Cricket 1885

j u l y 9 ,1885. CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME.251 BOWLING ANALYSIS. E ssex . First Innings. O. M. R.W. Shacklock .. 25 9 36 3 . Cropper .. 26.313 82 3 . Cochrane .. 16 6 80 3 . Hall . . . . 7 2 12 0 , Chatterton .. 9 2 11 0 . Second Innings. O. M. R.Wi . .. 81 7 64 0 . .. 31 10 61 2 . .. 89 12 65 4 . .. 20 6 88 1 . .. 21.311 20 2 D e r b y s h ir e . First Innings. O. AT. R.W. Bishop .. .. 26 15 48 1 Buxton.. .. 13 5 30 1 Silcock.. .. 24 10 81 5 Pickett.. . . 1 2 7 17 2 Second Innings. O. M. R.W. . :. 45.3 19 71 7 . .. 14 5 21 1 32 13 46 1 28 10 50 1 Bishop bowled one wide. SURREY C. & G. v. NORFOLK. A not very strong eleven of the Surrey Club and Ground beat a moderate team of Norfolk on Tuesday at the Oval by seven wickets. Hansell, a left-handed bat, hit very freely for 134 in Norfolk’s secood innings, but with considerable luck. In his score were eighteen fours. Jones batted and bowled well for the Surrey Club. He scored 107 for once out, and took eleven wickets for 117 runs. S u r r e y C. & G. First Innings. Mr. F. W . Bush, b Rudd...........................10 Mr. S. Colmin, st Wickham, b Beeton 65 Mr. E. B. Warren, c and b Hausell.. .. 2 Mr. C. T. R >llor, b H a n se ll...................10 Chilton, b Hansell .. 0 Mr. W. M. O. Wilson, c Gumey, b Hansell 0 Lockyor, c Wickham, b Hausell........................4 Harrison, c and b Ilanscll ........................ 1 Jones, o Hansell, b Rudd..............................87 Mills, not out .. . . 8 9 Mr. P. M. Walters, b Hansell .. .. .. 4 B 2,11>3 .. .. 5 Total .. ..217 In the Second Innings Bush scored, b Hansell, 13. Colman, b Currie, 47, Warren (uot out) 4'2, Jones (not out) 20, Walters, retired, 7; b 1,1 b 8 , n b 2—Total 185. N o r f o l k . First Innings. Second Innings. Mr.L.K.Jarvis, st Walters, b J o n e s.......................... 1 b J o n e s....................... 8 Major Currie, run out .. 26 c Wilson, b Mills.. 14 Mr. C. J. E. Jarvis, b Mills 0 c Chilton, b Bush.. 50 Hansell, run out .. .. 5 b J on es....................131 Rev.A.P. a ickham.b Jones 0 c Roller, b Jones .. 6 Mr. W . S. Gurney,b Mills 0 b Lockyer .. ..0 7 Mr. F. E. Patteson, c Roller, b Mills Mr. F. Beeton, b Jones E. J. Morris, b Jon:s Jones, not out 6 c C dm in, bJones 3 8 b J o n e s ..................0 0 b J o n e s..................0 6 c Mills, bJones F. Rudd c Jones, b Mills 0 not o u t .................. 0 B l . l b l ..................2 B 12,1 b 6 , n b 1 19 Total 54 Total .. ..291 HAMPSHIRE v. SURREY. Though Messrs. Roller and Horner, as well as Wood, were all absent the Surrey Eleven had a very easy win ia this return match, played at Southampton on Monday and Tuesday. The Hampshire Eleven were also, ia the absence of Mr. E. O. Powell, not the bast tin County could plac; in the field, and in losing this toss they wero placed at a gre it disadvantage, having all the worst of the wicket. The chief features of tin play were tha exoellent bitting at Mr. Bow; den and Abel, and the effective bowling of L ihmaim and Beaumont. Abel made 72 of tho first 132 by thorough good cri ket, with only one chance to mid-off just before he was out. Mr. Bowdtn’s innings, though, was even a better display. He was in for nearly two hours and a half and scored 125 out of 214 without a mistake of any kind. ■This is the first hundred he has made in a Oouuty match, ai-d he is heartily to be cou- gratulated on a fine performance. His figures were one 6 —a big drive out of the ground—twenty 4’e, four 