Cricket 1886

JUKE 10,1886. CRICKET A WEEKLY RECORD OP THE GAME. 185 CLAPHAM WANDERERS v. BARNES’ Played at Barnes on June 5. C la ph a m W a n d e r e r s . A. H. Behrend, b Rat­ cliff ........................ 0 H. V. Bate, not out... 53 P. J. Bate, l b w, b Carter ................. 0 W. J. Olivey, b Carter 3 R.W.Smith,cE dwards, b C. Nettleton ... 6 A. M. Fraser, c P. Nettleton, b Carter 9 A. F. W\ Humrn, lbw, b C. Nettleton ... 17 R. R. Clunis, run out 0 H. Holloway, e Burn­ side, b Ratcliff ... 1 E. Chaffey, b Jones 0 B 3, lb 3, w l ... 7 Total 96 B a r n e s . A. Humble, b F. J. B a te ........................ 3 F. Edwards, b Smith 0 C. Porteus, b F. J. B a te ........................14 C. Nettleton, b F. J. B ate........................ 2 H. W. Burnside, st Olivey, b Smith ... 1 E. E. Keys, b Bate ... F. J. C. E. Batcliff, not out A. G. H. Steves, c Behrend, b Smith T. G. Jones, b F. J. B a te ........................ P. Nettleton, not out B ........................ 12 Total W. B. Carter did not bat. TONBRIDGE SCHOOL v. TONBRIDGE TOWN. Played at Tonbridge on May 22. T o n b r id g e S c h o o l. H. A.. L. Rudd, b Hub­ bard ........................ 0 F. C. Barchard, c Hooman, b Best ... 27 H.G.B Reina, run out 0 R. M. King, run out... 13 L. L. Reid, c Kemp, b H ubbard.................45 W . F. Oldham, b R eynolds................. 2 C. P. Norsworthy, b Reynolds .......... 1 J. Story, b Hubbard 3 C.M. °layton,b Hub­ bard ........................11 P. T. Baker, not out 17 R.C.de la Condamine, b Best ................. 2 B 7,1 b 2 .......... 9 lo ta l ..130 T o n b r id g e T o w n . A* F. Kemp, b Baker 9 G. Collins, c Oldham, b Clayton.................95 T. C. Hooman,c Reid, b Barchard ..........40 G. C. Hubbard, c Old­ ham, b Reid ..........18 J. F. Reynolds, c Norswcrthy,bRudd 14 W. F. Best, not out... 49 G. Golding, not out 0 B l, w l .......... 2 Total ...227 F. L. Pattisson, E. H. Goggs, W. B. Gray, and E. Jervis did not bat. Cridict at fombnfrp. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY v. YORK­ SHIRE. The Cambridge Eleven won their third successive match this season at Cambridge, on Saturday, beating Yorkshire after an ex­ citing finish with twenty-six runs to spare. Their success was highly creditable for a double reason, firstly that they were playing without their most reliable bowler, Mr. C. W. Rock, who was representing the Gentlemen against the Australians, at Lord’s, and secondly that they had all the worst of the early part of the game. There was nothing particularly noteworthy in the first hands and the highest score was Peel’s 41 for Yorkshire, a display of good clean hitting. Following on in a minority of exactly 80 runs the University were able to make a better show, a result entirely due to the exceptionally fine cricket of one batsman, Mr. Kemp. This gentleman, who, singularly enough, made over a hundred for Lancashire against Y orkshire, at Huddersfield, again showed his appreciation of the bowling of the ttTorkshiremen. For three hours and a half he was batting in the most brilliant form, and with the exception of one hit which nearly came to hand when he had got 87 his play was without a fault. He went in first wicket down with the total at 10 and was seventh out, having contributed 125 out of 213 while in. When they went in on Saturday morning the Yorkshiremen wanted 151 to win, an easy task it was generally thought with the ground in run-getting order. Ulyett and Hall, too, made such an excellent