Cricket 1890

APRIL 17, 1890. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 59 HAMPSTEAD CLUB. F ix t u r e s f o r 1890. May a—Hampstead, Secretary v. Treasurer Way 10—Finchley, v. Christ’s College May 14—Kensington, v. Kensington Park May 17—Hendon, v. Hendon May 21—Hampstead, v. Mill Hill School May 24—Ealing, V. Ealing May!26—Hampstead, Over v. Under 30 May 28—Hampstead, v. Trinity Church May 31—Hampstead, v. Marlow May 31—Hornsey, v. Hornsey June 4—Uxbridge, v. Uxbridge June 7—Hampstead, v. Woodford Wells June 7—Highgate, v. Highgate School June 11—Hampstead, v. Emeriti June 14—Hampstead, v. Granville June 14—Mill Hill, v. Mill Hill School June 18—Acton, v. Pallingswick June 21—Sydenham, v. Crystal Palace June 21—Hampstead, v. Christ’s College June 25—Richmond, v. Richmond June 28—Hampstead, v. Uxbridge June 28—Lee, v. Granville July 2—Hampstead, v. Old Finchleians July 5—Hampstead, v. London Scottish July 5—Woodford, v. Woodford Wells July 7—Hampstead, v. South Hampstead July 9—Hampstead, v. Stoics July 12—Marlow, v. Marlow July 12—Hampstead, v. Pallingswick July 16—Charlton, v. Charlton Park July 19-Hamp8tead, v. Old Brucians July 19—Willesden, v. Willesden T h e H a m p ste a d W e e k . July 21—v. M C.C. July 22—v. Ne’er-do-Weela July 23—v. Clapham Wanderers July 24—v. Crystal Palace July 25—v. West Indians July 26—v. Surbiton July 26—Aldersbrook, v. Guildhall July 30—Hampstead, v. Forest Hill Aug. 2—Chiswick, v. Chiswick Park Aug. 2—Hampstead, v. Hornsey Aug. 4—Hampstead, Married v. Single Aug. 6—Hampstead, v. West Indians Aug. 8, 9—Eastbourne, v. Eastbourne Aug. 9—Hampstead, v. Ealing Aug. 13—Bltham, v. Eltham Aug. 16—Slough, v. Slough Aug. 16—Hampstead, v. Hendon Aug. 20—Hampstead, v. Chiswick Park Aug. 23—Hampstead, v. Hampstead Nondescripts Aug. 27—Hampstead, v. Charlton Park Aug. 30—Hampstead, v. Willesden Aug. 30—Forest Hill, v. Forest Hill Sept. 6—Surbiton, v. Surbiton Sept. 13-Hampstead, v. Guildhall THE NOTTS COLTS’ MATCH. Limited as it is to the first two days of Easter week, the Notts Colts’ match is rarely brought to a definite conclusion. Another drawn game was the result of this year’s trial, which took place on the Trent Bridge Ground at Nottingham on the 7th and 8th inst. Mr. J. A. Dixon, the captain of 1889, Mr.H. B. Daft, and Flowers were all absent from the Eleven, and their places were taken by Mr. C. W. Wright, J. Butler, and Guttridge. The Colts, who were captained by J. Carlin, of Eastwood, as usual had first innings, and Longdon and Parr made such a good start that 30 was up before the latter was caught in the slips. The bowling of Attewelf and Richardson, however, proved too good for the remaining batsmen, and twenty wickets fell for an addition of thirty runs. Attewell's analysis was particularly good. He delivered twenty-one overs and two balls for 21 runs and twelve wickets. At the end of the first day the Eleven had lost seven wickets for C J runs, and only five were added before the innings closed, Shacklock, who had injured his hand in making a catch on the first after­ noon, being unable to bat. On going in a second time the Colts made a rather better show against the bowling of Attewell and Richardson. Hooton, Wootton, Parr, and Attewell all got double figures, though the nineteen of the first-named, who was in an hour and a quarter without a mistake, was decidedly the best performance. A t the finish the