesex—118, Lord’s, 1887. Oxford University—109, Oval, 1887. Sussex—204, Oval, 1885 ; 144, Brighton, 1885. Mit. J. S huter (7). Essex—117, Oval, 1890. Gloucestershire—101, Clifton, 1884. Hampshire—125, Southampton, 1884; 135, Oval, 1885. Middlesex—100, Oval, 1887. Oxford University—111, Oxford, 1887. Sussex—108*, Oval, 1883. W . H. L ockwood (5). Hampshire—117*, Southampton, 1889; 100, Ova 1891. Leicestershire—168, Leicester, 1890, Oxford University—102, Oxford, 1892. Yorkshire—102, Oval, 1890. G. A . L ohmann (3). Essex—105, Oval, 1889. Kent—107, Beckenham, 1886. Sussex—115, Brighton, 1887. R. H enderson (3). Hampshire—105, Oval, 1891. Scotland—133, Oval, 1892. Somerset—106, Oval, 1891. M r . M . P. B owden (2). Hampshire—125, Southampton, 1885. Sussex—189*, Oval, 1888. T. H ayw ard (2). Kent-112, Oval, 1893. Leicestershire—100, Oval, 1893. E. J. D iver (1). Oxford University—143, Oxford, 1885. Thirty-six batsmen have made centuries against Surrey during the twelve years, Shrewsbury and Briggs doing so twice. The names are given in alphabetical order. CENTURIES AGAINST SURREY. W . Barnes, Notts—130, Oval, 1882. Mr. J. H. Brain, Gloucester—143, Clifton, 1884. J. Briggs, Lancashire—186, Liverpool, 1885; J. Briggs, Lancashire—112, Oval, 1893, Mr. E. H. Buckland, Oxford—148, Oval, 1887. Mr. J. Cranston, Gloucester—*111 Mr. J. Eccles, Lancashire—184, Oval, 1888. Dr. W . G. Grace, Gloucester—104, Cheltenham, 1883. W . Gunn, Notts- -118, Trent Bridge, 1889. Mr. A . N. Hornby, Lancashire -161, Liverpool, 1886. Mr. F. S. Jackson,Cambridge—123,Cambridge, 1893. A. A . Lilley, Warwickshire—124, Oval, 1893. Mr. A . Lorrimer, Leicestershire—109, Leicester, 1890. Mr. F. M. Lucas, Sussex—121, Oval, 1886. F. W . Marlow, Sussex—126, Oval, 1893. Mr. W. Newnham, Sussex—115, Brighton, 1885. Mr. T. C. O’Brien, Middlesex—113, Lord’s, 1893. J. Painter, Gloucestershire—133, Clifton, 1884. W . Quaife, Sussex—111, Brighton, 1887. Mr. O. G. Radcliffe, then Somerset—101, Oval, 1885. Mr. W . Rashleigh—105, Oxford, 1887 Mr. A. W . Ridley, Middlesex—136, Lord’s, 1883 Mr. F. E. Rowe, Essex—129, Leyton, 1892. Mr. S. W . Scott, Middlesex—126, Oval, 1882. W . H. Scotton, Notts—*110, Nottingham, 1886. A. Shrewsbury, Notts—207, Oval, 1882; A. Shrews­ bury, Notts—127, Oval, 1884. Mr. E. Smith, for Mr. Thornton’s England X I.—122, Scarboro’ , 1892. Mr. A. G. Steel, Lancashire—105, Old Trafford, 1887 Mr. H. B. Steel, Lancashire—100, Oval, 1884. ; Mr. A. E. Stoddart, Middlesex -125, Lord’s, 1893. Mr. C. T. Studd, Cambridge—*175, Oval, 1883