3’s, five 2’s, and seventeen singles. The wicket played badly on the second day,and with the exception of Mr. F. E. Lacey, who made 35 of the first 51 runs scored, no one on the Hampshire side could do anything with the bowling of Lohmann and Beaumont. The s:cond innings only lasted s xty-five minutes, and Surrey were left the winners by an innings and 252 runs, Lohmann’s figures are remarkable. He took altogether twelve wickets for 34 runs. S u r r e y . Abel, c Leat, b Wil- 1 Mr. M.P. Bowden^bw, lough by..................72 . b Heath .'.................12$ Mr. J. 8 huter, c Wil- |Lohmann, c Bencraft, loughby, b Dibie .. 2 1 b Cald r .................22 Mr. K. J. Key,c Heath,j Beaumont, c and b b Willoughby .. .. 0 Calder ................. 8 Mr. W. W. Read, c Bowley,c Leat, b Heath 46 Armstrong, b Wil- | Barratt, not out.. *. 16 lough by..................50 B 2,1 b 4 .. .. 6 M. Read, c Lacey, b — Willoughby .. .. 14 ; Tolal .. ..390 Mr. K. J. Diver, c and ! b Dible .. .. 31 1 H ampshire . First Innings. Seoond Inning). Mr. F. E. Lacey, c Bowden, b Lohmann .. .. ..3 5 c W. W . Read, b Beaumont .. 7 Mr. A. B. Heath, c and b Beaumont.......................... 11 c M. Read, b Lohmann .. 1 Mr. L. G. Bonham-Carter, o Key, b Lohmanu .. ..1 0 c Shuter, b Loh­ mann .. .. 0 Leat, b Bowley ...................13 cAbel,bBeaumont 6 Mr. R. Beucraft, c M. Read, b Lohmann ...................1 notout .. .. 6 Mr. H. Calder, c and b Loh- inann..................................14 b Beaumont .. 8 Smith,o Bowley,b Lohmann 0 c W . W. Read, b Lohmann .. 1 Mr. A. H. Wood.b Lohmaun 1 c Shuter, b Loh­ mann .. .. 0 Mr. H. Armstrong, not out 9 o Diver, b Beau­ mont.................. 2 Dible, b Lohmann .. .. 1 b Beaumont.. .. 0 Willoughby, o Abel, b Loh­ mann .................................. 4 c K*y, b Beau­ mont .. .. 0 B 1 ,1 b 4..........................5 B 1,1 b 2 .. 8 Total .104 Total ..8 4 BOWLING ANALYSIS. S urrey . 0. M. R. W. O. M. It. W- Dible .. 49 28 85 ‘2 jBonham- Willoaghb? 38 11 95 4 Carter 7 0 27 0 Lacey ..'11 8 26 0 Heath .. 11.1 2 28 2 Armbtrong 27 8 7d 0 ' Calder .. 14 2 47 2 H a m p s h ir e . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W Beaum >nt . . 1 2 3 82 1 . . . . 16.2 9 15 6 Barratt .. 8 8 12 0 Bowley .. 22 10 87 1 Lohmann ..18.213 18 8 .. .. 17 10 16 4 E A R L Y E TO N AND H A R R O W . If implicit reliance is to be placed on tho evidence handed down to us, Eton aud Harrow matches, in some form or other, date back at least to the commencement of tbe present century. There are some, indeed, who venture to affirm that they might bo traced to even an earlier period. Tradition tells of Harrow elevens more thin a century ago, and there is evidence of some kind to show that Richardson, afterwards Mr. Justice Richardson, was captain of the eleven at Harrow in 1782. As every Harro­ vian knows. though, the tirst score extant is that of the memorable match on August 2, 1805, played on old Lord’s ground, where Dorset-square now stand*. It was a memor­ able game, if only for the mere fact that Lord Byron played in the Harrow eleven. In all probability it was not a real fixture between the Schools under proper conditions, but rather a pick-up between Lord Byron on one side and Kaye, the Etonian, ou the other. Byron himself, indied, was never actually in the Harrow eleven. The evi* dence in support of the theory that tne game was not a legitimate meeting between the Schools is strengthened by the fact that Stanley, one of the Harrovians, was only thirteen years