start that the issue seemed placed beyond a doubt. These two batsmen, before they were parted, put on 55 runs, of which Ulyett, the outgoer, had con­ tributed 42. After this, though, the bowling of Messrs. Buxton and Dorman proved so effective that only Peel, Emmett and Preston got double figures, and the University were able to gain a most creditable victory as before stated. Mr. Dorman, who was in the Dulwich College eleven a few years ago, was tried in this match for the University and with the most favourable results. He bowls left-hand, medium pace, and on this occasion was re­ markably successful, taking nine wickets at a cost of 103 runs, a capital performance against a team like Yorkshire, and on such a ground as that of the University. The bowling figures of Ulyett and Bates in the first innings of Cambridge were noteworthy. C a m b r id g e U n iv e r s it y . First Innings. Mr. A. M. Suthery, b Em­ mett ............................... 0 Mr. C.D Buxton, b Ulyett 24 Mr. G. Kemp, b Peate ... 4 Mr. H. W. Bainbridge, c Ambler, b Peate .......... 5 Mr. J. A. Turner, b Ulyett...............................10 Mr. F. Thomas, b Bates... 12 Mr. C. Toppin, b Ulyett... 0 Second Innings. b Bates .......... 1 c Hall, b Peel ... 32 c Peate, b Em­ mett................. 125 b Bates 3 b Ulyett ..........10 c Ulyett, b Peate 13 c Hunter, P eel... Hon. C. M. Knatchbull- Hugessen, b Bates......... 10 b Preston ... Mr. H. Orr, c Peel, b Ulyett...' ........................ 1 b Bates Mr. W. Greenstock, not out ............................... 4 b Bates Mr. A. W Dorman, b B a tes............................... 2 not out B l, l b l ........................ 2 Total .............. . 74 Bll,lb6,wl,nbl 19 Total ...230 Y o r k sh ir e . First Innings. Second Innings. Ulyett, c Toppin, b Dor­ man ...............................36 b Buxton ........... 42 Hall, b Toppin .................11 c Toppin, b Dor­ man .................11 Bates, b T oppin................. 0 c Thomas, b Buxton .......... 5 Wraithmell, c Hugessen, b Dorman ........................17 lbw, b Dorman 1 Lee, lbw, b Dorman......... 16 c and b Buxton Ambler, b Dorman Peel, c and b Buxton Preston, b Buxton ... Emmett, b Toppin ... Hunter, not o u t ......... Peate, c Bainbridge, Toppin................. ... B 9, w 2 ................. ... 11 c Thomas, Dorman... ... 41 c Buxton, Dorman... ... 7 c Toppin, Dorman... ... 1 not out ... 3 b Toppin ... b ... 0 b Toppin ... ... 11 B 5, lb 1 Total ...154 Total b ... 0 b ... 19 b ... 15 ... 16 ... 7 ... 0 ... 6 ...124 BOWLING ANALYSIS. Y o r k s h ir e . First Innings. O. M. R, W . Toppin.......... 39.115 52 4 Buxton.......... 17 9 25 2 Dorman ... 31 13 48 Turner.......... 9 4 4 18 0 Second Innings. O M. R. W. ......... 18.3 4 39 2 ......... 13 4 20 3 ......... 26 7 55 5 ......... 3 0 4 0 Dorman and Turner each bowled a wide. C a m b rid g e U n iv e r s it y . First Innings. O. M. R. W. ... 23 16 11 Peate Emmett ... 21 12 25 1 .......... 28 14~33 1 Second Iniiings. O. M. R. W. .......... 