Cricket 1892

87 4 C B I C K E T : A W E E K L Y R E C O R D O F T H E G A M E . AUG. 18, 1892 T he follow ing inninga of a hun dred over have com e under ou r n otice since week A’Deane, W . W., Hampstead Nondescripts v. Priory Park, Chichester, August 8 ... Bromley-Davenport, H. R., Eton Ramblers v. Derby Friars, August 10.......................... Cartman, W., Skipton v. Elland, August 13 Corke, L., Hampstead Nondescripts v. G oodwood, August 10 .......................... Castle, S., Charlton Park v. Royal Artillery, August 10 .................................................. Cutts, Brentwood v. Ingatestone, August 10 Crowther. F., Bradford Rovers v. Leicester C. and G., August 1 0 ...................................... Douglas, J., Seaton v. Crystal Palace, August 9.............................................................. Fox, H., Lansdown v. W iltshire Wanderers, August 16 ................................................. Fletchcr, W. N., Ishmaelites v. Wellington, August 12 ................................................. Grant, A. Spencer, G. H. Coom bes’ Eleven v. Luton Park, August 16 .......................... Gay, L . H., A. P. Lucas’ Eleven v. Free Foresters, August 13...................................... GerdB, G. F., Granville (Lee) v. Mottingham, August 13 .................................................. Gibson, H., Free Foresters v. A. P. Lucas’ Eleven, August 13 ...................................... Hayward, E., Dover v. Holborn, August 12 ... Haygarth, E. B., Incogniti v. Exmouth, August 12............................................................ Hine-Haycock, V. R., Spike Island v. Youg- hal, July 30 ................................................'. Ingram, F. M., Free Foresters v. A. P. Lucas’ Eleven, August 12 ...................................... Jotnston, A. S., Corn Exchange v. Stoics, August 11 .................................................. Johnstone, Minerva v. Forest, August 13 Le Fleming, J , Blue Mantles v. South Saxons, August 8 ...................................... Lucena, S., Windsor H ome Park v. Slough, August 13 .................................................. Mathers, W., Deptford Tradesmen v. R Division (Podce), August 9.......................... Mansfield. Sergt., Staff-Sergeants v. Sand­ hurst V.C.C., August 10 ......................... Maclaren, A.C., Lancashire v. Sussex, August 1 5 ......................................................................... Northcote, P., L. De Rothschild’s XI. v. G. L. B. Calcott’s XI., August 12 ............... Pougher, M.C.C. & G. v. Bedfordshire, August 12............................................................. Preece, H. C., Bees v. Stonebridge, August 9 Phillips, F. A., A. P. Lucas' Eleven v. Free For* sters, August 1 3 ...................................... Rowe, F. E., A. P. Lucas’ Eleven v. Free Foresters, August 13...................................... Ranjitsinhji, K. S., Cambridge Victoria v. Bedford, August 1 0 ...................................... Ranjitsinhji, K. S., Trinity v. St. John’s, AUgUSt 12 .................................................. Ranjitsinhji, K. S., Bassinettes v. Jesus College L.V.C., August 1 6 .......................... Somerset, A. F., Littleham pton v. Croydon, August 8 ............................................................. Somerset, A. F., Sussex C. & G. v. Hastings and St. Leonards, August 11 ............... Smith, E., M oiely v. Ossett, August 13 Sawyer, T., Bees v. Kilburn, August 12 Smith, A., Lancashire v. Sussex, August 15... Shrewsbury, Notts v. Gloucestershire, August 1 5 ............................................................. Spens. Major J., Free Foresters v, Royal Engineers, August 12 .......................... Tubbs. L., Peripatetics v. Pem broke and Trinity Hall L.V.C., Angust 12 ............... Thornton, Rev. R. T., Blue Mantles v. East- bourne, August 10 ...................................... Tristram, H. B., S. H. W ood’s Eleven v. Yorkshire Gentlemen, August 12............... Thring, L. C. R., Thring’s Eleven v. Beds Gentlemen, August 10 .......................... Taberer, H. M., A. P. Lucas’ Eleven v. Free Foresters, August 13...................................... W right,, J. N. Pembroke and Trinity Hall L.V.C. v. Peripatetics, August 12.............. W igram, C., Charlton v. Chippenham, August 6 ............................................................. Womersley, D., Windsor H ome Park v. 81ough, August 13 ...................................... White, E. V., Belgrave v. Honor Oak, August 13 .................................................. and last 109* 162 119* 100 131 106 160* 132 107* 108 137 112 157 115 131 107 102* 130 112 131* 106 100* 113 104 182 120* 112 101 120 107* 141 142* 111* 145* 104* 101 170 111 127 178* 103 114 109 101 114 116* 169 114 101* SOMERSETSHIRE v. SURREY. Though the opening day’s nlay at Taunton gave promise of as interesting a finish as that recorded in the same match of last year, the Somersetshire men, after the rain of Tuesday morning, were unable to approach Surrey’s score of 253, and were yesterday beaten easily by 186 runs. W inning the toss, Surrey made such a good start that, at luncheon tim e on Monday, the score was 130 with only two batsmen out. Then came a remarkable change, and Mr. W oods’ bowling proved so effective that five m ore wickets fell for an addition of only 41 runs. Henderson, however, found a very useful partner iu Brockweil, and thanks to the w atchful play of the iormer, and the free cricket of the latter, the innings after all reached the respectable figure of 253. Somersetshire had only an hour left for batting, and in that time obtained 97 for the loss of two wickets. Tho credit of this performance rested entirely with Mr. Hewett, who made 61 of the first 81 runs in fifty minutes with only one chance in the long-field at 42. The heavy rain on Tuesday morning affected Somersetshire’s chances materially, and Lohmann utilised the assistance he got from the ground fully. Play was not resumed [till 1.40, and then the eight re­ maining wickets only added 87. Mr. Palairet, indeed, was the only batsman able to make any stay, and he was last out, having contributed 51 of the runs made on Tuesday. He played with consummate judgment as well as confidence, and considering the difficulties under which he laboured, it was an exceptionally fine per­ form ance. Five runs were wanted to avoid the follow on when Tyler came in, and an overthrow for four enabled them to save it with only a single to spare. The ground was getting faster on Tuesday afternoon, when Surrey en­ tered on their second innings, and runs came so quickly, that in the hour and twenty minutes that were left, 101 runs were made for the loss of half the side. The chief feature of the continuation of Surrey’s second innings yesterday, was the free hitting of W ood, who was responsible for no less than 32 of the 55 added by the last five wickets. Tyler was the most successful bowler, dismissing six batsmen for only 51 runs. When they went in for the fourth innings Somerset wanted 236 to win, and though Mr. Hewett made 18, the others failed so badly that in an hour the whole side were out for 49, leaving Surrey with an easy victory by 187 runs. Their dismissal was the result of the fine bowling of Lohm ann and Lockwood. Only twenty overs were delivered, with the result that Lockwood got five wickets for 18, Lohmann’s four for 31 runs. S u rrey . First Inninga. Mr. W . W . Read, c and b T y le r .......................... ... 53 Abel, b Tyler ..................45 Lockwood, b W oods...........45 M. Read, c Hill, b W oods 9 Mr. J. Shuter, c Roe, b Nichols .......................... 5 Henderson, not o u t ...........37 Lohm ann, lbw, b W oods 0 Baldwin, b W oods ........... 2 Brockwell, W oods Tyler, b ... 41 W ood, c Challen, b W oods 1 Richardson, b Nichols ... 13 B .................................. 2 Total ..................233 S o m erset . First Innings. Mr. H. T . Hewett, b Rich­ ardson ..........................61 Second Innings. cPalairet.bTyler 3 b W oods ...........15 cWoods,bHedley 21 cChallen, b Tyler 14 c Palairet, b Tyler ........... 5 c and b W oods 30 c Hill, b Tyler ... 4 cN ew ton, bH ed­ ley ...................12 c Newton, Tyler st Newton, Tyler not out B ......... b ... 37 ... 5 ... 2 Total ...156 Mr. J. B. Challen, b L ock­ wood ................. 3 run out Mr. L. C. H. Palairet, c Abel, b Lohm ann.......... 79 Second Innings. 3 W. Read, b Lohm ann ... 18 Mr. W . C. Hedley, c Bald­ win, b Lohmann ........... 2 Mr. W . N. Roe, c Richard­ son, b Lohmann ........... 0 Mr. V. T. Hill, c M. Read, b Lohmann .................. 6 Mr. S. M. J. Woods, c Bhuter, b Lohmann ... 3 Mr.A.E.Newton, c Shuter, b Lohm ann .................. 5 Nichols, c W ood, b R ich­ ardson .......................... 0 Mr. C. J. Robinson, lbw, b Richardson .................. 2 Tyler, not out ................... 1 B 4, lb 8 ...................12 c W ood, b L oh ­ mann ........... c Henderson, b Lockwood candb Lohm ann c Abel, b L ock­ w ood ........... cand b Lohmann not out ... 