Cricket 1884

224 CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME, ju n e 19, i884. HAMPSHIRE v. KENT. A fter som e u n u su a lly h igh sco rin g the H am p sh ire eleven d e fe a te d .K e n t at S o u th ­ am p ton yesterd ay w ith th ie e w ickets to spare. T h e featu re o f a ru n -g e ttin g m a tch w as th e b rillian t battin g o f M r. F . E ; L a cey, and it w as en tirely to h im th a t the su ccess of H a m p sh ire w as due. In all 1,122 ru n s w ere scored fo r 37 w ick ets, an arerage o f over 30 for ea ch batsm an . L o r d H arris w as unable to p la y fo r K e n t ow in g to an in ju re d hand.' H ampshire . First Innings. Second Innings. Mr. L. Bonham-Carter, c W ootton, b Bligh .. .. 59 b G. Heame .. 8 Leat, c Bligh, b Wootton .. 4 c H. Hearne, b W ootton.. .. 5 Mr. G. H. Longman, c Pen­ tecost, b Collins .. .. 6 b G. Hearne .. 17 Mr. F. E. Laoey, b G. Hearne ..........................211 not out.. .. . . 9 2 Major Wallace, c Atkins, b G. H earne.........................24 c F., b H. Hearne 2 Mr. H. Armstrong, b W ootton .. .. . . . 11 b G. Hearne .. 5 Young, c G. Hearne, b W o o t t o n .................. .. 2 c Pentecost, b H. Hearne .. .. 12 Mr. A. B. Ridley, 1b w, b Collins..............................41 bH . Hearne .. 1 Mr. C. E. Currie, b G. Hearne ..........................17 not ou t.....................9 Dible, not out ..................30 Major Fellowes, b Bligh .. 2 .i.B5,--l-b8.. .. . . . . 8 B ..2 m ■ — — T o t a l.................. 414 Total ,.148 K ent . First Innings. Second Innings. Rev. R. T. Thornton,b Dible 1 c and b Dible .. 57 E. Hearne, e Ridley, b Armstrong..........................81 c Young, b Ridley 0 G. G. Hearne, c Leat, b Armstrong..........................42 b Armstrong .. 88 Mr. L. Bligb, c Dible, b Young.. .. . . ... .. 0 b Dible...................8 Mr. L. Wilson, c Leat, b Armstrong..........................36 c Leat, b Dible .. 0 Mr. F. A. Mackinnon, c Currie, b D ible..................47 st Leat, b Currie. .115 W ootton, 1b w, bArmstrong 5 b Young .. .. 37 Mr. F. Atkins, b Young .. 1 c Fellowes, b Currie .. .. 5 Collins, run o u t ..................41 c Leat, b Young.. 2 H. Hearne, 1b w, b Fellowes 1 not out..................10 Pentecost, not out .. .. 6 c Armstrong, b Ridley .. .. 88 B ..................................5 B 81, lb7,n bl 39 Total ..................216 Total ..844 BOWLING ANALYSIS. H ants . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R.W . O. M. R.W . Wootton.. 57 17 99 3 .. .. 27.312 59 1 H. Heame .. 31 10 92 0 . . . . 19 7 41 8 Collins . . . . 14 4 82 2 .. .. 2 2 0 0 G. Hearne .. 28 5 44 3 . . . . 87 17 46 3 F. Hearne .. 70 21 59 0 Bligh . . . . 15 3 44 2 W ilso n .. .. 8 1 86 0 K ent . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R.W . O. M. R.W. Young .. .. 58 21 93 2 .. .. 46 18 94 2 Dible . . . . 36 18 48 2 . . . . 28 10 86 3 Currie .. .. 10 0 36 0 .. .. 46 23 50 2 Armstrong .. 18 9 19 4 . . . . 19 4 49 1 Fellowes .. 15 10 15 1 .. .. 