Cricket 1890

290 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OE THE GAME. JU L Y 81. 1890. DERBYSHIRE v. NOTTS. Although they had the assistance of Mr. F. R. Spofforth, and were otherwise well repre­ sented, Derbyshire were easily defeated by the powerful Nottinghamshire eleven in this match, begun at Derby on Monday. Even admitting that several of their batsmen experienced ill-luck, it must be said that Derbyshire made a mo3t disappointing show, nobody save W. Sugg and Malthouse offering any resistance to the bowlers. Chatterton was dismissed for handling the ball. He played the bull on to his body, where it lodged momentarily, and as he appeared to remove it with his hands, the umpire (Ilowbotham), when appealed to, had no alternative but to give him out. Against 62 got by Derbyshire, Notts quickly hit up a total of 284. The partnership of Shrewsbury and Gunn for the sccond wicket; produced 124 runs, and these great batsmen both played brilliant cricket. In Gunn’s 73 there was only one mistake, a hard chance to Chatterton when his score was 67. Shrewsbury played faultless cricket for 45, when he was clean bowled by Mr. Spofforth. Scotton, Shacklock, and Sherwin too, hit well, the last three wickets adding nearly 100 runs. In their second innings the home team played up considerably better, Chatterton and Sugg putting on 29 for the second wicket, and Chatterton and Malthouse 32 for the third. Notts had too long a lead, though, and before five o’clock on Tuesday afternoon they were victorious by an innings and 71 runs. Flowers it will be seen took eight Derbyshire wickets for 53 runs. D e r b y s h ir e . First Innings. Mr. L. G. Wright, b Flowers ........................ 8 W. Sugg, b Flow ers..........15 Chatterton, handled the ball ............................... 2 Davidson, run out .......... 0 Malthouse, b Flowers ... 22 Storer, c Butler, b Shack­ lock ................. .......... 0 Bagshaw, b Flowers.......... 2 Hall, c Sherwin, bFlowers 1 Mr. G. G. Walker, c Atte­ well, b Shacklock.......... 2 Mr. F. R. Spofforth, not out ............................... Porter, c Sherwin, b Shacklock........................ 0 B 7,1b 5 ........................32 Total .................62 Second Innings. c Attewell, M ee.......... run out b Barnes ... st Sherwin, Shacklock c Sherwin, Attewell... b Flowera.......... 9 c and b Attewell 25 c Shacklock, b F low ers.......... 8 c Butler, b Flow ers.......... 1 c Gunn, b Atte­ well .................15 not out.......... B 2, lb 1 Total ...151 N o t t s . Shrewsbury, b Spof­ forth ........................ 45 But'er, b Porter ... 5 Gunn, c Porter, b M a lth o u se ........ 78 Barnes, b Bpofforth 20 Mr. H. B. Daft, b Spofforth .. ... ... 0 Flowers, c Walker, b Lavidson...................21 Attewell, b Spofforth 0 Scotton, c Storer, b Davidson ..........26 Shacklock, b Porter 49 Mee. b Porter ... Sherwin, not out B 14, lb 4 ... Total 0 .. 27 .. 18 . 284 BOWLING ANALYSIS. D e r b y s h ir e . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W- Shacklock 24.3 10 31 3 ...... 7 2 20 1 Flow ers... 24 13 19 5 ....... 19 7 34 3 Mee ... 12 5 28 1 Barnes 16 6 27 1 Attewell 15.1 3 38 3 N o t t s . O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W Spofforth 44 10 111 4 I Walker 14 6 42 0 Porter ... 32 13 49 3Malthousel5 3 31 1 Davidson 23.2 IQ 33 2 | CftlGKSTSRS.—B e 8T G oods bear rm s M ark .— A dvt. SURREY v. SUSSEX. Arthur Hide was still absent from the Sussex eleven when it came to their turn to commence the return match with Surrey at the Oval on Monday, and as the latter were in full strength, his bowling was greatly missed. The wicket, too, was in the best con­ dition for run-getting, and when it was seen that Surrey had won the toss, the general opinion was that they were in for the day. From the early part of the innings, too, it looked as if such expectations were justified. Mr. Shuter and Abel put on 91 runs in sixty- five minutes, and Mr. Douglas, who came in first wicket down, kept up the pace of the scoring so well that 122 were added in an hour and a half, while he was in with Abel. Mr. Shuter’s 53 was in his very best form, and Mr. Douglas’ 72, though he was fortunate more than once in placing the ball through the slips, was Worthy of high praise. Abel up to nearly the close of his innings did not make a mistake, and even in spite of some luck just before he was out, his innings was on the whole an admirable one. Though the scoring board showed 200 with only one batsman out, Jesse Hide bowled with such success that no stand was made till Henderson and Wood got together, and these two batsmen by excellent cricket added 65 for the ninth wicket. In the half-hour that remained on Monday, Sussex lost two wickets for 28, and so badly did they fare on the following morning that they were all out for 91. This small score was chiefly due to the ex­ cellent bowling of Lohmann, who took seven of the ten wickets at a cost of 36 runs. Following on, too, under a heavy deficit of 301 runs, Sussex only fared slightly better. Tha only noteworthy feature of the innings, indeed, was the fine hitting of Bean. Of 53 runs made during his stay, he contributed as many as 50, and his hitting all round the wicket was very clean. Mr. Cotterill showed steady cricket, and Mr. Andrews, a left-handed batsman, got his 20 quickly, mostly from Henderson. Otherwise, though, the batting was very tame, and by four o’clock on -[Tuesday Surrey were left with a decisive victory by an innings and 165 runs. In the two innings of Sussex Lohmann took twelve wickets for 112, and Sharpe eight for 79 runs. S u r r e y . Mr. J. Shuter, c Te­ bay, b Godfrey ... 