Cricket 1885

oct . 29.1885. CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 437 HAMPSTEAD CLUB. Matches played 42, lost 16, won 13,drawn 13 BATTING AVE RAGES. Times Most Inns, nit out. Runs, in inm. Aver. A. E. Stoddart.. 19 .. 3 .. 1097 .. 185 .. 63.9 E. Swift.. .. 24 .. 1 .. 657 .. 118 .. 29 F. H. Walker .. 17 .. 4 .. 832 .. 54 .. 25.7 J G. Q. Bench .. 2L .. 4 .. 420 .. 83 .. 24.12 A. R. Parker .. 27 .. 1 .. 551 .. 83 .. 21.5 P. Dollar .. 12 .. 2 .. 190 .. 59 .. 19 W . B. Mari-hill 12 .. 1 .. 2>6 .. 116 .. 18.8 A. S. John ton.. 14 .. 1 .. 2 1 9 .. 56 ..16.11 R. A. Walker ..2 1 .. 2 .. 2 y| .. 84 .. 15.9 R. Furber .. 1 5 .. 1 .. 230 .. 59 .. 15.5 T. Spink.. .. 23 .. 3 .. 274 .. 57 .. 13.14 H. Smith-Turber- ville .. ..1 8 .. 1 .. 2 0 1 .. 58 ..1 1 1 5 C. H. Bishop .. 12 .. 4 .. 94 .. 23 .. 11.6 L. M. Fischtl .. 10 .. 1 .. 105 .. 34 .. 11.6 W . shackel .. 15 .. 0 .. 171 .. 51 .. 11.6 F. A. K. Doylo .. 23 .. 2 .. 249 .. 45 .. 10.19 H. R Walker .. 15 .. 0 .. 16) .. 34 .. 1010 S Smith.. .. 11 .. 0 .. 119 .. 44 .. 10.9 U nder 11 I nnings . .T. VV, Dinhara .. 6 «T. \V. Cutler .. 5 R. W .D . Hill .. 8 H. Shackel .. 5 G. II. Wood .. 5 E. B. Holmes .. 7 R. 8 . Creatou .. 7 R. Fleming .. 9 E O’Dwyer .. 8 C. C. Horsley .. 8 0. F. Butt .. 9 U .S. Barlow .. 5 G. M. Maryon- Wilson .. 6 C. F. Doll .. 6 W . Burchett .. 8 167 .. 63 .. 33 2 87 .. 71 .. 17 2 87 .. 33 .. 17.2 f 8 .. 25 .. 15.3 76 .. 29 .. 15.1 86 .. 21 .. 142 49 .. 22 .. 12.1 96 .. 29 ..1 2 64 .. 15 .. 9.1 27 .. 7 .. 9 '<4 .. 26 .. 8 2 31 .. 20 .. C.l 0 .. S3 .. 23 .. 5 8 0 .. 2) .. 5 .. 3.2 2 .. 16 .. 6 .. 2.4 The bowling analysis was not kept,the following took wickets—A . R. Parker 90, A. E. Stoddart 51, R, A. Walker39, H. R. Walker 35, A. S. Johnson 3% J.H. Walker 18, C. Butt 17, W . R. Marshall 15, G. H. Wood 14, H. S. Barlow 14, P. Dollar 13, E, O’Dwyer 11, GRANVILLE CLUB (LEE). F irst E leven . Matches played 24, won 8, lost 4, drawn 12. S econd E le v e n . Matches played 21, won 8, lost 4, drawn 9. The First Eleven have scored 3,617 runs for the loss of 224 wickets, showing an average of 10.133 runs per wicket, against their oppo­ nents’ 3,643 for 251 wickets, with an average of 14.129 runs per wicket. The Second Elevon have scored 2,286 runs for tbe loss of 197 wickets, showing an average of 11.119 runs per wicket, against their opponents’ 2,035 for 166 wickets, with an average of 12.33. F . iist E leven . RESULTS OF MA.TCHE3. May 2—at Lee, v. Charlton Park. Won by 12 runs. Charlton Park, 65; Granville, 77. Miy 9—at Lee, v. Clapton. Drawn. Granville, 6 C*; C ap;on, 67. * Four wickets down. M »y 16—at Beckcnham, v. Bee enham. Won by 97 runs, Granville, 133; Beckenham, 86 and lb*. * Two wickets down. May 25-a t Lee, v. Northb. ook. Lost by 26 runs and t Jfo wickets. Granville, 