Cricket 1893

288 ORlCKETs A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME0 JULY 20, 1893 NOTTS v. YORK SH IRE. Heavy rain interfered considerably with the first day of the return m atch between these counties, fixed for the latter part of last week on the Trent Bridge grouud at Nottingham . On Thursday, indeed, the tim e of actual cricket was under three hours, and when play was comm enced the light at one tim e was so bad as to cause a suspension of the gam e for twenty minutes. Though the Yorkshire eleven were unlucky in losing the valuable services of Peel, owing to a chill, the Cambridge captain was fo • the first tim e this year able to take his place in the eleven, and his all-round cricket was invaluable, as will be seen. Notts, who were fortunate in gettin first innings, were in from 3 20 till play ceased on Thursday night, with the one i ;terruption air ady mentioned, for a total of 117 for nine wickets. Their batting generally was very disappointing, for Barnes, w ho made 50 out of 88 while he was in. alone played with any confidence, and he was batting an hour and three-quarters with only one mistake just before he was out. An addition of seven runs on Friday m orning brought the innings to a close, Jackson, w ho w ith W ainwright had equally <ivided the wickets, bow ling the last batsm an—Sherwin—at 124. The comm encem ent of Yorkshire’s innings hardly pointed to a bet er result. The wicket still favoured the bowlers, and w ith Sellers and Tunnicliffe out for only 13 the prospects of a I ig score were apparently very small. Jackson, however, playing quite the right gam e as the wicket was, hit away freely, and when he was out at 77 his shar •was 59, an admirable innings of eighty minutes duration. Brown, who was eighth <ut, gave a very different display. He was in two hours and a half for his 49, the value o f which was partially spoiled by a chance when he had got 12. Meanwhile, Lord Hawke had m ade 25 by resolute hitting, and with the help o f useful scores later on by U lyett and Hirst, Yorkshire were able to claim a valuable lead of 58 runs on the first innings. In the condition of the ground this was, of course, a great advantage, but as Jackson was not well enough to take the field it was discounted a little. Still, as the result proved, W ainwright and Hirst were themselves quite equal to the occas on, and an hour and twenty minutes sufficed to dism iss the whole side of Notts. Nine batsmen, three of them run out, were indeed dismissed for 27, and the only double figure was at the close by Sherwin, w ho carried out his bat for 10. The Yorkshirem en thus gained an unexpectedly easy victory by an innings and 20 runs. The collapse of the Notts eleven at the finish was due to the fine bowling o f Wainwright and Bir^t. The form er i i the m atch took eight wickets at a cost of 11 runs apiece, while Hirst got four batsm en in the second innings of Notts for only 11 runs. M ounsey was in the Yorkshire eleven, and fielded up to a certain time. Having injured his hand, liowcver, the Nottingham captain allowed the Yorkshirernen to play R . W . Frank in his place. Attewcll’s i owling was, excepting Barnes’ batting, the only redeeming feature of the cricket of the losing side. He bowled throughout Yorkshire’s innings, and took si wickcts for 73 runs. N otts . First Innings. Shrewsbury, c sub., b W ainwright ..................19 Gunn, c Tunnicliffe, b Jackson ........................... 7 Barnes, c Sellers, b W ain­ wright ...........................50 Flowers, b W ainwright ... 3 D aft, b J a ck son .................. 0 Mr. J. A. Dixon, b Jackson 17 Mr. A. O. Jones, c and b Jackson .......................... 2 run out Attewell, c Hunter, b W ainwright ................... 1 Shacklock, not out ...........14 Mee, b W ain w righ t........... 5 Sherwin, b a ck s o n ........... 0 B 3, lb 2, nb 1 ........... 6 Second Innings. run out ........... 0 c Ulyctt, b W ainw iight 3 c TIawke, b Hirst 6 c Tunnicliffe, b H irst ........... 9 b H irst ........... 3 c Hun ter, b Birst 5 b W ainwright .. 0 run out ........... 0 b VVainwright .. 1 not out ...........10 N b ................... 1 Total ... Y obj ^ Mr. F. S. Jackson, b Wee ........... .........5'. Mr.A Sel ers,c Jones, b Shacklock .......... G Tunnicliffe, c Sher­ is in, b Attewell ... 0 Br< wn, st Sherwin, b A te /ell ... 43 W ; n /rig h t,c Shack- l o ^ , b D aft ... ' 5 Lord Hawke,cDixon, b S h a ck lock ......... 25 12 Total ... HUE. Mr. R. W . Frank, c Gunn, b Attewell oorhou^e, c Shack­ lock, b Attewell Uiyi-tf, c Dixon, b Attewell ........... Hirst, not o u t .......... Hunter, not out ... 