Cricket 1889

SEPT. 19, 1889. CEICKET: A WEEKLY EE CORD OF THE GAME. 417 BURL INGTON W ANDERERS . Matches played, 23—won 7, lost 5, drawn 11. RESULTS OF MATCHES. May 4—Eltham, v. Eltham. Lost by 44 runs. El­ tham, 106 ; Burlington Wanderers, 62. May 11—Wandsworth, v. Spencer. Won by 8 runs and 8 wickets. Spencer, 114; Burlington Wanderers, 122 for a wickets. May 18—Wormwood Scrubbs, v. Kensington. Won by 13 runs. Burlington Wanderers, 6J; Kensington, 47. May 25— Willesden Green, v. Merchant Taylor’s School. Won by 54 runs. Burlington Wanderers, 77 and 66 for 6 wickets; Mer­ chant Taylor’s School, 28. June 1—Carshalton, v. Carshalton. Drawn. Car­ shalton, 1*59; Burlington Wanderers, 83 for 4 wickets. June 3—Addiscombe, v. Addiscombe. Won by 154 runs. Burlington Wanderers, 281; Ad­ discombe, 127. June 8—East Molesey, v. East Molesey. Lost by 80 rnns. East Molesey, 130; Burlington Wanderers, 50. June 15—Bruce Grove, v. Bruce Castle School. Drawn. Burlington Wanderers, 136; Bruce Castle School, 65 for 8 wickets. June 15—Mitcham, v. Mitcham. Lost by 69 runs. Mitcham, 104; Burlington Wanderers, 85. Jane 22—Charlton Park, v. Charlton Park. Won by 18 runs. Burlington Wanderers, 93; Charlton Park, 75. June 29—Erith, v. Erith. Drawn. Erith, 90 for 5 wickets; Burlington Wanderers did not bat. July 2—Dorking, v. Dorking. Drawn. Dorking, 419 for 6 wickets; Burlington Wanderers, 132 for 8 wickets. July 6 - Addiscombe, v. Addiscombe. Drawn. Ad­ discombe, 192; Bur ington Wanderers, 108 for 5wickets. July 13—Ewell, v. Ewell. Won by 39 runs and 3 wickets. Ewell, 185; Burlington Wan­ derers, 224 for 7 wickets. July 20—East Acton, v. Pallingswick. Drawn. Pallingswick, 206; Burlington Wanderers, 89 for 5 wickets. July 22—Croydon, v. Croydon. Drawn. Burling­ ton Wanderers, 212; Croydon, 161 for 3 wickets. July 27—Lee, v. Northbrook. Drawn. North­ brook, 210; Burlington Wanderers did not bat. Aug. 3—Eltham, v. Eltham. Drawn. Burlington Wanderers, 107; Eltham, 59 for 7 wickets. Aug. 17—Bushey Park.v. Hampton Wick. Drawn. Burlington Wanderers, 193; Hampton Wick, 78 for 7 wickets. Aug. 22—Epsom, v. Epsom. Lost by 14 runs. Epsom, 150 and 38 for 5 wickets; Burling­ ton Wanderers, 136. Aug. 24—Croydon, v. Croydon. Drawn. Burling­ ton Wanderers, 88 for 1 wicket; Croydon did not bat. Aug. 31—Charlton Park, v. Charlton Park. Won by 2 runs and 7 wickets. Charlton Park, 76; BurlingtonWanderers, 78for 8wickets. Sept. 7—Lee, v. Northbrook. Lost by 31 runs. Burlington Wanderers, 74; Northbrook, 105 for 9 wickets. BATTING AVERAGES. Times Most in Inns, not out. Runs, an Inns.Aver. J. P. Baxter ... 7 ... 3 ... 100 ... 45* ... 25. F. W. Freeman 13 ... 0 ... 283 ... 102 ... 21.10 E. B. Warren... 18 ... 2 ... 345 ... Ill ... 21.9 S. Cook .......... 13 ... 5 ... 129 ... 43 ... 16.1 R. D. Green ... 6 ... 1 ... 76 ... 25 ... 15.1 W. H. Lunnon 12 ... 1 ... 162 ... 49 ... 14.8 E. C. Lindup ... 17 ... 1 ... I f ::: 45* ... 14.1 C. E. Judge ... 8 ... 1 ... 42 ... 14. A. Carter.......... 8 ... 0 ... 107 ... 54 ... 13.3 J. Messenger ... 3 ... 0 ... 36 ... 19 ... 12. G. E. Collins ... 4 ... 0 ... 44 ... 17 ... 11. A. E. Gent 15 ... 2 ... 132 ... 43* ... 10.2 F; W , Ledger... 9 ... 1 ... 79 ... 23 ... 97 E. A. Green ... 4 ... 0 ... 31 ... 21 ... 7.3 D. M. Bowie ... 6 ... 1 ... 3f ... 10* ... 6. F. J. Tickner ... 3 ... 1 ... 12 ... 8 ... 6. A. L. Pattison 14 ... 1 ... 77 ... 26 ... 5.12 R. Hazard 3 ... 1 ... 8 ... 4* ... 4. W. J. Jeffries ... 5 ... 3 ... 5 ... 2* ... 2.1 F. B. Godrich... 3 ... 0 ... 6 ... 4 ... 