Cricket 1882

june 15 , 1882 . CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 87 cricket, let them come and show their form on their county ground in club matches, and if good enough, but not otherwise, let them have a turn sometimes as a reward for their work in the county.—Yours truly, AN OLD BUFFER. *£TJIE>{SC 0 ]^E>B 0 0 K> (Continued.) SURREY v. GLOUCESTERSHIRE. Some excellent cricket was the result of this match at Kennington Oval on Thursday last and two following days. On Friday the weather only permitted the delivery of a few overs, but on both the first and third days the home team came out well, and in batting, bowling, as well as in fielding, the Surrey men are to be congratulated on the form they showed. In losing the toss they were placed at the outset at a great disadvantage, and an un­ fortunate strain a few overs after the start deprived them of the services of Jones, their best bowler. Despite the loss of the latter, Gloucester­ shire scored so slowly on the first day that they were in till within a quarter of time, having taken six hours to make 255 runs. Midwinter and Mr. W. G. Grace of these contributed 132, and both got their runs well, with only one hard chance by the latter. On Friday, on the wet wicket, Surrey lost three wickets for 14 ; but Mr. Lucas and Read played such fine cricket that the probable follow-on was saved. The two batsmen while together put on 119 runs, and considering the state of the wicket this was a very fine performance. Read gave three chances from good hits, but his innings stamps him as one of the most rising batsmen of the day. Mr. Lucas was in four hours for his runs, and there was not a mistake of any kind. Gloucestershire went in a second time with an hour and five minutes left to bat, and Mr. \Y. G. Grace, evidently unprepared for such a collapse, had changed, and before seven o’clock seven wickets were down for 45. Surrey, with only ten men to bat, and with the worst of the wicket, thus came well out of the drawn game. G loucestershire . First Innings. Dr. W. G. Grace, c anil b L u ca s .......................................55 Dr. E. M. Grace, b Barratt.. .. 3 Mr. W. R. Gilbert, c Colman, b Barratt.......................................39 Mr. W. D. Vizard, run out .. .. 7 Midwinter, not out ...............77 Mr. A. D. Greene, c W. Read, b L n ca s .......................................23 Mr. W. W. Pullen, c Pooley, b Barratt.......................................11 Mr. H. W. R. Gribble, b Lucas.. 8 Mr. L. M. Day, b M. Read .. .. 8 Mr. J. A. Bush, bM. Real .. .. 0 Woof, b B a rra tt..................... 18 B 5 ,1-b 1 ................................6 Second Innings. c Lucas, b Barratt .. 7 c W. Read, b Barratt . 21 c Pooley, b Barratt .. 0 notout..........................3 st Pooley, b Barratt.. 2 c and b Lucas .. .. 3 c W. Read, b Lucas.. 8 c and b Lucas L-b .. Total. Haden, c W oof, b W . G. Grace .......................... Barrett, c Woof, b W. G. G iu e ..........................4 Mr. Cattley, c Bush,b Mid­ winter ..........................1 Mr. W. W. Read, c Bush, b M idwinter..................32 Mr. J. Shuter, b Mid­ winter ..........................12 Mr. A. P. Lucas, c Pullen, b M idw inter..................52 .. ..255 S urrey . 2 Road, c and b Midwinter.. 73 Abel, not out ................0 Mr. S. Colman, b E. M. Grace............................... 0 Pooley, c Day, b E. M. Grace............................... 0 Jones, absent hurt. B 6,1-b3, n b 1 .. .. 10 Total ............. 186 ANALYSIS OF BOWLING. S urrey . First Innings, 0. M. R.W. W. G. Grace .. 45 21 61 "2. Gilbert.. .. Midwinter .. 59 49 59 5 Pullen .. .. w °o t .................. 42 29 33 0 E. M. Grace O. M. R.W. 12 6 10 0 7 3 10 0 5 4 3 2 G loucestershire . First Innings. O. M. R.W. J o n e s ................. 4 1 13 0 Barratt................... 83 45 914 .................. M. Read .. .. 30 13 29 2 L u c a s ................... 