13 1, nb 1 ........... 33 Total .. 182 BOW LING ANALYSIS. N otts . First Innings. O. M. R. W. 35 11 02 5 . 27.4 11 42 5 8 4 14 0 . 1 1 0 0 W ainw iight Jackson Hirst ... - M oorhouse Sccond Innings. O. M. It. W. ... 14.3 6 26 3 ... 14 10 11 4 Y orkshire . O. M. R. W , O. M. R. W. Attewell 42.3 13 73 6 Mee ... 17 9 19 1 Shacklock 17 5 34 2 D aft 10 1 31 1 Flow ers 9 2 23 0 Mee delivered one no-ball. SU RR EY v. SOM ERSETSH IRE. The Somersetshire eleven gained their first victory of the season at the Oval, on Friday, when they beat Surrey after an interf sting m atch by 39 runs. Their success was the m ore m eritorious, as, while opposing the full strength o f Surrey, they them selves were w ithout J. 13. Challen, W. (j. Bedley, and V. T. Hill. The recent rainfall had made the wicket slow, and the first day saw the bowlers so m uch in evidence that twenty-seven wickets only realised an aggregate of 311. Som er­ setshire, w ho went in first, though their total only reached 132, were able to claim a lead of 32 runs. For this advantage they were chiefly indebted to the excel ent cricket o f the younger Palairet and the effective bowling of Tyler. Palairet played the Surrey bowling with ease and confidence, and his score o f fifty was an exceptionally good dis­ play of sound and attractive cricket without any­ thing like a mistake. Going in again, Somerset­ shire did not fare as well, at least for a time. B ewett was caught in the long field when well set, and again R . Palairet shaped in good style, though he only m ade fourteen. Still seven wickets were down for 61, and it was only a useful stand of W oods and Bolus, who were both not out, that brought the total to 79 by the end of the day. So far, with 111 on and three w ickets to fall, Somer­ setshire had no great advantage, particularly if the weather had kept fine. As it was, rain made the ground fairly easy on Friday morning, and W oods utilised the opportunity by som e resolute hitting He gave a hard chance to Maurice Read at long-on when he had m ade about forty, and overnight he m ight have been caught in froLt of the stand when he had got four. Still, his plucky play was worthy of all praise, and his perfor­ mance. the m ore noteworthy as he had to give up bow ling on the previous day owing to a strain, had an im portant bearing on the result W ith 181 to win, Surrey had a far from easy task as the wicket was, and, as in the first innings, some of them shaped so badly against Tyler’s bowling that four o f the best batsm en were out for 28. Key and W . W. Read were the first to make a stand, but it was not till Brockwell cam e in on the fall of the fifth wicket that Surrey seemed likely to have an outside chance. W . W . played with great care, while Brockwell scored freely all­ round, and as the total was raised from 54 to 130 with both still in, Surrey’s prospects were m uch brighter. After their separation, though, the end soon cam e, and as the last four wickets only added H , Somersetshire were left with a very creditable win- W. W . was in two hours and a quarter for his 28. Tyler’s bow ling had very much to do with Somersetshire’s success. In the m atch he took eleven wickets for 97 runs. On the other side Lockw ood dismissed nine batsm en at a cost of 87. S om erset . First Innings. Mr. L. C. H. Palairet, c Abel, b L ockw ood.......... Mr. H. T. Hewett, b Lock­ wood .......................... .. Mr.G. Fowler, b Lockwood Mr. F. J. Poynton, b L ock­ w ood .................................. Mr. R. C. N. Palairet, c W ells, b Brockwell Mr. W . Trask, lbw, b Wells Mr. S. M. J. W oods, c Abel, b Brockw ell .................. N ichols, c W ood, b Lock­ w ood ........... ........... Bolus, c Abel, b Brockwell Tyler, run out ........... Rev. A. P. W ickham , not out .................................. B * lb 5 ................... Second Innings. 0 b Lockw ood ... ! c Read, b W ells 29 b Richardson . c Key, b Lock­ w ood ........... b Lockw ood ... : b Lockw ood ... st W ood, b Brockw ell ... I b Richardson ... b W ells .......... b Brockwell ... 3 Total .................132 S u rrey . First Innings. Abel, st W ickham ,bT yler 13 JVTr. J. Shuter, c and b W o o d s .....................................18 M. Read, b Woods ... 18 Birst delivered two no-balLs. Mr. W . W . Read, st W ick­ ham, b Tyler .................. 1 Baldwin, not out .......... 21 Mr. K. J. Ley, lbw, b Tyler 5 Lockw ood, c and b Tyler 0 r. C. M. W ells, c " ick- ham, b Tyler .......... ... 