Cricket 1893

APRIL 20, 1893 CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECOBD OF THE GAME. 77 TH E SEASON OF 1893. The ollow ing is the revised version of the principal fixtures for this year :— MAY. 4 —Lord’s, M.C.C.& Grv. Notts.(Wheeler's benefit) 4—Cambridge, the Senior’s Match 4—Oxford, the Freshmens’ Match 5—Taunton, Somersetshire Colts’ Match ft—Sheffield Park, Lord Sheffield’sX I. v. Austral. 8—Cambridge, Univ. v. Mr. Thornton’s Eng. XI. 8—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Warwickshire 8—Oxford, University v. Sixteen Freshm en 11—L ord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Lancashire 11—Nottingham, Nottinghamshire v. Sussex 11—G 'oucester, Gloucestershire v. Yorkshire 11—Birmingham, W arwickshire v. Australians 11—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Leicestershire 11—Oxford, University, v. Next Sixteen 16—Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Australians 15—Cambridge, the University v. Gentlem en o f England (Mr. A. J. W ebbe’s Eleven) 15—Oxford, the University v. Lancashire 15—Lord’s, M.C.U. and Ground v. Sussex 16— Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Essex 18—Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. v. Yorkshire 18—Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Australians 18—Oxford, Oxford University v. Gentlem en of England (Mr. A. J. W ebbe’s Eleven) 18—Derby, Derbyshire v. Surrey 22—(W hitMonday;—Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Australians 22—Nottingham, N ottingham shire v. Surrey 22—Manchester. Lancashire v. Kent 22—Lord’s, Middlesex v. Somerset 22—Brighton, Sussex v. Gloucestershire 22—Leyton, Essex v. Derbyshire 23— Birmingham, W arwickshire v. Cheshire 12—Leicester, Leicestershire v. Hampshire 22—Uppingham, the School v. M.C.C. & G. 25—Manchester, Lancashire v. Australians . */5—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Middlesex 25—Brighton, Sussex v. Somerset 25—Maidstone, Kent v. Gloucestershire 25—Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. v. M.C.C. & G. 25—Leicester, Leicestershire v. Yorkshire 25—Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Notts 25—L ord’s, M.C.C. & G. v. Northumberland 29—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Australians 29—Leeds, Yorkshire v. Sussex 29—Lord’s, Middlesex v. Gloucestershire 29—Cambridge, Eleven v. Next Sixteen. 29—Oxford, University v. Somersetshire JUNE. 1—Lord’s, M iddlesex v. Yorkshire 1—Nottingham, N otts v. Somerset 1—Manchester, Lancashire v. Sussex 1—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Gloucestershire 1—Leyton, Essex v. Leicestershire 1—Oxford, University v. Australians 5—Bradford, Yorkshire v. Australians 5—Lora’s. Middlesex v. Notts 5—Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Kent 5—Cambridge, Cambridge University v. Surrey 5—Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Leicestershire 5—Derby, Derbyshire v. Cheshire E—Oxford, University v. M.C.C. & G. 8— Mancheste-, Lancashire v. Surrey ft—Brichton, Sussex v. Nottinghamshire 8—Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Kent e—Uambridge, Camoridge Univ. v. Austra’ians 8—Leyton, Essex v. Yorkshire 9—Cardiff, Glamorganshire v. M onm outhshire 9—Oval. Surrey (2) v Lancashire (2) 12—Lord’s, Gentlem en of England v. Australians 12—Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Surrey 12—Leicester, Leicestershire v. N ottinghamshire 12—Derby, Derbyshire v. Lancashire 12—Kennington Oval, Surrey (2) v. Yorkshire (2) 15—Oval, South o f England v. Australians 15—Nottingham, Nottinghamshire v. Lancashire 15—Taunton, Som erset v. Yorkshire 15—Brighton, Sussex v. Middlesex. 15—Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Derbyshire 15—Stoke, Staffordshire v. Warwickshire 15—W ellington, Col ege v. M.C.C. 19— Lord’s. Players of England v. Australians 19 —Leeds, Yorkshire v. Lancashire 19-Gravesend, Kent v. Middlesex 20—W inchester, College v. M.C.C. 22—Gravesend, Kent v. Australians. 22—Lord’s, M iddlesex v. Surrey. 22—Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Nottinghamshire 22—Manchester, Lancashire v. O xford University 22—Brighton, Sussex v. Cambridge University 22—Halifax, Yorkshire v. Leicestershire £3 -E to n v. W inchester 23—Marlbro’, Col'ege v. M.C 0. 