Cricket 1886

A u g . i2 ,1886. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD 0E THE GAME. 848 BOWLING ANALYSIS. D erbyshire . 0. M. R. W. Bishop ...76 31 102 3 Buxton ...52 25 76 4 Silcock ... 21 9 28 0 Jones ...20 10 26 0 Stevens bowled a no-ball, E ssex . First Innings. O. M. R. W. W. Sugg......... 33 19 41 3 Davidson ... 46 19 53 2 W. Chatterton 20 12 14 2 Walker ......... 28 9 47 3 Cropper......... 7 3 17 0 J. Chatterton.. 10 4 8 0 O. M. R. W. Pickett.. 50.2 26 77 2 Stevens .14 3 37 1 Almond. 4 0 10 0 Second Innings. O .M. B. W. . ... 10 6 7 0 , 20 , 10 . 0 YORKSHIRE v. NOTTS. Special interest was attached to the return match between these Counties begun at Bram­ all Lane, Sheffield, on Monday, from the fact that in the previous contest, Notts had only won after a most exciting finish with eight runs to spare. Shaw was fortunate enough to win the toss, but so true was the Yorkshire bowling, particularly of Emmett and Peate, that the Nottingham team were at the wickets the whole of the first day for an aggregate of only 156. Altogether 182 overs were bowled for 138 runs from the bat, and three hours and ten minutes were occupied in making 92, Scotton having been in all this time for 82. Emmett, who retains his bowling powers in a remarkable degree, was again very successful, taking five wickets, with 49 runs as the result of 66 overs. Peate, too, had excep­ tionally good figures, bowling 45 overs and 1 ball for 29 runs and four wickets. Rain pre­ vented any play at all on Tuesday, and yester­ day the game was so much in favour of the bowlers, that the Yorkshiremen had a very narrow escape of a decisive defeat. In the first innings Peel and Ulyett alone had double figures, and these two contributed 32 of 57 from the bat. Flowers and Attewell bowled with­ out a change, and the former’s figures were re­ markable,^ overs (32 maidens) for 33 runs and 7wickets. In the follow-on Peel was again seen to advantage, and Bates and Hall lent useful assistance. When play ceased six batsmen were out for 75, so that Yorkshire still wanted 23 runs to save the innings, having four wickets to fall, N otts . Attewell, b Peate ... Shacklock, b Em­ mett ...................... Shaw, b Peate......... Sherwir, not out B 11.1 b 6. w 1 ... 18 Total ..1.56 Shrewsbury, b Peate 28 Scotton, b Emmett... 32 Barnes, b Preston ... 26 Gunn, b Peate.........23 Flowers, 1b w, b Em­ mett ...................... 8 Mr. H. B. Daft, 1b w, b Emmett ......... 4 Selby, c and b Em­ mett ......................11 Y orkshire . First Innings. Ulyett, c Selby, b Flowers 13 Hall, run out ..1 ......... 8 Bates, c Shaw, b Flowers 0 Hon. M. B. Hawke, b Flowers ...................... 0 Preston, b Flowers ......... 2 Grimshaw, c Attewell, b FTowers ...................... 8 Peel, not out..................... 19 Lee, b Attewell............... 1 Emmett, b Attewell......... 2 Mr. G. A. B. Leatham, b Flowers ..................... 0 Peate, b Flowers ......... 4 B ....................... 1 Total ............... 58 Total ... 75 BOWLING ANALYSIS. Y orkshire . First Innings* Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. B, W. Flowers ... 48 3i 33 7 ......... 9 * 12 0 Attewell ... 47 35 242 ......... 19 13 8 3 Shaw ... 19 15 6 0 Shacklock 23 12 80 2 Barnes#.. 17 10 13 1 Second Innings, b Shacklock ... 0 c Selby,b Barnes 14 b Attewell.........28 c Daft, b Atte­ well ............... 3 c Sherwin, b Attewell......... 0 not out ......... 4 c Shaw,b Shack­ lock .. _ ... 20 not out ......... 0 B ............... 6 N otts . O. M. B. W. Emmett... 66 42 49 5 Bates ... 36 21 35 0 Ulyett ... 15 11 7 0 Emmett bowled a wide. O. M. R.W. Peate......... 45.127 29 4 Preston ... 20 12 18 1 LANCASHIRE v. SUSSEX. The Sussex eleven are to be congratulated on a very creditable victory over Lancashire in the return match, concluded at Brighton yesterday. Mr. Hornby -won the toss for Lan­ cashire, who were in till half-past four o’clock on Monday, scoring 211, to which Robin­ son was the chief contributor with a well-hit 54. Humphreys was again very effective with his lobs, securing all the last four wickets at a cost of only 26 runs. Sussex, who had on the first night made 98 for the loss of three wickets, found the wicket easy at the outset on Tuesday, after the morning’s rain, and Mr. Thomas and Tester scored fast, adding 62 runs for the fourth wicket. After this, though, came a great collapse, and the remaining batsmen only added 60, Barlow, who took in all six wickets for 54 runs, bowling with great effect. Lancashire, though eleven runs ahead on the first hands, when they went in again had to bat on a drying wicket, and the Sussex bowlers, Tester, Jesse Hide, and Humphreys, were all seen to great advantage. Barlow was run out, as was Mr. Dobell, and at one time the score was 29 with seven wickets dowrn. Mr. Lancashire wras the only batsman able to get double figures,and the inn­ ings was all over for 60, Humphreys getting the two last wickets in six balls without a run. The Lancashire Eleven played up so well yesterday that, though Sussex only had 73 to win, until the last the result was in doubt. Six wickets were down for 48, but Jesse Hide, with the advantage of a life at mid-on, quickly rattled off the remaining runs, and Sussex won with four wickets to spare. L ancashire . First Innings. Second Innings. Mr. A. N. Hornby,c Smith, b Tester ...................... 