105; Noithbrook, 131*. * Eight wi<ke1« down. May 30 —at Croydon, v. Croydon. Drawn. Granville, 80*; Croydon,132. * Six wickets-down. June 6 -a t Blackheath, v. Morden. Drawn. Granvile, 53*; Morden, 142. * Seven tickets down. June 1 3 -at Hendon, v. Hendon. Drawn. Grsnville, 97: Hendon, 72*. * Nine wickets down. June 20-a t Ealing, v. Ealing. Won bj 246 runs. Granville, 319 ; Enlinpr, 73. June 23 21,‘25 (evenings)—at C<.tford,v.Privale Banks. I ofet bp 5’5 runs. Granville, 70; P.B , 105. Jun*; 27—at Lee. v. Cryt-tal Palace. Lost by 24 runs and three wickets. Granville, 149 ; Crystal Palace, 178*. * Seven wickots down. July 4—at nawpstpad, v. Hampstead. Lo*t by 197 run 4 , Granville, 97 and', 6 * ; Hampstead, 294. * Four wickets do*n. July 11—at Lee, v, Hendon. Won by 8 runs and 3 wickets, Granville, 149*; Hendon, 141. * Seven wickets down. July 15—at Lee, v. Hampstead. Won ly 50 runs. Gjanville, 120 and 103* ; Hampstead, 70. * Three wickets down. July 18—at Willesden, v. Law Club. Drawn. Gran­ ville. 100*; Law Club, 181. * Two wickets down. July 25—at Lee, v. Croydon. Drawn. Granville did not bat; Cro*don 244. Aug, 1—at Clapton, v. Clapton. Drawn. Granville, 70*; Clapton, 18?. * E^ht wickets down. Aug. 3—at Lee, v. Northbrook. Drawn. Granville, 166*; Non broo*, 246. * Nine wickets down. Aug. 8 —at Horsham, v. Horsham. Won by 157 runs. Granville, 255 ; Horsham, P 8 . Aug. 10, 11—at Chicbester, v. Priory Park. Drawn. Granville, 134 and 158* ; Priory Park, 138 and 205. * Eight wickets down. Aug. 12, 13—at Lewes, v, Lewes Priory, Drawn. Granville, 83 and 1S9 ; Lew s Pri ry, 176 and 75*. * 8 ix ■wickets down. Aug. 14,15—at Eastbourne, v. Devonshire Park. Won by 6 wickets. Granville, 2F8 and 57*; Devonshire Park, 123 and 222. *>Five wickets down. Aug. 22—at Addiscombe, v. Addiscombe. Won by 70 runs. Granville, 127 ; Addiscomb-, 57. Aug. 29—at Lee, v. Morden. Drawn. Granville; 291*; Mordeu did not bat. * Nine wickets down. Sept, 5—at Acton, v. Pallingswick. Drawn. Pallings- wicfr, 176; Granville, 29*. * One wicket down. BITTING AVERAGES. Times Most in Inns, not out. Runs. ; n Inn *. Avor G, Beves .. .. 8 .. 2 .. 376 .. 133 .. 62.4 J, Wilson, jun... 26 .. 2 .. 551 .. 59* .. 22.23 A. Sharood .. 16 .. 3 .. 253 .. 52 .. 19.fi R. L, Escombe.. 4 .. 1 .. 69 .. 25 .. 1^,2 W , L.Pierce .. 16 .. 2 .. 2 50 .. 86 * .. 18,8 A. Taylor .. .. 19 .. 2 .. 272 .. 60 .. 16.0 H. S, Dominy .. 19 .. 5 .. 222 .. 37* .. 15.12 H Jerrard.. .. 10 .. 3 .. 100 .. 40* .. 14.2 E .N . Hole .. 4 .. 1 .. ;6 .. 16* .. 12.0 F. E. Lander .. 14 .. 0 .. 166 .. 47 .. 11,12 J. S.Claruson .. 23 .. 3 .. 219 .. 63 .. 10,l9 P. H. Lockhart.. H .. 2 ..1 1 9 .. 2 4 .. 10.9 W. P. May .. ..1 0 .. 0 .. 10 S .. 52 ..1 0 .8 P.P. Webb.. .. 12 .. 1 .. 110 .. 37* .. 100 E, J. Brown .. 4 .. 0 .. 4» .. 