4 Brockwell b Nichols 9 W o o 1, c It Palairet, b N ichols .......................... 5 Richardson, b Nichols ... 0 B .................................. 6 Total .................ICO not out ........... B 3, lb 6 ... Total ...148 Second Innings, st W ickham , b Tyler ........... 2 c L. Palairet, b N ichols .. 4 c R. Palaire1, b Tyler ........... 9 cBolus.bNicbols 28 c W oods, b Tyler 9 b Tyler ...........18 b N ichols .......... 10 BOW LING ANALYSIS. c R. Palairet, Tyler ... . b Tyler ... . c Fowler, N ichols ... . not out .. . B 8, lb 5 Total ... S om erset . First Innings. O. M R. W . Lockw ood ... 26.1 3 35 5 ... Richardson... 14 5 36 0 ... W ells ............. 9 0 26 1 ... Brockwell ... 15 8 26 4 ... S u rrey . First Innings. O. M. R. W. Tyler .............. 24 7 47 5 ... W o o d s ............. 16 5 38 2 ... N ich ols......... 7.2 2 9 3 ... Fowler Second Innings. O. M. R. W . ... 16 2 52 4 ... 13 1 45 2 ... 7 1 35 2 ... 3.2 1 7 2 Second Innings. O. M. R. W . ... 37 15 50 ... 4 0 16 0 ... 32.313 59 4 . . . 2 1 3 0 KENSINGTON (2) v. B R O O K F IE L D .- Played at ti-jhgate on July 15. K ensington . G. P. Nicholson, b Arm itage................... 4 F. H. Briggs,b A. Bar­ ron .......................... 7 W B. H obcs, b A. Barron ...................36 C. F. Hayes, c Payne, b C. Barron ...........10 E. D. Todd, b C. Bar­ ron .......................... 5 W . K. Jacks,b A. Bar­ ron .......................... 6 H. Arthur, b A. Bar­ ron .......................... E. G. Langton b C. Barron ................... T. P. Chi d, lbw, b C. Barron ................... C. R. Bryan,b A. Bar­ ron ........................... H. W . Smith, not out B 9, lb 3 ....................12 T o t a l ......... IU) B rookfield . rirst Innings. Second Innings. W. Burchett, b T o d d .......... 0 c Jacks, b Nichol­ son ................... B. F. Glover, b Todd ... 3 n otou t.................... A A. Barron, b Todd ... 0 b Nicholson A. H. Armitage, c Briggs, b Nicholson C. Barron, run out F. E. Quartley, b Todd ... E. Stock, b 1odd.................. J. B. Payne, b T o d d ........... W . Sargant, o Nicholson, b Todd.................................. R. Priestley, run out........... W . H. Eliis, not o u t ........... L b .................................. Total 0 c Hobl s, b Todd 13 c Todd, b Nichol­ son ................... 9 c Briggs.b Todd 0 c and b Todd ... 0 cHayes.bNichol- son ................... 0 b Todd .. 3 b N icholson ... 17 2 b T o d d .................. 6 1 B 14, lb 1 ...1 5 , 3L Total ... C3 LONDON AND W ESTM INSTER BANK (?) v W INCHESTER HOUSE (2 ).—Played at Ken­ sington on July 15. L . and W .B. T. H. Pritchard, O’cullivan........... D. G. Shepherd,b Mc­ Millan ................... G. Stay, c Olivieri, b McMillan................... W . Fryer, c Bensley, bLockner..................12 G. W. Stojford, run out .......................... 12 W . E.Hunter,b Lock- Total Ler ...........................17 W inchi bter H ouse . 14 J. M. Aliceck,b Lock- ner ........................... F.G. K eeping,bLcck- ner ........... ........... L. C. B. H ockin, b O'Sullivan ........... G. P. Taylor, not out C. C.Sim pson.alsent B 2, lb 1 .................. 1 ... 73 R. E. Burke, c Sim p­ son. b Allcock W. T. W helan, c Hockin, b Fryer ..i A. E. S. Olivieri, c Fryer, b Sim pson... R. M. Lockner, c Simpson, b Fryer... H. T. Burke, b Sim p­ son .......................... S. S. Bensley, b All­ cock .......................... 18 15 E. G ordon Taylor, c Simpson, b Fryer 1 C. B . Bensley, c Stay, b Simpson ........... 5 W .T.O’Sullivan.c All­ cock, b Stopford .. 13 J. Connew, c Prit- chaid, b Allcock ... 2 A. A. McMillan, not out ........................... I B 7, lb 3 .................10 Total ...ICO NORWOOD v. ADDISCOMBE. «om te on July 15. N orwood . -Played at Addis- 21 L.F.Elliott, b HiU W. O. Eltorough, b J. G ra n t...................J5 F. S. H alLm .not out ft B 6. lb 2, w 1 ... 9 Total ...175 .. 1 .. 0 .. 13 141 W. AuRtin, c Martin, b HIM.........................19 A. P. Roe, c HilJ, b Martin ................. 19 A. Springett, b J. f rant.........................£7 L. de Montezuma, Ibw, b HiU ..........22 C. A. Checkland, run out ......................... c5 L. Rogers and F. Louddid not bat. clared cloted ADDTfCOMBF. R. F. Giant, b R oe ... 5 IH. A. Serrep.^Austin 13 Ii. Manr, b Austin ... 19 F. T. Wi tsbiie, c J. Grant, c Loud, b Elliott, b Roe ... ?6 Roe ................... 2 B 11, lb1 ............ 12 N Cutler, not out ... 34 1 Total .......... I ll T. Marshall, G. A. Martin, W\ F. Hil», W. Lem ­ mon and S. J. Tem p’etcn did not I at. Inn ngs dc-