Cricket 1893

OOt. 26, 18S3 <0RlC£ETg A WEE K L \ EECOKD OF THE GAME, 441 BURLINGTON WANDERERS CLUB. Matches played 16—Won 3, Lost 4, Drawn 9. RESULTS OF MATCHES. May 6—Eas!; Acton, v. Pallingswick. Lost by 76 runs. Burlington Wanderers, 46; Pal- lingswick, 122. May 13—Eltham, v. Eltham. Drawn. Burlington Wanderers, 144 for nine wickets (innings declared closed); Eltham, 117 for eight wickets. May 23—Clapton, v. Clapton. Drawn. Clapton, 128; Burlington Wanderers, 58 for nine wickets. May 27—Charlton, v. Charlton Park. Lost by 47 runs. Burlington Wanderers, 50 and 44 for seven wickets; Charlton Park, 97. June 3—Mitcham, v. Mitcham. Lost by 5J runs. Burlington Wanderers, 82; Mitcham, 1 9. June 17—Addiscombe, v. Addiscombe. Drawn Addiscombe, ‘.01 for six wickets (innings declared closed); Burlington Wanderers, 95 for two wickets. July 1—Beddington Park, v. Beddington. Won by 14 runs. Burlington Wanderers, £5; Beddington, 41. Ju’ y 8 —^Jwall, v. Ewell. Won by 24 run®. Bur­ lington Wanderers, 103 and 2C8 for five wickels; Ewell, 81. July 18—Dorking, v. Dorking. Won by 52 runs' Burlington Wanderers, 138 and 107; Dorking, 86. July 22—Epsom. v. Epsom. Drawn. Epsom, 172; Burlington Wanderers, 1 1 for three wickets. July £9—lee, v. Northbrook. Drawn. North­ brook, 157 for five wickets (innings declared closed); Burlington Wan­ derers. 68 for four wickets. August 8—Croydon, v. Croydon. Drawn. Croydon, £78; Burlington Wanderers, 192 for eight wickets. August 12—Lee, v. Northbrook. Drawn. North- trook, 181 for three wickets (innings declared closfd); Burlington Wanderers, 98 for five wickets. August 19—Wandsworth, v. Spencer. Drasvn. Spencer. 203 for six wickets (innings declared c osed); Burlington Wanderers, 102 for nine wickets. August 28—Bromley (Kent), v. Brom7ey. Drawn. Burlington Wanderers, 18i for four wickets (innings declared closed); Bromley, 79 for three wickets. September 2—Eltham. v. Eltham Lost by 13 run?. Burlington Wanderers, 87; Eltham, ICO. BATTING AVERAGES. Timee Most in Inns, not out Runs an inn. Aver. F. W. Freeman ...1 2 ... 2 ... f04 ... 79 ... £0.4 E. C. Lindup .. 12 ... 4 ... 168 ... 60*... 21.0 D. M. Bowie ,. 6 ..,. 1 ... 1'3 ... 45 ... £0.6 E. Williamson ... 14 ... 2 ... 2*4 ... 75 ... 20.33 J. P. Baxter... ... 11 ... 4 ... 97 ... 37 ... 13.85 A. E. Gent ... .... 9 ... 1 ... 103 ... 35*... 13.25 W . H. Lunnon ... 13 ... 1 ... 151 ... 31 ... 12.83 F. S. Lunnon .. 8 ... U ... 31 ... 22 ... 11.33 H .T . Bull ... ... 13 ... 4 ... 1 0 .. . 27*... 11.11 E. B Warren .. 10 ... 0 ... 1*1 ... £5 ... 11.11 W . C. Collins ... 5 ... 0 ... 47 ... 14 ... 9.4 Sam. Cook ... ... 7 ... 1 ... 54 ... 20 ... 90 M. J. We’ Is ... .. 10 ... 2 ... (5 ... 33*... 8.12 F. W . Ledger .. 2 ... 0 ... 14 ... 9 ... 7.0 C. H. Wall ... .,.. 8 .. 0 ... 17 .. . 8 .. 566 F. Holmes ........... 8 .,.. 1 ... 39 ... 15 ... 5.57 A. L. Pattison .. 6 .,.. 0 ... 17 ... 6 ... 2.83 One Innings each—W. Collins. 