Cricket 1892

228 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD Off THE GAME. JUNE 23, 1892 In the Second Innings B. N. Douglas scored, (not out) 38, Cooper, c Brann, b Guttridge 0, J. Douglas, b Tate 5, Latham, c Newham, b Gutt­ ridge 23, Scott, b Guttridge 0,Streatfeild, (not out) 2; b l, lb l.—Total70. BOWLING ANALYSIS. S ussex . First Innings. 0. M. R. W. Streatfeild...2G 10 55 6 Jackson ... 19 8 67 2 Wells ........ 13.2 5 26 1 Hill ........ 7 2 18 0 C ambridge U niversity . Second Innings. O. M. It. W. ......... 26 15 3) 4 .........15.1 5 25 .........10 4 27 First Innings. O. M.R. W. Tate ............ 22 7 57 1 Guttridge ... 23 3 48 3 Hnmphreys 17 0 49 2 Hide ............ 12.1 4 27 2 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. . ... 8.3 3 i8 1 . ... 10 1 28 3 . ... 4 2 5 0 , . . . 3 1 7 0 DERBYSHIRE v. SURREY. The Surrey Eleven finished up their match with Derbyshire, at Derby, on Friday, in much the same way as that against Middlesex, earlier in the week, at the Oval. In the latter 172 wanted to win were got for tho loss of two wickets, at Derby 165 only cost three wickets, and in each case Maurice Read was in when the winning run was got. Surrey’s luck in the toss has recently changed, and for the third time in succession they had to take the field first. On Thursday the wicket, after the overnight rain, helped the bowlers somewhat, and eighteen wickets fell for a total of 281. Though at the end of an innings Surey were 25 runs behind, the second day’s play went altogether in their favour, and they finished the match in brilliant style. Richardson, who had bowled with great success in Derbyshire’s first innings, was also seen to advantage on the second day. Lockwood, who did not bowl a ball till Derbyshire had made 87 in the second innings, too, performed with effect on the later batsmen, taking the last four wickets in eleven overs at a cost of only 19 runs. When Surrey went in to make 165 to win, Baldwin again showed good cricket, seeing Abel and Lohmann out before he was caught at the wicket at 92. Then the two Reads got together, and, by vigorous hitting, they knocked off the runs. Play was prolonged on Friday five minutes over the usual time to allow of a finish that night, tho 165 runs being got in two hours and a quarter. Richardson’s bowling was quite one of the best features of the match. Altogether he took twelve Derbyshire wickets for less than 11 runs a-piece. Chatterton received a blow on the head from a ball of Richardson, and had to retire when he had made sixteen, though he was able to finish his innings. Surrey were without Mr. Shuter, Mr. Key, and Wood, Derby­ shire without Mr. G. G. Walker and Hall. D erbyshire . Second Innings, b Richardson ... 7 First Innings. Mr. L. G. Wright, c Abel, b Lohmann ................ 17 Bagshaw, c Watts, b Rich­ ardson...............................18 Chatterton, b Richardson 5 Davidson, b Richardson... 0 Mr. S. H. Evershed, c and b Richardson.................12 Storer, b Richardson ... 4 Hulme, b Sharpe ... ... 44 W. Sugg, b Sharpe .......... 9 Malthouse, not o u t ......... 20 Mr. H. C. Mosby, c Watts, b R ichardson................. 3 Porter, c Brockwell, b Richardson ................ 4 B 11, lb 4 .................15 c Lohmann, b Richardson ... 19 b Lockwood ... 26 b Sharpe ..........13 b Richardson ... 0 b Richardson ... 0 b Lockwood ... 16 b Lockwood ... 14 c W. Read, b Lockwood ... 19 c Watts, b Rich­ ardson .......... 3 not out .......... 0 B 18, lb 3, nb 1 22 Total ...151 S urrey .—First Innings. Total ...139 Abel, b H ulm e......... 2:3 Baldwin, b Hulme ... 17 Lohmann, c Malt- house, b Davidson 9 M. Read, b Davidson 1 Mr. W. W. Read, b Hulme .................23 Lockwood, c Sugg, b Davidson................. 7 Henderson, b Hnlme 18 Brockwell, run out... 11 Sharpe, not out ... 4 Watts, b Davidson ... 0 Richardson,b David­ son ........................ 2 B 10, lb 1 ..........11 Total ...126 In the Second Innings Abel scored, b Davidson, 27, Baldwin, c Storer, b Sugg, 28, Lohmann, c Chatterton, b Sugg, 23, M. Read (not out) 40, W. W. Read (not out) 38; b 6, lb 5, nb 1—Total, 168. BOWLING ANALYSIS. D erb y sh ire . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M.R. W. Lohmann ... 16 5 38 1 ........... 13 6 15 0 Richardson... 30 8 67 7 .......... 31.1 6 63 5 Sharpe ............. 14 5 31 2 ........... 