Cricket 1889

86 CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OP THE GAME; MAY 2, 1889. matches as stated above, and estimate to save thereby about £200. They have also re-ad­ justed the ground staff, by -which a further saving of ^100 will be effected. For the balance they have to look to the increased gate receipts they trust will result from the above general season’s programme, and more par­ ticularly to a steady continuation of the present satisfactory influx of new members. Since the last general meeting 603 gentlemen and 71 lady members have been elected, which, after deducting deaths and resignations, leaves the present list of members at 1,020, exclusive o f lady members. The committee have decided to suspend the entrance fee of 1 guinea until the number reaches 1,500. The building fund, it will be noticed, has only been reduced by £37 10s. lid . during the E ast twelve months. The catering contract as been placed in very capable hands. The following members of the committee retire by rotation, v iz .:—Messrs. G. A. Sedge- wick, J. Armstrong,W. H. Pemberton-Barnes, and S. R. Bastard. The first three gentlemen offer themselves for re-election, and the com ­ mittee beg to suggest the election of Mr. G. L: Vasey, who has been duly nominated to fill the vacancy caused by Mr, S. R. Bastard’s re­ tirement. The committee have carefully revised the rules of the club, and have to propose certain alterations. The chief propositions are the rescindment of the two amendments passed at the special general meeting in April, 1887, and the proposed new rule giving members the privilege of introducing a friend to the pavilion on all ordinary occasions. The ground will be opened to the members on Saturday next, May 4, when the lawn- tennis courts will be ready, and the following ground bowlers will be in attendance at 2 p.m. at the nets :—J. Burns, H. Carpenter, G. Littlewood, and T. Russell. It is contemplated to add one or two of the most promising colts to this staff if they show sufficiently good form. BARNES CLUB. F ix t u r e s f o r 1889. May 4—Chiswick, v. Chiswick Park. May 4—Barnes, v. Willesden. May 11—Barnes, v. London Scottish May 18—Barnes, v. Ibis. May 25—Wandsworth Common, v. London County Council. May 25—Barnes, v. London Scottish. June 1—Brentford, v. Boston Park. June 1—Barnes, v. Boston Park. June 8—Dover, v. Dover College. June 10—Shorncliffe, v. Shorncliffe Camp. June 11—Hythe, v. Hythe. June 15—Barnes, v. Kensington. June 20—Epsom, v. Epsom College. June 22—Barnes, v. Dunn’s XI. June 29—East Acton, v. Pallingswick. June 29—Barnes, v. Spencer. July 6—Barnes, v. Pallingswick. July 6—Brondesbury, v. London Scottish. July 13—Wandsworth Common, v. Spencer July 13—Barnes, v. Panther. July 17—Charterhouse Square, v. Merchant Taylors’ School. July 20—Dulwich, v. Ibis. July 20—Barnes, v. Hendon. July 27—Barnes, v. Condors. Aug. 3—Barnes, v. Norwood Park. Aug. 3—Hendon, v. Hendon. Aug. 5—Barnes, v. Old Beverley Eoys. Aug. 10—Willesden, v. Willesden. Aug. 10—Barnes, v. R. Allison’s XI. Aug. 17—Brondesbury, v. London Scottish Aug. 17—Barnes, v. Panther. Aug. 24—Barnes, v. Boston Park. Aug. 24—Brentford, v. Boston Park. Aug. 31—Barnes, v. Frithville. Sept. 7—Wandsworth Common, v. Spencer. Sept. 14—Bromley, v. Plaistow. Sept. 21—Barnes, v. Club Match. J. B rig gs of the Lancashire eleven scored 74 out of 124 for Rochdale against Longsight on Saturday, and took five wickets. B ru n n in gton dismissed Chesterfield on Saturday last for 10 runs. Mr. G. G. Walker of the Derbyshire eleven got six wickets for seven runs. CRICKET IN TASMANIA. NORTH v. SOUTH. This return match was played at Launceston on March 9 and 11. The North won easily by 10 wickets. Pennefather was chief scorer for the winners, and C. Eadyfor the losers. S outhern T asmania . First Innings. Second Innings. J. G. Davies, c Douglas (sub.), b Windsor *.......... 