Cricket 1889

MAY 9, 1889* CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OP THE GAME; 101 CROYDON v. CLAPHAM WANDERERS. Played at Croydon on May 4. C ro yd on . H.R. Groom, b Jeph- son ...................... 1 A. J. Lane, c and b Bate...................... 54 R. Biscoe, b Jephson 36 J. C. Neech, b Jeph­ son ...................... 39 C. \V. M. Feist, st Vieber, b Bicknell 35 E. R. Wilkinson, b Rigden ............... 30 F. J. Rolls,b Jephson 28 J. Aris, bJephson ... 13 E. H. Balch, b Bick­ nell ...................... 2 A. C. Dent, b Jeph­ son ......................15 V. G. Biscoe, not out 1 B 23,lb 6, w 1, nb 2 32 Total .........286 Clapham Wanderers did not bat. SURREY COLTS v. HONOR OAK. The Surrey Colts had an easy win in this match, played at Kennington Oval on May 3. Street, son of James Street, the old Surrey bowler, showed excellent all-round cricket for the Colts, and Roles, as will be seen, bowled with great effect, taking nine wickets for 21 runs. S u r r e y C o l t s . 18 Ayres, b Lett ... Street, b Harrison Milboum, b Lett ... 0 Matthes, b Jones ... 2 Large, b Murden ... 20 Figg, b Jones ......... 7 Cripps, b Harrison... 10 Roles, st Dines, b Harrison................ 3 Betts, b Lett ... Sheer, c Dines, Harrison......... Huish. not out... B 2, lb 3, w 4 Total ... ... 1 ... 2 ... 9 ...138 First Innings. G. Harrison, b Roles ... 13 F. Lett, c Ayres, b Roles .. 8 G. Smedley, c Milbourn, b Roles ...................... 0 E. Kenyon, c Street, b R oles............................ W. E. Holford, b Roles ... M. Murden, b Street......... W. North, not out ......... A. Jones, b Street ......... C. Hayes, b Roles ......... A. R. Carson, c Street, b R oles............................ E. H. Dines, st Large, b Roles ............................ B ............................ H onor O ak . Second Innings. b Betts ......... 10 b Huieh .........19 st Large, Street ... c Ayres, b Betts b Street ... hw., b Roles b Milbourn not out ... b Huish ... Total ................48 c Roles, b Street 1 run out ... ,ti 0 B 4, lb 2 „. 6 Total 4,. 74 O. M. R. W, Lett ......... 26 8 45 3 Harrison ... 15.24 24 4 First Innings BOWLING ANALYSIS. C o l t s . O. M. R. W. Jones ... 18 4 38 2 Murden. 8 2 22 1 H o n or O a k . Second Innings. Sheer Street Roles O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. 2 0 12 0 . 13 3 9 2 ......... 7 2 9 3 8.3 3 20 8 ......... 1.2 0 1 1 Betts ... 8 5 8 2 Milbourn 7 0 22 1 Huish ... 10 4 17 2 Ayres ... 2 0 11 0 SURREY CLUB AND GROUND v. BICKLEX PARK. Two strong teams, including several players Vho represent or have represented Surrey and Kent, were placed in the field at Bickley Park ■on Saturday last, for the opening match of the Surrey Club. Mr. John Shuter won the toss, but although there was plenty of batting to support him, no one except Wood, who played i’eally good cricket for his 32, and Lockwood, lent him any great assistance, and the side were all out for 109. Mr. G. Hilder was the most successful bowler, his four wickets costing 24 runs. Mr. Marchant, who opened the Bickley Park batting with Mr. T.P. Hilder, was soon bowled, but the latter and Mr. Patterson gave some trouble, and while they were together the chances of the home team were very hopeful. When Lockwood came on to bowl, however, the end soon arrived, and the last nine batsmen only added 13 runs, Sharpe getting six of the ten wickets for 20, Lockwood four for 16 runs. Going in again, 41 runs to the good, the Surrey Club had scored 63 for four wickets when play ceased, Lockwood, as before, batting in very neat style. S u r r e y C. a n d G. Second Innings. b Avery ......... 