5; A. C. Dent. 4 ’ F. A. Oldaker, 3; W . J. Jeffries, 3*. EOWLING ANALYSIS. Overs. Mdns. Runs. WktF. Aver. F. G. Lunnon J. P. Baxter... D. M. Powie... E. Williamson H. T. Bull ... V. W. Freeman 8. Cook ........... w. H. Lunnon W . C. Collins W . H. Lunnon towled two wides, and D. M. Bowif, J. P. Baxter, and E. Williamson one wide each. 11.3 .... 2 .... 25 ..,. 4 £9.3 ..,. 12 ..,. 242 ... 21 11 ... 2 .,.. 38 .... 8 140.1 .,.. £5 .,,. 3(1 .. £5 208 I ,. 51 .,.. 546 .... 38 35 .. 12 .,.. 241 ..,. 16 25 . .. 5 .. .. 71 .. . 4 123 .... £1 ..,. J?6 .. 13 31 ... 12 ..>. 75 .. . 1 , 625 , 11.52 12.66 , 13.60 , 14.36 15-*5 . 17.7* , 25.8? rr;n|OU q Send l^d. for Artistic Show Cardof C r ic k e t with E rtraits of ei.her Arthur Shrewsbury, George ohinann, Dr. W. G. Grace (in four batting por­ tions). or Mr. S. M. J. Woods. Suitable for hang­ ing up in Pavilions, Club, and Dressing Rooms. CROYDON CLUB. Matches played 70.—Won 37, lost 17, drawn 16. BATTING AVERAGES. Times Most in L.deMontezuma 4 F. J. Rolls.......... 4 H. M. Tindall ... 18 W T. Grant ... 13 H. W . Wheeler 17 C. W. M. Feist 19 L. K. Watson .. 10 C. G. May..........13 B. Cox ... . J. A. Archer J, Whitcomb . A. L. Curtis . F. H. Balch . H. R. Groom . T. A. Watson . J. Aris ... . F. Hill ... . E. R. Wilkinson 27 C. G. Paget ... 37 B. D. Dalgliesh 8 A. P. Patey ... 15 F. Lucas ........... 8 A. Bill ........... 5 A. E. Clarke ... 18 H J. Ching ... 25 W . H. Bagott... 14 R. Archer...........16 G. Spicer..........13 W . J.K. Flinton 23 . 10 31 . 19 . 5 . 4 . £0 . 25 . 26 , 16 A. C. Dent N. Lavers... F. Harries G. F. Long L. J. Turner H. L. Turner W . H. Dent B. Biscoe .. A . V. Straker J. C. Neech P. w. Scrivener H . W . Ward L. Wood .......... 7 O. P. Wicks ... 8 E. A. Williams 10 T. S. Ready T. B. Joy ... . R. J. Grant A. S. Warren H. Biscoe . 9 10 C.V.N.Shortland 4 F. E. White A. E. Drage J. H. Hardy H. W. Fatey . B. Stanley T. A . Jenkins 5 11 16 13 9 6 )t out. Runs, an inns. Aver. n ... 2(0 ... 124 .. . £0 o ... 142 ... 81 .... 35.2 i ... 558 .,.. 88 ..., 32.14 0 ... 3l5 .... 106 ..., 30.5 0 ... 472 .. 91 ... 27.13 3 ... 401 .... Ill* ... 25.1 5 ... 118 ... 6fc* ..., 23.3 1 ... 2«1 .,.. 70 ..., 21.9 1 ... 186 .... 70 ..., 20.6 1 ... f5l ... 8) ... 19.27 2 ... 3 5 .. . 67 ... 18.9 U ... 83 .,.. (6 ..., 17.1 2 ... 31 ... 22 ..., 17 0 ... 339 .... 64 ..., lS.’ O 2 ... 382 .... 61* ..., Jf.22 3 ... 344 .. . 57 ... 11.22 1 ... i(8 ..,. 41 ... 13.13 3 ... 331 .,.. 70 ... 13.19 5 ... 430 .. f8* ..., 13.14 1 ... £3 .,.. 18 ..., 13.2 2 ... 169 ..,. 45 .... 13 3 ... 61 . .. £5 ..., 1?.4 0 ... 61 .,.. 22 ... 12.4 2 ... 202 .... 6) .... 12.10 0 ... 303 .... 79 ..., 12.2 1 ... 155 .,,. 38 ..., 11.12 2 ... 158 .,.. 26* ..., 1.4 2 ... 123 .... £9 ..., 11.-3 2 ... 3' 1 .,.. 47 .... 11.4 1 ... 156 .... 45 ..., 11.2 2 ... 100 .... 24* ..., 11.1 0 ... 1H9 ... f8 ..., 10.9 2 ... 160 ., 25 ..., 10.10 3 ... 71 ..,. 23* .. 10 ( 0 ... 67 .,,. 35 ..., 9.1 2 ... 73 ... 17 .„. 9.1 0 ... J2 ... 42 ..,. H.4 3 ... 108 ... 24* .... 8.4 1 ... 66 ... 39 ..,. 8.2 1 ... 48 ... 21 ... 8 2 ... 134 ... £4 .... 7.15 1 ... 46 .,.. 19 ..,. 7.4 1 ... 51 ... 13 .... 7.2 0 ... t8 .,.. 20 ..,. P.8 2 ... 