20 11 29 0 Ridley 14 6 80 2 Lacey 8 4 12 0 Longman5 8 5 0 Currie bowled one no-ball. SUKREY v. GLOUCESTERSHIRE. Surrey won its first match of the season with Gloucestershire at the Oval on Tuesday J>y an innings and 33 runs. Abel, owing to illness, was not able to help Surrey, but Gloucestershire was even in worse plight, losing Messrs. Page, Townsend, Moberly, and Pullen. In addition Mr. W. G. Grace was so lame that he was practically of little use in the field, and his bowling was greatly missed. The first twenty-one wickets pro­ duced 695 runs, but after Mr. W. G. Grace was caught in the second innings Gloucester­ shire collapsed utterly, and the last nine batsmen only added 48. Over a hundred runs were got for the first wicket in the first innings of each side, a very rare occurrence. Score and analysis :— G lo u c e ste r sh ir e . First Innings. Dr. E. M» Grace, c W . Read, b Homer .... . . . . .. 67 Mr. W. R. Gilbert, c W. Read, b •Homer .. .. 69 Mr. F. L. Cole, c Barratt, b H o r n e r .......................0 Painter, run o u t .................. 49 Dr. W. G. Grace, c M. Read, b Horner v . v . .. .. 8 Mr. G. Francis, c Wood, b Horner.. .. .. .. .. Mr. G. B. Nicholls, c Barratt, b Horner .. . . .. .. 0 Mr. H. Clowes, b Barratt .. 19 Gregg, c Horner, b Barratt 9 Mr. J. A. Bush, b Barratt .. 3 Woof, not out .. .. .. 6 B 7,1 b 2 ..................9 Total .. ..240 Second Innings. c Barratt, b Jones c W. Read, b Bar­ ratt .................. b Jones.................. c W. Read, b Bar­ ratt .................. c Diver, b Loh­ mann .. 1 b Jones., b Jones.................. c Homer, b Bar­ ratt .. .. .. 1 c Roller, b Barratt 11 not out.................. 5 c Barratt, b Horner 15 B 5 ,1 b 5 .. .. 10 Total.. ..115 S u r r e y . Mr. E. J. Diver, c Gregg, b W oof.. .. 65 M. Read, c Bush, b Gilbert .. .. .. 99 Mr. J. Shuter, st Bush, b G ilbert..................26 Mr. W. W. Read, c Painter, b W oof .. 89 Mr. M. P. Bowden, 1b w, b Nicholls .. 2 Mr. W. E. Roller, c Gilbert, b Woof .. 47 Jones, b Woof .. . . 4 2 Lohmann, not out .. 24 Wood, st Bush, b W. G. G ra ce ..................11 Barratt, b Gilbert .. 8 Mr. C. E. Homer, b Gilbert ..................4 B 16, lb 5.. . . 2 1 T otal.. ..888 BOWLING ANALYSIS. G lo u c e ste r sh ir e . First Innings. O. M. R. W. Barratt.. .. 85.1 7 85 8 Jones . . . . 84 16 44 0 H om er.. .. 85 18 64 6 Roller . . . . 3 0 1 5 0 M. Read .. 5 0 13 0 Lohmann . Second Innings. O. M. R. V 80 11 47 .. 25 14 18 11 1 23 0 Nicholls W oof .. Gilbert.. 3 10 0 S u r r e y . O. M. R.W. 2 17 1 6 49 1 74 82 127 4 20.1 6 46 4 O. M. R.W. W . G. Grace 17 5 4i 1 Gregg.. .. 50 17 88 0 Cole .. . . 5 2 9 0 E. M. Grace 2 0 7 0 OXFORD UNIVERSITY v. LANCA­ SHIRE. The Oxonians gained another victory at Manchester on {Tuesday, when they defeated Lancashire with five wickets to spare. Much of the credit of this success was due to Mr. O’Brien, who again showed brilliant form with the bat, scoiing 91 (not out) and 57 in the match, a fine performance. Mr. Hornby was unable to play for Lancashire owing to an injured hand, and in the absence of the brothers Steel the county was only poorly represented. Score and analysis:— L a n c a s h ir e . First Innings. Second Innings. Barlow, b Bastard..................0 bB ocklan d.. .. 48 Robinson, c Kemp, b Whitby 12 b Nicholls .. .. 20 Mr. E. Roper, c Nicholls, b 0 Whitby, b Nich- Page ................................. 12 o i l s ...........0 M. F. Taylor, b Whitby .. 41 c Kemp, b Bastard 23 Mr. O. P. Lancashire, b Whitby.......................... .. 21 b Bastard .. .. Go Briggs, c O’Brien, b Page .. 30 b Nicholls .. .. 