13 c W ood, b L ock­ wood ........... 0 c Richardson, b Lockwood ... 11 b Lockw ood ... 1 Total .................. 174 Total BOWLING ANALYSIS. ... 49 S u rrey . First Innings. O. M. P. W. W oods............... 36 8 92 6 ... Tyler ............... 30 7 70 2 ... H edley............... 9 4 15 0 ... Nichols........... 28.311 74 2 ... S om erset . First Innings. O. M. R. W. Lockwood ... 10 5 62 1 . Lohmann ... 30.2 9 47 6 . Abel ............... 8 0 10 O Richardson... 20 7 43 3 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. ... 20 5 57 2 ... 18.2 5 51 6 ... 18 1 31 2 ... 7 3 15 0 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. ... 10 3 18 5 ... 10 3 81 4 EAG LE HOUSE (SANDHURST) v. WIXENFORD —Played at W ixenford on July 22. W ix e n po r d . B. H. Romilly, b Du Boulay ... ........ 3 B. A. Smith, b Web­ ster .................... 0 J.W.Church.b Gooch 20 J. E. Tomkinson, b Gooch .............. 4 W. H. Seeker,b Black 19 R. Howard, c Web­ ster, b Black......10 T. A. Dennistone, b Du Boulay ........ 1 E agle J. Van der Byl, run out .................... 0 H. H. M. Harris, c Digby, b Scott ... 0 H. C. Webster, b Seeker .............. 16 A. H. Du Boulay, c Smith, b Baird ... 12 E. S. Gooch, c Den­ nistone, b Howard 8 E. A. Morton, b Seeker .............. 0 A. K. D igby, b Du Boulay ................... G. S. Hoare, not out J. C. Scott, b Du Boulay ................... W. A. Baird, b Du Boulay ..................... E x tra s.................. Total ... 63 H ouse . J. H. Costeker, b Scott.......................... 18 J. Kennaway, c Church, b Scott ... 2 W. D. Black, b Scott 7 E. L . Moysey, c Rom illy, b Howard 14 S. W. Price, not out 1 E xtras................... 8 Total 86 SHIRLEY HOUSE SCHOOL v. ST. CHRISTO­ PH ER’S SCHOOL.—Played at Blackheath on July 21. S t . C h risto ph er ’ s . Watson, b D a y .......... Rawlinson, b Day ... Adamson, b Day Tagart, b Day .......... Festing, b D a y .......... Grylls, b Dalgliesh... Turnbull, b Day Beard, b Day W ilson, not out Lomer, c Hockley, b Dalgliesh Causton, b D ay B 1, w 1 ... Total 5 1 2 , 58 S h ir l e y H ou se , W. H. Dalgliesh, c and b T a ga rt.........12 G. ff. Bellairs, c Tagart, b W atson 0 T. Hazlerigg, c Raw ­ linson, b Grvlls ... 0 6. H. Day, not out ... 55 N. S. Braidwood, c Turnbull.b Watson F. M. Vipan, c Fest­ ing, b W atson ... R.Y. Buchly, not out Total ... A. J. Biscoe, F. B. Dalgliesh, A. S. Hockley, and W. B. V. W ebb did not bat. SH IRLEY HOUSE SCHOOL v. SYDENHAM COLLEGE.—Played at Blackheath on July 20. S yd en h a m C o lle g e . F. Mutter, b Day ... 0 R. A. Smallwood, c Braidwood, b D al­ gliesh.......................... 7 E. Russell, b Day ...12 L. W illiams, c Braid­ wood, b Day .......... 0 F. West, c Hockley, b Dalgliesh ........... 1 C. Hayward, b Day... 0 H. A. Lewis, c Bel­ lairs, b D algliesh... 1 F. Rogers, c Buchly, b Dalgliesh ........... V. Burch, lbw, b Dalgliesh ........... E. Chamney.not out L. Tapley, c W ebb, b D algliesh .......... W ........................... Total ... 23 W. n . Dalgliesh, W illiams, b W est .. 2 G. ff. Bellairs, c and b Burch ..................14 J.Hazlerigg.b Russell 15 S h ir le y H o u se . S. H. Day. not out... 76 N. S. Braidwood,not o u t ...........................31 B 12, w 2 ...........14 Total .......... 152 F. M. Vipan, R. I. Buchly, A. J. B iscoe, F. B. Dalgliesh, A. S. Hockley, and W - V. B. Webb did not bat. GOLDSMITHS’ IN STITU TE v. BROCKLEY.— —Played at Brockley on August 6. G o ldsm ith s ’ I n stitu te . H. Holmes, c Jaques. b W elch m a n ........... H. E. Murrell, c Ball, b W elchm an........... H .B.Scully,c Griffith, b H arrup.................. W. C. Lake, b Welch­ m an .......................... 5 S. R. Best, not out... 33 F.L.O.Franks,notout 4 B .......................... 6 Total ...........51 F. Bowler, H. E. Knapton, A. W. Nalty, A. Don­ aldson, and C. E. H oldcroft did not bat. B r o c k le y . L. Harrup, b Murrell 49 |W .M erchurst.b D on­ aldson ................... 0 G.A. Fowler, not out 0 B 1, w 1 ........... 2 M.A. Jaques, cN alty, b D on aldson ...........51 J. F. Griffith, b Scully 8 T. R. Coals, b Lake... 25 C. G. Welchman, not out ..........................13 J. Price, R. W etherell, S. Fraser, and E.Ball did not bat. Total ...148 C r ic k e t C h at for 1891.—(Eighth Year of Issue), enlarged and im proved edition, post free 7£d Containing in addition to Portraits and Biographies, Gronps of Cricket, and Cricket Anecdotes and Oddities. To be had at the Office of this paper, of all Booksellers, or W. H. Smith & Sons stalls.