Cricket 1892

AUG. 18, 1892. C R I C K E T : A W E E K L Y R E C Q R D O F T H E G A M E . 8 7 5 SUSSEX v. LANCASHIRE. The Lancashire eleven, who have been showing excellent all-round cricket during the last m onth, ■were again seen to great advantage this week at Brighton. Briggs, owing to an attaok of quinzy. was unable to play, but fortunately Mold and Watson bowled so well that Lancashire required no change during the match. As Mr. Crosfield was fortunate in the toss Lancashire went in first, and when the time cam e to draw stumps on Nionday night the innings were uncompleted, 327 runs having been made with still one wicket to fall. The commencem ent gave little prom ise of such a good finish, as Guttridge got rid of W ard and Sugg, two of the m ost dangerous batsmen of the side, for only twenty runs. The batting, indeed, was sin­ gularly uneven, as Mr. Maclaren and Smith were responsible for 243 of the total of 327. Their stand for the third wicket lasted three hours and twenty minutes, and realised 208 runs. The Old Harrovian, who made such a successful debut for Lancashire in the same m atch two years ago, showed cricket of a very high order. During the three hours and three-quarters he was in he batted with great judgm ent, and until just before he was out there wan no mistake of any kind. Smith was at the wickets forty-five minutes longer. His watchful cricket was as usual of the greatest assistance, but his innings was by no means fault­ less. As Mold and Watson added 29 more for the tenth wicket on Tuesday morning, Sussex had to go in against a big total of 356. Nor did they at any tim e seem as if they were likely to make anything of a fight of it. On the contrary, as already stated, M old and W atson were neither of them really collared, and soon after half past five o’clock the m atch was over. Lancashire, w ho got their opponents out twice on Tuesday, for an aggregate o f 231 runs, had in the end an easy victory by an innings and 125 runs. M old’s bowling contributed greatly to their decisive success. In the m atch altogether he took fourteen wickets at a cost of under eleven and a half runs a-piece. L ancash ire . A. Ward, c Tate, Guttridge ...........16 Mr. A. C. M’Laren, c H um phreys, b B ean.......... ... ...132 F. Sugg, b Guttridge 0 A. Smith, st Butt, b Humphreys ... ...Ill Baker, b Humphreys 15 Mr. S. M. Crosfield, b Humphreys ...........13 Yates, b Humphreys 6 S u s se x . First Innings. Bean, c Yates, b W atson 20 Mr. T. R. Hubback, b Tate ... ........... Mr. A. T. Kemble, c Marlow, b H um ­ phreys ................... Watson, not out Mold, c Bean, b H u m p h reys........... B 2, lb 8 ........... 10 Total ...356 Marlow, b M old.................... 4 Hollands, b W atson..............12 Mr. W . Newham, c Hub- back, b M o ld ......................16 run out Mr. G. Brann, c Baker, b Second Innings, c Kemble, b Wat­ son .................. b M old.................. run out ........... Mold Guttridge, b Mold ... Hide, b Mold ........... Mr. W. H. Andrews, ] out .......................... H um phreys, b Mold Butt, c Baker, b Mold Tate, b W atson ........... B .......................... 10 17 , 6 ’ 15 0 1 . 0 4 M old c Baker, b b M old.................. b M old.................. b M old.................. not out ........... c Ward, b Mold bM old.................. B .................. Total .................. 105 Total BOWLING ANALYSIS. L ancashire . O. M. R. W. O. Tate ... 56 26 t*7 1 |B ran n.......... 16 Guttridge 45 14 114 2 |Hide ............5 Humphreys37.3 4 80 6 |Bean ...........16 S u ssex . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M.R. W . O. M. R. W M old .................... 24 8 72 7 ... ... 29.3 7 87 7 Watson ............ 23.1 8 29 3 ..............