Cricket 1893

S E P T . 21, 1898] OKIORET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 431 of Y ork sh ire, this year m ade a great advance. T h e sam e m ay be said of B rock .veil w h o in one season has ju m ped into the front rank o f bow lers. A s a slow bow ler, too, M ead o f E ssex did m ore than one good perform an ce n otably for E ssex against the A ustralians. A m ention o f the B ow l in g A verages w ould be incom plete w ith ­ out special reference to H u m p h rejs. H is success as a lob bow ler w as distinctly one of th e m ost rem arkable features in the year’s cricket. F low ers’ all round cricket was one of n ot the least notew orthy incidents in the professional cricket of last summ er. M ore than once, indeed, his pow erful batting was the saving o f his side. A s a bow ler, too, he w as frequently o f great service, aud, as a rule, he m anaged to keep the runs dow n. Of the other slow bow lers, W ain w rigt t and T yler had excellen t figures. O f the new order, O akley, of L ancashiie, looks like training on. A tte w ell’ s b o A lin g o n the hard w ickets prevalent during the sum m er w as by no m eans as successful as in previous years. H is com - rarative failure seem ed to have an unfavour­ able effect on the N ottingham b ow lin g generally. A t all events, the w eakness of N otts w here it has usually been strongest—in the attack—had m ost to dow ith the disappoint­ m ents o f tho county eleven in 1893. A m on g th e am ateurs, C. M. W ells’ slow bow lin g was rem arkably successful fo r C am ­ bridge. F rom any p oin t of view his p erform ­ ance w as a m ost creditable one. O f the other bow lers, perhaps, it w ill be enough to say that the w ickets w ere n ot in their favour, hence an absence of notable feats. Still, there are several figures decidedly creditable. T h e success of C. J. K ortrigh t’ s fast, very fast, bow lin g fo r E ssex w as the on ly very striking feature. BOWLING AVERAGES. Overs. Mdns. Runs. W kts. Aver W alter Hearne (Kent) ............... 31 9.4... Mead .................. 178.1.. Peel ..................lOf 0 3... Mr. C. M. W ells 453.3... H ir s t.................. 828.1 Foueher .......... j ,27.4... Wainwripht ... 81?.l... B ro?k w ell......... 496 3... Rieh-.rds n ... 993.4 .. Mr. C. J. Kort- ri*_ht ......... 82.3,. Brisgs.................. 1364 ... Daft .................. 82 3 .. J. 'P. Pearne (M iddlesex;... 1741.4... L ockw ood.......... {312... Oak ey ........... 3*8.3 - M old .................1 85.4... Humphreys ... 613.4.. Mr. H. K. Brcm- ley-Davenpoit 228 1 .. 61 ... 560 . Mr. ff.C. Strea:- feild ........... 921.. 58 ... 191 . Tyler .......... 944 1 .. 3?3 1873 . Brown (Yorks)... £14.. 2l ... >11 . Mr. t_\ G. Pope 81 ... 29 ... 179 . A. H eam e(Eent; 8 1.3... 31 i .. 1)41 ...85 ... 1*.9» Mr. A J. Ij. 1=1ill ill.s... b7 ... 49'> ... 27 ... 18.33 Ward all ... ... 206.1 .. 97 ... 276 ... 11 ... 18 40 Mr. E. Smith ... £90.4... 70 ... 8 5 ... 44 ... 18.f2 Mr. H. A. Arb- Mr. F. G. J. Ford Mr. T. S. B. Wil­ 193.4.. 46 .. 558 ... 22 ... 25.96 son ................. Mr. G. F. H. 227 .. 64 .. 534 ... 21 ... 25.42 Berkeley.,. ... 199.4.. 70 .. 421 .. 16 ... 26 31 Mr. G. Fowler ... 74 .. 37 .. 211 ... 8 ... 26.37 Moot house 169.4, 86 .. 297 ... 11 ... 27 ■’•r. C. B. Fry ... 1 7 . . 31 .. 3'3 ... 31 ... 