13 .,.. 5 * ..., 6.1 1 ... 31 ..,. 19* ..., 6.1 0 ... 48 ... 14 .. . 6 1 ... 48 ... 26 .. . 6 0 ... 57 ..,. iO ... , 5.7 1 ... 17 .,.. 9 .... 5.2 1 ... 22 .,,. 7* .... 5 2 3 ... 44 .,.. 15 .... 5.4 5 ... 57 .,.. 38 ..,. 5.2 4 ... 44 .,.. 22 .... 4.8 3 ... £6 ... 8 . 4.2 1 ... 11 .... 7 ..., 2.2 The following batted in three matches A. L. Kemp 0 -0 —1, S. F. Kemp 11—4—2, F. W. Ingall 12—0—0*. The following batted in two matches:—A. E. Cox 0—4, G. C. Lambert 0—1, T. P. Austen 7—0, E. H. B. Stanley 84— 1. The following batted in one match:—T. G. Mansfield 1, W . T. Taylor 0*, S. Patey 0. BOWLING AVERAGES. The following also bow’ed tut without success —C. P. Wicks and E. A. Williams. FOR. AGAINST. Runs. Wkts. Aver. Buns. Wkts. Aver. 10,607 ... 691 ... If.191 9,621 ... 690 ... 13.651 I ZINGARI. Overs. Mdns. Runs. Wkts. Aver. J. H. Hardy 119.4 . . fc7 .. £07 . . 25 ... 8.7 L. J. Turner 229.3 .. 43 .. 553 . . 59 ... 9.25 S. J. Ching.......... 395.2 ...117 .. 7P4 . . 81 ... 9.38 W. J. K. Flinton 88.2 .. £5 .. 380 . . 19 ... 9.9 W. H. Bagott ... 48.3 .. 14 .. 115 . . 12 ... 9.7 A. E. Clarke 199 2 .. 53 .. 421 . . 41 ... 10 11 J. A. Archer 249 8 . . £9 .. 723 . . f9 ... 10.33 L. de Montezuma 75.2 .. 19 „ 161 . . 15 ... 10.11 A. E. Drage 120.3 .. 21 .. 299 . . 25 ... 11.24 C. W . M. Feist ... i82 .. 81 .. 703 . . 57 ... 12 19 C. G. Paget 351.4 .. 83 .. 826 . . 57 ... 14.28 S. M. Tindall ... 233.4 .. f2 .. 542 . . £6 ... 15.2 T. A. Watson ... 151.3 .. 38 .. 360 . . 23 ... 15.15 E. H. Balch 104 .. 26 .. 255 . . 16 ... 15.15 F. J. R o lls.......... 35 .. 3 .. 132 . . 8 ... lfl.4 J. C. Neech......... £8.1 .. 11 .. £66 . . l« ... 16.10 H. W. Patey 11P.2 .. 32 .. 345 . . 18 ... 19.3 C.V.N. shortland 6M .. 6 .. 174 . . 8 ... 21.6 H. W . Wheeler ... 42 .. 12 .. 117 . . 5 ... 23.2 W . T. Grant 130.3 .. 21 .. 404 ... 15 ... 26.14 L Wood ........... 82.2 .. 22 .. 197 . . 7 ... 28 1 H. L. Turner ... 85 .. 20 .. i03 . . 6 ... 33.5 The following bowled three times or less. A. P. Patey 4.1 .. 0 .. 18 . . 2 ... 9 H. Harries........... 7 .. 1 .. 21 ... 2 ... 10.1 A. L. Curtis.......... 35 .. 10 .. 70 .. 6 ... 11.4 M. Biscoe ........... 12 .. 2 .. i 5 2 ... 12.1 G. Spicer ........... 12 .. 0 .. SO . 2 ... )5 A. L. K em p......... 15 .. 3 .. 57 .. 2 ... 2H.1 A. F. Cox ........... 33 .. 14 ... f5 .. 2 ... 12.1 H. W. W&rd ... 8 .. 3 .. 20 .. 1 ... — R. Riscce ........... 17 .. 4 .. 51 .. 1 ... — V. H ill.................. 13 .. 0 ... 63 .. 1 ... — Matches played 28—won 13, lost 6, drawn RESULTS OF MATCHES. May 12. 13—Oxford, 'v. BaHingdou Club. Won by five wickets. I Z , 2C0 and 157 for five wickets ; Ballingdon, 198 and 156. May 21—Woolwich, v. Rojal Military Academy (18 aside). Drawn. I Z., 206; Koyal Military Academy. 