Cricket 1886

46 CRICKET,; A WEEKLY RECORD QF THE GAME. MARCH 25,1886. BOWLING ANALYSIS. N e w S o u th W a l e s . First Innings. Sccond Innings. Spofforth Palmer ... Brace Trumble.. W orrall... M'Shane... B. M. 183 17 66 84 72 1 20 40 11 42 44 R. W. 4 1 2 B. M. R. W. 182 23 70 4 15 0 .......... 15 0 Horan , 213 21 . 60 2 26 0 64 8 16 0 46 Spofforth bowled 9 and Palmer 6 no-balls, and Brace 1 wide. V ic t o r ia . First Innings. B. M. R. W. 48 4 200 21 165 20 20 2 Jones Evans . Garrett ., Marr Turner . 21 0 70 4 55 6 8 0 10 0 Second Innings. B. M. R. W. ... 12 4 5 1 ... 149 21 31 3 ... 148 17 56 6 ... 20 1 6 0 ... 28 3 8 0 Thirty-six matches have now been played, of which Victoria has won twenty and New South Wales sixteen. RICHMOND CLUB. F ix t u r e s f o r 1886. April 26. Richmond, v. E. R. H. Burlton’s XI. May 8. Richmond, v. Wanstead May 10. Richmond, v. United Hospitals May 12. Wormwood Scrabbs, v. Kensington Park May 15. Richmond, v. University College Hospital May 17,18. Richmond, v. Incogniti May 19. Beckenham, v. Beckenham May 22. Chiswick, v. Chiswick Park May 26. Elstree, v. Elstree Masters May 27. Richmond, v. Guy’s Hospital May 29. Richmond, v. Streatham June 2. Richmond, v. Hornsey June 3. Crystal Palace, v. Crystal Palace June 5. Wimbledon, v. Wimbledon June 9. Upper Tooting, v. Upper Tooting June 10. Richmond, v. Hampstead June 12. Richmond, v. M.C.C. and G. June 14. Richmond, v. Merchant Taylor’s School June 18,19. Richmond, v. Bickley Park June 23. Richmond, v. Sutton June 24. Richmond, v. Civil Service June 26. Richmond, v. Will-o’-the-Wisps June 30. Richmond, v. Rossall Rangers July 1. Richmond, v. Wanstead July 3. Streatham, v. Streatham July 7. Richmond, v. Kensington Park July 9,10. Bickley Park, v. Bickley Park July 14. Richmond, v. Revellers July 17. Richmond, v. Chatham House Wanderers July 21. Richmond, v. Upper Tooting July 22. Richmond, v. Ne’er-do-Weels July 24. Richmond, v. Crystal Palace July 28. Richmond, v. Beckenham July 29. Richmond, v. Law Club July 31. Richmond, v. Hampton Wick Aug. 2. Richmond, v. Isleworth Aug. 4. Richmond, v. Harrow Blues Aug. 7. Richmond, v. Wimbledon Aug. 14. Richmond, v. Chiswick Park H a l f -D a y M a tc h e s . Willesden, v. Law Club Richmond, v. King’s College Hospital Hornsey, v. Hornsey Richmond, v. International College Cooper’s Hill, v. R.I.E.C. Teddington, v. Teddington Richmond, v. Teddington Richmond, v. Merchant Taylor’s School Isleworth, v. International College Osterley Park, v. Spring Grove Ealing, v. Ealing May 15. May 22. May 29. June 5. June 12. June 19. July 3. July 10. July 17. July 24. July 31. Aug. 10, Aug. 12. Aug. 13. Aug. 14. Aug. 16, Aug. 18. Aug. 19. Aug. 20. Aug. 21. NORTHERN WANDERERS. S econd A n n u al T o u r . 11. Weymouth, v.Weymouth C.C. Dorchester, v. Dorset County Bournemouth, v. Bournemouth C.C. Southampton, v. Southampton C.C. 17. Southampton, v. South Hampshire Shanklin, v. Shanklin C.C. Ryde, v. Ryde C.C. Fareham, v. Fareham C.C. Portsmouth, v. United Service C.C. H a r ro g a te C l u b — The Fourth Fancy Calico Ball in connection with this flourishing Club was held in the Queen’s Hotel, Harrogate, on Friday the 26th February. One hundred and forty-nine guests assembled in response to the invitations issued, and as the proceeds are devoted to charitable purposes it is gratifying to have to record that the affair was in every respect a pronounced success. As the resuit a sum of £27 Is. 3d. was handed over to the Harrogate Bath Hospital. The Committee of the Cricket Club has had such good reason to be gratified with the recent gathering that they have determined