27.54 Mr. J. Douglas 181.1.. 53 .. 473 ... 17 ... 27.82 G uttridge........... 467.2.. 1 0 .. 1166 ... 4L ... 28.43 Sharpe ........... 391 .. 71 .. 401 ... 14 ... 28.C6 Mr. J. J. Ferris Mr. J. H. J. C85.2.. 204 .. 1570 ... 53 ... £9.62 Hornsby 132.4.. 48 .. £31 ... 11 ... 30.09 Philips ........... 191 .. 49 .. 481 ... 16 ... 30.25 Mr. J. Burrough 153 .. 69 .. 312 ... 10 ... 31 20 Mr. J. B. Wood 231.4.. 26 .. 816 ... 27 ... 31.33 Hayward ........... 134 .. 38 .. 322 ... 30 ... 32.20 Lowe .................. 373.4 54 ... 4E3 ... 14 ... 32.85 Hilton ........... 325.4.. 112 .. 742 ... 22 .. 33.72 Tate .................. 470.4 . 162 .. 1056 ... 3L ... 34.06 B e a n .................. 422.4.. 142 .. 909 ... 25 ... 35.33 Mr. f!. A. Smith 1?6 .. 39 .. 2 8 ... 8 ... 87 25 Dr. W . G. Grace 311 .. 95 .. 854 ... 22 ... 38.81 Mr. G. L. W ilson 208.2.. 42 .. 663 ... 9 ... 73.66 SCORES OF A HUNDRED IN FIRST-CLASS l e.B , ... 5(5 ..,. 46 .,.. 11.81 57 ... 318 .... 25 .,.. 13.38 431 .. 1 22 .,.. 121 ... 11 */3 139 .,. 1049 .... 73 .,.. 14.37 343 ...1425 .., 99 ..,. 34 33 £4 .,.. 216 .... 15 . .. 14.40 2#>0 ,.. 1*25 .. 119 . .. 11.49 183 .,. 10*7 .... (8 .,.. 15.c9 283 .. £683 .. . 174 ..,. 1\40 16 ... Sf9 .... 37 .,.. 35.82 488 .. £639 ... 166 .... 15.89 21 ... 196 .. 12 ... 16 33 667 ...3492 ... £12 .., 16 47 2o7 .,.5517 .. 130 .,.. 16 78 1?3 .,. 610 .., 36 ..,. 3694 426 ...‘ 817 .. , 1 6 .. 16 9? 1 2 . . 2598 ... 15J .., 17 32 32 ... 17.?0 11 ... 17.54 1' 6 ... 17.66 13 ... 17 63 , 1) ... 17.90 wright ........... 114 4 32 ... £63 :.. 14 .., 18.78 D avid son ........... Mr. t>. S. Jack­ 196.2... 81 .... 879 .., 19 .,.. 19.91 son .................. 5 #Q.4 .. 18» .,..1172 ... 57 .,,. 20.56 Martin ........... Mr. J.W . Trum­ 781.1,.. 3.8 ,.. 1235 .., 6J ., 10.68 ble .................. Mr. *. E. Stoc- 1C2 ... 27 .,.. £28 ... 11 .,.. 20.72 dart ........... 537 3.. . 70 ... 545 ... 26 .,.. 20 P6 Nicholls .......... 60D-1 .. 196 .,..3339 .. . (3 ..,. U 25 Mr.O.G. Radcliffe 78 2 . . 21 ,... 193 ... 9 .,.. 21.41 Mee ................... Mr. C. L. Town­ 614.4... 196 .. 1:33 .., 76 .,.. 21.48 send ................. W alter W right 213 ... 45 ,... 581 .., 27 .,.. 21.51 (Kei.t) .......... 70P.3.... 2)9 ...1378 ... 64 .., 21/3 Riw lin .......... 1149.2 .. 4 6 .. 2 67 ... 96 .. '1 .r4 Wm. Attewell... 12M ... 493 .. 22*>7 ... 1 6 . , ,. 21.57 Flowers ........... 671.4 .. 175 . 1283 ... 59 ..,. 21.79 R orerts ........... (84.1.. . 2 3 . . 1355 ... 61 ... 22.2 Baker .................. 174.2 . f 8 .,. 357 .., 16 ... (/2 3l Mr. w. C. Hedley 362.2... 103 ,... 889 ... 39 , 2.'.56 M u rch ................. 6 3 1 . . 173 .,..3577 ... 69 ..,. 22.85 Abel .................. 115 .. 31 ... 276 ... 12 .. 23 M .^.M .T.Wood-i 674.1 .. 1(8 .,.382i ... 79 ..,. 23.05 Dr. E. M. Grace 71.3... 32 ,... 234 ... 9 .,.. 23 77 Mr. J. R. Mason M r.L.C.V. Bath- 157.2... 44 ... 3:8 ... 14 ..„ 21.li hurst ........... G. G. Hearne 235.1. . 72 . 634 ... 26 .. 24.38 (Kent) ........... £80 ... 60 . 523 ... 21 .,,. 21.81 Shacklock.......... 615.3,. . £11 .. 1491 ... 59 .,,. 25 27 195* 191 186 183 171 169* 164 159 156 154 150 149 1-38 147* 145 Ilf,* 139 137 135 133 130 129 1.8 128 127 127 127 126 125 124 124 1 4 i 2 1 120 150 120 120 1 0 117 a15 113 112 112 •12 112 111* 110 109 1-9 108 107 107 106 103 106 105 10) 1O0 303 103 103 103 101* 102 102 10.