63 23 853 .................. W. W. Read .. 5 8 6 0 Abel ; ................... 27 15 21 0 Second Innings. O. M. R.W. 19 8 23 4 18.3 9 21 3 i STELLA v. AUBURNE. Played at Herne Hill on May 29, and resulted in a victory for the Stella. S tella . First Innings. C. Wood, b Collard ..................1 W. Denman, c Bradley, b Coul- shaw Second Innings, c b Heath, b Collard 14 C. Bishop, c and b Coulshaw .. 3 C. Morgan, b C o lla rd ................7 C. Morgan jun., st B. Heath, ,b Collard....................................... 4 A. B. Walter, b Collard .. .. 1 W. H. Monk, b Coulshaw .. .. 0 G. T. Wicks, not o u t ................3 II. Homersham, st B. Heath, b A. H e a th ........................................4 G. C. Cookman, c B. Heath, b Collard.......................................0 R. Paget, b A. H eath ................0 Extras ................................6 Total First Innings. H. Collard, b C. Morgau A. Heath, b b C. Morgan W. Bradley, b Walter .. H. Hill, b C. Morgan 32 A uburne . .. 11 .. 1 .. 1 0 c Theak, b A. Heath 25 c Collard, b A. Heath.. 5 not out..........................11 b A. H eath..................23 c Coulshaw, b Collard 1 b A. H eath..................0 c Bradley, b Collard.. 1 b Collard ..................8 b A. H eath..................0 b A. H eath..................3 Extras..................7 Total .. . . 9 8 Second Innings, b C. Morgan c Bishop, b Walter b C. Morgan E. Gillett, c Wood, b C. Morgan 0 B. Heath, b C. Morgan .. E. Bradley, b C. Morgan .. P. Coulshaw, b Walter .. J. Guppy, c and b C. Morgan .. A. Bromley, not out .................. W. Theak, b C. Morgan .. b C. Morgan .. .. 1 b Walter .......................4 1 0 0 0 1 not out. b C. Morgan c and b Walter . b C. Morgan not out. Total. 17 E x tr a ..................1 Total .. . . 8 0 AUSTRALIANS v. NOTTINGHAMSHIRE. This match, played at Nottingham on Thursday last and two following days, had the weather only allowed its completion on a good wicket, would have been the most interesting of the series of County fixtures arranged for the Australians. Unfortunately the rain previous to and during the game made the cricket altogether unreliable, and the mat3h throughout was one for the bowler. A plucky stand by Blackham and Palmer enabled the Australians, after losing five wickets for 30 runs, to reach a respectable total of 142. This proved to be 32 more than that of Nottingham, a result mainly due to the effective bowling of Garrett. Spofforth, owing to an injured hand, was unable to play on the third day, so that the burden of the bowling fell on Palmer, the latter of whom took five wickets for 41 runs. On going in a second time, Bonnor, who was playing better cricket than was expected on this side, lent Murdoch useful assistance, but no one else except Jones could do much against the Not­ tingham bowling. Alfred Shaw was especially difficult on the heavy ground, and his analysis of 27 overs for 18 runs and four wickets was worthy of his best days. During the short time left for play Notts lost one of its best wickets, that of Selby, for 12 runs, aud as they were at the finish left with 127 still to win and nine wickets to fall, they had, in the state the ground was, none the best of the draw. Score and analyses:— A ustralians . First Innings. A. C. Bannerman, c Sherwin, b S h a w ......................................... 12 H. H. Massie, run out..................11 W. L. Murdoch, c Scotton, b Flowers ..................................28 G. Giffen, b Morley ..................1 G. J. Bonnor, c Gunn, b Shaw .. 1 S. P. Jones, b M orley..................0 J. McC. Blackham, not out.. .. 56 T. W. Garrett, c Gunn, b Barnes 0 H. F. Boyle, c Shrewsbury, b Barnes.........................................0 G. E. Palmer, lb w ,b Wright .. 26 F. R. Spoflorth, b Wright .. .. 7 Second Innings. c Shrewsbury b Shaw 7 c Barnes, b Morley .. 