to make the ball an annual one* N o tts C ou n ty C l u b . —The provision for accommodation of the members of this Club on the Trent Bridge Ground, will be consider­ ably improved when the new pavilion now in course of erection is completed. The execu­ tive of the County Club has spared neither pains nor expense to make suitable provisions not only for the subscribers but also for those who play in the chief matches on Trent Bridge. A few particulars of the arrange­ ments of the new building will be of interest. The general plan of the pavilion, which will be ready it is expected towards the end of May, may be described as a central block, fronted by a spacious stepped terrace and flanked on each side by detached wings, the floors of which are on lower levels than the central portion of the building, which contains on its principal floor level with the terrace a club-room in front measuring 50ft. by 20ft., and a dining hall in the rear of it of the same size. Two main entrance halls are on each side of these principal rooms, and the terrace in front of the club-room is partly covered by a verandah. At the back of the dining hall and in connection with one of the principal entrances is a spacious bar 40ft. long by 14ft. wide, with beer and wine cellars underneath. The eastern wing contains on the ground floor a kitchen, scullery, pantry, and several offices, as well as a ladies’ room, which can be entered from the outside of the building, pro­ vision also being made for service from the kitchen. The western wing has on the ground floor a dressing room for players 16ft. 9in. by 14ft., which is larger than that until recently in use, besides being fitted up with bathroom, lavatories, and shower bath. Above this are the apartments consigned to gentlemen players and members of the club, which will also be appointed with every requisite. Access to the upper portion of the building is provided by a wide staircase leading from the entrance vestibules. Above the dining-hall is a private dining-room, and the flat roof over the whole central block is utilised for the accommodation of 300 persons in a very ingenious manner, part of it being covered by a permanent roof supported on iron pillars, and surmounted by a clock turret. On the upper floor of the eastern wing is arranged a committee room 28ft. by 17ft. with a continuous balcony in front, while at the back is a secretary’s room with offices attached. Corresponding to this on the western wing are the gentlemen’s rooms, as we have stated before, a front bal cony being also arranged for them. In addition to the main building it is proposed to erect, as briefly mentioned, two detached galleried wings, for the accommodation of visitors, and these will seat 500 persons, so that the total number provided for on the terrace and flat of the building and on the detached wings may be roughly stated at 2,000. The character of the erection may be described as having a tendency to what is known as Queen Anne’s style, especially in the treatment of the wings, where the timber balconies form an excellent and picturesque feature in the design, and break up a part which is purposely kept some­ what flat, so that the sight from any point may not be obstructed. The buildings are to be of red brick with black brick bands and dressings of Mansfield stone. The wing roofs will be of Staffordshire tiles, while the flats are con­ structed of concrete and cement on iron girders, everything being of amost substantial character. Mr. M. Townsend, A.R.I.B.A., of the Minster Precincts, Peterborough, is the architect. INCOGNITI CLUB. F ix t u r e s f