Eleven wanted 97 to win, and as when the game ended they were still wanting 40 w ith practically only tw o wickets to fall, the draw could hardly be said to have been in their favour. W alter Attewell, a cousin of the County bowler, was successful w ith both bat and ball. W ootton , H ooton, Parr, Longdon, Stevenson, Gregory, H ardy, and Saxton, too, all showed fairly good form , considering that the bitterly cold weather prevented anyone being seen to the best advantage. T wenty - two . First Innings. Second Innings. A. Longdon (Watnall), b Attewell ........................12 c Sherwin, b Richardson ... 0 T. Parr (Hyson Green), c Gunn, b Attew ell.............20 b Attewell... ... 15 E. Moss (Clifton), b Atte­ well .................................. 0 b Richardson ... 0 J. Stevenson (Calverton',, c Richardson, b Atte­ well ............................... 0 b A ttewell......... 1 S. Coleman (Selston), c Shrewsbury, b Attewell 0 c Richardson, b Attewell.......... 3 H. Wright (Lambley), c Shrewsbury, b Richard­ son ............................... 3 b Attewell........... 8 L. Wootton (Ruddington), b Attewell......................... 3 c Shrewsbury, b Attewell ...... 18 T. Ball (Stanton Hill), b Attewell ......................... 0 lbw, b Richard­ son ............... 1 W. Goodall (Kirkby Folly) b Attewell........................ 0 run out ........... 1 J. Saxton (Hucknall) lbw, b R ichardson................. 0 b Attewell............ 0 S. Hooton (Old Bas!ord), b Attewell........................ 0 run out ............19 D. Gale (Burton Joyce), b Richardson ................. 7 st Sherwin, b Attewell........ 2 E. Stapleton (New Bas- ford), b Attewell .......... 0 c Sherwin, b Richardson ... 2 W. Ford (Eastwood), b Richardson ................. 3 b Attewell............ 0 R. Hibbert (Ruddington), b R ichardson................. 0 c Guttridge, b Richardson ... 1 A. Statham(Nottingham), b Richardson................. 0 run out ............ 6 Walter Attewell (Key- worth), b Guttridge ... 0 b Attewell.........10 J. C. Gregory (Sutton-in- Ashfleld), b Guttridge . . 4 c and b Attewell 1 J.Terry (Arnold), c Shack­ lock, b Richardson ..." 6 b Attewell............ 0 H. Gough (Sandiacre), b Attewe 1 ........................ 1 c Richardson, b Attewell........... 6 S. Hardy (Kimberley), b Attewell ........................ 0 b Richardson ... 0 J. Carlin (Eastwood), not out ................................ 0 not out .......... 5 B ................................ 3 Extras.......... 9 Total ... 62 T h b E l e v e n . Total ...108 First Innings. Second Innings. Scotton, b Attewell.........18 b G regory........... 7 Shrewsbury, b Wright ... 1 c Terry,bSteven- son .............. 16 Gunn, c Moss, b Hardy ... 14 c Terry, b Longdon ... 6 Barnes, b C olem an........ 16 b Saxton ............ l Mr.C.W.Wright,cHooton, b Stapleton ................. 8 b Saxton ............ 1 Guttridge, c Wootton, b Stapleton......................... 5 c Wright, b Stevenson ... 6 J. Butler, b Attewell.......... 3 b H o oto n ............ 0 Attewell, c Carlin, b Atte­ well .......... .................. 1 not out ............ 4 Richardson, c Gough, b Attewell ... .......... ... 0 Sherwin, not out .......... 2 Shacklock, absent(hurt)... 0 E xtra s......................... 6 Extras..........16 T o ta l.................74 Total ... 57 BOWLING ANALYSIS. N otts C o lts . First Innings. O. M. R. W. Attewell ... 