0 First Innings. Mr.L. A. Shuter, b Christo­ pherson ...................... Harris, b Christopherson Wood, b G. Hilder ......... Mr. W. W. Read, 1b w, b Martin............................ Mr 4 Shuter, c Avery, b G. Hilder............................ 18 Abel, c Christopherson, b Martin ......................11 Mr. K. J. Key, 1b w, b S. Christopherson ......... 5 Lockwood, b G.Hilder ... 15 not out Sharp, st Pattisson, b Martin ......... ......... Mr. C. E. Horner, not out b Christopher­ son ............... Watts, c Christopherson, b G. Hilder ............... B 6,1 b 2...................... 10 b Martin ......... 8 b Christopher­ son ............... 0 c Christopher­ son, b Tonge 20 8 B 4 , l b l ... 5 Total ............... 109 Total ... 63 B ic k l e y P a r k . T. P. Hilder, b Sharpe 15 F.Marchant.b Sharpe 3 W. H. Patterson, b Lockwood .........18 J. N. Tonge, c Wood, b Sharpe............... 0 Rev. R. T. Thornton, b Lockwood ......... 3 A. M. Streatfeild, c Abel, b Sharpe ... 0 W. B. Pattisson, b Lockwood ......... 4 S. Christopherson, c L. A. Shuter, b Sharpe ................ G. Hilder, b Lock­ wood...................... C. Avery, not out ... Martin, b Sharpe ... B 6,1 b 3 ......... Total ......... . 2 BOWLING ANALYSIS. S u r r e y C. a n d G. First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. Martin .........25 11 Christophrsn. 18 1 G. Hilder Avery 10.4 2 24 3 1 5 3 3 4 ......... 0 ...... Tonge ... Patterson O. M. R. W. 16 9 33 1 21 2 9 0 1 1 4 1 6 3 1 1.1 1 3 1 2 0 10 0 B ic k l e y P a r k . O. M. R. W. j Sharpe ... 17.410 20 6 Harris ... 12 4 13 0 | O. M. R. W. Lockwood 10 2 16 4 SURREY COLTS v. GUY’S HOSPITAL. The Surrey Colts did not as a team show to very great advantage in this match, played at Kennington Oval on Monday last. Milbourn, a promising young cricketcr, got exactly one half of their total, and Ayres, who was also of use with the ball, showed good cricket for his 16. Betts was the most effective bowler, taking seven wickets at a cost of 55 runs. Col- clough’s batting, and the bowling of J. H. Bettington, a young Australian, were the chief features on the side of Guy’s. G u y ' s H o spita l First Innings. F. Colclough, c Roles, b Huish............................ 40 E. Reid, b Milbourn........36 J. H. Bettington, c Mil­ bourn, b Hughes......... 9 D. G. Mitchell, b Betts... 8 W. J. Scott, b Roles.........16 J. D. Cruikehanks, b Betts 1 S. J. Layman, b Roles ... 10 J S. Busteed, lbw, b Ayres 2 J. B. Bettington, not out... 5 E. Hewitson, c Hughes, b Ayres ...................... H. S. Wilks, b Ayres......... B 20,1 b 2 ......... ... Total......................1 Second Innings. not ont b Betts ... 23 ... 0 run out .........11 c Ayre>», b Betts 11 c Ayres, b Betts 0 1b w, b Betts . b Betts ... . 2 b Huish B 2,1 b 2 Total... 72 Ayres, b Reid .........16 Milbourn, c Busteed, b Bettington.........57 Cripps, b J. H. Bet­ tington ............... 8 Figg, c Colclough, b Layman............... 