2. The following played in less than 3 innings:— G. A. Simpson. ] Wells, V. W. Bit . Lupton. C. A. Stein, G. H. ur, and E. Williamson. BOWLING AVERAGES. Overs. Mdns. Buns. Wkts. Aver. W. H. Lunnon 159.3..., 57 ... 310 ... 28 ..,. 11.07 F.W. Freeman 277.2..., 60 ... 614 ... 52 ... 11.80 S. Cook .......... 47 ... 13 ... 110 ... 8 .. 13.75 D. M. Bowie... 26.2 . 9 ... 65 .... 5 .,,. 13. J. P. Baxter... 179.1... 33 ... 495 . .. !5 .. . 14 14 J. Messenger 36 .... 14 ... 77 ... 5 ... 15.40 F.W . Ledger... 146.2 . 24 ... 371 .... 19 .. 19.52 R. D. Green ... 77.1..., 18 ... 216 ... 6 .. ,. 36. The following also bowled C. A. Stein ... A.E. Gent C. E. Judge ... G. A. Simpson E. Williamson E. C. Lindup... Messenger bowled 4 wides, Bowie and Simpson 1 wide each, Ledger 1 wide and 3 no-balls, and Lindup 1 no-ball. 12 .... 1 .... 26 ... 3 ... 8.66 10 ... 4 ... 18 ... 1 ,... 18. 8 ..,. 2 ..„ 18 ... 1 ... 18. 27 .... 8 ..,. 63 ..,. 3 .,. 21. 7 .. . 1 .,.. 25 ., .. 1 . .. 25. 12 ... . 0 .. ,. 58 .. ,. 1 . ,. 58. LANCASH IRE . Matches played 23—won 17, lost 3, drawn 3. RESULTS OF MATCHES. May 9,10,11—at Lord’s, v. M.C.O. and G. Drawn. Lancashire, 189 and 134; M.C.C. and G., 131 and 43 for 6wickets. May 20, 21—at Leicester, v. Leicestershire. Won by 9 wickets. Lancashire, 125 and 10 for 1 wicket; Leicestershire, 84 and 50. May 23, 21, 26—at Manchester, v. Sussex. Won by 5 wickets. Lancashire, 160 and 103 for 5 wickets; Sussex, 155 and 107. May 30,31—at Oxford, v. Oxford University. Won by 9 wickets. Lancashire, 133and 62 for 1 wicket; Oxford University, 116 and 75. June 6, 7—at Manchester, v. Middlesex. Lost by 31 runs. Lancashire, 74 and 159 ; Middle­ sex, 96 and168. June 13,14—at Manchester, v. Kent. Won by 9 wickets. Lancashire, 197 and 14 for 1 wicket; Kent, 84 and 123. June 20, 21--at Manchester, v. Oxford University. Won by 7 wickets. Lancashire, 172 and 114 for 3 wickets; Oxford University, 156 and 129. June 24, 25 -at Nottingham, v. Notts. Lost by an innings and 59 runs. Lancashire, i20 and 89; Notts, 268. June 27, 28 -a t Manchester, v. Surrey. Won by an innings and 48 runs. Lancashire, 284; Surrey, 118 and 123. July 1, 2—at Bristol, v. Gloucestershire. Won by an innings and 95 runs. Lancashire, 327 ; Gloucestershire, 145 and 67. July 5,6—at Manchester, v. Warwickshire. Won by an innings and 144 runs. Lancashire, 404; Warwickshire, 99 and 161. July 15,16—at Lord’s v. Middlesex. Won by an innings and 67 runs. Lancashire, 398; Middlesex, 145 and 186. July 18,19—at Huddersfield, v. Yorkshire. Won by 3 runs. Lancashire, 81 and 153; York­ shire, 160 and 71. July 22, 23—at Birmingham, v. Warwickshire. Won by 5 wickets. Lancashire, 62 and 84 for 5 wickets; Warwickshire, 67 and 78. July 25, 26—at Liverpool, v. Gloucestershire. Lost by 3 wickets. Lancashire, 73 and 102; Gloucestershire, 89 and 87 for 7 wickets. Aug. 1, 2—at Manchester, v. Yorkshire. Won by 10 wickets. Lancashire, 215 and 43 for no wicket; Yorkshire, 117 and 139. Aug. 5, 6—at Manchester, v. Cheshire. Drawn. Lancashire, 134; Cheshire 77. Aug. 12,13-at Brighton, v. Sussex. Won by an innings and 83 runs. Lancashire, 225; Sussex, 64 and 128. Aug.15,16—at Oval, v. Surrey. Lancashire, 226 and Surrey, 111 and 187. Aug. 19,20, 2i—at Maidstone, v. Kent. Won by an innings and 35 runs. Lancashire, 215; Kent, 128and52. Aug. 22, 23, 24—at Manchester, v. Notts. Draw®. Lancashire did not bat; Notts, 69 for 8 wickets. —at Manchester, v. Leicestershire. Won by an innings and 69 runs. Lancashire, 123; Leicestershire, 23 and 31. Sept. 6, 7—at Stockport, ▼. Cheshire. Won by an innings and 179 runs. Lancashire, 345; Cheshire, 55 and 111. Won by 8wickets. 