Cricket 1885

MAY28,1885, CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OP THE GAME. 149 OXFORD UNIVERSITY v. LANCASHIRE. Though only moderately represented, Lancashire was able to claim a majority of 50 runs at the finish of this match—twelve- a-side—played at Oxford on Thursday last and two following days. Rain interfered with the progress of the game materially, and the wicket was against the batsmen. Under such conditions the superior bowling of the County enabled it to have a slight advantage throughout. Barlow, Watson, and Nash were all very difficult, and, indeed, none of the University batsmen, except Messrs. Brain, Page, and Buckland, made a long stay in either innings. The best bowl- iog for Oxford was done by Messrs. Bastard and Cochrane. The former proved very effective in both innings. In the match, altogether he was credited with ten wickets at a cost of 108 runs, L ancashire . First Innings. Mr. A. N.Hornby,c Brain, b C och ra n e..................25 Barlow, c Hildyard, b Bas­ tard ..................................13 Mr. O. P. Lancashire, b Bastu rd ..........................12 A. Price, b Bastard.. .. 0 Robinson, lbw, bBastard 17 Briggs, o Cochrane, b Page 17 Mr. J. E. Kershaw, b Bas­ tard ..................................o Watson, c Page. bCochrane 15 Mr. 8 . M. Crossfield, c Page, b Cochrane .. .. 12 Pilling, b Whitby .. . . 3 Crossland, b Cochrane .. 0 Nash, not o u t ...............0 B 7,1 b 2 ..................9 Second Innings, b Cochrane .. 4 b Bastard..................42 b Bastard.. b Buckland c Nicholls, b Bastard c Hildyard,bPage.. 12 c and b Page .. c Key, b Cochrane.. 27 b Page ................... cC^chrane.b Bastard 6 c D Aeth, b Bastard 27 not out ..................0 B 1, w 1 .. .. Total., .124 Total ..119 O xford U niversity . First Innings. Mr.L. D. Hildyard, b Barlow 5 Mr. J. H. Brain, b Barlow.. 36 Mr. R. H. Pemberton, st Pilling, b Nash.......................2 Mr. H. V Page, b Nash .. 0 Mr. K.J. Key. c Price, b Nash 1 Mr.E.K.H. D*Aeth, b Barlow 0 Mr.E. U. Buckland, b Barlow 2 Mr. A. H. J. Cochrane, c Kershaw, b Nash .. .. 15 Mr. A. E. Newton, run out.. 19 Mr. B. E. Nicholls, bN ash.. 9 Mr. H. O. Whitby, not out 11 Mr. E. W . Bastard, b Barlow 8 B 5, 1b 6, w 1 .. ... 12 Second Inning*, b Barlow .. c and b Barlow ., cPilling, b Barlow 0 b Crossland.. .. 47 c Watson, b Nash 1 c Pilling, b Na«h.. 1 c Kershaw, b Wat­ son ..................31 b Watson .. b Watson .. .. not out.................. b Watson .. .. 1b w, b W atson.. L b .. .. Total .115 Total.. ..103 BOWLING ANALYSIS. L ancashire . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R.W . O. M. R.W, Bastard . . 86 14 46 5 . .. 40.2 14 C2 5 Bnckland . 4 1 16 0 . .. 7 a 19 1 Cochrane . 26 14 85 4 . .. 16 6 27 2 Page .. . 1 2 6 15 1 . .. 24 10 81 8 Whitby . . 6 4 8 1 . . .. 7 4 8 0 Cochrane bowled a wide. U niversity . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R.W . O. M. R.W. Barlow.. ,. 46 22 45 5 .. 2(5 12 43 3 Nash .. .. 45 25 58 5 .. .. 31 16 39 2 Watson . 