24 .. l'i.O E. Furze .. .. 7 .. 3 .. 33 .. 12 .. 9.3 E. A. Ferry .. 13 .. 4 .. 82 .. 48 .. 9.1 B. Noakes.. .. 7 .. 1 .. 41 .. 16 .. 7.4 G. T. Easten .. 6 .. 1 .. 35 .. 16* .. 7 0 S. Brown .. .. 8 .. 2 .. 27 .. 13 .. 4.3 F. Edwards .. 3 .. 0 .. 13 .. 6 .. 4.1 The following played in two innings only H. H. Carey 4, 3, A. Easten 2, 0, T. Jerrard 19*, 9*, F. Tolley 0 , 0 . Tho following played in one innings only:—II. Croucher 3*, A. G. O. Kennedy 21, A. R. Layman 2, C. N udiD g 4, E. M. Rogers2, F. Taylor 1. BOWLING AVERAGES. Balls. Mdns. Runs. Wkts. Aver. G. B eves.. .. 609 .. 41 .. 232 .. 31 .. 7.15 E. A. Ferry .. 1137 .. 83 .. 412 .. 37 .. 11.5 W. P. Mav .. 340 .. 16 .. 161 .. 14 .. J1.7 G. T. Easten .. 3S5 .. 21 .. 176 .. 13 .. 1 .8 H. Jerrard .. 603 .. 72 .. 305 .. 22 ..13.20 A. Sharood .. 1938 .. 160 .. P99 ..4 3 .. 14.81 E .J. Brown .. 164 .. 6 .. Ill .. 6 .. 18.3 S.Brown.. .. 613 .. 32 .. 281 .. 15 .. 18.13 J.Wilson,jun... 133 .. 3 .. 93 .. 2 .. 47.0 The fo lowing bowled in three innings and under:— P. P. Webb 8 , A. Easten 7, B. Noakos 1, H. Croucher 1 wicket, J. S. Clarkson, F. Edwards, R. L. Escombe without success. No analy^s was kept in Northbrook match (Aug. 3), A. Sharood t. king 7, G. Beves 1, E. A. F« rry 1 wicket. S econd E leven . RESULTS OF MATCHES. May 2—at Finsbury, v. H.A.C. Drawn. Granville 85; H.A.C. 42*. * Six wickets down. May 9—at Blackheath, v. Eliot Tlace. Lost by 131 runs and 6 wickets. Granville, 21; Eliot Place, 152*. * Four wickets down. Mav 16—at Lee, v. Forest Hill. Drawn. Granville, ’ * 190; Forest Hill, 23*. * Four wickets down. May 23—at Addiscombe, v. Addiscombe. Lost by 14 runs. Addiscombe, 63; Granville, 49. May 25—at Lee, v. Noithbrook. Won by 27 tuns. Granville, 108; Northbiook, 81. May 30—at Leo, v. Croydon. Won by 2 runs. Gran­ ville, 90; Croydon, 88 . June 6 —at Lee, v. Buckhurst Hill. Won by69rurs and 6 wicktts. Granville,ISO*; buckhurst Hill, 120. * Four wickcts down. June 9,10 (evening*)—at Lee, v. London Joit t Stock Honk. Won by £6 runs. Granville, 99 ; L.J.S.B. 43. Jure 13—at Lee, v. Blackheath Prop. School. Lost by 138 runs and 3 'wicket?. Granville, 70; Blankheath Prop. School, £08*. * Seven wicketa down. June £0—at Lee, v. Lower Clapton. Drawn. Gran­ ville, 216 ; Lower Clapton, 41*. * (One wicket down. June27—at Sidcup, v. Sidcup. Drawn. Granville, 219 ; Sidcup, 50*. * Two wickets down. July 4—at Lre, v. Addiscombe. Drawn. Grenville, 20J; Addiscombe80*. * Six wickets down. July 7, 8 (evening.