0 b Pennefather... 8 G. Gatehouse, b W. H. Savigny ...................... 14 b Pennefather... 10 G.Vautin, c and bWindsor 0 c Sidebottom, b J. Wilson ... 54 K. Burn, c R. Sams, b Windsor ......................22 c W. H, Savigny, b Windsor ... 4 C. Eady, b W. H. Savigny 52 not out ....43 C. Vautin, c Sidebottom, b Windsor ........................ 4 b Pennefather... 10 J. Watt, st Ewart, b Windsor ...................... 1 b Windsor.... 7 J. Bingham, b Windsor ... 22 b Pennefather... 0 C. M’Allan, not o u t.......... 1 b Pennefather... 10 J. Adkisson, b W. H. Savigny ...................... 0 c Sidebottom, b Windsor......... 4 T. Kendal], b W. H. Savigny ... ................ 0 b Windsor.... 0 B 3, lb 1 ................ 4 Extras........13 Total ................120 Total ...163 N orthern T asmania , First Innings, Pennefather,bDavies 83 Joe.Wilson,bBingham 41 H.Savigny, st Vautin, b Kendall............... 3 H. Wilson, c and b Kendall ............... 43 W. Sidebottom, c and b D avies............... 2 W. H. Savigny, b Kendall ............... 18 L. Sams, b Watt ... 85 H. Ewart, st Vautin, b Watt ............... 13 J. Martin, b Kendall 1 A. E. Windsor, not out ...................... 3 B. Sams, run out ... 2 B 9, lb 10 .........19 Total ...263 In the Second Innings H.Wilson scored (not out) 15, J. H. Savigny (not out) 3 ; b 3.—Total, 21. BOWLING ANALYSIS. S o u t h . First Innings. Second Innings. B. M. R. W. B. M. R. W. Windsor ... 102 4 56 6 ......... 129 8 29 4 W. Savigney 48 0 26 4 ......... 24 0 24 0 Sidebottom.. 37 0 110 ......... 24 0 12 0 R. Sams ... 48 3 23 0 ......... 30 3 15 0 Pennefather 120 5 52 5 J. Wilson ... 24 2 18 1 N orth . First Innings. B. M. R. W. Kendall . Bingham . Burn ... . Eady ... . Atkinson . W att... . Davies 227 11 114 4 72 , 78 . 78 54 , 48 61 3 22 6 4 1 1 4 1 0 26 0 26 0 20 2 27 2 Hecond Innings. B. M. R. W. ... 18 0 11 0 ... 24 0 4 0 ... 12 0 3 0 It will be seen from the following that 43 matches have been played between the two divisions; that the North have won 21, and the South 17, and 5 have been drawn. April 20,1850—at Oatlands, North won by 12 runs Dec. 20,1851—atCampbellTown,South won bylwkt. April 1,1858—at Hobart, North won by 7wickets Dec. 10,1858—at Launceston, North won by 54ms. March 25,1859—at Hobart, North won by an innings and 10 runs Feb. 10,1860—at Hobart, North won by 3 wickets Dec. 26,1862—at Hobart, South won by 24 runs Man. 9,1863—at Launceston, South won by 36runs +Dec. 31,1864—at Launceston, Drawn Dec. 27,1865—at Hobart, South won by 3 wickets Jan. 9,1867—at Launceston, North won by 94 runs Jan. 17,1868—at Hobart, North won by 152runs Feb. 6,1869 - at Launceston,North won by 9wickets and 2 runs Dec. 28,1869—at Hobart, North won by an innings and 57 runs Feb. 17,18,1871—at Launceston, South won by an innings and 64 runs April 1, 2, 3,1872—Hobart, South won by 131 runs §March 12,13,1873—at