11.8 5 15 5 Crossland 6 1 9 1 LORD SHEFFIELD’S ELEVEN v SHAW ’S AUSTRALIAN TEAM. The rain which prevailed everywhere at the close of last week rained this impor­ tant match played at Sheffield Park on Thursdaylast andtwo following days. This ill- luck is the more to be regretted as it is the only occasion on which Shaw’s Eleven are likely—though there is some talk of a fixture in the North—to appear this summer. Con­ sidering the number of important fixtures on the same days, Lord Sheffield had collected a strong eleven, and with fine weather the game would have been very interesting. As it was some good cricket was shown on both sides despite the wet wicket, and the match was finally left in a very even condition. Maurice Read and Briggs were representing their respective counties, and as a con­ sequence Alfred Shaw and Lillywhite had to play to compkte the Australian eleven. Frank Hearne showed fine cricket for Lord Sheffield’s team on the opening day. Going in first he made 62 out of 108 while he was in—a capital performance against such good bowling. For Shaw’s team Ulyett hit with even more than his wonted vigour. Shrews­ bury played, on the other hand, with more care than usual, and he was altogether three hours and twenty minutes at the wicket for his 28. The best batting in the innings, though, was that of Flowers. His 40 (not out) was a steady and sound display of cricket. Just at the finish some capital batting was shown by Messrs. Grace and Newham, who were not out when the stumps were finally drawn. L ord S heffield ’ s E leven . First Innings. Mr. W. G. Grace, Shrewsbury, b Barnes F. Hearne, c II inter, b Shaw ..........................( Painter, c Seotton, b Barne* . . . . Mr. W. Newham, Shrewsbury, b Atte­ well .......................... G. G. Hearne, c Hunter, b Peel............................. ] Hall, c Shrewsbury, b P e e l ........................ Iu the Second Innings, Mr. W. G, Grace scored (not out) 89, Mr. W , Newham (not out) 17, F. Hearne, b Bates, 5, Painter, c Attewell, b Bates, 1; l b 2— Total, 64. S haw ’ s A ustralian T eam , J. Hide, c Bates, b 5 Ulye t .. .. .. 40 Emmett, c Peel, b 62 Barues .. .. .. 10 Grim-haw, run out .. 10 18 H. Phillips, not out . . 1 Peate, c Barnes, Uljett .. .. b . . o 5 B 6,1 b 2 .. .. 8 19 6 Total .. ..181 Shrewsbury, b Hide .. 28 Scotton, c Grimbha t, b Peate ..................0 Ulyett, c Hide, b G, H earne..................51 Barnes, b G. Hearne 0 Bates, c Hall, b Grace 82 Flowers, not out.. •. 4) Attewell, b Peate .. 28 Peel, b Hide .. ..1 6 Hunter, 1b w, b Hide 0 Shaw, b Grace .. .. 1 Lilly white, b Hide .. 5 B 1,1 b 2, w 1 .. 4 Total ..200 CITY RAMBLERS v. BUCKHURST HILL, Played at Buckhurst Hill on May 23. B ockbokst H ill . W. Charlesworth, b R oth w ell..................10 H. Palmer, b Dempsey 11 H. Kennet, c Priestley, b Dempsey .. .. 0 H. B. Tidswell, c Kistruck, b Dempsey 0 C. Stephen, run out .. 2 R. L. Allport, b Scott 20 R. W. Muir, b Dempsey 7 H. Hants, e Hassall, b Bell ..........................83 W. R. Bowman, 1b w, b Dempsey .. .. 9 W . Sworder, b Scott 6 M. W.Wallace, notout 16 W. J. Lloyd, b Bell .. I B 5,1 b 1, w 8, n-b 1 10 Total .. ..175 C ity R amblers . E. J. Pritchard,not out 5 H.W.Priestley.b Hants 18 W. Cryer,h w,b Wallace 26 F. E .Rothwell,b Kennet 2 Total J. Kistruck, not out .. 7 J. Dempsey, W. R. Hassall, J. Bell, H. T. Sturgeon W. Scott, T. Cocks, and G. Harlow did not bat. 58 CITY RAMBLERS v. RAVENSBOURNE. Played at Lee on May 25. CITY R amblers . W. Jarrow, b Wigley 0 W. R. Hassall,b Wigley 5 W. Hcott, b Wigley .. 