*)—at L'e, v. London Joint Sto k Bank. Wen fcy61 luns. Granville, 152 ; L.J.S.B. 91. July 11—at Blackheath, v. Eliot Place. Drawn, Gran­ ville 83; Eliot Place, 70*. * Five wicketsdown. July 18—at Blackheath, v. Blackbeath Prop. Schoo1. Won by 33 runs. Granville, 105; Black* heath Prop. School, 72. July 25—at Croydon, v. Croydon. Drawn. Granvillo, 85*; Croydon,‘232. * Nine wickets down. Aug. 1—at Lee, v. Sidcup. Lost by 79 runs. Gran» ville, 62 ; Sidcup, 14J. Aug. 3—at Lee, v. Northbrook. Won by 10 wicket?! Granville, 85 and 80*; Northbrook, 85 and 78. * No wickets down. Aug. 8 —at Lee, v. Post Office. Won by 11 runs. Gianville, 82; Post Office 68 . Aug 29—at Buokburst Hill, v. BuckhurstHill. Drawn, luckliurst Hill, 255; Granville, 9*. * Four wickets down. Sept. 5—at Forest Hill, v. Forest Hill. Drawn. Gran­ ville, 57; Forest Hill, 52*. * Five wickcts down. BATTING AVERAGES. Times Most in Inns, not out. Runs, an Inns. Aver. W. W. Aspur 11 7 .. 0 ..1 4 6 .. 73 .. 20.0 E. N. Hole .. 15 .. 1 .. 222 .. 87 .. 15.12 F. Tollev .. .. 9 .. 3 .. 95 .. 35 .. 15.5 F. Edwards .. 18 .. 1 .. 234 .. 8 i* .. 1313 F. Taylor.. .. 20 .. 0 .. 270 .. 75 .. 13.10 E.J. Brown ..1 4 .. 2 .. l r>7 .. 35* .. 13.1 E. Furze .. .. 13 .. 2 .. 134 .. 41 .. 122 P. T. Webb.. .. 15 .. 0 .. 147 .. 54 .. 9.1 H. Deed .. .. 8 .. 0 .. 78 .. 63 .. 96 A. Lindley.. .. 9 .. 1 .. 75 .. 42 .. 9 3 T. Jerrard .. .. 12 .. 1 .. 84 .. 80 .. 7 7 C.Nuding.. .. 9 .. 1 .. 55 .. 21 .. 6.7 C. M. Moore .. 9 .. 1 .. 53 .. 19 .. 6.5 H, Crouch* r .. 4 .. 0 .. 22 .. 16 .. 5.2 G T. Easten .. 9 .. 0 .. 4-5 .. 12 .. 5.1 W . E. Moxon .. 3 .. 0 .. 12 .. 10 .. 4 (I E.H.W right .. 3 .. 0 .. 12 .. 9 .. 4.0 H. W. Edwards 7 .. 1 .. 22 .. 6 .. 3 4 C. di Mattos .. 3 .. 1 .. 10 .. 8 .. 3.1 A. Eisten .. ..1 2 .. 6 .. 18 .. 6 * . . 8.0 The following played in two innings only: —S. Brown 2, 0, L. R. Glover 12*, S, H. Jtrrard 32,9, H. Martin 0 % 0, W. P. May 9, 5, E. M. Rogers 6 , 0. The following played in ono innings only :—H. n . Carey 17, J. P. Clarkson 4, H. T. Fraser 0, II. Gardini r I, F. E. Lander 64*, W. L. Pierce 2, W. F. Moore 10. * Signifies not out. BOWLING AVERAGES. Balls. Mdns. Runs. W its. Aver. E. J. Brown .. 903 A. Easten.. .. 744 G, T. Easten .. 455 C. M. Moore .. 123 C.Nuding .. 445 W. W. Aspinall 240 F. Taylor .. .. 129 P. P. Webb ..3 3 5 H. W . Edwards 81 40 82 26 2 .. 426 .. 42 .. 10.9 .. 309 .. 30 .. 10.13 .. 188 .. 18 .. 10,10 54 .. 5 .. 10.4 24 ..2 3 9 .. 19 .. 12 15 14 .. 82 .. 6 .. 14 1 5 .. 62 .. 4 .. 15 3 18 .. 168 .. 7 .. 21.1 1 .. 57 .. 2 .. 28.1 T.Jerrard.. .. 100 .. 4 .. 56 .. 0 .. — The fol’owing bowled in three innings and under:— H. Jerrard 6 , W. P. May 8 . E. H. Wright 2. A Lindley I.S.Brvwnl, H. Croucher 1, W .E . Moxon, F. Edwards, E. N. Hole, C, de Mattos without success. S c h u ltz —D l-iu n t. -Oct. 1 G, at St. George’s, Hanover-square, by the Rev. liavenscroft Stewart, vicar of All Saints’, Ennismore- gardens, Sandford Spence Schultz, youngest son of the late George Edward Schultz, of Birkenhead, to Mabel Elizabeth, only daughter of Charles James Durant. Next Issue November 26-