Cricket 1890

SEPT. 25, 1890. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 429 RESULTS OP MATCHES. Matches played, 38—won 18, lost 16, drawn 9. May 8 , 9,10—at Sheffield Park, v. Lord Sheffield’s Eleven. Australians won by an innings and 34 runs. Australians, 191; Lord Sheffield’s Eleven, 27 and 130. May 12,13—at Birmingham, v. Warwickshire. Australians won by 132 runs. Aus­ tralians, 89 and 134; Warwickshire, 38 and 51. May 15,15.17—at Westbury, v. Mr. W. H. Laver­ ton’s Eleven. Mr. Laverton’s Eleven won by 181 runs. Mr. Laverton’s Eleven, i l l and 223; Australians, 67 and 116. May 19,20 -a t Oxford, v. Oxford University. Australians won by an innings and 61 runs. Australians, 234; Oxford Univ., 120 and 53. May 22, 23, 24—at Kennington Oval, v. Surrey. Australians won by 8 wickets. Surrey, 200 and 156; Australians, 278 and 79 for 2 wickets. May 26, 27—at Sheffield, v. Yorkshire. Yorkshire won by 7 wickets. Australians, 87 and 125 ; Yorkshire, 161 and 53 for 3 wickets. May 29, 80—at Manchester, v. Lancashire. Aus­ tralians won by an innings and 155 runs. Australians, 316; Lancashire, 78 and 83. June 2,3—at Lord’s, v. M.C.C. and Ground. M.C.C. and Ground won by 7 wickets. Australians, 124 and 180 ; M.C.C. and G., 194 and 111 for 3 wickets. June 5, 6,7—at Cambridge, v. Cambridge Univ. Drawn. Cambridge University, 189 and 357; Australians, 351. June 9,10,11—at Lord’s, v.| Middlesex. Drawn. Australians, 135 and 176 for 8 wickets Middlesex, 113. June 12,13,14—at Nottingham, v. Nottingham­ shire. Nottinghamshire won by an innings and 26 runs. Nottinghamshire, 215; Australians, 62 and 127. June 16,17, 18—at Kennington Oval, v. South of England. South won by 97 runs. South of England, 163 and 12 1; Australians, 113 and 74. June 19,20, 21—at Lord’s, v. Players of England, Players won by an innings and 263 runs. Players, 526; Australians, 156 and 107. June 23, 24,25—at Bradford, v. Yorkshire. York­ shire won by 8 wickets. Australians, 177and 141; Yorkshire, 171 and 148 for 2 wickets. June 26,27, 28 —at Manchester, v. North of Eng­ land. Drawn. Australians, 216 and 58 for 5 wickets; North of England, 148. June 30, July 1,2—at Derby, v.Derbyshire. Drawn. Australians, 108 and 75 for 9 wickets (innngs declared finished); Derbvshire, 54. July 3,4—at 8 toke, v. Staffordshire’s Eleven. Australians won by 88 runs. Australians, 60 and 139; Staffordshire’s Eleven, 61 and 51. July 7,8,9—at Leicester, v. Leicestershire. Australians won by an innings and 64 runs. Leicestershire, 166 and 46; Australians, 276. July 10,11, 12 —at Bristol, v. Gloucestershire. Drawn. Gloucestershire, 94 and 140 for 6 wickets; Australians, 408. July 14,15—at Sheffield, v. Players of England. Players won by 9 wickets. Players of England, 221 and 32 for 1 wicket; Australians, 91 and 161. July 17,18,19—at Kennington Oval, v. Surrey. Drawn. Australians, 199 and 93 for 6 wickets; Surrey, 277. July 21, 22,23—at Lord’s, v. England. England won by 7 wickets. Australians, 132 and 176 ; England, 173 and 137 for 3 wicketB. July 24, 25, 26—at Brighton, v. Sussex. Australians won by an innings and 45 runs. Australians, 363; Sussex, 91 and 227. July 28, 29—at Maidstone, v. Kent. Australians won by 9 wickets. Australians, 189 and 64 foe 1 wicket; Kent, 77 and 171. July 31, Aug. 1, 2—at Barnes, v. Lyric Club and Ground. Lyric C. and G. won by 96 runs. Lyric Club and Ground, 106 and 