o r 1886. May 15. Haileybury, v. Haileybury College May 17,18. Richmond, v. Richmond May 20. Sutton, v. Sutton May 22. Woolwich, v. R.M. Academy May 26. Dulwich, v. Dulwich College May 29. Weybridge, v. Oatlands Park May 31, June 1. Bury St. Edmunds, v. Gentlemen of Suffolk June 2, 3. Littlebury, Saffron Walden, v. Mr. Burrell’s XI. June 5. Carshalton, v. Carshalton Park June 9, 10. Colchester, v. Colchester and East Essex June 12. Blackheath, v. Blackheath June 14,15. Rochester, v. Rochester June 16. Elstree, v. Elstree Masters June 19. Cheam, v. Mr. A. S. Tabor’s XI. June 21,22. Crystal Palace, v. Crystal Palace * June 23. 24. Beckenham, v. Beckenham June 25, 26. Bexley, v. Bexley June 26. Vincent Square, v. Westminster School June 28, 29. Bickley, v. Bickley Park June 30. Wormwood Scrubbs, v. Kensington Park July 1. Tooting, v. Upper Tooting July 2, 3. Shoeburyness, v. School of Gunnery July 7, 8. Shorncliffe, v. Shorncliffe Camp July 10. Chiswick, v. Chiswick Park July 12,13. Maidstone, v. Mote C.C. July 15,16. Nutfield, v. Nutfield July 17. Esher, v. Esher July 19, 20. Portsmouth, v, United Services July 21, 22. Horsham, v. Horsham. July 23, 24. Streatham, v. Streatham July 26, 27. Llanfairfechan, v. Bryn-y-Neuadd July 28, 29. Brighton, v. Sussex C.C. and G. July 30, 31. Llanfairfechan, v. Bryn-y-Neuadd July 30, 31. Brighton, v. Old Brightonians Aug. 2, 3. Devonshire Park, Eastbourne, v. Ros­ sall Rangers Aug. 2, 8. Clifton, v. Clifton Aug. 4, 5. Devonshire Park, v. South Lynn Aug. 4, 5. Bath, v. Lansdown Aug. 6, 7. Eastbourne, v. Eastbourne Aug. 6, 7. Torquay, v. Torquay Aug. 9,10. Sidmouth, v. Ishmaelites Aug. 11,12. Sidmouth, v. Sidmouth Aug. 13,14. Exmouth, v. Exmouth Aug. 16,17. Liverpool, v. Liverpool C.C. and G. Aug. 18. Eccles, v. Western C.C. Aug. 19, 20. Old Trafford, v. Manchester C.C. & G. *Aug. 23, 24. Phoenix Park, Dublin, v. Phoenix C.C. ♦Aug. 25, 26. The Curragh, v. Curragh Camp *Aug. 27, 28. Dublin, v. Irish Civil Service * Not finally arranged HORNSEY CLUB. F ix t u r e s f o r 1886. April 24. Hornsey, Opening Day May 1. Hornsey, v. Granville May 8. Hornsey, v. Hampstead May 8. Southgate, v. Southgate May 15. Hornsey, v. Tottenham May 15. Highgate, v. Highgate School May 19. Hornsey, v. University College School May 82. Hornsey, v. Buckhurst Hill May 22. Lee, v. Granville May 29. Hornsey, v. Richmond May 29. Finchley, v. Christ’s College June 2. Richmond, v. Richmond June 5. Hornsey, v. Trafalgar June 5. Tottenham, v. Bruce Castle June 12. Hornsey, v. Pallingswick June 12. Totteridge, v. Totteridge Park School June 14. Finchley, v. Finchley June 14. Hornsey, v. City Ramblers June 15. Hornsey, v. M.C.C. June 16. Hornsey, v. Stoics June 17. Hornsey, v. Croydon June 18. Hornsey, v. Southgate June 19. Hornsey, v. Clapton June 19. Hendon, v. Hendon .Tune 26. Hornsey, v. Upper Clapton June 26. Highbury, v. Highbury July 3. Buckhurst Hill, v. Buckhurst Hill July 3. Hornsey, v. Totteridge Park School July 10. Clapton, v. Clapton July 10. Hornsey, v. Christ’s College July 14. Croydon, v. Croydon July 17. Hornsey, v. Crystal Palace July 24. Hornsey, v. Hendon July 24. Acton, v. Pallingswick July 31. Tottenham, v. Trafalgar July 31. Hornsey, v. Hampstead Nondescripts Aug. 2. Hornsey, v. Finchley Aug. 2. Winchmore Hill, v. Winchmore Hill Aug. 7. Hornsey, v. Upton Park Aug. 7. Highgate, v. Highgate Aug. 14. Tottenham, v. Tottenham Aug. 21. Hampstead, v. Hampstead Aug. 21. Hornsey, v. Highbury Aug. 24. Hornsey, v. Bank of England: Aug. 28. Upper Clapton, v. Upper Clapton. Aug. 28. Hornsey, v. Highgate Sept. 4. Blackheath, v. Blackheath Next Issue April 15-