Cricket 1888

244 CRIOKET: A WEEKLY RECORD 01' THE GAME.’ . . I - ■ rf" JU L Y 5, 1888. SU RR EY v. HAM PSH IRE. Hampshire, without Messrs. H. W . Forster and H. J. Mordaunt, fared badly in tlieir first match of the season with Surrey, played at the Oval on Thursday and Friday last. They were, indeed, beaten at all points, and had to put up with a defeat by an innings and 89 runs. Mr. Lacey, who made his first appearance for the county this year, won the toss for Hampshire, and Surrey had to take the field. Jones, who had not played for Surrey since the middle of last summer, and Beaumont began the bowling, and Lohmann, who was kept in reserve, only bowled fifteen balls at the finish. The wicket was slow, and except Mr. Bonham-Carter, who hit well, no one made any stand until the last two batsmen, Young and Roberts, got together. Young hit well, and the two professionals added thirty- eight for the tenth wicket. A very curious and unusual occurrence took place during their partnership. Young was apparently caught at short-slip by Lohmann from Beaumont, and the players were returning to the Pavilion, accompanied by the batsmen and umpires, who had removed the’; iJt. Mr. Lacey, how­ ever, doubtful abouti i e catch, appealed to Pullin, who said he had given the batsman not out, and the players having resumed their positions, the game was resumed, with the result that the score was raised from 70 to 103. Beaumont took seven of the ten wickets at an aggregate cost of 47 runs. Rain had mean­ while caused a long interval, and the day’s cricket only amounted to 117 runs, Mr. Bowden and Henderson having in the last quarter-of-an- hour made fourteen runs for Surrey without the loss of a wicket. Mr. Shuter had reversed the Surrey order completely, with a view to give the batsmen who usually go in late a chance, and Mr. Bowden and Bowley utilised the opportunity. Both played well, particu­ larly Mr. Bowden, who was in an hour and fifty minutes for 73 out of 121, and got his runs in the best style. When Hampshire went in a second time the drying ground was all against them. Mr. Lacey scored fast, and on the fall of the second wicket the total was 40. Lohmann, however, at this point crossed over to bowl to the pavilion wicket, and his delivery was so irresistible that his last forty-one balls got rid of seven batsmen at a cost of only nine runs, a remarkable piece of bowling. H a m psh ire . First Innings. Second Innings. Mr. C. R. Seymour, b Jones............................ 6 run out ........... 2 Mr. F. E .Lacey, c Hender- son, b Beaumont......... 3 b Beaumont ... 27 Mr. E. G. Wynyard, c Bowden, b Beaumont ... 10 bLohmann ...14 Mr. E. O. Powell, c Jones, b Beaumont ............... 7 Mr. L. G. Bonham- Carter, b Henderson ... 24 Mr. A. H. Studd, b Eeau- mont ............................ 0 Mr. S. E. Forster, b Beaumont..................... 6 Mr. C. E. Currie, c Shuter, b Beaumont ... c W. Read, Lohmann c Bowden, Lohmann b Lohmann b Lohmann 6 st Bowden, Lohmann Mr. H. Armstrong, c Loh­ mann, b Beaumont ... 2 b Beaumont Young, c and b Lohmann 28 st Bowden, Lohmann Roberts, not out............... 7 not out B ............................ 4 Extra Total .........103 S u r r e y . Total ... 58 Mr. M. P. Bowden, c Armstrong, b Roberts ..................73 Henderson, b Young 31 Lohmann, c Stadd, b Lacey...................... 