Cricket 1890

182 C R IC K E T : A W E E K L Y RECORD OF THE GAME . JUNE 12, 1890. 0 F. S. Heyneman, b H. Edw ards.......... B. A. Carter, c Lay­ man,b H. Edwards A. H. Milsom, not out ........................ S. Cheesman, b H. Edwards................. 0 P. Schooling, C. J. Jarvis, J. W . Clemence did not bat. P a llin g sw ic k . A. H. Stevens, b H. Edwards................. 4 H. W. Burnside, b G od frey.................11 F. Clemence, not out 0 Extras................. 8 8 Total ..........87 H. Dean Drake and BRIXTON v. HONOR OAK. Played at Brixton on June 7. H o n o r O ak. G. Harrison, lbw, b Bourne .................30 F.Harrison.cRoberts, b L ofthouse..........33 G. Smedley, b Loft­ house........................15 W.Tyler.cMcNamara, b Bourne................. 3 A. C. Haynes, lbw, b Bourne .................14 F. Lett, b Lofthouse 0 F. Cheeswright, not out ........................84 H. Browning,cSmed- ley, b G . Harrison 4 C. H. Mayo, c McNa­ mara, b Chees- wright .................11 J. H. Warren, c Den­ nis, b Lofthouse ... 48 C.A.Turner,bBourne 20 B. Kenyon, c Bourne, b Lofthouse..........39 W. North, not out ... 0 B 17, lb 5, w 2 ... 24 Total 237 A. Cheeswright, not out ........................39 B 12, lb 1 ..........13 Total ..........140 O. Corbett, W. J. Dennis, P. R. McNamara, W. H. Bagott, R. F. Roberts, E. H. Dines, S. Bourne and J. H. Lofthouse did not bat. 10 First Innings. G. Hearne, b U lyett.......... 0 c A. Hearne. b Peel................. Mr. C. J. M. Pox, b Peel ... Mr. F. Marchant, c White­ head, b U lyett................. Mr. L. Wilson, b Peel Pentecost, c Brown, b U lyett............................... Wright, not o u t ................. Martin, c and b P eel......... W. Hearne, absent .......... Mr. S. Christopljerson, absent ........................ Mr. W . H. Spottiswood, absent ........................ 0 B......................................10 Second Innings. Hunter, b Wainwright 25 b Peel c Hawke, b Ulyett .......... b P eel................. b P eel................. 6 b Ulyett .......... 2 c Hunter, b Peel 0 c Whitehead, b Wainwright ... 0 b P eel................. 0 not out ........ Total.. .................46 Y o r k s h ir e . First Innings. b Wainwright... 37 Extras..........12 Total ...16_ Hall, c A. Hearne, b Martin ................. 5 Ulyett, b Wright ... 29 Lee, c Marchant, b Wright ................. 4 Lord Hawke, c A. Hearne, b Martin... 10 Peel, c A. Hearne, b Wright .................24 Wainwright, c A. Total .............. 114 Hearne, b Martin ... 2 Brown, b Martin ... 2 In the Second Innings Hall scored (not out) 33, Ulyett, b Wright 15, Lee, b Wright 12, Lord Hawke (not out) 28; b 12.—Total 100. Moorhouse, b Mar­ tin ......................... Mr. W. T. Whitwell, c and b Martin ... W h i t e h e a d , b Wright ................. Hunter, not out ... B ......................... thanks to Abel, Maurice Read, Lohmann, and Wood, were seen to better advantage, and at the end of the day they had got 92 for nine wickets. On Tuesday morning Bowley and Wood added 11 before Briggs bowled the former, leaving Wood to carry out his bat for an extremely useful score of 24. Lancashire were left with 112 to win, but it soon became evident that this was beyond their powers. Half the wickets were down for 32, and as the last five only added 18, the innings, which had lasted an hour and a Ijalf, was quickly over. Surrey were thus left with an easy victory by 61 runs. Lohmann and Sharpe, as will be seen, bowled throughout Lancashire’s two innings, and, indeed, there was only one change in the match, when Barlow relieved Watson for three overs. The bowlers on both sides had remarkable figures. By far the best performance, though, was that of Lohmann, who got thirteen wickets (nine clean bowled) for an average of just under four runs. Every batsman was bowled in Lancashire’s second innings, a most unusual occurrence. S u r r b y . YORKSHIRE v. KENT. Kent was only represented by eight men at York, on Monday, for the commencement of this match, and had to bat three short in their first innings. The absence of Walter Hearne and Messrs. Christopherson and Spottiswoode, the result of some mistake of the manage­ ment, in consequence seriously interfered with Kent’s chances of success, and Yorkshire got a long lead on the first day of which they were never deprived. Winning the toss, Mr. Marchant thought it bes* to take the innings, but the wicket did not play particularly well at the outset, and Ulyett’s bowling got up awkwardly at times. Batting in a bad light, too, Kent fared badly, and of the eight batsmen Alec Hearne and Mr. Leslie Wilson alone got double figures. Yorkshire, who had to go in against a very small total of 46, did not make .a very much better show against the bowling of Martin and Wright. Except Ulyett and Peel, no one offered any serious resistance, so that after all, when the tenth wicket fell, Kent were only 68 to the bad. In their second attempt George and Alec Hearne made an excellent start, and the score was 41 before the former was caught at the wicket. After his retirement, though, two wickets, those of Mr. Fox and Pentecost, fell quickly, and at the end of the first day the Kent total was 70 with three batsmen out. On Tuesday morning, Alec