5 Matthes, b Layman 0 Weston, b J. H. Bet­ tington ............... 0 Hughes, b Layman... 0 S urrey C olts . Roles, b J. H. Bet­ tington ................ 3 Betts,b J. H. Betting­ ton ......................10 Sheer, c Scott, b Cruikshanks......... 4 Huish, not out......... 5 B 7,1 b 1, w 1, nb2 11 Total ...114 BOWLING ANALYSIS. G u y ’ s H o spita l . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Weston ... ... 5 1 12 0 Betts ... 15 5 28 2 ........ 18.4 7 27 5 Roles ... 12 3 30 2 ........ 5 1 11 0 Milboum ... 8 3 20 1 ........ 5 0 11 0 Sheer ... 6 3 16 0 Hughes ... ... 2 0 13 1 Huish ... 4 3 3 1 . ........ 8 1 19 1 Ayres .... 5.2 1 7 3 C o l t s . 4 20 0 6 41 5 1 5 0 Reid... Layman Cr u i k - shanks O. 6 M. R. W. 0 10 1 2 14 3 O. M. R. W. J. B. Bet­ tington 11 J.H. Bet­ tington 20 Mitchell 4 J. H. Bettington bowled two no-balls and Lay­ man a wide. 4.3 2 13 1 SURREY COLTS v. MITCHAM. Though they did well at the outset in dis­ missing Mitcham for a total of 74, the Surrey Colts had all the worst of this match, played at Kennington Oval on Tuesday, and were beaten in the end by 85 runs. The chief fea­ ture of the match was the remarkable bowl- iD g of the Mitcham captain, Mr. T. P. Harvey, who took eight wickets—all that fell to the bowlers—in the Colts’ first innings, at a cost of only 3 runs. W ith a view to give the youngsters another chance, Mr. Harvey ter­ minated Mitcham’s second innings, under the new rule, when the total was 149 for six wickets. Score:— M it c h a m . First Innings. Second Innings. Lyddon, c Weston, b Ayres......... ................ 8 c Sheer, b Huish 7 T. D. Lee, c Huish, b R oles............................. 14 b Milbourn 0 Boxall, c Huish, b Roles... 6 b Roles ......... 52 T. P. Harvey, lbw, b Roles 0 c and b Roles ... 14 W. M. Duncan, b Roles ... 2 b Huish ......... 15 N. Harvey, c Cripps, b R o le s............................ 10 not out ......... 32 Jas. Caffarey, b Ayres ... 1 b Milbourn 21 A. T. Clarke, c Miibourn, b Ayres ............... ... T. P. Angell, b Ayres Russell, b Milbourn ... ... Harris, not o u t ................ 2 B 7, lb 7 ...................... 14 B 7, lb 1 ... 8 Total ... ... ... 74 Total ...149 S urrey C olts . First Innings. Second Innings. Ayres, st Clarke, b T. P. Harvey ...................... 6 c Clarke, b T. P. Harvey......... 8 Milbourn, b T. P. Harvey 4 run out ......... 4 Cripps, b T. P. Harvey ... 6 b T. P. Harvey 0 Figg, b T. P. Harvey......... 0 b Lyddon......... 11 Matthes, c Caffarey, b T. Harvey ................ ... 1 cAngell,bHarris 81 Weston, run out................ 1 Ibw, b Harris ... 30 Hughes, run out............... 0 run out ......... 1U Roles, c and b T. P. Harvey ...................... 0 c T. P. Harvey, b Harris......... 4 Betts, b T. P. Harvey 1 not out ......... 3 Sheer, not out ................ 0 b Harris ......... U Huish, c Angel!, b T. P. Harvey ...................... 0 b Lyddon ......... 12 L b ............................. 1 B 7, lb 1 ... 8 Total ................ 20 Total ...118 BOWLING ANALYSIS. M it o h a m . First Innings. O . M . R. W. Betts ......... 7 1 22 0 Ayres ......... 15 8 194 , Roles .........10 3 19 5 Milbourn ... 2.3 2 0 1 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. ... 7 2 15 0 ... 12 0 39 0 ... 15 1 39 2 ... 7.1 0 32 2 Huish... 10 3 16 2