of age. It is unfortunate that in tracing the earlier records of this match, recourse can only be had to tradition. In all probability, there were contests of some kind betweea the two schools prior to 1818, when the first recorded match is said to have taken place. Tne evidence, though, respect­ ing these contests during the-interval of thirteen years, from 1805 to 1818, is very conflicting. The Duke of Dorset stated that he had played in one, and another old Harrovian, Lord Rowcliflfe,affirined distinctly that other matches had taken place. Lord Palmerston, too, in speaking of the fixture of 1805, added “ But we beat them after­ wards.” On the other hand., old Harrovians who ought to have known, among them the late Mr. Charles Lloyd, have- skid that they had no recollection of such matches. It is possible that there were contests of some kind, but in all. likelihood they were pick-up matches, and probably not confined to those at the School at the time. Unfortunately, the fire which razed the pavilion on the second night of the Harrow and Winchester match at Lord’s in 1825, destroyed all the scores belonging to the Marylebone Club, and those now in existence are mere transcripts Still, though the score of 1805 is not included in the School matches, it is none the less the first extant of a contest between Etonians and Harrovians. It has, too, more than one feature of interest. Lord Ipswich, who made 10 and 21 for Harrow, was according to Lord Frederick Beauclerk, the best man on either side, and he turned out to be a good player afterwards. Byron, makes mention of the match in his “ Letters,” though he does not seem to have been a good cricketer. On the contrary Mr. Lloyd, who was Captain of Harrow that year, made the remark to Dean Merivale, who has repeated it in his “ Recollections,” that “ Byron played in the eleven, and very badly, too. He should never,” he added, “ have been in the eleven had my counsel beon taken.” The victorious Etonians, it is said, after the match addressed the following epigram to their vanquished opponents :— Adventurous boyt of Harrow School, Of Cricket you’ve no knowledge; You play not cricket, but the fool, With men of Eton College. Lord Byron, on behalf of Harrow School, sent the following reply Ye Eton wags, to play the fool I< not the boast of Harrow School j What wonder then at our defeat, Folly like yours could ne’er be beat. The score of the match was as’ under Played at Lord’s on August 2, 1805. H a r r o w . First luning*. Second Innings. Lord Ipswich, b Carter 10 b Heaton.. .. ..2 1 T. Farrer, b Cirter .. .. 7 c Bradley....................s T. Dufy, b Carter .. .. 0 nt Heaton .. .. 6 Bolton, run out .. .. 2 b Heaton..................... ii C. Lloyd, b Cartit .. 0 b Carter .. .. .. 0 A. Shakespeare, st Heatou 8 run o u t ....................5 Lord Byroti, c Barnard .. 7 b Carter....................n Hon. T. E. bkina, b Carter 4 b Heaton................... 8 W . Brockman, b Heaton .. 9 b Heatou....................1) K. Stanley, n t out .. .. 3 c Canning .. .. 1 E. Ashetou, b Carter .. .. 3 n o to u t.....................0 B .................................. 2 B .. .. 3 Total Total 65 .. .. 55 Eton. Heaton, b Lloyd .. .. 0 Barnard,b Shakespearo 0 Sliogsby,bShakespeare 29 Barnard, not out .. 3 Carter, b Shakospeare 8 1 Kaye, b Byron .. .. 7 Fairhil], c L'oyd.. .. 6 Dover, c Bolton .. .. 4 Canning, c Farrer ..1 2 — Campliu, b Ipswich .. 42 Total .. ..112 Bradley,b Lloyd.. ..1 6 Eton winning in one innings and two runs