73 for 2 wickets; Aug.! BATTING AVERAGES. Times Infis. notout. A. Ward ......31 Barlow............. 26 F. H. Sugg......33 Briggs .............29 Mr. A. N. Hornby 29 Mr. J. Eccles ... 25 Baker .............17 F. Ward ......12 Paul .............19 Watson.......... ... 27 Pilling.............23 Mr.S. M. Crosfield 17 Mold ............. 27 Buns. . 803 . . 619 .. , 841 .. . 591 ., . 512 .. . 402 ., . 268 .. . 172 ., . 258 .. . 216 ., . 164 .. , 107 .. , 90 .. Most in an Inn Aver. 114* ... 30.23 29.10 27.4 21.24 . 106 . 115 , 78 . 78 . 78 . 55 . 50 . 60 . 23 . 28 . 27 . 13* . 17.19 . 17.11 . 1612 . 15.7 , 16.2 . 11.7 . 9.11 . 7.2 . 4,6 The fol owing batted on three occasions.—Yates 2 -3 —10, and Mr. R. Smith 14—0*-15 ; Mr. A. G. Steel 31—15, Whiteside 2—0, twice; Mr. G. Jowett 4, Mills 1, Higson 15, Mr. A. E. Stanley 12, and Mr. J. Leigh once only. BOWLING AVERAGE3. Overs. Mdns. Runs. Wkts. Aver. Barlow .......... 151 ... 61 ... 233 ... 25 ... 9.8 Briggs .......... 990.4... 398 ... 1583 ... 157 ... 10.13 Watson.......... 1114.4 ... 580 ... 1419 ... 123 ... 11.66 Mold................. 686.2... 263 ... 1242 ... 98 ... 12.68 The following bowled in two innings.—Mr. A. G. Steel3—0-12—1, and F. Ward 15-6—26-1. The following bowled in one innings.—A. Ward 5 -1 -1 2 -0 . Watson bowled a no-ball. HUGH Y . G ILLE TT ’S X I. v. G. X I. Played at Compton , Surrey. H u g h V . G il l e t t ’ s XI. First Innings. G. Winter, b Bett ... 3 N. Vyvyan, b Bett ... 6 LI. Evans, b Bett ... 0 E. Lambert, ran out 3 H. V. Gillett, c V. Powell, b Haig- Brown .......... ... 19 J. R. Gassiot. c Haig- Brown, b Philip ... 2 K. Dowson, b Haig- Brown ................. C. Winter, b Ionides H- Lambert, b Ionides ................. G.R.Gillett,b lonides O.Lambert.blonides B 2, nb 1 .......... Total . , 45 In the Second Innings Winter scored (not out) 81, Vyvian, c and b Bett, 10, Evans, run out, 0, E. Lambert, c and bHaig-Brown, 3, H. V. Gillett (not out) 0; b 2.—Total, 46. G. B btt ’ s XI. First Innings. A. Haig-Brown, b G, Winter ........................ J. Fleming, b Vytyan ... Philip, b Vyvyan .......... G. Bett, c Winter, b Evans E. Powell, b Evans .......... P. Drewitt, c Vyvyan, b G. Winter ........................ T. Ramsden, b Evans E. Thesiger, c Vyvyan, b G. Winter........................ V. Powell, c Vyvyan, b Evans............................... R. Fleming, c Gassiott, b G. Winter........................ Goddard, not out .......... Second Innings. Total 7 b Winter .......... 0 5 c and b Winter... 4 0 b Winter .......... 1 12 b Vyvyan .......... 20 8 c and b Vyvyan 0 8 c Winter, b Gillett .......... 0 0 b Gillett .......... 0 0 b Vyvyan.......... 0 0 b Vyvyan.......... 0 0 not out .......... 0 0 Ionides, (sub.) o D ow son , b Gillett .......... 12 6 B5, w 1 ... 6 46 Total ... 43 W ALTHAM STOW v, HADLEY P layed at Had ley on September 14. W a l t h a m s t o w , Willis, b Harrison ... 21 D. Nicholson, b Harri­ son ........................21 H. Tuck, b Harrison 11 Gunton, b Harrison... 9 Chappie, b Harrison 0 H. E. Walters, c Pendleton, b Austin 8 C. E. Walters, c Tins­ ley, b Austin.......... 3 Waterer, b Harrison B. H. Heath, b Har­ rison ................. Cook, not out.......... Collard, c and b Harrison .......... B 13, lb 2, w 1 ... Total H a d l e y . Andrews, c Willis, b Tuck........................ Pendleton, b Tuck ... Boutle, c Waterer, b Collard ................. Harrison, b Collard... E. Tinsley, st Heath, b Collard................. Dresser, b Tuck Austin, b Tuck........ . Baldock, b Tuck ... Pilgrim, b Collard... Wright, b Tuck ... H. Tinsley, not out B ........................ Total , 19