37 c Lucas, b Tester ......... 7 Barlow, c Phillips, b J. Hide ............................ 30 run out ......... 1 Mr. P. Dobell, c Phillips, b Tester ...................... 0 run out ......... 8 Briggs, c Newham, b Tester............................ 8 lbw, b J. Hide... 3 Mr. J. Eccles, c Phillips, b A. Hide ...................... 34 b Tester ......... 1 Robinson, c J., b A. Hide 54 c Tester, b J. Hide............... 0 Mr. O. P. Lancashire, b Humphreys ......... 24 cSmitb,b Tester 21 Yates, not out ............... 15 c Cotterill, b J. Hide............... 1 Mr. A. Teggin, st Phillips, b Humphreys............... 0 c Tester,b Hum­ phreys ......... 9 Watson, c Lucas, b Hum­ phreys ............................ 9 c Lucas, b Hum­ phreys ........ 6 Pilling, lbw, b Humphreys 0 not out ......... 2 L b... Total 211 S ussex . First Innings, J. Hide, c rilljng, b Bar- low .......................... 4 Tester, c Watson,b Briggs 58 Mr. G. H. Cotterill, b Ba low ..................... 0 b Briggs Mr. W. Newha n, 1b w, b Wat>on ....................37 Total ... 60 Second Innings. not out .........21 b Barlow ......... 8 c Pilling, b Bar- low ............... 25 b Watson......... 0 c Hornby, b Watson......... 4 Mr. F. Thomas, run out ... 58 Mr. F. M. Lucas, c Pilling, ur>ajL-n.w ............... ... 23 Mr. G. Brann, lbw, b Bar- low ............................ 3 not out Humphreys, not out.......11 b Barlow lvir . . i\. damn, c i'll'ing, b Barlow ..................... 0 Phillips, b Barlow ........ 0 A. Hide, b Briggs ........ 1 B 2, lb 3....................... 5 Total ...200 B 1,1b 6........ 7 Total ... 73 BOWLING ANALYSIS. L ancashire . First Innings. O. M. R. W. J. Hide ... 45 19 75 1 a . Hide ... 32 11 61 2 Tester......... 28 16 36 3 Humphreys. , 9.2 2 26 4 Smith ... ... 6 2 13 0 S ussex . First Innings. O. M. R. W. Barlow ... 50 30 51 6 Briggs......... 61.225 79 2 Watson ... 26 10 43 1 Teggin ... 5 2 7 0 Yates ......... 4 0 12 0 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. ......... 25 13 27 3 ........ 24 11 32 3 .......... 1.2 1 0 2 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. 35 17 43 3 , 12 6 8 , 21 19 15 HORLEY v. ELEVEN WATNEYS. Played at Horley on August 7. W atneys . First Innings. A.N. Watney, b Field 9 S C. Watney, b Field 20 G N. Watney, c H. D. Hall, b Held ... 4 P. Watney, b Field 2 Daniel Watney, not out ...................... 3 B 5, 1b 2, n b 2... 9 W. D. Watney, c W. Kelsey, b Jennings 1 F. D. v\atney, c and b Field ............... 23 J. S. Watney, 1b w, b Field......................11 A. G. Watney,b Field 14 Dendy Watney, b H. D. Hall ............... 16 E. J. Watney, b H. D. Total .........115 H a ll............... ... 3 In the Second Innings F. D. Watney scored (not out) 2, and J. S. Watney (not out) 0.—Total, 2. H orley . First Innings. W. Dorling, b Dendy Wat­ ney ......... ... ... ... 5 H. D. Hall, c Dendy, b A. G. Watney..................... 4 F. Jennings, b A G. Wat­ ney 3 F. Field, b Dendy Watney 11 J. W. Tweedie, b A. G. Watney .................... 7 W. Kelsey, c A. N., b A. G. Watney....................... 0 L. Densham, b Dendy Watney .................... 1 J. Hall, e Dendy, b A. G. Watrey .................... 4 H.jWebbcr, c and b Dendy Watney .................... 8 F. Stevens, b A. G.Watney 1 F. W. Kelsey, not out ... 0 B ........................... 2 Total Second Innings. bDendy Watney b Dendy Watney b W. D. Watney c and b A. G. Watney......... b Dendy Watney 12 b W. D. Watney 0 b W. D. Watney 8 c W. D., bDendy Watney......... 3 b W. D. Watney 3 not out ......... 2 1 b w, b A. G. Watney.........11 B 1,1 b 1,w 3 5 Total... 70 O n Thursday last Tufnell Park totalled 635 runs for five wickets against Holloway College (Old Boys) at Tufnell Park. T. Sawyer scored 253, not ou t; J. C. Gregory, whilom of Surrey, 110; and A. H. P. Snow, once of the Middlesex eleven, 96, O n Saturday last at Woobum Park, in a match between M.C.C. and Ground and Mr. A- Gilbey’s Eleven, the former in their second innings were dismissed for 17. Six w'ickets were down for no runs E, D, Shaw, the old Oxonian, took eight wickets for four runs. E ngland v. A ustralia . —The Eleven to represent Engluid against Australia at the Oval to day, will be the same as at Lord’s, Messrs. W. (i. Grace, A. G. Steel, W. W. Read, E. F. S. Tylecote, and Barlow, Briggs, Ulyett, Scotton, Shrewsbury, Barnes and Lohmauu,