* 101 100 CRICKET. A. E. Stoddart for M idd'esex v. Notts W . Bruce for Auuralians v. Oxford and Cambridge (P. and P.) Bean for Sussex v. Lancashire G. Giffen for Australians v. Gloucestershire G. Giffen for Australians v. Yorkshire F. H. Sugg for La cishire v. Sussex Shrewsbury for Notts v. Sussex G. Brann for Sussex v. Middlesex Gunn for Notts v. Sussex E. Smith for North v. South Gunn for Notts v. Yorkshire J. J. Lyons for Australians v. M.C.C. and G. Shrews ury f or Notts v. Lancashire W. W. Read for Surrey v. Lancashire G. H. s. Trott for Austra’ ians v. Middlesex A. Ward for Lancashire v. Gloucestershire J. a. Dixon for Nott-j v. Kent G. Brann for Sussex v. M.C.C and Ground J. A. Dixon for Notts v. Middlesex A. C. Bannerman for Australians v. Oxford and <’ambridge (Past and Present) F’oweis for M.C.C. aud Ground v. Australians Gunn for N 'tts v. Kent w. ■-». Gr ce for ME.C.C. and Ground v. Kent Marlow for Sussex v. Surrey F. H. Su?er for Lancashire v. Notts F. H. Su?g for Lanc.sM rev. Gloucestershire A. E. Stoddart for Thornton’s England E even v. Australians A. W ard for Lancashire v. su*sex A. E. htodd-trt for Middlesex v. Surrey A. E. Btoddart for viiddlesex v. Notts Shrewsbury for Notts v. Kent Gunn for M.O.C. and Ground v. Snssex F. S. Jacfcson for Cambridge Uni\ersity v. Surrey A. Hearne for South of England v. Austra­ lians H. T. Hewett for Som<rset v. Notts G. Brann for Sussex v. Somerset C.unn for Notts v. Midd'esex Bean f r Sun. ex v. Gloucestershire G. L. W ilson for Sussex v. G oucestershire Carrenter for M.C.C. and G. v. Cambridge Uuiversuy. T. C. O’ Brien for Middlesex v. Surrey Riiggs for Lancashire v. Surrey Hayward for Surey v. Kent H. r. Hewett for Somerset v. Gloucestershire S. F. Gregory for Australians v. Middlesex F. S. Jackson for Yorkshire v. M.C.C. and Ground C. E de T afford for North v South T. N. Perkins for Kent v. Notts Gunn for Notts v. Kent J. B. Ch-llen for Somerset v Sussrx H. Graham for Austra’ia v. England Flowers for Notts v. Lancashire J. J. Kerris for Gloucestershire v. Sussex W adall for Yorkshire v. Glouces:ershire Shrew-burv for Encland v. Australia A. Sellers for Yorkshire v. Middlesex G. L Wilson for Sussex v. Gloucestershire H. Trumble for Au tra'ia v. Oxford and Cam'-rid e (P. and P.) F. March tut f or M.C.O. m i G. v. Australia F. S. .Jacks >n for England v. Australia J. A. D x >n for Notts v. Gloucestershire A. Sellers for Yorkshire v. som erset Gunn for Eng and v. Australia Barnes for Notts v. Sussex F. S. Jackson for Cambridge University v. M.'\C. and G. J. Doug as for Cambridge Univerti y v. M.C.C. and G. Rev. W. Rashleigh for Kent v. Notts Shrewsbury for Notts v. Lancashiie K. J. Key for Surrey v. Yorkshire GRANVILLE (L E E ).— Matches arranged 6 8 - won 27, lost 14, drn wn 22. RUNS SCORED. FOR AGAINST R uqp . Wkts. Aver. 1 219 ... 5S1 ... 17.51 Buns. Wkts. Aver. 828J ... 661 ... 