53 Abel, c Bean, b Hide 79 Mr. R. N. Douglas, c Smith, b Hide ... 72 Mr. W . W. Read, c Quaife, b Hido ... 18 M. Read, c Smith, b Godfrey .................17 Mr. K. J. Key, c An­ drews. b Hide......... 32 S u sse x . First Innings. Quaife, b Lohm ann..........12 Tebay, c Abel, b Lohmann 0 Humphreys, b Lohmann 2 Bean, c W. W. Read, b b Lohmann .................16 Mr. W. Newham, c Abel, b Lohmann .................12 Henderson, c New­ ham. b Hum­ phreys .................43 Lohmann, c Butt, b H ide........................ 5 Lockwood, b Godfrey 7 Wood, not o u t..........39 Sharpe, b Godfrey ... 13 B 13, lb 1, nb5 ... 19 Total ..392 Second Innings, c W. W. Read, b Sharpe ..........21 b Sharpe ........... 0 not out .......... 5 c Henderson, b Lohmann ... 50 J. Hide, b Sharpe ... Mr. G. H. Cotterill, d Sharpe ........................ 4 c Mr. C. A. Smith, not out 16 c Andrews, c Abel, b mann b Sharpe . Loh- and b mann and b mann Loh- L o h -' 10 Mr. W. H. _ _ Sharpe ...................... 10 Mr. C. J. M. Godfrey, b L ohm ann........................ 4 Butt, cSharpe.b Lohmann 1 c Abel, b Sharpe 20 b Sharpe c sub, b mann B 4, w 1 Loh- Lb 7, w 1 .................__ Total .................91 Total ...136 BOWLING ANALYSIS. S u r r e y . First Innings. Sccond Innings. O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. B ean.......... 25 8 73 01 Hide... 34 14 62 5 Smith ... 20 7 49 0 I Godfrey22.2 0 109 4 Humphreys 20 3 67 1 ICotterill 7 4 13 o S ussex . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M.R. W. O. M. R. W- Sharpe ... 26 10 47 3 .......... 23 11 32 5 Lohmann 26,114 36 7 .......... 28 8 76 5 Henderson 5 0 23 0 SOUTHGATE ROYERS TOUR. SOUTHGATE ROYERS v. ORDNANCE SURVEY. Played at Southampton on July 12. O r d n a n c e S u r v e y , Major Johnston, c Tolfree, b Kemp ... 6 H. Wilkins, c George, b Kemp ................. 8 G. Carter, c Powys, b F ord ........................19 J. Calder, c Wilson, b George .................77 F. W . Heath, b Kemp ................. 9 G.Marshall,b Wilson 5 G. Newton, b Kemp 25 W. Bale, b Kemp ... 0 J. Thompson, st White, b George ... 13 H. Buckle, b Kemp... 4 H. Price, not out ... 0 B 16, w 2 ..........18 Total ...184 S o u t h g a t e R o v e r s . First Innings. A. M. Wilson, b Price ... 7 A. E. White, c Buckle, b P r ic e ...............................10 A. L. Kemp, run out..........10 T. S. Sidney, b Price ... 4 E. Tolfree, b Heath........ . 0 A. L. Ford, b Heath.......... 5 J. Bradshaw, b Heath ... 0 A. Walker, b Heath.......... 0 W. H. George, lbw, b Price 8 Eon. J. Powys, not out ... 13 J. Allen, c Marshall, b Heath............................... 1 ................. ... 8 Second Innings. run out ... ... 17 c Heath, b Buckle ... ... 1 c Calder, b Heath ... ... 18 b Heath ... 4 c Carter, b Calder ... ... 4 not out ... 23 run out ... 4 c Newton, b Calder ... ... 4 b Calder ... ... 3 b Heath ... 9 c Marshall, b Heath ... ... 0 B Total Total ... 87 SOUTHGATE ROVERS v. LITTLEHAMPTON. Played at Littlehampton on July 14. L it t l e h a m p t o n , H. Mitchell, c S. F. Kemp, b Ford.......... 5 W. Lefroy, b Ford ... 2 R. Jardine, c A. L. Kemp, b Ford ... 8 H.B.Pearson,cPowys, b W alker................. 5 W. H. Mitchell, c Sidney, b George... 11 W. M. Borchards, b F o r d ........................10 C. W. Scott, c S. F. Kemp, b W ilson... 8 W. Flavin, c Harris, b A. L. Kemp ... 2 H.E.Harris.b George 21 L.Matthews,cPowys, b A. L.Kemp..........24 W.G.Henley, not out 22 B 5, lb 2, w2 ... 9 ...127 Total S o u t h g a t e R o v e r s . Firet Innings. Second Innings. S. F. Kemp, b W. Mitchell 0 not out ........... 6 E. P. Sugden, b H. Mit­ chell ... .. .................14 c Scott, bW.Mit- chell.................11 A. M. Wilson, c Lefroy, b W. Mitchell ................. A L. Kemp, b W. Mitchell 2 Hon. J. Powys, b H. Mit­ chell ...............................22 T. S. Sidney, b H. Mitchell 0 A. L. Ford, c Borchards, b W. Mitchell ................. 2 A. Walker, c and b W.Mit- chell ............................... 1 W. H. George, c Harris, b W. Mitchell ................. 0 F. P. Nathan, not out ... 0 F. S. Harris, c and b H. Mitchell ........................ 0 B 6, lb 3, nTi 2 ..........11 c Flavin, Henley ... c Matthews, Henley ... c Flavin, b Henley .......... c Borchards, b Henley ... ... b P earson.......... b Henley .......... 33 ! 16 > 1 2 7 0 c Borchards, b W. M itchell... 2 st Matthews, b W. Mitchell ... 10 b Henley B ... Total ... ... 54 Total ... 92