1 b Wright ..................24 c Morley, b Barnes .. 0 c Butler, b Morley .. 39 c Selby, b Morley .. 17 b Shaw..........................0 c Shrewsbury, b Shaw 8 not out................ c Selby, b Shaw, absent B 8................ N ottingham . First Innings. Shaw, b Palmer .. Wright, b Palmer Sherwin, b Palmer Morley, b Garrett B 6 ,1-b 1 .. ..(>1 ■ ■r• ..ii no Scotton, b Spofforth.. .. 0 Selby, c Bonnor, b Garrett 88 Barnes, b Palmer .. .. 2 Shrewsbury, c Bannerman, b Garrett..........................80 Butler, b Garrett .. .. 0 Gunn, n o t o u t ..................13 Total Flowers, c Murdoch, b G a r re tt.......................... Second Innings.—Scotton, not out, 4 ; Selby, b Palmer, 0 Gunn, not out, 5 ; b 3; total, 12. ANALYSES OF BOWLING. N ottingham . First Innings. Second Innings. O. R. M. W. o. R. M. W Spofforth .. 11 4 14 1 Palmer . . . . 31 22 38 4 ........................... 7 4 Garrett .. .. 32.111 41 5 .............................. 7 4 Boyle .. .. 5 1 10 0 A ustralians . First Innings. O. M. R.W. Morley .. .. 43 23 45 2 .. Shaw .. .. 39 24 28 2 .. Flowers .. .. 22 12 29 1 .. Barnes .. .. 15 5 27 2 .. Wright .. .. 10.2 4 13 2 .. 6 I 3 to Second Innings. O. M. R.W .. .. 81 16 31J .. .. 27 19 18 1* .. .. 10 2 15 0 .. .. 11 2 18/ .. .. 18 9 16/ Total 142 Total ..io„ LANCASHIRE v. SOMERSETSHIRE. Bat for the opportunities it gave Nash and Cross land of showing what they can do on a bowler’i wicket against inferior batsmen, this match, playe< at Manchester on Thursday last and two following days, was of little interest. Somersetshire with iti best eleven would hardly have been able to bea Lancashire, but with Messrs. Evans. Roe, Ramsay and Newton all away, its chances were hopeless Lancashire succeeded in getting their opponent out twice within two hours and a quarter—anothe: best on record, we should fancy. In their firs innings Nash took four wickets in one over o four balls, and in all he bowled 63 overs for 1^ runs and eight wickets. In the second inning! Crossland delivered 46 balls for seven runs and sn wickets. Lancashire won by an innings and 151 runs. Score and analyses :— L an cash ire . Mr. A. N. Hornby,c Fowler, b T r a s k ..........................22 Barlow, 1 b w, b Trask .. 40 Robinson, c Hall, b Fother­ gill ..................................9 Mr. O. P. Lancashire, c H. F. Fox, b Scott .. .. 17 Pilling, c Tate, b Fother­ gill ..................................78 Briggs, c Sainsbury, b Scott..................................80 Watson, c Welman, b Fow­ ler ................................ J*i Mr. C. G. Hulton, b Fowler^ Mr. L. O. Milne, not out. ."7 Crossland, c Sainsbury, b , Fothergill .. .. .. » Nash, b Fowler.................. I B 2 ,1-b 5, n b 1.. ..8 : T o t a l ..................23 “ 7 S omersetshire . First Innings. Mr. W. H. Fowler, c Hulton, b Watson .................................. Mr. E. Sainsbury, b Watson Mr. H. G. Tate, b Nash .. Mr. F. T. Welman, b Nash.. .. Fothergill, l b w , b Nash .. Mr. II. F. Fox, c Pilling, b Nash Mr. F. J. Potbury, c Pilling, b N a s h .......................................... Mr. H. Fox, c and b Nash Mr. Trask, c and b Nash Mr. H. Hall, b N a s h .................. Scott, not out.................................. B .......................................... Second Innings. T otal. 9 b Crossland.. .. £ 1 9 •1 1 0 b Crossland.. 5 b Nash................ 0 0 bCrossland.. .. 3 5 .0 ( 0 0 0 b Crossland.. .0 0 st Pilling, b Nash .1 0 not out.................. 0 0 b Cropland 1 B 7 ,1-b 3 .. JO 1 29 Total .. # 5 Fothergill Mr. Hall Scott .. ANALYSES OF BOWLING. L ancashire . O. M. R.W . | o. M.R.W 56 19 83 3 I Mr. Trask .. 15 6 20 I 37 9 47 1 Mr. Sainsbury 5 45 23 49 2 | Mr. Fowler.. 10.1 2 14 0 5 113! S omersetshire . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R.W Naih .. .. 15.3 10 14 8 .......................... 18 6 24 k Watson . , 1 5 9 14 2 ..........................7 4 10 A Crossland ,, 11.2 8 7