278; Australians, 154 and 134. Aug. 4,5, 6 —at Canterbury, v. Kent. Kent won by 108 runs. Kent, 145 and 205; Australians, 114 and 128. Aug. 7,8, 9 -a t Leyton, v. Past and Present of Cambridge University. Drawn. Cam­ bridge, 389 and 78 for 8 wickets; Australians, 218 and 355 for 6 wickets (innings declared finished). Aug. 11,12—at Kennington Oval, v. England. England won by 2 wickets. Australia, 92 and 102 ; England, 100 and 95 for 8 wickets. Aug. 14,15.16—at Portsmouth, v. Past and Present of Oxford and Cambridge Universities. Drawn. The Universities, 233 and 112 for 2 wickets; Australians, 131 and 300 for 5 wickets (innings declared finished). Aug. 18,19, 20—at Nottingham,v.Nottinghamshire. Nottinghamshire won by 20 runs. Not­ tinghamshire, 145 and 138; Australians, 148and 115. Aug. 21, 22, 23—at Cheltenham, v. Gloucestershire. Australians won by 8 wickets. Aus­ tralians, 184 and 25 for 2 wickets; Gloucestershire, 77 and 130. Aug. 25, 26,27—at Manchester, v. England. Abandoned owing to rain. Aug. 29, 30—at Stoke, v. Staffordshire. Australians won by an innings and 28 runs. Aus­ tralians, 144; Staffordshire, 57 and 53. Sept. 1, 2, 8 —at Leeds, v. A North of England Eleven. Australians won by 160 runs. Australians, 134 and 195; North Eleven, 76 and 94. Sept. 4, 5, 6 —at Scarborough, v. Lord Londes- borough’s Eleven. Australians won by 8 runs. Australians, 77 and 60 ; Lord Londesborough’s Eleven, 39 and 90. Sept. 8 , 9, 10—at Lord’s, v. M.C.C. and Ground. M.C.C. won by four wickets. M.C.C., 372 and 44 for six wickets ; Australians, 291 and 124. Sept. 11,12—at Hurst Park, v. Hurst Park Club. Hurst Park won by 34runs. Hurat Park, 99 and 138 ; Australians, 101 and 102. Sept. 15,16,17—at Hastings, v. South of England. South won by ten wickets. South, 262 and22 for no wicket; Australians, 138 and 142. Sept. 18,19,20—at Manchester, v. An Eleven of England. Drawn. Australians, 234 and 186 for four wickets; Eleven of England, 167. BATTING AVERAGES.—ALL MATCHES. Times Most in Inns, not out. Runs, an Inn. Aver. Mr.W.L.Murdoch 64 ... 2 ... 1459 ,...158 ... 23.33 Mr, J. E . Barrett 64 ... 7 ... 1305 ... 97 ... 22 51 Mr. H. Trott ... 65 ... 1 ... 1273 ...186 ... 19.57 Mr, J. J. Lyons... 65 .,.. 1 ... 1142 ... 99 ... 17.54 Mr.J. M’C. Black­ ham .................51 . .. 5 ... 728 ... 75 ... 15.38 Mr. C. T. B. Turner ..........60 . .. 0 ... 910 ,... 59 ... 15.10 Mr. J. J. Ferris ... 56 ,... 13 ... 647 ... 54*... 16.2 Mr.P.C.Charlton 47 .... 11 ... 5-*4 ... 75*... 14.30 Mr. S. E. Gregory 60 ... 15 ... 568 ... 59*... 12.28 Mr. S.P. Jones... 35 ,... 2 ... 400 ,... 98 ... 12.4 Mr. K. E. Burn... 39 .,.. 4 ... 355 ... 35*... 10.5 Mr. F. H. Walters 43 3 ... 402 ... 53*... 10.2 Mr. H. Trumble... 53 .„. 12 ... 310 .. 34*... 8.6 Mr. R. J. Pope ... 4 ... 0 ... 6 ... 6 ... 1.2 Mr. H. F. Boyle batted once, and scored 3. BOWLING AVERAGES—ALL MATCHES. Overs. Mdns. Buns. Wkts. Aver. Mr. C. T. B. Turner .......... 1651.1... 724 ... 27*25 ...215 ...12.145 Mr. J. J. Ferris 1685.4... 688 ... 2838 ...215 ...18.43 Mr. P. C. Charl­ ton ................. 406.3... 146 ... 8C0 ... 42 ...19.2 Mr. H. Trumble 497.4... 175 ... 1138 ... 53 ...21.25 Mr. J. J. Lyons 310.4... 113 ... 989 ... 43 ...23 Mr. H. Trott ... 199 ... 34 ... 610 ... 