Cricket 1892

APRIL 21, 1892 CRICKET: A WEEKLY BECORD OF THE GAME. 69 SURREY COUNTY CRICKET CLUB. May 2—Kennington Oval, Surrey Colts v. Honor Oak May 3—Kenningfcon Oval, Surrey Colts v. Kenning­ ton Wanderers May 4—Kennington Oval, Surrey Colts v. Barnes May 5—Kennington Oval, Annual General Meet­ ing, 5 p.m. May 7—Reigate, Surrey C. and G. v. Reigate Priory May 11—Kennington Oval, Surrey Colts v. Clapham Wanderers May 16a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Essex May 19a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Leicester­ shire May 23—Kennington Oval, Surrey C. and G. v. Guy’s Hospital May 25—Kennington Oval, Surrey C. and G. v. Crystal Palace Miy 26a-Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Warwick- bhire May 26—Barnes, Surrey Colts v. Barnes United May 27- Cane Hill, Surrey C. aud G. v. (Jane t± 11 Asylum May 30a—Oxford, Surrey v. Oxford University May 30—Kfnbingion Oval, Surrey Colts v. Batter­ sea United May 31—Mitcham, Surrey Colts v. Mitcham June 2a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Somerset­ shire June 6a—Nottingham, Surrey v. Notts Juue 66—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Bedfordshire June 6—Wimbledon, Surrey C. and G. v. Wim­ bledon June 6—Dorchester, Surrey C. and G. v. Mr. Spencer Balfour’s XI. June 8—Battersea, Surrey C. and G. v. Battersea June 9a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Cambridge University June 13a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Middlesex Juue 14—Addiscombe, Surrey C. aud G. v. Addis- combe June 16a—Derby, Surrey v. Derbyshire June 20a—Leeds, Surrey v. Yorkshire June 206—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Hertford­ shire June 22—Roehampton, Surrey C. and G. v. Clarence House June 23a—Manchester, Surrey v. Lancashire June 2 16 —Kennington Oval, Surrey (2nd XL) v. Lancashire (2nd XI.) June 27a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Gloucester­ shire June 27—Denmark Hill, Surrey C. and G. v. Brix- ton Wanderers June 28—Epsom, Sum y C. and G. v. Epsom College June 29—Honor Oak, Surrey C. and G. v. Honor Oak June 3Pa—Edinburgh, Surrey v. Scotland July 2—Charterhouse fequare, Surrey 0. and G. v. Merchant Taylors’ School July 4 - Kennington Ova', Surrey C. and G. v. Clapham Wanderers July 5—Mitcham, Surrey C. and G. v. Mitcham July 6—Woolwich, Surrey Colts v. Royal Artillery, July 7a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Scotland July 7—Kenley, tturrey C. and G. v. Kenley July 11a—Kennington Oval, Gentlemen v. Players July 13—Thames Dittcn, Surrey C. and G. v. Thames Ditton July 14a—Tonbridge, Surrey v. Kent July 15—Streatham, Surrey C. and G. v. Streatham July 18a—Brighton, burrey v. Sussex July 18—Kennington Oval, Surrey C. and G. v. Battersea Park Association July 20—Dulwich, Surrey C. and (*. v. Dulwich July 21a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Yorkshire Ju y 25a -Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Sussex July 23 b -Tunbridge Wells, Gentlemen of Kent v. Gentlemen of Surrey July 27—Cobham, Surrey C. and G. v. Cobham July 28a—Leyton, Surrey v. Essex July 29—Surbiton. Surrey C. and G. v. Surbiton August 1—Rcigate, Surrey C. and tf. v. Reigate HM August la —Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Nottn August 2 Bunstead, Surrey C. and G. v. Banstead Augu t 4a—I eicester, Surrey v. Leicestershire August 4o—Luton. Surrey v. Bedfordshire August 4—Oxted, Surrey C. and G. v. Oxted Dis­ trict Angust 5—Beddington, Surrey C. and G. v. Btd- dington August 8a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Derbyshire August 9—DorHiug, Surrey C. and G. v. Fifteen of District August 10-E ast Molesey, Surrey C. and G. v. East Molesey August 1' a— Lord’s, Surrey v. Middlesex August 15a—Taunton, Surrey v. Somersetshire Augu&t 