£9 15 38 1 ...126 M. R. W. 7 31 0 8 6 0 7 28 1 LEICESTERSH IRE v. ESSEX. Though there was little to choose between the two elevens as the result of Monday’s play at Leicester, the home team were able yesterday to claim a fairly easy win with five wickets to spare. Leicestershire, who had on Monday night made 70 for the loss of one wicket, against a total of 237, fared so well on the:following day, thanks to the generally bad fielding o f their opponents, that they were able to add 138 before the last bats­ man was out. The rain, which had prevented the renewal of the game at the proper time, affected the ground during the afternoon, and Essex had not a very good tim e of it. Thanks to another good innings by Mr. Johnston, 94 was the score when the third wicket fell. Subsequently, however, W oodcock and Pougher bowled with such success that the remaining batsmen only added 76. W ood­ cock’ s figures were exceptionally good, showing six wickets for 38 runa. On Tuesday night Leicestershire had made 11 of 148 wanted to win, for the loss of one batsman, and yetterday the 137 •till wanting were got with little trouble, four m ore w ickets falling before the winning hit was made. E sse x . First Innings. Second Innings, Mr. H. G. Owen, run out 2 c Warren,b S. R. W right.........14 Mr. A. P. Lucas, b F. Wright ......................74 b Woodcock ... 16 Mr. A. S. Johnston, c Pougher, b Woodcock... 65 b Woodcock ... 53 Carpenter, b F. Wright ... 12 c Chapman, b Woodcock ... 14 Mr. F. E . Rowe, c Wood­ cock, b S. R. Wright ... 10 c de Trafford, b Pougher......... 3 Burns, lbw, b F. Wright... 8 b Woodcock ... 2 Mr. H. Hailey, c Tomlin, b Pougher ... '............... 15 b Pougher........... 0 Mr. F. A. Phillips, b F. Wright ... ............... 0 c Woodcock, b Pougher......... 9 Mr. H. M. Taberer, not out ............................ 30 b Woodcock ... 5 Mead, c de Trafford, b Pougher ......... ......... 4 b Woodcock ... 0 Pickett, c F. Wright, b Pougher ......... ......... 2 not out ......... 1 B10, lb 5...............15 B .................. 1 Total ...........237 L e ic e st e r sh ir e . Total ...118 First Innings. Second Innings. W arren, b T a b e re r...........66 lbw, b Burns ... 49 Holland, lbw, b Taberer... 16 hit ball twice ... 0 Chapman, c Hailey, b Taberer ..........................26 b Pickett .....14 Mr. S. R. Wright, b Mead 2 c Owen, bPick­ ett 20 Pougher, lbw, b Mead ... 41 lbw, b Mead ... 24 Mr. C. E. de Trafford, c Rowe, b M ead.................. 0 not out ...... Tom lin, c Owen, b Tab­ erer ..................................31 not out .... 28 Mr. F. Wright, b Mead ... 0 Riley, b Mead .................. 0 W oodcock, b M e a d ........... 3 Mr. F. W. Stocks, not out 0 B 15, lb 8 ...........23 B ..................... 5 Total Total ...148 HAMPSHIRE v. DERBYSHIRE. After having considerably the worst o f the first part of the match at Southam pton on Thursday, Hampshire played up so well that they were only in the end beaten by three wickets. Davidson and Porter bowled with success for Derbyshire, though both were rather expensive. Porter’s nine wickets cost 140, Davidson’s eight 180 runs. Baldwin took six Derbyshire wickets at a cost o f 95 runs. Mr. Hill’s five only eost 49 runs. H a m psh ir e . First Innings. Soar, b Davidson ........... 4 Mr. C. Robson, c Chatter­ ton, b Porter ..................46 Barton, c S. H. Evershed, b Porter ..................' ... 16 Mr. F. E. Lacey, b Porter 9 Mr. R. Bencraft, run out 0 Mr. A. J.L.Hill, c Chatter­ ton, b Davidson ...........27 Mr. A. H. Wood, not out... 37 Mr. D. A. Steele, c Porter, b Davidson .................. 0 Mr.E.Newton, cDavidson, b Porter .......................... 0 Mr. G. Russell, c Storer,b Davidson ... .................. 0 Baldwin, c Chatterton, b Porter.................................. 7 Second Innings, b Davidson ... 7 c Bagshaw, b Porter ........19 c S. Evershed, b Davidson ... 5 b Porter ........16 lbw, b Davidson 28 c Chatterton, b Porter ........ 31 b Porter ............ 4 not out .........17 c Eadie,bD avid- son .................... 7 cBagshaw.bSugg 20 ... 32 ... 1 run out B ... Total ..................146 D e r b y s h ir e . Total ...187 First Innings. Second Innings. Mr. L. G. W right, c Soar, b H ill..................................47 c W ood, b H ill... 85 Bagshaw.c Steele, b Bald­ win .................................. 5 c Hill, b Soar ... 1 Chatterton, c Hill,b Bald­ win ..................................55 b Soar ... ............. 2 Mr. S. H. Evershed,c Soar, b H ill..................................13 c Hill, b Steele... 22 Davidson, c W ood,bBald- win ..................................17 b Baldw in.............10 Storer, b Baldwin ...........21 c Robson, b H ill 33 Mr. W. S. Edie, run ou t... 21 n otou t ........... 