145 for three wickets. May 27—Vincent Square, v. Westminster School. Won by 33 runs. I Z., 212; Westminster School, 179. May c0—Winchester, v. Winchester College (12 aside). Lest by 161 runs. I Z , 30 and 75for no wickets; Winchester College.194 June 3 —Wellington College, v. Wellington College (12 aside). Won by one wicket and 113 runs. I Z., 198 for ten wickets; Wel­ lington College, 85. June 7—Windsor, v. 1st Bittn. Grenadier Guards. Won by 31 runs. I Z.. 101 and 106 for seven wickets; 1st Battn. Grenadier Guards, 70. June 10—Charterhouse, v. Charterhouse (12 aside). Lost by 79 runs. I Z., 67 and 93 for no wickets; Charterhouse, 156. June 12—Chelsea, v. Household Brigade. Lost by seven wickets. I Z., 337 for seven wickets (innings declared closed) ; Household Brigade, 339 for three wickets. June 2 —Hounslow, v. Hounslow Garrison. Won by 12runs. I Z..142; Hounslow Garrison, 130 and 26 for five wickets. July 1—Harrow, v. Harrow School (12 aside). Lost t»y 41 runs. I Z., 100 and 42 for seven wickets; Harrow School, 111. July C—Chiselhursf-, v. West Kent. Won by 140 runs. I Z., 216; West Kent, 76. July 8—Eton, v. Eton College (12 aside). Drawn. I Z.,251 forseven wickets; Eton College, 151 for five wickets. July 8—Sandhurst, v. Staff College. Drawn. I Z., 590; Staff College, 224 for nine tickets. July 17,18—Winchester, v. Greenjackets <12 aside). Drawn. IZ .. 810; Greenjackets, 219 and 1 !9 for six wickets. July 51, 22—Shoeburyness, v. R.A. School of Gunnery (12 aside).Won by an innings and21 runs. IZ ., 180; R.A. School of Gunnery, 95 and 74. July 21,22-Rickling Green, v. Rickiing Green. Wen by one wicket. 1 Z , 76 and 201 for nine wickets; Rickiing Green, 149 and 127. July 28, 29 - Colchester, v. Colchester Garrison. Won cy an innings and 27 runs. I Z., 315; Colchester Garrison, 44 and231. August ?, 3—Dublin, V.R. Lodge, v. Vice Regal Club. Drawn. I Z , 181; Vice Begal * Club, 219 and 132 for five wickets. Augnst 4, 5—Dublin, Phcenix Park, v. Gentlemen of Ireland. Lost by an innings and 127 runs. I Z., 94 and 101; Gentlemen of Ireland. 302 for nine wickets (innings dec’ared closed.) August 6, 7—Dub:in, V.R. Lodge, v. Military of Ireland. Drawn. IZ ., 214 and 114 for three wickets; Military of Ireland, 194 and 2 5 for nine wickets (innings declared closed). August 2, 3—Norwich, v. Gentlemen of Norfolk. Drawn. I Z., 327; Gentlemen of Nor­ folk, 211 and 106 for seven wickets. Augnst 7, 8—Aldershot, v. Aldershot Division M2 aside). Won by five wickets. IZ., 144 and 130 for six wickets; Aldershot Division, 95 and 178. August 9, 10—Woolwich, v. Royal Artillery (12 aside). Won by an innings and 12 runs. I Z., 105; Royal Artillery, 43 and 51. August 11, 12—Chatham, v. Royal Engineers (12 aside). Drawn. I Z , 165 and 62 for three wickets; Royal Engineers, 229 and 110 for eight wickets (innings declared closed). August 16,17—Culford, v. Lord Cadogan’s T< a-r;. Won by 117 runs. I Z., 1^2and 151 ; Lord Cadogan’aTeam, 60 and 95. August 17. 18—Culford, v. Bury and West Suffolk. Lost by 56 runs. I Z., 107 and 82; Buiy and West Suffolk, 132 and 113. August 21, 22—Wynyard, v. Gentlemen of Durham (12 aside). Drawn. I Z , 272 and 79 for six wickets; Gentlemen of Duihoin, 302. August £4. 25—Wynyard, v. Lord Londonde1n ’s Team (12 aside). Won by 94 runs. 1 Z., 214 ard 215 ; Lord Londonderry’s Tci m, 170 and 165.