2i ...26.12 Mr. J. E. Barrett bowled in three innings, 38— 15-89—6. The following bowled in one innings :—Mr. S. E. Gregory 3—0—21—0, Mr. S. P. Jones 2—0—16—0, Mr. J. M’C. Blackham 16—4—37—0, Mr. H. F. Boyle 10—4—17—0, and Mr. R. J. Pope 2—0—19- 0. ENGLISH BATTING IN REPRESENTATIVE MATCHES. Times Most Inns, not out.lRuns. an Inns. Aver. Gunn .......... 14 ... 2 ... 561 ... 228 .... 46.9 Dr. W. G. Grace 13 ... 1 ... 859 ... 84 ..,. 29.11 Chatterton ... 4 ... 0 .... 112 ... 61 .. . 28 Ulvett .......... 7 ... 0 ... 1*9 ... 74 ... 21.2 M. Read .......... 9 ... 1 ... 170 ... 35 ... 21.2 Shrewsbury ... 9 ... 1 .,,. 159 ... 65 .... 19.7 Barnes .......... 6 ... 0 .,,. 105 ... 67 ... 17.3 Peel ................. 8 ... 2 ..,. lo4 ... 41 ... 17 2 Mr. W. W . Read 14 ... 0 ... 189 ... 90 ... 13.7 Mr.A.E.Stoddart 7 ... 1 ... 76 ... 46 ... 12.4 Mr. J. Cranston 4 ... 0 ... 45 ... 16 ... 11.1 Briggs .......... 6 ... 0 ... 63 ... 35 ... 10.3 Lohmann.......... 12 ... 0 . .. 120 ... 38 ... 10 Sherwin .......... 6 ... 2 ... 34 ... 18*... 8.2 Quaife .......... 5 ... 1 . .. 31 ... 15 ... 7.3 Martin .......... 6 ... 3 ... 21 ... 7 ... 7 Attewell ........... 8 ... 3 ... 33 ... 20 *... 6 Sharpe .......... 5 ... 2 ... 10 ... 5*... 3.1 ENGLISH BOWLING IN REPRESENTATIVE MATCHES. Overs. Mdns. Runs. Wkts. Aver- Briggs................. 154.3 ... 76 ... 234 28 .... 8.10 Martin................. 292.2 ... 122 ... 453 ..,. 43 ... 10.23 Sharpe................. 65 ... 21 ..,. 130 ... 12 .,.. 10.10 Dr. W. G. Grace 31 ... 15 ... 44 ... 4 .... 11 Peel ................. 221 ., . 110 .. . 284 .,. 23 .... 12.8 Lohm ann.......... 346 .... 141 ... 588 .,, 41 .... 14.14 Attewell .......... 281.1 ... 135 ... 415 ... 24 .,,. 11.7 Barnes................. 69 ... 35 ... 105 ... 5 ... 21 Ulyett ................. 26 .,.. 13 .., 60 .,, 2 ..„ 25 The following innings of 109 or more were hit for the Australians :—Trott 186,102, Murdoch 158,129. In addition, there were thirty-four scores of 50 or upwards, viz., Lyons 99. 68 , 56,55, 50, Jones 98, Bar­ rett 97, 96, 83, 76, 73 (not out), 67 (not out), 61 (not out), 61, 54, Murdoch 93, 74, 73. 69, 57,50, Blackham 75, 66 (not out), 58, Charlton 75 (not out), Trott 61, 61, Gregory, 59 (not out), 53 (not out). Turner, 59, 53, Ferris 54 (not out), 52 (not out), and Walters 53 (not out). Burn’s highest score was 35 (not out) and Trumble’s 34 (not out). Six individual innings of 100 and upwards were scored against the Australians :—Gunn, 228, 118, Mr. E. C. Streatfeild 145, Mr. L. A. Hamilton 117 (not out), Mr. T. C. O’Brien 105, and Bean 100. In addition, the following individual innings of 50and upwards were scored by the Englishmen:— Dr. W. G. Grace 84, 75 (not out). 64. Mr. W. W. Read 90, 87,57, Shrewsbury 65, 61, UlyeH 74, 70, Peel 73,55 (not out), Mr. G M’Gregor 73 (not out), 53, Gunn 50, Barnes 67, Chatterton 51, Mr. O. G. Radcliffe 93, Hall 64, Abel 80, Lee 67 (not out), Mr. C. A. Smith 58 (not out). Mr. T. C. O’Brien 87, Mr. L. A. Hamilton 56, Mr. R. N. Douglas 57, and Mr. E. C. Streatfeild 74 (not out). In all 10,573 runs were scored by the Australians for the loss of 628 wickets, giving an average 16.86, while the various English elevens scored 9,739 runs for 622 wickets, the average thus being 15.65, or a run less. The highest innings hit by the Australians was 405against Gloucestershire at Bristol, and the lowest 60 against Staffordshire’s Eleven at Stoke, and the same total against Lord Londesborough’s Eleven at Scarborough. The highest innings scored against them was 526 by the Players at Lord’s and the lowest 27 by Lord Sheffield’s Eleven at Sheffield Park. From the figures given below our readers can see the manner in which every member of the Aus­ tralian team was dismissed during the tour. Lyons, Trott, and Gregory were generally caught out, whereas Ferris ana Blackham were more frequently bowled. HOW THE AUSTRALIANS WERE OUT. Run Hit Cght. Bwd.Lbw. out Std.wkt. W. L. Murdoch... ... 