0 Beaumont, c Currie, b Lacey ................ 0 M. Read, c Lacey, b Currie ..................27 Bowley, c Studd, b Young ..................45 Mr. K. J. Key, b Currie ............ 29 Abel, notout ......13 Mr. W. W. Read, c and b Young......22 Mr. J. Shuter, c Carter, b Currie ... 2 Jones, runout....... 1 Extras.............. 7 Total ...256 BOWLING ANALYSIS. H a m p sh ir e . First Innings. O. M. R. W. Jones ......... 2816 30 1 Beaumont ... 4125 46 7 Henderson ... 12 4 15 1 Lohmann ...33 U 7 1 Bowley......... 1 0 1 0 Second Innings- O. M. R. W. . ... 13 9 13 2 . ...23.1 11 28 7 9. 5 16 0 S u rrey . O. M. R. W. Armstrong 25 9 51 0 Currie ... 36 9 69 3 Young ... 35 17 46 3 O. M. R.W Roberts 209 2} 1 Lacey... 172 46 2 Studd... 20 8 0 Armstrong bowled a no ball. TONBRIDGE SCHOOL v. BRIGHTON COLLEGE. Played at Tonbridge on June 30. T o n brid ge S chool . First Innings. Second Innings. R. A. Arnold, c Gay, b Cooper ..................... 3 h w, b Meissner 21 H. Lovegrace, c Gay, b Cooper ...................... 8 run out E. H. Perry, b Holland ... 8 c Heward, Woods ......... 2 E. E. Bryant, b Cooper ... 0 not out ......... 9 C. E. Hatt, c Walters, b Cooper ..................... 5 . L. Ai R ston, not out.........35 C. J. Kortright, b Woods 18 L. L. Reid, b Woods......... 0 M. O’C. Tandy, c Gay, b Meissner ...................... 4 W. A. White, c Young, b Meissner ..................... 0 E. S. Cardell, b Woods ... 1 B 3, w 1 ..................... 4 b Woods c Woods Cooper c Coope Woods not out c Woods Cooper ... 25 b ... 58 b ... 0 ... 37 B10, lb 2, w3 15 Total...............87 Total ...170 B righton C o lle g e . N. C. Cooper, cAston, b Kortright .........27 A. D. Heward, b Kortright............... 0 E. L. Copleston, b Kortright............... 0 FT. D. L. Woods, c Kortright, b Perry 33 C. R. Fort, b Kort- rig n t..................... 4 R. Young, bReid ... 7 L. H. Gay, b Kort­ right..................... 4 J. H. Walters, b Kortright ......... 1 A. L. King, b Kort­ right..................... 0 H. C. Holland, b Reid..................... l A. Meissner, not out 0 B 4,1 b 3, W1 ... 8 Total ... 85 N E ’ER-DO-WEELS v. LEATHERHEAD . Played at Leatherhead on June 80, and won by Ne’er-do-Weels by 328' runs. Raike’s, analysis (74 balls—5 maidens—for thirteen runs and 7 wickets) is well worth noting, see­ ing that no fault could be found with the wickets, as proved by the long score of the Ne’er-do-Weels. N e ’ e r - do D. H. Barry, b Earn- shaw ............... ... 1 H. E. M. Stutfield, |c Williams, b Lucas... 27 B. A. F. Grieve, st Williams,bF.Sturt...l36 E. J. McMaster, c Cattley, b F. Sturt 65 W.J.Barry.stWilliams, b T. Sturt...............49 J.G.T.Bruce.cLindup, b T. Sturt...............31 W eels . E. B. Raikes, st Williams,bT. Sturt 2 T.Moore.stWilliams, b T. Sturt ......... 1 G.C. Cope, b F. Sturt 20 Capt. Muggeridge, c F. Sturt, b Lucas 6 T. B. Harbottle, not out ..................... 2 B 14, w 1 .........15 Total ...355 L eatherhead . First Innings. E. C. Lindup, st Har­ bottle, b Raikes ... 8 S. W. Cattley, b Raikes ...............12 F. W. Earnshaw, b Raikes ............... 0 E. L. Lucas, b Raikes 1 T. Sturt, st Harbottle, b W. J. Barry......... 1 H. Batchelor, b W. J. Barry..................... 