9 2 20 1 Lockwood 11 4 19 4 Lockwood bowled one no-ball. S u r r e y . First Innings. O. M. R. W. 30.3 19 33 5 19 23 4 50 0 ... 8 32 4 ... Chatterton Sugg.. O. M. It. W. 21 6 39 1 8 1 28 0 14 3 31 0 5 0 20 0 7 3 19 2 4 0 15 0 3 2 4 0 Davidson Porter ... Hulme... Malthouse Davidson bowled one no-ball. NORWOOD v. NORBURY PABK .-Played at Norbury Park on June 18. N o rw o o d . E. McCausland, b Robinson................. 1 A. Conan Doyle, c W. Hobbs, fc Nichols... 3 H. S. Goodwyn, c Blacker,b Robinson 25 W. C. Elborough, c A. Hobbs, b Nichols... 12 F. L. Elliott, not out 37 H. P. Tidy, c Robin­ son, b Nichols ... 0 P. A. Sharman, b Meredith................. 1 N orbory P ark . B. Featherstone, b Meredith................. W. L. McNay, b Meredith................. P. S. May.c Manning, b Robinson .. H. A. Payne, Nichols ........ B4, lb l ... 18 b ... 0 ... 5 Total . ...102 W. It. Manning, t Elborough .......... W. E. Hobbs, b Doyle L. B. Meredith, b Doyle ................. K. Robinson, lbw, b Elborough .......... J. J. Morris, b El­ borough ................. G. Nichols, c McNay, b Elborough .......... 29 F. Holmes, run out... 11 G. H. Chappel, b Doyle ................. 8 A. Blacker, not out 12 J. McAldin, ran out 0 A. E. Hobbt*, p Mc- Causland, b El­ borough .................10 B 2, lb 2, w 3, nb 1 8 Total ... , 88 NORWOOD v. GUY’S HOSPITAL—Played at South Norwood on June 18. N o r w o o d . J. M. Capel, c Smith, Leslie Rogers, DLay­ b Layman .......... 44 man ........................ 49 F. S. Hallam, c Sharp, J. R. Goold, b Todd 27 b Mitchell .......... 2 C. E. Lyon, b Lay­ R. S. Rogers, b Mitman ........................ 0 chell ....................... 2 H. Blachford, b Todd 0 C. A. V. Checkland, b M. D. Hallam, not Laym an................. 6 out ..................... . 0 A. Spriugett, b MitB G, w 2 .......... 8 chell ........................ 1 — W. J. Goodwin, b Total ......... 148 Sharp ................. 9 G uy ’ s H ospital . R. H. Fagge, b F. W. H. Jewell, c F. Hallam ................. 0 Hallam, b R. S. H. C. Sharpe, b R. S. Rogers ................. 0 Rogers ................. 8 T. S. Jackson, b R. S. E. G. Layman, bR. S. Rogers ................. 0 Rogers ................. 19 J. W. Mitchell, not H. Hewetson.b Goodout ........................ 7 win ........................ 16 W. S. Frith, b R. S. D. B. Todd, c Lyon, Rogers ................. 0 b R. S. Rogers 4 B 6, lb 1 .......... 7 W. E. Stee’e. b Good— win ........................ 0 Total .......... 62 E. Kalshoven, bR . S. Rogers ................. 1 NOTTS v. LANCASHIRE. The Notts eleven, following up their successes against Sussex and Surrey, gained a brilliant victory over Lancashire at Trent Bridge on Satur­ day. Though Mr. Hornby was absent, Lancashire had a strong side, while Notts was also well represented, finding a place for Mr. A. O. Jones, the Cambridge freshman, who had shown to advantage in the Colts’ match at Easter. Rain prevented a commencement on Thursday after­ noon until 2.45 p.m., and then Lancashire had the advantage of batting on a wet and easy wicket. Still the earlier batsmen were not seen to any great advantage, and it was the tail which did the greater part of the run-getting. Half the wickets were down for 86, and it was mainly to Mr. Cros­ field, with useful assistance from Smith and Baker, that Lancashire was chiefly indebted for its total of 217. Smith played with characteristic steadiness for his 29, which occupied him an hour and ten minutes. Baker, who was in a little over an hour, helped to add 76 runs and only lost his wicket through a good piece of fielding by Daft, who threw down the stumps. The great feature of the innings, though, was Mr. Crosfield’s plucky and resolute hitting. He made 82 out of 131 runs while he was in, and there was no actual mistake to mar an exemplary display of free cricket. Notts, who went in on Friday morning, did not find the wicket so difficult as might have been expected. The ground in fact dried steadily, and, though just at the outset perhaps in favor of the bowlers, was fairly easy. The best cricket was shown while Gunn and Barnes were together. The partnership for the third wicket lasted for a few minutes over an hour, in which time the score was raised from 36 to 109, without anything like a chance. Gunn’s 54 occupied him an hour and fifty-five minutes, and was a characteristic