29 ... 24 ... 2 ,... 1 ... 6 ... 0 J. E. Barrett ... 29 ... 24 . ... 1 ... 2 ... 1 ... 0 H. Trott.................. ... 32 .,.. 22 ... 6 ... 1 ,.. 3 ... 0 J. J. Lyons .......... ... 46 ... 16 . ... 1 , ... 1 ... 0 ... 0 J. M’C. Blackham ... 13 ... 27 ... 3 ,... 0 ,... 3 ... 0 C. T. B. Turner ... ... 29 ... 26 ... 4 ... 0 ... 0 ... 1 J. J. Ferris .......... ... 14 ... 23 ,... 2 ... 2 ... 2 ... 0 P. C. Charlton ... ... 11 .,.. 17 ... 5 .... 1 ... 2 ... 0 S. E. Gregory ... ... 25 ... 15 ,.. 3 ,... 0 ... 2 ... 0 S. P. J o n e s .......... ... 14 .,.. 9 .... 7 .... 2 ... 0 ... 1 K. E. Burn .......... ... 14 ... 15 ... 3 ... 2 ,... 1 ... 0 F. H. Walters ... ... 18 .... 15 ... 3 ... 2 ... 2 ... 0 H. Trumble.......... ... 15 ... 14 . ... 1 ... 3 ... 5 ... 0 R. J. Pope .......... ... 1 ... 2 .... 0 . ... 1 ... 0 ... 0 F.H. B oy le.......... ... 1 . .. 0 ,... 0 ,... 0 ... 0 ... 0 In the thirty-eight matches Blackham stumped thirty-one and caught forty-two ; Murdoch stumped two and caught ten, and Pope caught two. E N G LISH B A IT IN G A G A IN S T A U S ­ T R A L IA N S. Times Most in Inns, not out. Runs, an Inn. Aver. Mr. E. C. Streat­ feild ................. 6 ... 1 ... 286 ... 145 ... 57.1 Gunn ................. 18 ... 2 ... 750 ... 228 ... 46.14 Mr.T. C. O’Brien 5 ... 0 ... 217 ..., 105 ... 43.2 Hall ................. 5 ... 1 ... 154 .... 64 ... 38.2 Dr. W. G. Grace 19 ... 1 ... 536 .... 84 ... 29.14 Peel ................. 16 ... 4 ... 317 ... 73 ... 26.5 Lord Hawke ... 6 ... 2 ... 103 ..., 31* ... 25 3 Mr. J. Shuter ... 5 ... 0 ... 127 .... 88 ... 25.2 Mr. O. G. Rad­ cliffe................. 8 ... 0 ... 194 , 93 ... 24.2 F. H. Sugg.......... 6 ... 0 ... 136 ... 42 .... 22.3 Shrewsbury ... 13 ... 1 ... 259 ..,. 65 ... 21.7 Mr. G. M‘Gregor 12 ... 2 ... 213 .... 73* ... 21.3 Mr. W. W. Read 19 ... 0 ... 377 ..,. 90 ... 19.16 Abel ................. 6 ... 0 ... 119 ... 80 .... 19.5 Chatterton 9 ... 0 ... 169 .... 51 ... 18.7 M. Read .......... 19 ... 1 ... 829 ..,. 40 .... 18.5 Mr.8.M.J.Woods 6 ... 1 . 91 ... 26 ... 18.1 Barnes................. 9 ... 0 ... 157 ..,. 67 ... IV 4 Ulyett................. 15 ... 0 ... 261 .... 74 ..., 17.6 Lockwood.......... 5 ... 0 ... 87 .... 48 ..., 17.2 Mr. J. A. Turner 4 ... 0 ... 68 .... 49 ... 17 Dr. E. M. Grace 4 ... 0 ... 62 .... 24 ... 15.2 Mr. A. E. Stod­ dart ................. 10 ... 1 ... 137 ... 46 ..., 15.2 Mr. F. Marchant 6 ... 0 ... 84 .... 30 .... 14 Mr. W. W. F. Pullen .......... 4 ... 0 ... 55 ... 40 ... 13.3 Briggs................. 13 ... 2 .... 150 ... 35 .... 13.7 A. Hearne.......... 6 ... 0 ... 76 ... 35 ..,. 12.4 Lohm ann.......... 20 ... 1 ... 231 ... 45 ... 12.3 Flowers .......... 8 ... 0 ... 96 ... 24 .... 12 Mr. C. J. M. Fox ... 0 ... , 71 ... 31 .... 11.5 J. Hide .......... 4 ... 0 ... 45 ... 37 ..., 11.1 Shacklock.......... 6 ... 2 ... 43 ... 16 ..,. 10.3 Mr. K.J, Key ... 7 ... 1 ... 63 ..,. 20* .., 10.3 Pougher .......... 4 ... 0 ... 41 ... 17 .... 10.1 NEXT ISSUE, OCTOBER 80;