12.52 Highest innings for, 422 for two w ickets; lowest innings for, 28. Highest innings against, 326 ; lowest innings against, 8. RESULTS OF MATCHES. April 22—v. Sidcup. W on. Granville, 156 for eight w ickets; Sidcup, 23 and 41 for three wicket?. May 6—v. bromley. W on. Granville, 168 for three wickets; bromley, 50 and 43 f jt four wicketp. May 6—v. Guy’s Hospital (2). Lost. G uy’s Hos­ pital t2), S4; Granville, 82 and 41 for five wickets*. May 13—v. <harlton Park. Drawn. Granville,’ 81 for six w ickets; Charlton Park, 111 for nine wickete. May 13—v. Charlton Park. Lost. C hirlton Park, 117 for nine w ickets; Granvi le, 72. May 17—v. Dulwich. Drawn. Dulwich, 140; Granville did not bat. May 23—v. Plaistow. Won. Granville, 131; Plais­ tow, 62 and 58 for two wickets. May 22—v. Bickley Park. Won. Granville, 2S7; Bickley Park, 120. May £2—v. fcorest Hil1. Lost. Forest Hill, li7 ; Granville, 82. May 24—v. Erratics. Drawn. Granville, 179 for nine wickets ; Erratics, 99 for six wickets. May 27—v. Crystal Palace. Drawn. Granville 149 for eicht wickets ; Crystal Palace, 183.’ May ?7—v. Blackhe ith Proprietary School. W on. Granvi le,l65; Blackheath Prop. 8ch., 63. June 3—v. Rochester. W on. Granvil e, 132 and 185 for four wickets ; Rochester, 87. June 3 v. Carshalton. Drawn. Granville, 157 for seven wickets; Carshalton, 74 for f ; x wicket?. June 3 -v . Sidcup. Drawn. Sidcup, 190; Gran­ ville, 109 for live wicketp. June 7—v. Forest Hi 1. Lost. Fores!; Hill, 101 and 46 for five wickets; Granville 78 and 67. June 10- v . Hampstead. Drawn. Hampstead, 528 for seven w ickets; Granville, 145 for four wickets. June 10—v. Croydon. Won. Granville, 155 for six w ickets; Croydon, 152. June 14—v. T u ntrilge W .lls. W on. Granville, 422 for two w icket-; Tunbridge Wells, 82. June 17—v. W hitgift Wanderers. W on. Gran­ ville, £2i for five wickets; Whitgift W an­ derers, 48 and i8 for six wickets. June 17—v. Hr. D uustan’a College. W on. Gran­ ville, 111; St. Dunstau’dCollege, 35 and 143. June 19 and 20-v . Alliance B ink. W on. Gran­ ville 138; Alliance Bank, 9?. June 21—v. Streatham. W ou. Granville, 175; Streatham, 99 and i53 for thiee wickets. June 21—v. Panther. Lo9t. Pauther, 149; Gran­ ville 66 and 51 for four wicketp. June 24—v. Hampstead. Won. Granvil!e, 189; Ham puead, 94. June 28—v. Croydon. Won. Granvi le, 284 for five wickets; Croydon, 93. July 1—v. Hornsey, Drawn. Hornsey, 103 ; Gran­ ville, 99 for nine wickets. July 1—v. droydo). Drawn. C rojdon, 181; Gran­ ville, 143 for six w ickets July 3 and 4 -v . P*r.ther. Lost. Fanther, 1:8; Granville, 152. July 5—v. M.C.C. Lost G-anville. 88 and 24 for six wickets; vl O.C. 61andl?3. July 8 -v . Charlton PaTk. Drawn. Granville, 231 for tUre3 w ic-ets; Cnarlton Park, 88 for t ree wickets. July 8—v. Charlton Park. Drawn. Granville. 183 for six w ickets; Ch^r.ton Park, 78 for five wickets. July 12—v. Tunbridge w <llc<. Drawn. Granville. 83 for five w ickets; Tunbridge Wells. 141. Ju'y 15—v. Hornsey. Lost. Hornsey, 74 ; Gran­ ville, 66. July 15—v. Blackheath Prop. Sch. Lost. Black­ heath Prop. Sch , 148; Granville, 62 and 36 for four wickets. Ju’ y 17 and 18.—v. AllUnce Bank. W on. Gran­ ville, 156 for four wickeds; Alliance Bank, 141. July 19— v. Blackheath. Drawn. Granville, U 0 ; Hlackheath did not bat. July 22—v. Eith-tm. Won. Granville, 217 for four wickets; Eltham, 67. July 22—v. Eliot Place Club, W on. Granville, 151; Eiiot Place Oiu?, 20 and 94 for eight wickets July 26—v.Croydon. Lo3t. Croydon. 169: Gran­ ville, 89 and l&l for two wicket-1. July 29—v. Norwood. Drawn Grauville, 125; Norwood, 94 for four wickets. July 29—v. Norwood. W on. Uranvi le, 159; Nor­ wood. 50. Ju'y 31 and August 1—v. Mr. Corballis’ XT. W on. Granville, 189 for six wickets; Mr, Cor- bahis’ XI., 74.