1 P. . Milford, not out Rev. A. Woodruff, b Raikes ............... A.H. Tritton, c Mug­ geridge, b W. J. Barry ............... F.Sturt,cD.H. Barry, bR:iikes............... F.Hue- williams,lbw, b Raikes............... B 2, lb 2 ......... Total , 37 the cond Innings Cattley scored (not out) 16^ Milford, (not out) 8; b 1,1b 1.—Total, 21. HORNSEY v. BRU CE CASTLE SCHOOL. Played at Tottenham on June 23. H ornsey . F. Bisiker, b Richards 0 S. L. Clarke, c Richards, b Almack 2 G. W. Sherlock, b Richards............... 0 R. H. King, c Morgan, b Sharps...............29 H. Rood, b Almack ... 13 F. Orton, c Berkeley, b Almack............... 0 L. H. Bacmeister, c and b Richards ... 0 H. S. Rawson, b Almack............... 8 B.G.Wilmer, not out 9> J. Clark, run out G. C. Rayner, Richards B 2,1 b 1, w 7 Total 9 b ... 13 ... 10 ... 99 B ruce C astle S ch ool . Rev. W. Almack, b Bacmeister .......... 0 F. Berkeley, b J. Clark...................... 1 Rev. O. Philpot, c Rawson, b J. Clark 3 H. A. Sharps, c Sher­ lock, b J. Clark ... 0 H. B. George, 1b w, b Rayner ..................14 J. Morgan, c Wilmer, b Rayner ... ............21 H. W. Hardman, b J. C lark............... P. D. Richards, b Bacmeister......... G.W. David, run out H. Swell, not out ... T. Dickson, b Bac­ meister ............... B 4, w 2 ......... Total ......... ROYAL NAVAL SCHOOL v. NORTH- BROOK. Played at New Cross on June 23. R.N.S. A. C. Sheppard, b Abbott ............... 0 C.McCarthy, c Digby, b Leeds ............... 0 C. M. Mintow, b Abbott .................19 H. E. Chapman, c Leeds, b Abbott ... 1 W. Leahy, b Leeds ... 10 P. C. Lodge, b Leeds 0 F. F. Moresby, b Leeds..................... 0 G. E. Playne, b Leeds ............... H. P. Comber, not out ..................... W.H.Hopo.cBlyther, b Leeds ............... R. Fremlin, c F. A. Smith, b Leeds ... B 2, lb 2, w 1 ... Total ... N orthbrook . C. Higham, b Chap­ man ..................... 14 W. P. Baker, c W. Leahy, b Chapman 17 G. H. Blyther, b •Moresby ...............80 S. A. Abbott, c W. Leahy, b Chapman 71 S. O. Woolmer, b Moresby............... 3 J. W. Knowles, c Sheppard, b Lodge 30 F. A. Smith, c Hops, b Lodge...............21 H. P. Digby, c anJ b Lodge ............... 7 P.R Steele,cMoresby, b Lodge............... 0 H. Leeds, not out ... 4 J. S. W. Allin, c and b Chapman ......... 0 B 10, lb 3, w 2 ... 15 Total ..213 PALLINGS vVICK v. PL VISTOW. Played at East Acton on June 30. P a llin g sw ic k . F. S. Heynemann, b Longden...............12 M. T. La Thangue, c sub., b Longden ... 3 W. L. Hotchkin, c Reed, b Longden ... 17 E. Kettle, b Longden 32 B. A. Carter, b Reed 11 D. H. Hewitt, not out 18 H. W. Burnside, b Latter ............... A.W.Graham.b Reed P. J. De Launey, b Latter ............... P. Hawkins, bLatter D.H Daniell,bLatter B 12, lb 10......... P laistow . Total ...128 H. D. Nicholas, b Heynemann ......... 0 A. H. Latter, c De Launey, bHotchkin 0 W. Hodgson, not out 19 E. C.Reed,bUotchkin 8 H. Diherty, b Heyne­ mann..................... 0 J. Longden, c Hotch­ kin. b La Thangue E. Layton, b Heyne­ mann ............... T. Schooling, not out B 8, w 3 ......... Total 9 1 11 . 76 T. Hodgson and V. Howard did not bat. I n a match played at Raynes Park, o;i June 23, between Lloyd’s Register and General Steam Navigation, Carey and Hanson, of the Register, bowled with suoh success that the General Steam were disposed of for 2 runs. Nine wiokets fell without a run, and then the last man got a lucky snick for a oouple.