21.211 22 12 Shacklock ... 13 7 18 0 Richardson 16 10 14 7 Guttridge ... 9 5 5 2 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. ... 49 26 48 12 ... 89 15 36 6 ........ 12.2 7 15 0 T he C ounty E leven . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Wright ... 7 2 33 1 Statnam ... 6 2 5 0 Moss .......... 3 1 4 0 Hardy.......... 8 2 12 1 Parr .......... 7 1 9 0 Longdon ... 7 4 5 0 ................. Coleman ... 7 4 5 1 Ball .......... 6 3 3 0 W cotton ... 5 4 1 0 W . Attewell 5.3 5 1 4 Stapleton ... 4 1 6 2 Gough.......... 1 0 4 0 ................. T e rry .......... 7 8 4 0 Gregory ... 5 2 10 1 Hooton ... 5 2 6 1 Saxton ... 4 2 3 2 Stevenson... 5 2 3 2 Goodall ... 1 0 5 0 “ ONE AND A L L ” CRICKET CLUB. (NINETEENTH SEASON). F ix tu r e s f o r 1890. May 3—Blackheath, v. West Kent Wanderers. ♦May 3—Kennington Oval, v. Godolphin School (Old Boys). May 10—Kennington Oval, v. Lyndhurst. ♦May 10—Balham, v. Lansdowne. May 17—Richmond, v. Richmond Town. ♦May 17—Brixton, v. Eltham House. May 24—Kennington Oval, v. Belgrave. ♦May 24—Paddington, v. Lorraine. May 3i—Kennington Oval, v. Yarra. ♦May 31—Raynes Park. v. Stafford. June 7—Kennington Oval, v. Stebonheath. ♦June 7—Raynes Park, v. Kennington Wanderers June 14—Kennington Oval, v. Belvedere Ram­ blers. ♦June 14—Eton and Middlesex, v. Harley and Portman United. June 21—Kennington Oval, v. Bow and Bromley. ♦June 21—Kennington Oval, v. Bohemians. June 28—Thames Ditton, v. Thames Ditton. ♦June 28—Kenuington Oval, v. Harley and Port­ man United. July 5—Kennington Oval, v, Rangers. ♦July 5—Balham, v. Hawthorne. July 12—Wanstead Park, v. Bow and Bromley. ♦July 12—Kennington Oval, v. Kennington Wanderers. July 19—Battersea, v. Battersea. ♦July 19—Kennington Oval, v. Stafford. July 26—Clapham, v. Yarra. ♦July 26—Kennington Oval, v. Stanley. Aug. 2—Kenningtou Oval, v. Stebonheath. ♦Aug. 2 -Hammersmith, v. Godolphin School (Old Boys). Aug. 9—Away (not yet filled up). ♦Aug. 9.—Kennington Oval, v. Bohemians. Aug. 16.—Blackhe<ith, v. West Kent Wanderers. ♦Aug. 16.—Dulwich, v. Stanley. Aug. 23.—Richmond v. Richmond Town. ♦Aug. 23.—Kennington Cval, y . Hawthorne. Aug. to.—Leyton (Essex Ground), v. Rangers. ♦Aug. 30.—Kennington Oval, v. Lansdowne. Sept. 6.—Lordship Lane, v. Lyndhurst. ♦Sept. 6.—Kennington Oval. v. Lorraine. Sept. 13.—Grove Park, Chiswick, v. Belvedere Ramblers. ♦Sept. 13.—Kennington Oval, v. E tham House. ♦ 2nd Eleven Matches. THE GLOUCESTERSHIRE COLTS’ MATCH. Two days proved quite insufficient to com­ plete this match, begun on the County Ground, at Bristol, on Easter Monday. Mr. W. G. Grace, considering the cheerless weather, put a strongish twelve into the field to oppose the Colts, who were twenty-three in number. Some fairly good batting was shown by more than one of the young players, but the bowling was only moderate, lies, of Bristol (fast), having by far the best figures. In the first innings, R. W. Rice, of Tewkes­ bury, made 64 in good style, and of the others, Messrs. Belcher, 1, Taylor, Wintour, Brown, and Murch were the most successful. Messrs. W. G. Grace, Radcliffe, and Cran­ ston were the chief scorers for the County team. All three were in good form, particu­ larly Mr. W. G. Grace, whom everyone will be glad to see commencing the season so well. Mr. E. M. Grace’s lobs were very effective in the first innings of the Colts. At the finish, the latter were 34 runs on, with ten wickets to fall.