display of steady and, at the same time, attractive batting. Though later on Shacklock and Mr. Jones were seen to advan­ tage, the remaining batsmen did little. Briggs took the last five wickets for only 14 runs, and the innings, which had lasted three hours and twenty minutes, closed for 178. With a lead of 39 runs Lancashire lost most of their advantage by a bad start, the total being 58 with six good bats­ men out. As in the first innings, however, Mr. Crosfield and Baker came to the relief of their side, and the brilliant hitting of the latter took the score to 146 before play ceased, Mr. Crosfield h a v in g meanwhile been bowled. Showers on Saturday morning assisted the later batsmen of Lancashire, and though Baker only added one run, some free hitting by Mr. Kemble carried the total eventually to 178. With 222 to win, and a wicket recovering from the rain,Notting­ ham appeared to have a very difficult task. The ground, though, fortunately for them, dried slowly, and the batsmen gave an exceptionally fine exhi­ bition of cricket. Mr. Jones, who went in first with Shrewsbury .played in very attractive style, and 75 had been put on before a good piece of fielding by Baker ran him out. Gunn and Shrewsbury raised the total to 115, when the latter, whose batting was quite up to his reputation, was bowled. Barnes, who took his place, was also in his best vein, lie made 37 out of the next 60 runs, and Flowers, who followed, in half an-hour scored 31, by good all-round hitting. Soon after Attewell came in the winning hit was made, and Notts were left with a thoroughly well deserved victory by six wickets. Gunn, who was not out56, was batting for two hours and twenty minutes, and there was no fault of any kind to be found with bis innings. The 222 runs were made in three hours and twenty minutes. Such a performance for a fourth inn­ ings was one of great merit, and will do much to encourage the Nottingham team for the hard work of tbe season. L a n c a s h ir e . First Innings. Mr. A.0 .M’Laren,cShrews- bury, b Shacklock... 19 A. Ward, c Sherwin, b Flowers ........................18 F. Sugg, c and b Shacklock 28 A. Smith, c Shacklock, b Barnes ........................29 Briggs, c Sherwin, b Atte­ well ............................... 0 Mr. G. Kemp, b Attewell 2 Mr.S.M. Crosfield, not out 82 Baker, run out .................28 Mr. A. T. Kemble, c Slicr- win, L Attewell .......... 1 Watson, b Flow ers.......... 1 Mold, b Flowers .......... 0 B ............................... 9 Second Innings. b Attewell.......... runout.......... c Robinson, Shacklock run out b Flowers ... c Sherwin, Attewell... b Shacklock b Shacklock ... 19 b ... 10 ... 1 ... 19 b ... 3 ... 26 ... 51 not out c Barnes, b Atte­ well .......... c Sherwin, b Flowers..........10 B 6, lb 2 ... 8 ... 31 4 T ota l.......... ...217 Total ...182 N o t t s . —First Innings. Mr. J. S. Robinson, c Watson, b Briggs... 4 Mr. A. O. Jones, not out ........................17 H. B. Daft, b Briggs 8 Sherwin,lbw,b Briggs 0 B 3, l b l .......... 4 Total......... 178 Shrewsbury, c Sugg, b Mold .................12 Mr. J. A. Dixon, b Mold........................18 Gunn, lbw, b Briggs 54 Barnes, b Mold......... 37 Flowers, b Mold ... 0 Attewell, b Briggs ... 0 Shacklock, b Briggs 21 In the Second Innings Shrewsbury scored b Briggs 49, Gunn (not out) 56, Barnes b Briggs 37, Flowers, c Ward, b Smith 31, Attewell (not out) 4, Mr. A. O. Jones, (run out) 38; b2, lj 5.—Total, 222. BOWLING ANALYSIS. L a n c a s h ir e . Second Innings. O. M. K. VV. Attewell Flowers Shacklock Barnes... Mr. Dixon First Innings. O. M. R. W. 15 65 3 9 , 25 , 18 . 6 55 58 0 21 3 2 1 9 0 41 2L 49 16 5 30 26 9 €4 6 2 3 0 13 3 2 3 18 0 N o tts. First Innings. Mold ... Briggs Watson Baker O. M. R. ^ , 38 10 70 4 , 36.1 15 60 6 3 32 0 4 12 0 13 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. .......... 24 2 67 0 .......... 46 19 84 2 .......... 21 10 25 0 .......... 6 1 22 0 Smith 5.3 2 17 1 M o t t in g h a m C l u b an d G ro u n d v . M r . A. S p e n c e r ’ s E l e v e n .— Played at Mottingham on Juno 15. Scores:—Mottingham, 114 (Layman 31) and 89 (Lucas, 24); Mr. Spencer’s Eleven, 67 (A. W. Stewart 31) and 121 (S . Casile 59). C ricketers not satisfied with the Balls and Bats they have used are advised to t'ry the GGB brand made by Geo. G. Bussey & Co., Peckham Rye, S.E.—Advt.