32 22:25 1 U lyett..........19 9 19 4 Bates ..........19 10 17 3 1 12 0 3 0 10 0 Emmett bowled a wide, and Peel a no-ball. Peel .. Preston Ambler Hall .., 12 3 33 32.220 36 29 11 47 10 4 15 M r . G. C. M a lla m , playing for Uppingham (Town) v. Kettering 011 May 20, bowled 15 overs (14 maidens), for 1 run and 5 wickets. OXFORD UNIVERSITY v. SURREY. The Oxford University Eleven gained a creditable victory over Surrey, at Oxford, on Friday last. Though the county was without the services of Messrs. W. W. Read and W. E. Roller, who were representing the Gentlemen against the Australians, at Lord's, the elevetfi was a good one. The wicket had not as yet recovered from the heavy rainfalls, and the game was, in consequence, all in favour of the bowlers. In the two days 267 runs were totalled for thirty-six wickets, giving an aver­ age of only seven runs for each batsman. Surrey won the tOss, but no one except Abel made any stand, and his score of twenty-three was the highest on the first day. Oxford, with only sixty to win, lost two of their best wickets for six, and there seemed then every chance of a close finish. The plucky play of Messrs. Page and Key, however, improved the position of the University, and their stand, which pro­ duced 47 runs, decided the result. Mr. Key continued to play excellent cricket, and he was in at the finish, Oxford winning with four wickets to spare. The victory of the Univer­ sity was due to the capital batting of Mr. Key and the effective bowling of Messrs. Cochrane, Page and Whitby. In Mr. Key’s 36 not out was one hit out of the ground for six. Messrs. Cochrane andWhitby each took seven wickets for Oxford, the former for 45 and the latter for 37 runs. Mr. Whitby’s six wickets in Surrey’s second innings cost only 21. Lohmann’s bowl­ ing was the most noteworthy feature on the Surrey side. His nine wickets were obtained at an average of under six runs. S u r r e y . First Innings. Mr. M. P. Bowden, c and b Page ...............................13 Abel, c Hildyard, b C ochrane........................23 M. Read, b Cochrane ... 0 Mr. J. Shuter, b Page ... 2 Diver, st Cobb, b Page ... 17 Henderson, b Page .......... 5 Lohmann, c Brain, b Page 4 Wood, b Cochrane .......... 3 Jones, c Buckland, b Page 0 Beaumont, not out .......... 1 Bowley, b Cochrane.......... 0 B ............................... 2 Second Innings, c and b Whitby 3 , 11 . 3 . 1 . 9 . 0 2 Total , 70 b Whitby .., b Cochrane b Page................. b Cochrane b W h itby.......... 1b w, b Whitby c Page, b Coch­ rane ................. c Page, b Whitby 23 not out .......... 5 c and b Whitby 1 B 2,1 b 3 ... 5 Total ... 63 0 O xf o r d U n iv e r s it y . First Innings. Second Innings. Mr. J. H. Brain, c and b Beaumont........................18 c & b Lohmann 2 Mr. R. G. Glennie, b Beau­ mont ............................... 2 Mr. W. Rashleigh, c Bowley, b Lohmann ... 1 Mr. A. K. Watson, c Henderson, b Lohmann 1 Mr. K. J. Key, lb w , b Bowley ........................10 Mr. H. V. Page, c Abel, b Bowley ........................17 Mr. L. D. Hildyard, not out ...............................14 mann Mr. A. R. Cobb, b Jones ... 1 Mr. E. H. Buckland, b Bowley ......... ... .»* 4 notout Mr. A. tf. J. Cochrane, b L ohm ann........................ 0 Mr. H. O. Whitby, c and b L ohm ann........................ 2 B 2,1 b 2 ................. 4 B b Lohmann ... 0 c Wood, b Bowley 0 b Lohmann ... 0 not out ..........36 c & b Lohmann 13 c Read, b Loh- Total ... 74 * Total BOWLING ANALYSIS. S u rrey . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W, Cochrane... 28.2 20 17 4 ............ 24 12 28 Whitby ... 12 5 23 0 ............ 28.1 18 21 P a g e .......... 23 11 28 6 ............ 5 4 9 1 O xford U n iversity . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R .W Lohmann... 30 18 25 4 ............ 25.3 17 26 5 Beaumont 28 17 22 2 ........... 12 8 8 0 Bowley ... 12 8 11 3 ........... 17 11 12 1 Jones.......... 11 5 12 1 ........... 3 1 11 0