17—Richmond, Surrey C. and G. v. R ich­ mond Town August 18a— Cheltenham, Surrey v. Gloucestershire August 22a -Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Lanca­ shire August 226—Manchester, Surrey (2nd XL) v. Lan­ cashire (2nd XI.) August 25a—Kennington Oval, Surrey v. Kent August 29a—Birmingham, Surrey v. Warwickshire September 5a—Scarboro’, Surrey v. North of Eng­ land a three day matches; b two day matches. VICTORIAN CRICKETERS’ ASSOCIATION. The ordinary meeting of the Victorian Cricketers’ Association was held on March 8 in Melbourne, Mr. Best, M.L.A., occupying the chair. AUSTRALIAN CRICKET COUNCIL. The meeting considered a code of rules, brought up by a special committee, for the control of an Australian Cricket Council. The rules which the committee recom­ mended to the association were read, and were adopted without important modifica­ tions. As adopted, they were to the effect that the council should be deemed to be formed as soon as its constitution was adopted by the associations of the colonies of New South Wales, South Australia, and Vic­ toria. The council should consist of four delegates from each colony. The association of any other colony might be admitted after the council was constituted. The office-bearers should consist of a president, two vice-presi­ dents, and an hon. secretary, to be elected at the annual meeting of the council from the delegates. The first election of office­ bearers should be held at the first meeting of the council, which should be convened by the committee of the New South Wales association as soon as practicable after the adoption by the several associations of the rules. A meeting of the council should be held at least once a year, at such time and place as should be decided by the council. The manager and members of any Australian team visiting England or elsewhere should be approved by the council, which should be empowered to declare whether the time fixed for a visit of an Australian, English, or other eleven were opportune or otherwise, and should communicate such decision to the governing cricket bodies concerned. All disputes between associations, or arising out of matches played between colonies repre­ sented on the council, should be referred to and decided by the council, and any associa­ tion declining to abide by such decision should cease to be represented on the council for such time as should be agreed on. The council should be empowered to invite the co-opera­ tion of the governing cricketing bodies of England or elsewhere, with a view to giving effect to the rules of the council. It was agreed that five gentlemen should be appointed from the association to repre­ sent it at a proposed cricket conference, to be held at Adelaide on or about the 25th inst., and that the rules just adopted should be handed to the five gentlemen as instruc­ tions. Messrs. Eruce, Budd, Row, Madden, and Best were elected to represent the association at the Adelaide conference. It was agreed that a copy of the rules should be forwarded to the New South Wales Association. O n the 11th inst., at Kynnce, Northlands Road, Southampton, the wife of Mr. H. K. Grierson, of a son. T h e anniversary meeting and dinner of the Marylebone Club will be held at Lord's, on Wednesday, May 4. E a g le v . U n it y . —Played at Clapharn Common on April 16th. Score : Eagle, 65 (H. Histed 17, C. Parmiter 16): Unity, 42 (W. Grant 12). CR ICKETERS-Best G oods City Agents— bear t h is M a r k .