Launceston, North won by 5 wickets and 1 run April 4, 6,1874—at Hobart, South won by an inns, and 50 runs March 29, 30,1875—at Launceston, North won by 9 wickets and 2 runs April 15,17,1876—at Hobart, North won by 1 wkt. and 1 run March 31, April 2,1877—at Launceston,North won by an innings and 160 runs Dec. 26, 27,1877—at Hobart, South won by 2 wkts. Dec. 26,1878—at Launceston, South won by an innings and 44 runs April 14,1879—at Hobart, Drawn Dec. 27,1879—at Hobart, South won by an innings and 4 runs March 27, 29,1880—at Launceston, North won by 8 wickets April 16,18,1881—at Launceston, North won by 157runs Dec. 26, 27,1881—at Launceston, North won by 65 runs March 10,11,1882—at Hobart, Drawn Dec. 26,27,1882—at Hobart), South won by 159 runs March 24, 26,1883—at Launceston, North won by 5 wickets Dec. 22, 24,1883—at Launceston, North won by 17 runs April 12,14,1884—at Hobart, South won by 195rns. Dec. 26, 27,1884—at Hobart, South won by an inns. and 144 runs April 4, 6,1885—at Launceston, South won by 9w. Dec. 26, 28,1885-a t Launceston, South won by Sw. March 26, 27,1886—at Hobart, South won by 37rns. Dec. 27, 28,1886—at Hobart, Drawn March 25, 26,1887—at Launceston, North won by 10 wickets Dec. 26, 27,1887—at Launceston, South won by 6w. March 31, April 2,1888—at Hobart, Drawn Dec. 22, 24, 1888—at Hobart, North won by 5 runs March 9,11,1889—at Launceston, North won by 10 wickets * XI. Northern v. XI. Hobart Colts; t Return Colts Match; § First Cup Match.J HAMPSTEAD NONDESCRIPTS. F ix tu re s fo r 1889. May 4—Ealing, v. Ealing May 11—Epsom, v. Epsom May 18—Beddington, v. Beddington May 25—Godalming, v. Godalming *May 28—Addiscombe, v. Addiscombe June 1—Wormwood Scrubbs, v. Kensington Park June 8, 5, 6—Catford Bridge, v. Private Banks June 8—Plaistow, v. Plaistow ♦June 10—Haslemere, v. Haslemere June 15—Windsor, v. St. Mark’s College June 22—Ewell, v. Ewell June 29—Epsom, v. Epsom College July 6-Croydon, v. Croydon July 13—Carshalton, v. Carshalton July 20—Willesden, v. Willesden July 22,23,25—Catford Bridge, v. Bank of England July 27—East Acton, v. Pallingswick T h e T o u r . *Aug. 3—Hornsey, v. Hornsey *Aug. 5, 6-Devonport, v. Plymouth Garrison *Aug. 7, 8—Sidmouth, v. Sidmouth *Aug. 9,10—Exmouth, v. Exmouth *Aug. 12,13—Taunton, v. Taunton Aug. 17—Sutton, v. Sutton Aug. 24—Clapton, v. Clapton *Aug. 31—Surbiton, v. Surbiton Sept. 7— »v. Stoics *Sept. 14—Hampstead, v. Hampstead * Day Matches. TEDDINGTON CLUB. F ix tu res fo r 1889. May 4—Bushey Park, v. London Hospital May 9—Bushey Park, v. Stoics May 11—Bushey Park, v. Hampton Wick May 18—Bushey Park, v. Twickenham Town May 23—Bushey Park, v. St. Thomas’ Hospital May 25—Bushey Park, v. St. John’s (Putney) May 30—Bushey Park, v. Ne’er-do-Weels June 1—Bushey Park, v. Hornsey June 8—Bushey Park, v. Bichmond June 10—Bushey Park, v. Strawberry Hill June 15 —Bushey Park, v. University Coll. Hosp. Juno 21—Bushey Park, v. Middlesex Hospital June 22—East Moulsey, v. East Moulsey June 29-Bushey Park, v. Hampstead Nonde­ scripts July 6 - Hampton Wick, v. Hampton Wick July 13 —Hornsey, v. Hornsey July 20—Bushey Park, v. Clapham W'anderers July 27—Ilichmond, v. Richmond August 3—Bushey Park, v. St. Stephen’s August 5-Bushey Park, v. Anchorites August 10—Bushey Park, v. Brunswick August 17—Bushey Park, v. Twickenham August 24— August 31—Bushey Park, v. St. John’s Sept. 7— Sept. 14—Bushey Park, v. Brunswi