Cricket 1886

CRJCKEJ!: A WEEKLY EECOfiD OE THE GAME. MAT 27,1886. mself to ciroumstancea a8 well as m oat baits- men. Apart from his excellence as a batsman, is bowling capabilities are of a high class, and s my conviction that he would distinguish itaselfin more than one match in the old coun­ try in this department of the game.” Mr. Trumble, I may add, bowls slow round-arm, with ahigh delivery. He is a lawyer by profes. sion, and intends, we believe, immediately on his return to Australia, to commence practice. Our portrait is from a photograph by the London Stereoscopio Co. Cricket at (Kanrfrnftg*. THE UNIVERSITY v. M e . C. I. THORN* TON’S XI. The Cambridge University Club opened its season auspiciously with a victory on Saturday last over a fairly strong combination captained by Mr. C. I. Thornton. This success was the more creditable as the earlier stages of the game were altogether against the University Eleven. Though they aid well to get rid of their opponents for 164, when they went in Crossland and Chatterton, helped by the ground, bowled so effectively that five of the eleven failed to Boore. Messrs. Kemp, Mar- ohant, and Moline were responsible for 64 of 81 made from the bat, a»d the two last named g ut on 40 runs for the last wicket. Though aey just failed to avert a follow-on, when they went in again the Cambridge eleven made ample amends for their previous failure, Messrs. Bainbridge and Turner put on 68 runs for the first wioket, and another addition of 74 was made on the former’s retirement by Messrs. Turner and Kemp. Mr. Crawley, the old Harrovian, hit freely auring hie stay with Mr. Turner, and the score was 254 when he was bowled by Crossland. Mr. Turner, who had from the first played fine cricket, was out the fifth wicket witn tne total at 811, of which he had contributed 174. He was at the wiclsets four hours, and with the exception of one hard chance, there was no fault of any kind in his innings. His chief hits were twenty fours, seven threes, and twenty-one twos. The re­ maining batsmen were disposed of for an addition of 81 runs, and the innings closed for 842—a very creditable performance. Mr. Thornton’s Eleven, with 268 to win, began well, the captain by vigorous hitting sub­ scribing 46 of the first 61, Mr. Burls played steadily, but with the exception of some good hittingbyMr.Vernon therewaslittle elseworthy of note, and Mr. Studd being unable to bat owing to an injured knee,Mr. Thornton’sEleven were at the finish in a piiuority of 108 runs. Much of the credit of the University victory was duo to Mr. Rock. His boiling was in fact one of the most noticeable, features of the match, In the two innings of Mr. Thornton’s XI. he bowled 35 overs for 87 ruH3 and 11 wickets— exceptionally good figures. ENGLAND. First Innings. Second Innings. C. I. Thornton, c Kemp, b Rock ...............................13 e Hutson, b Turner ..........46 E. J.C. Studd,c Marchanfc, b Turner ...................' ... 30 absent, hurt ... 0 Ulyett, c Marebant, b Rock ...............................31 b Turner ............ J. G. Walker, c Slocock, b Rock ...............................31 bR ock ............. Chatterton, lbw, b Rock... 5 c Moline,b Rock G F. Vernon, c Moline, b Turner ........................12 First Innings. Second Innings. J. A. Turner, st M. C. Kemp, b Chatterton ... 5 c Vernon,b Para- vicini ..........174 H. E. Crawley, b Chatrter- ton ............................... 0 b Crossland ... 54 G. Kemp, b Crossland ... 19 run out .......... 24 H. W.Bainbridge, cUlyett, b Crossland ................. 9 c Crossland, b Chatterton ... 28 C. D.Buxton.c M. C.Kemp, b Chatterton ................. 0 b Paravicini ... 9 H. T. Hutson, b Crossland 0 b Paravicini ... 20 F. Marchant, not out 29 b Crossland 10 C. W. Rock, b Crossland 0 c Walker, b Para­ vicini .......... 0 S. F. Slocock, run out ... 0 b Crossland 4 G. T. Mirehouse, c Thorn­ ton, b Chatterton.......... 3 run out .......... 0 C. H. Moline, c Crossland, b Ulyett ........................ 16 not out ......... 0 B 2, lb 1 ........................ 8 B10, lb 9 .. 19 C a m bridge . Total . 84 Total ...342 BOWLING ANALYSIS. E ngland . First Innlhgs. Rock ... Mirehouse . Turner ... Buxton... Moline ... O, . 43 , 13.2 . 20 . 7 . 16 M. R. W. 21 40 6 2 28 1 9 33 9 2 12 0 Second Innings. O. M. R.W. ... 42 20 41 5 7 . 15 . 12.1 6 First Innings. O. M. Crossland... 29 Chatterton. 27 Ulyett ... 3 Hutson 2 Turner bowled one wide. C am bridge . Second Innings. 12 R. W. 62 4 .......... 22 4 .......... 7 1 .......... Paravicini Pigg........ O. M. R. W. 77.1 25 103 3 52 19 102 1 9 73 0 10 0 SURREY v. YORKSHIRE. The Surrey eleven followed up their success of last week over the Australians with an equally good performance against Yorkshire whom they defeated yesterday at the Ova after another hard fight with 27 runs to spare. Though continuous rain prevented a com­ mencement on Monday the ground had re­ covered wonderfully by the following morning, and'thewicket, consideringthe heavy downpour, was indeed faster than could havo been ex- peoted, though it naturally helped the bowlers considerably. The game was, indeed, alto­ gether in their favour, and in all only 295 runs were scored for forty wickets, an average of under eight runs. Mr. Read, Mr. Roller, and Maurice Read were the only batsmen to make any^ stand for Surrey, and as will be seen their scores were very level. On the other side Hall’s second score oi 23 was the highest in the two innings, and it was certainly a good performance of the Surrey team to get rid of such a side as Yorkshire for totals of 71 and 63. The bowlers, as already stated, were seen to the greatest advantage. Emmett was the most successful on the Yorkshire side. In the two innings he took eight wickets for 49 runs. The best figures of the mateh though, were those of Beaumont, a Yorkshireman by birth, for Surrey. His eight wickets only cost 35 runs. Surrey won by 27 runs. It will be seen there were 18 byes in Surreys’ second score of 105. Surrey’s last victory over York­ shire was in 1877. S urrey . First Innings. Abel, c Hall, b Emm ett. Mr. J. Shuter, b Peate . COMMERCIAL UNION ASSURANCE v. WAVERLEY. Played at Loughborough on May 22. C om m ercial U nion A ssurance . G. H. Harnett, not o u t ........................75 A- C. Owens, e sub, b Celthrop ......... 4 F. P. Mountain, b Gallop ................. 0 A. Hodgson, e and b Colthrop.................21 H. Wild, b Colthrop 0 T. A. Cox, b Colthrop 1 A. F. Bailey, b Gallop E. I. Boor, b Gallop P. A. Tidd, b Gallop T. O. Borington, b Curtis .............. . E. A. Stark, eGallop, b C u rtis................. B 8, lb 4, w 1 ... Total ...114 W a verley . W. H. Tulk, b Moun­ tain ........................ W. Curtis, b Moun­ tain ........................ G. Sutton, b Moun­ tain ........................ E.Gallop,b Mountain A.Emmett,bHodgson B. Colthrop, not out 0 A. G. Fisher, not out 0 F. Teel, c Tidd, b Hodgson.................14 Total 17 F. Edmonds, R. Archer, and A. G. Emmett did not bat. BURLINGTON WANDERERS v. EAST MOLESEY. Played at MoleG^r.on May 22. B urlington W anderers . 15 c Bainbridge, Buxton ... . bR ock ... . b Rock ... . M, C. Kemp, c Sloaock, b Turner............................... 4 C. Pigg, c Turner, b Rock 3 C.W.Burls,c Rock, b Mire­ house ............................... 4 b Moline P, J. de Paravictai, c and b Rock ..................... 15 Crossland, notout ......... 0 B7, lb 2, w l... Total .. 10 ..164 not out c Crawley, Rock £ 13, lb 1 37 „. 25 ... 2 b ... 0 ... 14 Total ...154 E. B. Warren, c Town- end, b Bradford ... R. D. Green, b Cooper E. C. Lindup, b Brad­ ford ........................ F. W. Freeman, b Bradford ... .......... E. Williamson, . c Townend, b Duthie A. Carter, b Duthie... D, M. Bowie, e Cook, b Duthie.................18 F. W. Godrich, b Duthio .............. 0 G. Elers, b Cook ... A. E. Green, not out 14 W. J. Jeffries, rim out 4 Extras .......... 3 Total ...104 Second Innings. b Emmett.......... ■ st Hunter, b Peate b Ulyett ... , 13 0 Diver.c Hunter.b Emmett Mr. W. W .Read, 1b w, b B a te s...............................18 b Ulyett .............17 Bead, c Grimshaw, b Emmett ........................22 b Bates .............15 Mr. W. E. Roller, c Grim- shaw, b B ates................. 6b Peate .............30 Lohmann, c Ulyett, b Emmett ........................ 2 Wood, c HaH, b Emmett 0 Jones, b Emmett Bowley, b Bates... . Beaumont, not out W ................. Total 0 0 1 , 56 c and b Ulyett c Grimshaw, b Ulyett .......... c Hnnter, b Em­ mett................. lbw, b Peate ... not out .......... B 18, w 4 ... Total ...105 Y orkshire . First Innings. Ulyett, b Jones .......... ... 18 Hall,st Wood, b Lohmann 4 Bates, b Roller .................10 Lee, b Beaumont ..........10 Grimshaw, c Lohmann, b Beaumont................. ... 5 Peel, c Diver, b Beaumont 7 Preston, b Beaumont ... 2 Emmett, b Beaumont ... 6 Hunter, c Shuter.bBowley 1 Peate, not out ................. l Harrison, b B ow ley.......... 0 B ............................... 7 Second Innings. b Beaumont ... 0 run out ..........23 c W. W . Read, b Beaumont ... 5 b Bowley ..........10 b Bowley .......... b Beaumont ... b Lohmann c Wood, b Jones b Lohmann ... b Jones ... ... not out .......... B 3, lb 1 ... Total 71 Total 0 1 13 4 3 0 . 0 4 63 Emmett Peato ... Ulyett... Bates ... BOWLING ANALYSIS. S u rrey . First Innings, O. M. B. 30.315 28 13 6 18 5 2 6 12 9 3 W. 6 1 0 Sccond Innings. O. M. R. W. 17 10.310 13 3 E ast M© l e se y . Andrew, st Warren, b Williamson .......... Cook, b Williamson... Chesterton, not out... Macdona, o A. E. Green, b Freoman... Cooper, b Williamson Pritchard, c and b Freem an.............. ... Townend, c Bowie, b W illiam son.......... Hume, st Warren, b W illiam son......... Duthio, st Warren, b Williamson Extras .......... Total Bradford did not bat. ..........27 19 Peel ... 12 10 Harrison 8 4 Emmett bowled five wides. Y orkshire . First Innings. Second Innings. Lohmann . Jones ... . Beaumont. Roller... . Bowley , O. , 16 , 17 . 18 12 4.2 2 R. W. 22 1 18 1 12 5 10 1 2 3 O. M. R. W. , 14.1 11 2§ 5 23 23 10