6 W. Sugg, b Soar.................. 1 not out ........... 0 Mr. F. Everahed, b Soar... 1 Malthouse, not o u t........... 2 c Soar, b Hill ...11 Porter,c Steele, b Baldwin 0 fi 17, lb 3, n b l ...........21 B 7, lb 4 ...11 Total ... ...204 Total ...131 CHISW ICK PARK v. BIRKENH EAD VICTORIA —Played at Chiswick on August 5. C h isw ick P a r k . E. W. Newbroner, c W ilson.b Freeman 42 J. B. Brockbank, c Fisher, b Freeman 56 B. M. Killion, not out ... ... ... ...100 J.Tullock, c Brockle- bank, b Freem an... 7 J..J.R. Green, not out 63 B 12, lb 6 ...........18 Total ...286 D. R. Dangar, R. Dawes, J. Mosley, L. Johnstone, P. Farr, and Budden did not bat. Innings deolared closed. B irk en h e a d V ictoria . J. Fish, b Dawes ... 5 J.P.Freeman.bDawes 40 H. W ilson, c Tulloek, b D a w e s..................18 H. Routledge, b Farr 27 J.Brouklebank, c Tul- lock, b Farr ...........17 J. Macdonald, b Tullock .................. 0 C.Mayo, b Newbroner 3 G. Warne, c Killion, b Newbroner.......... C. Hayes, c Green, b Tullock ........... ... L. Roberts, not out R. Mercer, not out... B .......................... Total ...166 OXFORD UNIVERSITY AUTHENTICS v. TON­ BR IDG E.—Played at Tonbridge on August 1 and 2. T on bridge. First Innings. Second Innings. W . Rashleigb, c Stewart, b Christopherson........... 4 b Johnson........... 83 J. Le Fleming, b Christo­ pherson .................. ... 63 c Taylor, b Johnson ... 3 A. S. Page,c Christopher­ son, b Fair ................... 12 c Stewart, Johnson T. Pawley, b Christo­ pherson ........................... 7 st Berens, Thornton J. P. S. Hervey, b Thorn­ ton .................................. 19 b Thornton Capt. Ham ilton, b Thorn­ ton .................................. 6 bJoh nson... R. E. Marehant, b Christo­ pherson .......................... 5 b Johnson ... F. W . Franks, c Chris- to p herson, b Thorn­ ton .................................. 10 st Berens, Thornton S. S. Williams, runout ... 14 b Thornton M. Streatfeild, b Thorn- , 55 » . 14 , 5 , 0 . 9 ton F. Gully, not out Day, b Thornton Extras ... Total Rev. R. T. Thornton, b Gully .....................45 H. C. Stewart, c Marchant, b W il­ liam s...........................122 A. K. W atson, b Wil­ liam s............................. 31 E. A. Parke, b W il­ liam s........................... 0 R . D. Budworth, b Le Fleming ................... 0 R. A. Ingram , c Page, b P aw ley.....................17 J. St. F. Fair, b Le Fleming .....................27 7 not out ........... 8 ...........12 o B e r e n s , b C hristo p her- s o n ................... 4 ........... 6 c and b Thorn­ ton ................... ........... 1 Extras........... — —0 ...........166 Total ...137 A u th e n tic s . P. Christopherson, b L e Fleming ... 12 A. C. Taylor, b W il­ liams .......................19 R. Berens, b W il­ liams ... ... ... 5 L. W. Andrews, not out ............................. 1 F. G. Johnson, b Le Flem ing.............................. 5 Extras...................... 37 Total OXFORD UNIVERSITY AUIHENTICS v. OXTED (MR. L E V E 90N -G 0 W ER’S XI).— Played at Oxted on August 3. A u t h e n t ic s . H. C. Stewart, c F., b Leveson-Gower 12 It. D. Budworth, b S n ellin g.................. 1 R. B. Stewart, b Snelling ................... 1 A. C. Taylor, o Mar­ riott, b Snelling ... 19 J. St. F.Fair, o Hoare, b E.Leveson-Gower 4 R. A.Ingram, c Hoare, bC.Levesoc-G ower 39 E. Berens, b Snel- lings..........................20 A. J. Boger, b C. Leveson-Gower ... 7 R. F. C. de W inton, c L»veson-Gower, b Snelling.................. 10 R. Berens.b M arriott 22 E. Britten Holm es, not o u t ................... 9 Extras ...........20 T otal.......... 164 O x t b d . C. Leveaon-Gower, c B. Stewart, b E. Berens .................. 5 F. Leveaon-Gower, c and b B o g e r ...........68 H. Leveson-G ower, c R. Stewart,b Fair... 21 Rev. H. R . Marriott, c R.Bereni, b Boger 7 Fennell, c Budworth, b T a y lo r .................. 3 G. W. Lawrence, c Budworth, b Taylor 2 E. Leveson-Gower, not o u t ..................30 G. Hoare, c and b Bosrer .................. 0 Snelling,cH.Stewart, b B o g e r ................... 0 F. Young, c H. Stewart, b Taylor 3 C O. Leveson-Gower, c Taylor, bBoger 0 Extras .......10 Total....... 149