Hearne, who had been in an hour and fifty minutes in all, was soon bowled by Peel, but Mr. Wilson, Mr. Spottiswoode, and Walter Hearne all played up well, and at one time the telegraph showed 160 up with only six wickets down. This was a very creditable score considering that the wicket was still far from easy, and had the lacer bats­ men only lent moderate help, Yorkshire might have had some trouble to win. As it was, the last four wickets were all dismissed for an addition of 7 runs, so that Yorkshire at the finish wanted 100 to win. This did not prove a difficult task, and though Ulyett and Lee gave little trouble, Lord Hawke and Hall quickly knocked off the remaining runs, giving Yorkshire the victory by eight wickets. Peel’s bowling was the best feature of the match. In Kent’ s two innings he got nine wickets for 48 runs. BOWLING ANALYSIS. Peel ... Ulyett... K e n t . First Innings. O. M. R. W. ....... 14.4 14 21 4 15 3 .......... Whitwell ... Wainwright Whitehead Brown.......... Second Innings. O. M. R. W 34 26 11 16.2 Y o r k sh ir e . First Innings. Wright... Martin... O. 31 33 R. W. 56 4 . 6 Second Innings. O. M. R. W Christopherson 17 12 5 First Innings. Mr. J. Shuter, c Sugg, b Watson ........................ 6 Abel, b Briggs ................. 0 Watts, lbw, b Briggs ... 0 Mr. W.W. Read, b Watson 30 M. Read, b Briggs .......... 2 Henderson, c Paul, b Briggs............................... 1 Lohmann, b Watson ... 5 Wood, c Watson, b Briggs 9 Brockwell, run o u t .......... 9 Sharpe, c and b Watson... 0 Bowley, not o u t................. 7 Second Innings. c Sugg, b Briggs 0 st Kemble, b Briggs .............23 c and b Watson 1 c F. Ward, b Briggs ........... 6 b W atson.............23 b Briggs .......... 1 b W atson ..........18 notout ..........24 c Tinsley, b Briggs ........... 1 lbw, b Watson... 0 b Briggs ........... 5 B .................. 1 C r ic k e t e r s .— B e s t < C C B « ; G o o d i b e a r t h is M a rk . — A d vt LANCASHIRE v. SURREY. Heavy rain on Sunday last had affected the wicket to such an extent when play began at Old Trafford on Monday last, that there was every reason to predict the match would be of very brief duration. These expectations were fully realised, for on the first day twenty-nine wickets fell for an aggregate of 222 runs, and by 1.80 on Tuesday afternoon the game was at an end. Except for the absence of Pilling, whose place at the wicket was taken by Mr. A. T. Kemble of Liverpool. Lancashire had the eleven it has been playing this year. Surrey,on the other hand, lost both Mr. Roller and Lockwood, both of whom scored so heavily against Leicestershire Ifast week, owing to accidents in that match, the former from a sprained wrist, and the latter from a twisted knee-cap. Mr. Shuter winning the toss, decided to go in, but helped by the ground, Briggs and Watson were very difficult, and except Mr.W.W.Read, who made 30 out of 35 while he was in, there was not a double figure in the innings, which only lasted an hour and fifty minutes. Briggs and Watson had bowled unchanged for Lan­ cashire, a feat which was repeated by Lohmann and Sharpe when Lancashire went in. Surrey were out in the field a quarter of an hour less than their opponents, and when the tenth Lancashire wicket fell the total was 61, or eight runs short of the other side. Of this sum Barlow and Mr. Kemble had contributed 37, indifferent styles,the former by careful, and the latter by free cricket. Going in a second time on Monday afternoon, the Surrey eleven, _ __ Total ................. 69 Total ..103 L ancashire . First Innings. Second Innings. Mr. A. N. Hornby, b L oh­ mann ............................... 0 b Lohmann .. 4 Barlow, b Lohmann.......... 19 b Lohmann .. 4 F. Sugg, c Henderson, b Lohmann........................ 0 b Lohmann .. 0 A. Ward,c and b Lohmann 5 b Lohmann .. 8 Paul, c M. Read, b Lohm ann........................ 7 b Sharpe ... .. 6 Briggs, b Sharpe................. 4 b Sharpe ... .. 4 F. Ward, b Sharpe .......... 0 b Lohmann .. 0 Tinsley, b Sharpe .......... 6 b Lohmann .. 8 Mr. A.T. Kemble,bSharpe 18 b Lohmann .. 10 Watson, not out .......... 0 b Sharpe ... ... 0 Mold, c Abel, b Lohmann 1 not out ... 0 B ............................... 1 B .......... ... 6 Total ................. 01 Total ... 50 BOWLING ANALYSIS. S u r r e y . First Innings. O. M, R. W. W atson .......... 29 19 17 4 ... Briggs .......... 28.110 52 5 ... Barlow . L a n cash ire . First Innings, Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W . Second Innings. O. M. R. W. ........ 32 17 36 4 28.1 8 60 6 3 2 6 0 Lohmann Sharpe ... . 20.2 , 20 33 9 27 20.1 12 21 20 10 23 KENSINGTON PARK v. BEDFORD SCHOOL. Played at Bedford on June 5. B e d fo r d S c h o o l. First Innings. W. B. Winkfleld, b Fullerton ..........18 F. Kendall, b Fitz­ gerald .................13 W. Surtees, b Fuller­ ton ........................ 5 E. M. D. Sewell, c Seton, b Brown ... 31 C. A. Plowden, c Browu.bFitzgerald 0 S. J. E. Watson, b Fitzgerald .......... 5 B. Streatfield, b Fitz­ gerald ...................17 F. M. Rickard, c Fitz­ gerald, b Brown ... F. Duhan, b Fitz­ gerald ................. J. VV. Holt, c Porter, b B row n................. S. Macnaughton, not out ........................ B 19, lb 6, w 1 ... Total ..130