23—Sherborne, School v. M.C.C. 23—Leyton, Essex v. Dublin University 5:6—Nottingham, England v. Australia, for Shrewsbury’s leneftt 26—Tonbridge. Kent v. Lancashire 26—Lord’s, M.C.C. and G. v. C»m bridge Univ. 26—Brighton, Sussex v. Oxford U niversity 26—Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Yorkshire 26—Leicester. Leicestershire v. Essex. 26—Stockport, Cheshire v. Derbyshire. £9—Manchester, N orth of England v. Australians 29—Tonbridge, K ent v. Somersetshire. *9—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Yorkshire. 29—Lord’s, M.C.C. and G. v. O xford University. 29—Leeds, Yorkshire 2nd v. Surrey 2nd 29—Edinburgh, Scotland v. Gloucestershire JULY. 3—Lord’s, Oxford v. Cambridge 3—Bradford, Yorkshire v. N ottingham shire 3—Brighton, Sussex v. Surrey 3— D erby, Derbyshire v. A u stra lia n s 3—Birkenhead Park, Cheshire v. Staffordshire 6—Kennington Oval, Gentlem en v. Player 6—Lord’s, Middlesex v. Sussex 6—Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Somerset 6—Leicester, Leicestershire v. Australians 6—Dublin, D ublin University v. Oxford University 7—M arlboro’, College v. Cheltenham College 7—Rossall, School v. M.C.C. 10—Lord’s, Gentlemen v. Players 10 —Leeds, Yorkshire v. Australians 10—Taunton, Som erset v. Kent 10—Manchester, Lancashire v. Derbyshire 13—Brighton, Sussex v. Australians 13—Nottingham, N ottingham shire v. Yorkshire 13-B ristol, Gloucestershire v. Lancashire 13—Kennington 0*al, Surrey v. Som erset 14—Lord’s, Eton v. Harrow 14—Malvern, College v. M.C.C. and Ground 17—Lord’s, England v. Australia 17—Taunton, Somerset v. Lancashire 17—Derby, Derbyshire v. Yorkshire 17—Leyton, Espex v. Hampshire 17—Hull, N. and E. Riding Yorks, v. W arwickshire C. and Ground 17—Oval, Surrey (2) v. Hertfordshire 20—Taunton, Som erset v. Australians 20—Manchester, Lancashire v. Middlesex 20—Catford Bridge, Kent v. Surrey 2 —Dewsbury, Yorkshire v. Warwickshire 20—Brighton, Sussex v. Hampshire 20—Lord’s, M.C.C. and G round v. Leicestershire 24-L iverpool, Lancashire v. Somerset 24—Nottingham, N otts v. Kent 24—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Sussex 21—Sheffield, Yorkshire v. Essex 24—Birmingham, Warwickshire v. Ham pshire 24—Stoke, Staffordshire v. Cheshire 21—Lord's, Middlesex v. Australians 27—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Australians 27—Huddersfield, Yorkshire v. Gloucestershire 27— Beckenham, Kent v. Sussex 27—Derby, Derbyshire v. Ham pshire 27—Cambridge, Cambridgeshire v. Norfolk 27—Lords, M.C.C. and Ground v. Bedfordshire 28—Lincoln, Lincolnshire v. Hertfordshire 28—Newport, M onm outhshire v. Glamorganshire 28—N ortham pton, Northam pton v. M.C.C. and G 28—Manchester, Lancashire (2) v. Yorkshire (2) 81—N ottingham , Notts v. Gloucestershire 31—Blacbheath, Kent v. Yorkshire 31—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Lancashire 31—Leicester, Leicestershire v. Derbyshire 31—Bedford, Beds v. Lincolnshire or Bucks 31—Exeter Devonshire v. Glam organshire 81—Portsm outh, Australians v. Ox. & Cam. (P. & P.) 31—Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Lincolnshire 31—Southam pton, Hampshire Club and Ground v. Uppingham Rovers 31—Sunderland, Durham v. M.C.C. and Ground 31—Dudley, W orcestershire v. W arwickshire Club and Ground 31—Manchester, Manchester Club and Ground v. Hairow Wanderers AUGUST. 2—Lord’s, Rugby v. M arlborough 3—Leyton, Cambridge Past & Present v. Austral. 3—Manchester, Lancashire v. Gloucestershire. 3 -K ennington Oval, Surrey v. Kent 3—Hull, Yorkshire v. Derbyshire 3—Southam pton, Ham pshire v Sussex 4—Oxford, Oxfordshire v. Staffordshire 4—M.C.C. and Ground v. Cheltenham College 4.—W orcester, W orcestershire v. Surrey (2) 4—Bedford, Bedfordshire v. M.C.C. and Ground 7 (Ban* Holiday)—At Canterbury, Kent v. Australians 7 (Bank Holiday)— Oval, Surrey v. Notts 7—Taunton, Somerset v. Middlesex 7—Bristol, Gloucestershire v. Sussex 7— Birmingham, W arwickshire v. Staffordshire 7—Derby, Derbyshire v. Essex 7—Leicester, Leicestershire v. Cheshire 7—Southampton, Hampshire v. Devonshire 7—Norwich, N orfolk v. Cambridgeshire 7—Lord’s, M.C.C. and G round v. Notts Castle 7—Malvern, Worcestershire v. Lancashire 2nd 7 -M anchester, Lancashire v. Yorkshire 7—Dunstable. Surrey (2) v. Bedfordshire 9—Norwich, N orfolk v. Lincolnshire 9—Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. H ertfordshire 9—N ortham