10 W . Cryer, run out .. 8 T. Cocks, b Pritchard.. 8 J. Dempsey, c Kistiuck, b W ig ley..................1 H. J. Sturgeon, run out 16 A. Duke, not ou t.. .. 20 W . Bee, b Wigley T. Sutton, b Pritchard G. Harlow, b Pritchard 13 4,1 b 2 .. .. Total () 1 0 6 76 RAVENSBOURNE, J.S.Kistruck.bDempsey 6 A. J. Prior, b Scott .. 11 F. Ellingham, b Scott 0 E. J. Pritchard, b Scott 1 A. T. Pearce, not ou t.. 16 H. A. Gore, b Dempsey 4 G. Wigley, b Scott .. 0 W. J. Cowley, b Scott H. Guille, b Dempsey R. James, b Scott B Henish, b Dempsey B 2, w 1 .. .. Total 2 8 0 1 8 , 47 INSURANCE v, PRIVATE BANKS. Played at Catford Bridge on May 18, 19. 20. I nsurance . R. W .Sh up, b Thriug 70 W. G. Newcomh,bWall 6 F. B. Becker,b Th'ing C. A. Marshall, c W..1I, b M ilU .........................9 P. C. G i’di gh'tm, c Thiing, b T y dall .. 9 R. B. Watts, b Wall .. 21 W. T. Petrie, b Johr- P to u ..........................54 H.S.Moore, b Johnston 14 F. O. S. Iteade, not ont 15 J. F. Smith, c Preedy, b Johnston .. ..2 2 J. Cockell, c Tyndall, b T h rin g..................1 B 7,1 b 6, w 8 ..1 6 Total ..237 P rivate B anks . BOWLING ANALYSIS. L ord S heffield ’ s E leven . First Innings. O. M. R. W. P eel.................. 84 20 T he N ew I n door G ame — C r cket . —Just out. Post free Is. l£d. The game is easily learned, and a match can be played with every detail the same as on the cricket-field. One can play it, though two gives greater interest. An excellent amusement for winter evenings and wet days. Testimonials from Lord Harris, Mr. A. G . Steel, and many other eminent cricketers have been received. Wright & Co., 41, St. Andrew's Hill, E.C. Attewell Barnes Shaw Ulyett P.:ate .. Grace .. Emmett 83 80 2 . 60 1 18 65 3 Second Innings. O. M. R.W- . .. 28 17 22 0 27 19 22 1 Bates 20 8 26 2 12 6 9 2 Flowers 8 2 14 0 S haw ’ s E leven , O. M. R. W. . 55 80 58 2 | G. Hearne . . 56 38 52 2 Hide .. . . 19 18 17 0 I Emmett bowled a wide. O. M. R.W. 57 34 50 2 20.8 11 19 4 F ob St Thomas’s Hospital v. Charing Cross Hospital, at Hammersmith, on May 22, J. P. A. Geoghegan took 5 wickets for 5 runs, in 6 3 overs (two maidens). W. B. Tyndall, run out 22 R. S. Wills, not out .. 8 S. Worthington, b Cockell .................. 2 R. D. Eicke, b Cockell 0 R. E. Mills, b Cockell 5 C.H.M.Tbring,bBecker in C. H. Wall, b Golding. ham .................. 49 E. E, White did not bat. W. Birkett, c Becker, b Cockell..................10 Johnston, not out .. 7 W. Pieedv, not out .. 8 B l,lb l.w 8 ,n b 2 7 Total .118 RICHMOND v. WIMBLEDON. Piayed at Richmond on May 25. W.D.T. Rogers,run out 2 J. Sheppard, b Bowden Sm ith..........................1 W. E. Martyn, run out 12 W. Muir, b Stone.. .. 22 B A. Reeves, 1 b w, b Yerburgh..................1 H.T. Pears, b Yerburgh 1 W imbledon . E. W. Reeves, b Stone 3 C. J. Inglis, b Yer­ burgh .................. 18 R. M. Pearce, not out ii H.W.Ricketta, run out 0 B. H. Cooper, b Stone 2 B 1,1b 4, w 3 .. 8 Tvtal 72 C ricket R e po r t S h eets for sending matches to this paper can be had at the office, 41, St. Andrew’s Hill, Doctor’s Commons. Price Id. each, or 9d. dozen postage extra.