25 Haggas, run o u t ..................8 b Whitby .. .. 13 Ward, b W h itb y ..................0 b Whitby .. .. 5 Watson, c Page, b W hitby.. 0 c Kemp, b Buck­ land .11 Crossland, b Page..................1 n otou t.. .. .. 5 Pilling, run out ..................0 cBastard,b Whitby 0 B 5,1 b 2 ..................7 Byes . . . . 5 Total..................182 Total . .220 O xfo rd U n iv e r sity . First Innings. J. H. Brain, b Watson .. .. 2 T. R. Hine-Haycock, b Cross- land ..................................0 T. C. O’Brien, not out .. .. 91 H. V. Page, b Crossland .. I M. C.Kemp,b Watson.. .. 3 A. R. Cobb, b Crossland .. 17 K. J. Key, c and b Crossland 16 E. H. Buckland, b Crossland 10 B. E. Nicholls, b Watson .. 0 H. O. Whitby, st Pilling, b Watson.................................7 E. W. Bastard, b Crossland 0 B 9,1 b 4 ..................13 Second Innings, b Crossland .. c Pilling, b Briggs 84 c Robinson, Watson .. b Crossland.. c Robinson, W ard.. .. not ou t.. .. not out.. b .. 57 .. 24 b .. 85 .. 15 Total .. ..160 BOWLING ANALYSIS. L a n c a s h ire . B 13,1 b 3 .. 16 Total ..195 First Innings. O. M. R .W . Bastard .. Whitby .. Page .. .. Nicholls .. Buckland.. 12 34 7 40 21.312 32 7 2 18 4 8 1 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. 25 27 17 11 8 44 7 72 5 40 3 20 17 6 39 2 Watson ., Crossland Barlow.. O xfo rd . First Innings. O. M. R. W. 27 12 47 4 81.2 9 81 6 13 7 19 0 Second Innings. O. M. R. W. 1 2 0 1 1 29.2 11 58 . . 8 8 11 54 . . . . 18 8 80 Briggs 9 4 18 Ward 4 0 19 T H E F O U R TH A U S T R A L IA N T E A M . AUSTRALIANS v. NOTTS. The Australian eleven deserve the full credit due to a very good performance in their defeat of Notts, after so interesting a game as that brought to a conclusion on the Trent Bridge Ground at Nottingham on Saturday. The matches between the Aus­ tralians and Notts have always been pro­ ductive of excitement, and that of last week fully upheld the character of its predecessors. The game was, indeed, throughout replete with interest, and the cricket of the finest quality. Notts had the advantage in going in first on a capital wicket, and though Giffen bowled with great success, at the end of the first hands the Australian eleven were in a minority of 39 runs. At one time, with five wickets down for 56, it looked as if they might have to follow on, but Palmer and Boyle, the last batsmen, improved the aspect of the game, and the tenth wicket gave a lot of trouble, In their second innings Notts began very badly, but Wright, Shaw, and Sherwin played up so well that the total after all reached 137. This left the Australians with 178 to win, and when play began on Saturday morning 166 still re­ mained, with all ten wichets to fall. Mc­ Donnell hit freely for 30, but by luncheon­ time Bannerman, Murdoch, Palmer, and Midwinter and he had also fallen, and the score was 85 for 5 wickets. Bonnor, after get­ ting 18, was bowled, and at 157 Giffen was run out. When Scott joined Blackham 21 were still wanted to win, and the excitement was intense. The runs, though, were safely got, and the Australians won another finely- contested match with three wickets to spare. Their success was mainly due to the plucky play of Blaokham. Too much praise can not be given to him for his judicious batting at the crisis, and he fairly won the match for his side.