— Advt. P a r to n & L e st e r , 94, Q ueen S t ., C h e a p sid e . BUCKHURST HILL. April 30—Buckhurst Hill, Club Match May 7—Buckhurst Hill, v. Hampstead Park May 14—Buckhurst Hill, v. Trafalgar May 21—Buckhurst Hill, v. Clapton May 21—Woodford, v. Bancroft School May 28—Buckhurst Hill, v. Wanstead May 28—Loughton, v. Laughton 2nd June 4—Buckhurst Hill, v. Holhorn June 4—Chigwell, v. Chigwell Grammar School June 6—Buckhurst Hill, v. London Hospital June 11—Buckhurst Hil , v. Woodford Wtlls June 11—Woodford, v. Woodford Wells June 15—Buckhurst Hill, v. Stoics June 18—Upper Clapton, v. Upper Clapton June 18—Buckhurst Hill, v. Upper Clapton June 21—Buckhurst Hill, v. Bishops Stortford June 25—Buckhurst Hill, v. Chigwell July 2—Alexandra Park, v. Islington Albion July 2—Buckhurst Hill, v. Walthamstow July 5—Havering, v. E. Pemh. Barnes’ XI. July 9—Woodford, v. Woodford Wells Juiy 9—Buckhurst Hill, v. Woodf>rd Wells Ju'y 13—Bishops Stortford, v. Bishops Stortford July 16—Buckhurst Hill, v. Upper Clapton July 16—Woodford, v. Bancroft School July 21—Buckhurst Hill, v. Anchorites July 23—Tottenham, v. Trafalgar July 23—Buckhurst Hill, v. Loughton 2nd July 28—Buckhurst Hill, v. Ackworth Vacation July 30—Wanstead, v. Wanstead July 30—Buckhurst Hill, v. Epping Town August 1—Buckhurst Hill, v. Walthamstow August 4—Buckhurst Hill, v. Birkenhead Victoria August 6—Clapton, v. Clapton August 6—Buckhurst Hil), v. Loughton Park August 11—Buckhurst Hill, v. Colveston Augnst 13—Buckhurst Hill, v. St. Johns August 13—Upper Clapton, v. Upper Clapton August 2o—Buckhurst Hill, v. Holhorn August 20—Wanstead, v. Wanstead Park August 24—Buckhurst Hill, v. Anchorites August 27—Huckhurst Hill, v. Bank of England August 27—Walthamstow, v. Walthamstow August 3 —Buckhurst Hill, v. Erratics September 3—Buckhurst Hill. v. Islington Albion September 3—Epping. v. Epping Town September 10—Buckhurst Bill, v. Honor Oak September 10—Lough‘on, v. Loughton Park CHARLTON PARK. April 30—Charlton Park, v. Point House Ramblers Apiil 30—Dulwich, v. Dulwich (2) May 7—Eltham, v. Eltham May 7—Charlton Park, v. Linden May 14—Charlton Park, v. Granville (1) May 14—Lee, v. Granville (2) May 21—Brondesbury, v. London Scottish May 21—Charlton Park, v. Army Service Corps May 25—Charlton Park, v. Clapham Wanderers May 28—Catford Bridge, v. Bank of England May 29—Charlton Pk.,v. Royal Mi'itaryAcademy (2) June 1—Charlton Park, v. Old Yverdonians June 4—Charlton Park, v. Blackheath June 4—Abbey Wood, v. West Heath June 6—Charlton Park, v. Old Charlton (1) June 6—Charlton Park, v. Old Charlton ( 2 ) June 8—Charlton Park. v. Ne’er do Weels June 11—Forest Hill, v. Forest Hill (1) June 11—Charlton Park, v. Forest Hill (2) June 15—Charlton Park, v. Royal Naval College Juno 18—Charlton Park, v. Burlington Wanderers June 18—Finsbury, v. Hon. Artillery Company June 22—Charlton Park. v. Peripatetics June 25—Dulwich, v. Dulwich (i) June 25—Charlton Park, v. Dulwich (2) June 29—Hampstead, v. Hampstead July 2—Charlton Park, v. Eltham July 2—Honor Oak, v. Linden July 6—Charlton Park, v. Emeriti July 9—Lee, v. Granville (1) July 9—Charlton Park, v. Granville ( 2 ) July 13—Charlton Park, v. Hampstead July 16—Charlton Park, v. Old Charlton (1) July 16—Charlton Park, v. Old Charlton (2) July 20—Charlton Park, v. Royal Fusiliers July 23—Charlton Park, v. Forest Hill (1) July 23 -Forest Hill, v. Forest Hill (2; July 28—Crystal Palacc, v. Crystal Palace Ju'y 30—Charlton Park, v. London Scottish August 1—Rectory Field, v. Blackheath August 1—Charlton Park, v. Hon. Artillery Comp. August 4—Charlton Park, v. Erratics August 6—Charlton Park, v. Dulwich Augnst 10—Woolwich, v. Royal Artillery August 13—Charlton Park, v. Bank of England August 20—CharltonPark.v.Point House Ramblers August 27—Charlton Park, v. Burlington Wndrs. August 30—Charlton Park, v. Royal Fusiliers September 3—Charlton Park, v Oakleigh Wndrs. September 10—Charlton Park, v. Royal Naval Coll. TOUR. August 15—Tun> ridge Wells, v. Blue Mantles August 16—Hastings, v. Hastings Alexandra August 17,18—St. Leonards, v. South Saxons August 19, 20—Eastbourne, v. Devonshire Park