pton, Northants v. Bucks 9—Malvern, W orcestershire v. Devonshire 9—Swindon, W iltshire v. Glamorganshire 10—Canterbury, Kent v. Nottinghamshire 10—Taunton, Som erset v. Sussex 10—Clifton, Gloucestershire v. Middlesex 10— I eicester, Leicestershire v. Surrey 10—Southam pton. Hampshire v. W arwickshire 11—N orwich, N orfolk v. Herts 11 - L ord’s, M.C.C. & G. v. Glam organshire 11—Malvern. Lancashire (2) v. Worcestershire 11—Dunstable, Bedfordshire v. Oxfordshire 14—Cheltenham, Gloucestershire v. Somersetshire 14—Oval, England v Australians(M. Read’s Beni fit) 14—Bradford, Yorkshire v. Middlesex 14—Birm ingham , W arwickshire v. Surrey 14—D erby, Derbyshire v. Leicester 14—Huntingdon, Huntingdonshire v. Lincolnshire 16—W atford, Hertfordshire v, Lincolnshire 16— Cambridge. Cambridgeshire v. Oxfordshire 16—Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Cheshire 17—Cheltenham, Gloucestershire v. Australians 17—Nottingham , N ottinghamshire v. M iddlesex 17—Brighton, Sussex v. Lancashire 17 - Taunton, Som erset v. Surrey 18—Darlington, Durham v. Yorks 18—Bicester. O xfoidshire v. Bedfordshire 18-L o r d ’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Warwickshire 21—Bishop’s Stortford, Hertfordshire v. Norfolk 21—Lord’s, Middlesex v. Lancashire 21—Taunton, Somersetshire v. Nottinghamshire 21—Sheffield. Yorkshire v. Kent 21—Clifton, G loi cestershire v. Surrey 21—Southam pton. Hampshire v, Leicestershire 21—Birkenhead Park, Cheshire v. Warwickshire 21—Oval, Surrey Second Eleven v. W orcestershire 21—Exeter, Devonshire v. M,C.C. and Ground 23—Cardiff, Glamorganshire v. Wiltshire 28—Exeter, Devonshire v W orcestershire 24—M anchester, England v. Australians 21—L ord’s, Middlesex v. Kent 24—Brighton, Sussex v. Yorkshire 24—Leyton, Essex v. Surrey 24-Southam pton, Ham pshire v. Derbyshire 25—Durham, Durham v. Warwickshire 28—Manchester, Lancashire v. Notts 28—Brighton, Sussex v. Kent 28—Taunton, Som erset v. Gloucestershire 28—Scarborough, Yorkshire v. M.C.C. and Ground 28—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Derbyshire 23—Leicester, Leicestershire v. W arwickshiie 28—Southam pton, Ham pshire v. Essex 29—Lord’s, M.C.C. and Ground v. Staffordshire 31—Scarborough, N orth v. South 31—N ottingham , N otts v. Australians SEPTEMBER. 1—Lord’s, M.C.C. & G. v. Cambridgeshire 4—Scarborough, Mr. C. I. Thornton’s England Eleven v. Australians 7—Hastings, South o f England v. Australians 11—Hastings, Gentlem en v. Players M ILL H IL L PARK v. EALING W A S P S—Played at Ealing on April 15. M ill H ill P ark . L. J. Norm an, b Parsons ................... 0 Capt. R. H. Grey, b Dickens jun............... 0 H.L. White, b Dickens jur................................. 1 G. A. de Belin, b Dickens ju n .............. 0 Soley. c Beaucham p, b Parsons.................. 11 W .Ridgway.bDickens jun................................ 3 F. T. Joy, b Parsons H. P. W oodhouse, b Dickens jun............. A. B. Ridgway, not out .......................... W . J. S.arlef, b P a rson s................... C. H. de Belin, b P a rson s................... Total ... 19 E alixg W asps . B. Cope, b J o y ........ H.Beauchamp,b Soley E .J. Beer, b Joy G. Parsons, b Joy ... G. Percy, b J o y ......... A. Nye, b S o le y ........ W. Dickens jun., b Joy ........................... R. Percy, b Joy A. Hellard, not o u t .. W . Dickens sen., b J o y .......................... R. Chambers, b Joy b ........................ T otal........... Richard Humphrey is engaged at Bedford Grammar School for the second year. On March 4 Mr. Victor Cohen, the manager of the coming Australian team, was enter­ tained at dinner at the Oxford Hotel, Sydney, by a number of the chief cricketers of New South Wales. In a match at Rush Cutters Bay (N.S.W.) on March 4, W . Camphin carried his bat through the innings for Ivanhoe v. Sydney University. He scored 60 out of 103. On the other side, T. W . Garrett, who will be well re­ membered in connection with the ear.ier Australian teams, made 56 not out of SO for three wickets. C. Lillyw hite & Co. have a quantity of good Cricket Balls, slightly discoloured, which they are willing to cleir as f o l l o w s F o u r Seamed 51/-. Catgut 8eamed 48/-. Best M atch 42/-, Second Match 39/*, Treble Practice 3 ty. dozen, carriage paid. Sam ple threepence extra. Southborough, Tunbridge Wells.